I'll start, Hawkman.
>>154853118
>>154853118damn near every green lantern
>>154853312Even Jessica?
>>154853118The Flash was a hardcore Conservative until the New 52 got rid of it
>>154853118Rorschach
Gambit should technically be. He was raised by people who's been alive for 200 years and they're quite traditional. They're also Catholic.
>>154855839Sus pose
>>154853431especially jessica
>>154855839Bats should beat the shit out of Antifa AND Proud Boys.
>>154853312Hal Jordan is a Roosevelt democrat goddamnit!
The entirety of the Inhumans Royal Family technically.
>>154855839Batman scratching ICE on his Bat emblem is the cherry on top.
>>154858017He does.
>>154855944Gambit knows how to cook so that automatically makes him conservative.
>>154858176Then what's the big deal?
>>154859167Negative portrayal of political spheres are not able to exist with people who want political orthodoxy rather than plurality.
>>154858165>>154855839do you guys realize that batman isn't politicaly biased he hunts down actual real dangerous criminal.
>>154859303The creator of Wild Dog hated this comic; they turned Wild Dog into a conspiracy theory idiot when he pretty much a Punisher knockoff But other than that, I do like his shirt
>>154855839Every hero is conservative when written by Chuck Dixon.Batman. Nightwing. Green Arrow. Everyone.
Ms. Marvel's Imam at first refused to help the Inhumans because they look like Liberals. She takes a lot of advice from him, she's likely some form of crypto conservative beneath her outwards acceptance of LGBT
>>154858017Nope
>>154855839This boomer saw Batman beating the pulp out of some Neo Nazis and got triggered. That’s a yikes
>>154860178You realize everyone hates liberals, even those to their left
>>154860526He seems like the kind type of catholic that wouldn’t just use religion as an excuse to hate everyone different from him
>>154861098yeah that's why no one comes to this country rightturns out FDR solved civilization
>>154859201But shouldn't the prevailing ideology be not being a dumb shit?>>154860498Why not?
>>154860526He literally has two moms>>154861114I remember 1610 Kurt not liking gays but I don't think he even bothered using the religion card
>>154862668The PB are nothingburgers>>154864564Your headcanon isn't real
>>154855839>>154858165batman wouldn't be pro ICE.
>>154864629Yeah he'd let criminals and rapists go free right?
>>154864629Why wouldn't he be?
>>154864655ICE doesn't target criminals.(in theory) they are supposed to target people who have committed immigration violations. These are usually civil infractions which are not punishable as a crime. Immigration court is a civil administrative court.
>>154864704Nice sophistry.
>>154864736Go suck your pacifier
>>154864746>tWuMp Is FaScIsT! Lick my sack, Pinko!
>>154864683The same reason batman (or the usual superhero) would be against any authoritarian and incompetent police force. They're not even good at the job they're supposed to be doing.>'This is at odds with common sense': Judge grants habeas petition after ICE stops immigrant who bought one-way plane ticket out of the country from self-deportinghttps://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/this-is-at-odds-with-common-sense-judge-grants-habeas-petition-after-ice-stops-immigrant-who-bought-one-way-plane-ticket-out-of-the-country-from-self-deporting/
>>154864736how is it sophistry? >>154864766whats wrong with calling him that?
>>154864796He is a democratically elected and a liberal capitalist.
>>154864811hitler and mussolini's political parties were voted into powerI don't think tarrifs are pro free trade or a popular thing among liberal capitalists.
>>154855839Based. Will check out his work >>154864629I think he would. They're a benc branch of law enforcement catching people here illegally. It's not like they're fleeing a war or genocide, they just want to come here for welfare. If anything, he'd be smart enough to deduce that there's a secret cabal crippling the agricultural industry to create a false justification for their existence in the first place then take them down and root out ZOG as well so we can have a return to secure borders and family owned farms (something Superman would also support as the issue would also be threatening the Kents and everyone in Smallville's livelihoods)The only one who would oppose it is Green Arrow, who would call Supes a White Supremacist who benefitted from slavery, then when he reminds him that he's an immigrant from another planet he would insinuate that Kryptonians were nazis and there's no such thing as bring ethnically Kryptonian
>>154859252That’s political bias because he doesn’t hunt down white collar crime.
