Is this good comics technique?
>>153629595i can easily understand which direction im meant to read, so yes.
>>153629611What about this one?
>>153629738what about it
>>153629595Yes but the lettering kinda sucks, difficult to read
>>153631105It's not difficult to read, just unappealing.
>>153629595Is it legible? Sure. But it’s static and boring. Text dumps like this are always bad and a sign that either it’s an artist who doesn’t script or a writer and artist team with bad communication. Thats enough text for four or five panels. Monologuing like this is boring and monotonous. The worst way to compose a page is to just start drawing and then figure out the text after.>>153629611“Is it able to be read” is not the same as being “good”. >>153629738Another bad page. Compostionallh 2/3s of the page is wasted and it leaves the final third cramped.
>>153631574* Compositionally
>>153631574It's baffling that it was such a critical darling despite all of this.
>>153629595boring
>>153629595>>153629738Am I dumb, I don't know exactly where to read past the first few lines
>>153629595yesbecause it grabbed my attention. the art is good and has lots of detail
>>153629611>>153633232Are you going to read it?
>>153629595Nahh, too wordy for my liking
>>153634137If I can find it for free online
>>153629595What is this?
Tongues v01 (2025) (Digital) (XRA-Empire).cbzhttps://mega.nz/#!D8x3kLRL!EZhchVltpC3hqEgdeiEEDdxp5-TOxwf2-E5k_E7qAp4
>>153638753Awesome, thanks.
>>153638020See >>153638753
>>153629595Nice art. Too many words crammed in to each balloon in difficult to read font. Paneling gives art no room to breath because it's smothered in speech bubbles. Good art- shit tier writing and lettering.
>>153631435It's both.
>>153634137sure i can do that. yeah.
