>Literally tell Simpsons animators to stop emoting and animating so fluentlySeriously what was the philosophy behind this? To deliberately handicap yourself like this.
>>153730985>Seriously what was the philosophy behind this?Keep everything clean, sterile, and corporate. There is no place for independent style in The Simpsons.
Matt Groening is a pedophile
To maintain a coherent visual style.
>>153731004No
>>153731039Yes.
>>153731039You are a pedophile
>>153731037For the character designs sure but most of what I see is limitations for the sake of it. Cross eyed Lisa is a big example. This is a peak facial design and they say not to use it
>>153730985What's up with people confusing "fluidly" and "fluently" so much these days
>>153731109T and D have similar spoken sounds, kids these days don’t read and mistake written words for homophones
>>153731137Who are you calling a faggot Mr.Faggot?
>>153731046No>>153731054You are
>>153731150It's 4chan. We're all faggots.
>>153730985because it looks ugly and goes against the intended spirit of the characters. you knew this when you made the post.
>>153730985And then they broke this in the 4th episode
>>153730985Writer-driven cartoons were a mistake.
>>153731037>big pointed smileIsn't this how they were drawn in the Tracy Ullman days?
>>153730985Oh, I saw this video.It's actually really interesting. The page in context was about the Simpsons being largely driven by impulses. They aren't the characters that go "Moohahaha, I'm going to do this thing and it will make this person SO MAD"! They mostly just act without thinking.
>>153730985