>>154864837Generally what liberal capitalists like is bad for the people.
>>154864655ICE was made by Bush and Bush was a retarded kikelover and the reason the world is fucked.
>>154864704> I refuse to accept the fact that they're criminals unless they go through my invented system to get a piece of paper that says so> I'm also going to refuse to hand out those pieces of paper or be impartial because of my inherent bias"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."— Declaration of Independence
>>154864848White-collar criminals are harder to catch
>>154864842we've actually seen superman's position on this in the comics. he's pro immigration.>I think he would. They're a benc branch of law enforcement catching people here illegally.see:>>154864704>>154864780
>>154864892>> I refuse to accept the fact that they're criminals unless they go through my invented system to get a piece of paper that says so>> I'm also going to refuse to hand out those pieces of paper or be impartial because of my inherent biaswhat are you trying to say here?
>>154864902Cope
>>154864902Superman is a fictional character. You can write him saying anything.
>>154864957>invented systemBased retard
>>154865007Stfu, retard
>>154864704Non-permitted entry is a federal crime. Illegal immigrants are criminals by definition.
>>154864977whats your point?the designation of crime and criminal is also an invented system. It's entirely separate from good and bad.
>>154865028Nope.
>>154865042so you are saying you dont have a point?
>>154865055That was your "argument"
Iceman supports ICE so much he named himself after them.
>>154865062what are you trying to say then? If you don't like the legal process and courts because its invented, you should know Borders and nations are also invented systems.
>>154864977>>154865042how does it feel having the moral depth of a toddler?
>>154865025most undocumented immigrants enter legally.https://www.npr.org/2019/01/10/683662691/where-does-illegal-immigration-mostly-occur-heres-what-the-data-tell-us
>>154858186He's above most modern women.
>>154865092So true! I should be able to murder when I believe it's right!
>>154865085Not me>>154865092What about yourself?
>>154865125>The only thing stopping me from murdering someone is the law!You have no morals
>>154865292>breaking the law is only okay when I think they should be brokenIt's only okay to murder when I believe it's okay according to my morals!
>>154853312Do you think there ever was an intergalactic George Floyd moment with the GL corps?
>>154865388>The law is the only thing keeping me from murdering peopleYou have no morals and you're a psychopath The equivalent of this guy saying that religion is the only thing keeping him from fucking animals
>>154855839>piggybacking on absolute Batman hype even though he hasn’t written that version of the character and it is contradicting his actions in the comicsSAD
>>154865526Anon, you are dumb. This is not his hypotethical, he is pointing out that atheists have no rational objective meansurement or argument against it.
Illegal immigration is unjust and unfair to legal migrants. Not only they steal objectively parts of the systems destined to protect and help legal migrants, but also creates resentment towards them. Specially rapefugees.Illegal immigration is bad even for migrants. No whats or ifs. And they are also mostly males trying to piggyback gibs from better economies. You wont see a majority of kids and women on those migrant caravans.If Batman liked so much the migrants he should pay them a monthly allowance for them to stay in their countries instead of risking their lives, the lives of the host citizens, and the lives of legal migrants.Of course this cant happen because comic books are written by leftists. But a moral Batman should be against illegal immigration. And yes, that includes Superman, because he was lucky he dropped into a white christian household, if he had dropped into africa he would be a psychopathic warlord. FACT
>>154865671>if he had dropped into africa he would be a psychopathic warlord. FACTDC, hire this man.
>>154865611I didn't think someone would have to be told this but:Don't fuck dead animals even if your sky father tells you it's okay, anon.
>>154865698Anon, the point is that you have no argument for it being bad, while everyone else who doesn’t share yoir beliefs have.
>>154865671Criticizing ICE doesn't imply that one is for open borders.Criticizing a corrupt police force doesn't mean that wants murder and theft to be legal.
