>WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH WHY DIDN'T GUNN LET SYDNEY BE KARA?! Because you retards are thinking of the OTHER Kara!
>>154614434does anyone even actually like sydney sweeney as an actress or is it just tits and owning the libs?
>>154614434She can play both>>154614441Why do you troons keep fake asking this question? She wouldn’t be as popular as she is if people didn’t like her>b-but her box offi-She only stars in low budget obscure flicks you fucking man
>>154614441>does anyone even actually like sydney sweeney as an actressI'm sure there are people out there who do, just not here.
>>154614434>>154611605
>>154614475Normal people do NOT care about your retarded culture war bs.
>>154614434We all know she's going to be alt-universe supergirl from another dimension. Probably from....the lois and clark superman tvshow.
>>154614461>She wouldn’t be as popular as she is if people didn’t like herAs an actress, right? Right?
>>154614492
>>154614441She's a good actress. That is only even brought into question because guys think she's hot. Not like Zendaya or any other actresses are all that talented anyway
>>154614540>That is only even brought into question because guys think she's hot.pretty sure it's because all people ever talk about is how much they want to bang her and how she should play X character because then that character would be fuckable
>>154614561Yes because she is hot. Something that is key to a woman being a good actress
>>154614581And that is why you are NOT a casting director.
>>154614609Huh? Hot women make good actresses. Competent casting directors know that
>>154614540She's not a good actress though.
>>154614441It's just the tits
Ew, no. Cutting Sydney's hair is a crime.
>>154614621Yeah she is. She's just under scrutiny about that because of her politics and popularity with men
>>154614581that's retarded
>>154614609Anon, we have ugly women who CANT act and have shit material made by and for other loser foids queers and wierd fuckers from the coasts running things now. How good of an actor are the current crop of mid at best Z actresses? Not very. If I want decent acting and hot women I have to go to streaming and social media now.
>>154614625But that's part of being an actress?
>>154614619>Competent casting directors Yeah, for PORN.Besides, I still remember when everyone - yes, EVERYONE - was ragging on Megan Fox for being a no talent void who only got cast because she was pretty.
>>154614649Margot Robbie doesn't have tits like that, does she? You saying she's a bad actress?
>>154614649Appearance is a good thing on actors and actresses, but it's not everything.
>>154614672Tell that to >>154614581
>>154614644How so? >>154614650Not really. Hot women can be good or great actors. Sweeney and Fox are both good actresses that are boosted by their hotness. Not that hard to get >>154614670She's not particularly amazing just like Sweeney, but she's not ugly or anything so I don't get why you are comparing them
>>154614689>Fox >good actressSnicker
>>154614672It's an important component for sure and Sweeney is a good actor so irrelevant to the thread too
>>154614699She is? Not everyone has to be Meryl Streep
>>154614434>>>/r/aifancast
>>154614717She's really not.
>>154614734Different strokes I guess. Personally love me some Jennifer's Body. Point is most people just bitch about hot actresses because it's en vogue to act like catty girls when it comes to their looks
>>154614684I mean, they aren't wrong that's key for an actress. But again, it's not everything, hotness is subjective, so you can have someone hot for someone yet objectively they can be a good or bad actress. I have seen Sweeny's act and it's somewhat ok to bad, she really benefits from being pretty. It is worth noting that when they hit the "wall" you can tell someone gets remembered as a great actress or a pretty face, and that beauty standards change over time. Today is all about a big ass and a good sized tatas, back then it was slim and pretty faces.
>>154614703It really depends on the role, I agree that she's not a terrible actress but I wouldn't consider her great or even good, like most of the hype behind her is her appearance, which again key thing yet not as big as it can be. I just don't see her cut for the superhero shit.
>>154614769>Hotness is subjective>Acting objective Kind of invalidating your own statement here. She's a good actress and definitely hot
>>154614818>the hype behind her is her appearanceBecause that's important to bring a good actress. She's as good as her peers. Just gets shit for being a hot girl that's not completely libtarded
>sydney playing the version of supergirl that's more popular only because she has her tits outtalk about defeating your purposefuck sake don't you know other busty blondes? it's always her.
>>154614717Please.Streep was the hot blond thot of her day. She's the respectable lady Meryl Streep and all that now. But her pussy game is legendary in hollywood. That thot left directors drained and sobbing on her doorstep at 2AM looking for another hit of that sweet poontang.And she was a GOOOD actress even while she was an infamous nympho. Not as bad as Carrie but she was up there.
>>154614833Ah, so it is just tits and owning the libs.
>>154614441Sydney Sweeney is not a good actress. The only reason she is cast in roles is because she is beautiful and willing to do nude scenes. There is a reason she is rarely ever cast as the protagonist or in a serious role.
>>154614858>the version of supergirl that's more popular only because she has her tits outThen why has only Supergirl Classic ever been adapted in live action and not the "more popular" one?
>>154614887gooner fake fans =/= DC editorial
>>154614434you just know execs at Warner are seething hard because Gunn didn't hire Sydney.
>>154614987The same execs at Warner that own HBO? The same HBO which has her most important role ever?
>>154614441she is a TURRIBLE actress that is why she should only be cast for her tits and looks in roles even a retard couldn't fuck up
>>154615039Sydney carried 3 seasons of fucking Euphoria on her back alone.
>>154614864Well yeah. That's the only reason anyone even is overly negative about her. Of course it would swing the other way too. You guys are really bad at getting people
>>154615062Drool...
>>154614871She was the protagonist in that boxer movie though and no one itt has issues with pretty actresses besides you
>>154614434They are better as childs
>>154615169>She was the protagonist in that boxer movieThat totally bombed like her other flicks?
>>154614434Why didn't Feigie or SONY cast her as Black Cat? Why wasn't she cast as Marilyn Monroe? Why didn't Netflix adapt Fairy Tail with her as Lucy?