Can a Scholastic channel work?
>>153725545It'll work about as well as this literal who streaming service.
>>153725545No because they'd be competing against TikTok reels, and the few brainy kids who are interested in learning are already subscribed to multiple science based YouTube channels, like Kyle Hill.
>>153725545A FAST channel owned by Scholastic would sound cool. I could see the programs they owned that they can include.>The Magic School Bus (OG series)>The Adventures of Captain Underpants>Clifford the Big Red Dog (OG series and the 2019 series, plus Clifford's Puppy Years)>Animorphs>Goosebumps (OG series)>The Weston Woods Productions content they have>Maya and MiguelShame, there's already a streaming service for Scholastic content, but a FAST channel would be a pipe dream.
>>153725849They should really should make a Tubi or Pluto channel.
No, I mean a Scholastic TV channel.
>>153726038>TVCable's dead, grandpa.
>Get a Scholastic channel>There is an actual non-zero chance we could get a Spy Gear Adventures show
>>153725545I mean I think it could work, but Scholastic adaptations cover several different demographics and companies. Could you get>PBS Magic School Bus>DreamWorks Captain Underpants>Nickelodeon GoosebumpsAll on the same network without licensing issues or content dissonance?
>>153725849Throw in WordGirl and you've got my vote
>>153727639There are kids' channels that cover kids of all ages, without having sub-blocks of different names (like Nick with Nick Jr., and Disney Channel with Playhouse Disney/Disney Junior).>The Hub>Spacetoon (Arab world)>Boing (Italian TV channel, until 2011)>Gulli (France)
>>153725849>>153727745That's the best line-up I've seen since BBC Kids (Which just shut down a few weeks ago). Of course we'll never get something that good...
>>153725545If we got Animorphs I'd be on board
>>153725545Give me a 2D animated Animorphs series and I'll take an eight year subscription.
>>153729361>>153729386Animorphs fucking sucks.
>>153729459Wrong.
I love reading :D