>>154864848He does, even did in BTAS and in the Nolan movies. You're a retard.>>154864900You're a retard too for feeding his idiocy.
>>154865742Why is "god said its bad" a valid argument?
>>154865791>You're a retard too for feeding his idiocy.I said the right thing, you gasbag>>154865794Because no religion encourages necrozoophilia (not even Hinduism)
>>154865742Normal people know not to fuck dead animals because it's disgusting and unsanitary lmao, they don't need the Bible to tell them that lmfao
>>154865822for regular bestiality there is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leda_and_the_Swan
>thread about conservative superheros>not even 100 posts into the thread, a conservative admits he might fuck a dead animal if the law or religion did not tell him not to
>>154865822>I said the right thing,You said a stupid thing by implying the point he was making was factually correct, you just added a "but...".It wasn't, Batman went against corrupt CEOs or brokers for more than 40 years, they usually have some hitmans to put against him because otherwise it would be fucking boring, but they're absolutely white-collar fags doing white-collar crimes.
>>154865857That's not a moralistic story>>154865869Not what I implied, you cunt
>>154865794Because, look at this anon here >>154865845According to his, if precautions are taken and it's sanitary, then its fine. Because his complain is just that it's unsanitary. According to him, if you clean it well, it's totally fine.
>>154865868Nice headcanon.
>>154865868Anon, there are pro-zoophilia organizations on USA and they are mostly lgbt leftists
>>154865945Did God have to tell you that fucking a dead animal is disgusting and unsanitary, or did you assume it was just something you can't do because your told?
>>154865961>implying
>>154865979Anon, you are implying that if its clean, its fine.
>>154865945Their argument is the biological reason why humans avoid decaying matter in the first place, retard
>>154865996Anon, not only zoophilia is mroe common among lgbt, but NAMBLA is also a pedo org that was created as part of the gay movement.
>>154865996You suck
>>154866012>>154865997
>>154865997You're the only one implying that. Like >>154866012 said, the revulsion all humans share when getting near decaying matter is something thats existed since before your concept of a God ever existed to humanity. We weren't fucking dead animals before the Bible, but I think you know that, which is why you tried to flip an argument around on me
>>154866017ok, stop fucking animals
>>154866034You're really grasping at straws, but all your coming off as is someone that's really desperate to fuck a dead animal if he thinks it's okay
>>154866036BTFO
>>154866036>You're the only one implying thatYou were the one that said it was because it's unhigienic.
>>154865913>Not what I impliedIt clearly was, now stop this pathetic lie and just take the L.
>>154866085No>>154866090Take it up your ass
>>154866051Anon, you are the one that said that as long as its clean, its fine. Many palestines already do it.
>>154866089And so your argument is that it's not a good enough reason to not fuck a dead animalNoted.
>>154866107Pretty sure palestinians prefer child brides.
>>154866135so do republicans, so idk why anon is bringing them up at all
>>154866096>Take it up your assIf a faggot tells someone else to take it up the ass, the numbers of faggots in the world stays the same.
>>154866135>>154866146There, now you triggered the tranny, are you happy?! Do you know how long it takes to pacify him?! Now we will have to feed him three hours straight of Owl House threads before he stops stimming!
>>154865118They don't. More recent data from the DHS shows that illegal entries outnumber visa and lawful entry overstays. Only about 40% of the total unauthorized immigrant population have entered through legitimate means or have some form of legal protection, and that was only after the Biden administration greatly expanded protections. Most entered the country unlawfully and thus have committed a federal crime.https://www.pewresearch.org/race-and-ethnicity/2025/08/21/u-s-unauthorized-immigrant-population-reached-a-record-14-million-in-2023/
>see this dead thread nearly 20 hours ago>ignore it knowing it will probably be dead in a few hours>notice it suddenly gets a spike in posts>"huh, that's weird, I wonder what happe-">chuds are defending necrozoophilia Please burn this board to the ground
>>154866165Such as yourself
>>154855839bats would beat up antifafags AND icefags
>>154866196Nice headcanon
>>154866134Your post basically confirms that if its higienized, you would agree with it.
>>154866212Why do you blow it out your ass, master Fag? So that you can learn to take it up again.
>>154866231>higienizedOh, it's an ESL too. Also noted.
>>154866196Cleaning up roadkill doesn’t make it fine to fuck it anon. What is hard to understand?
>>154866239That’s more of your thing
It's basically the breakfast question again.> it's bad because it's not hygienic> okay it's clean now. What is your objection then?> uuuh uuuuuuh I don't have, so I will accuse you!It's a lowbrow version of the Moral Argument, where materialistic atheism doesn't have any objective values, but theism believes that there are moral values imbued in humanity and right and wrong exist.
>>154866380>Would you fuck a dead animal?>"No that's disgusting">Okay but what if I cleaned it?>"....."That's when a normal person would punch you in the mouth
>>154866408It's as shrimple as that
>>154866408>>154866421Anon, you can't answer the question? What are you afraid? You don't have other reason?
>>154866441Would you fuck an animal if God said it was okay?
>>154866478uh uhhhh no that's disgusting and unsanitary
>>154866441He is going to keep deflecting. The key here is that he can only mention practical reasons for why fucking roadkill is bad for an atheist, but practical reasons can be solved, so he really has nothing.
>>154866495Okay it's clean now and God says it's okay. What is your objection then?
>>154866380>>154866478>>154866495>>154866515Holy shit never seen someone get so effortlessly mogged before
>>154866478You are relying entirely on pragmatic consequences (health, laws, social disapproval). But pragmatic problems have pragmatic solutions. If we remove all practical harm, your framework has no basis left to say it's wrong. You're confusing 'risky' with 'immoral.'Without a moral principle (like human dignity, divine command, inherent sanctity, or harm to a conscious entity), you cannot justify why it's wrong once all practical harm/risk is removed.
>>154866531Ugly samefag
>>154866536So if God said it was okay and it was cleaned, then you'd be okay with fucking a dead animal? A normal person has never had to have these boxes checked btw
>>154866478I'm not muslin
>>154866536Human dignity isn't based on theology and is another reason why a normal person would not have sex with a dead animal lol
>>154853118Every four years they should put out a two different JLA covers one with Hawkman holding a sign for republican candidate for presidentand another with Green Arrow holding a sign for a dem(and yea. both these characters would probably hate any candidate from an major party anyways)it would be funny gimmick cover
>>154866564Except its not? You are just saying "if God said to do the opposite of what says". Which makes no sense.Swap God for "Objective Reality" and see how your argument makes no sense.
>>154866536>>154865526>anon has been defending fucking dead animals for exactly two hours now
>>154866573You don’t have it
>>154866573>Human dignity isn't based on theologyActually yeah, its way closer to theology, metaphisics and philosophy than anything else. Yours is inherited from Christians
>>154866188>Only about 40% of the total unauthorized immigrant population have entered through legitimate means or have some form of legal protection, and that was only after the Biden administration greatly expanded protections. This was before biden was president: https://www.npr.org/2019/01/16/686056668/for-seventh-consecutive-year-visa-overstays-exceeded-illegal-border-crossings> thus have committed a federal crime.A misdemeanor.
>>154855839Accurate
>>154866596Yes, its very weird when anons can only mention germs for why its bad. It should be obvious, and not something that could be solved with hygiene.
>>154866358I met a fag like you, way back in Burma...
>>154866633TANGERINE
>>154866564That's a misunderstanding of divine command. God doesn't issue arbitrary commands that contradict His own nature or the baseline design/dignity of creation. Asking 'What if God commanded something degrading?' is like asking 'What if a square had three sides?' it's a logical contradiction.Of course a normal person finds it revolting because moral intuition and natural disgust exist. The difference is that my framework explains WHY that intuition is valid (it violates the intended design and inherent dignity of life). Your framework reduces that 'normal reaction' to mere evolutionary conditioning or social taboo. If it's just biology/social conditioning, then 'normal' is just an opinion, not an objective truth.
>>154866674Too high IQ for that anon. He certainly has no theory of mind.
>>154866712Objective/subjective morality and good & evil are not easy for most people to grasp. Most just go with whatever is the default around their circles or media, believing that they are self-evident and objective.I don’t fault him too much; he just doesn’t know he is a Cultural Christian.
>>154853118Jack is conservative, very traditional guyGenndy stuff generally gives that vibe
>>154866674>But i ate breakfast this morning
I imagine him as the typical traditionalist that’s secretly a horndog
>>154866806You are asking a contradiction, not a hypothetical
>>154866851>But that's a contradiction. I ate breakfast this morning.
>>154866865...the breakfast analogy makes no sense in this scenario.To not mention you are deflecting to answer the question yourself. Yours is?
>>154866712>tranime poster defending zoonecrophilia
>>154866674Why is "god said its bad" a valid argument?
>>154866941what question is being deflected?
>>154866977 God's commands reflect His unchanging nature and the objective moral order of reality. Goodness isn't good because God randomly picked it; God commands it because it aligns with truth, order, and human/creation dignity.And before you ask 'Well, if God said [insert horrible act] was good, would you do it?' that's a logical contradiction. God cannot command something that violates His own nature, just like a square can't have three sides.The real question is about your baseline: If morality is purely secular and practical, then morality is just a matter of convenience. Once you remove the practical risks (disease, getting caught, laws), you have no objective basis left to say anything is wrong. You’re left with personal disgust, which isn't a moral argument.
>it's another episode where christfags admit to fantasizing the most degenerate bullshit that their thin devotion keeps them from doing
>>154866986This started because anon, when questioned, said that germs are the only thing that makes fucking roadkill wrong.When asked if it would still be wrong if the germs were removed, he couldn’t answer.His only way of winning this, is finding a way to justify objective morality in an atheistic mindset.
>>154867051Don’t project
>>154864902Those were biased opinions based on flawed and erroneous thinking. As such I don't they're assumptions to be inaccurate.
>>154864957'Twas rather straightforward
>>154865781But they aren't corrupt, you're just saying that because you are for open borders.
>>154867015>Goodness isn't good because God randomly picked it; God commands it because it aligns with truth, order, and human/creation dignity.So, then god isn't the objective source of morality?
>>154865794Because there is only one Truth: Jesus Christ.
>>154867113>Those were biased opinions based on flawed and erroneous thinking. As such I don't they're assumptions to be inaccurate.what.
>>154867149http://archive.today/2026.01.22-210617/https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2026/01/22/vance-defends-ice-memo-telling-agents-they-can-raid-homes-without-a-judges-warrant/https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/05/ice-keeps-detaining-the-same-us-citizen-again-and-again-and-again-hes-fighting-back/>>154864780>>'This is at odds with common sense': Judge grants habeas petition after ICE stops immigrant who bought one-way plane ticket out of the country from self-deporting>https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/this-is-at-odds-with-common-sense-judge-grants-habeas-petition-after-ice-stops-immigrant-who-bought-one-way-plane-ticket-out-of-the-country-from-self-deporting/If you arrest someone who is doing what they are supposed to be doing, you are corrupt. Some of this would be too on the nose for a comic book.
>>154867156That is called Euthyphro Dilemma, which has been tackled by thinkers before.You think God is either making up arbitrary rules out of nowhere, or following a rulebook that exists outside of Himself. It’s neither. You're viewing God like a human king who writes arbitrary laws. Think of it closer to the laws of physics.In classical theology, God's nature IS the ultimate standard of goodness, truth, and order. God doesn't look up "dignity" in an encyclopedia outside Himself, nor does He invent it randomly on a whim. Goodness flows directly from His essence. God is the objective source because He is the ultimate reality.
>>154867236
>>154867166No
>>154867166so is 2 + 2 not equal to 4?
>>154867274That's an entirely different thing, and doesn’t even make sense if atheism is right. To use the Epicurean Paradox, you HAVE to admit that objective Evil exists. Dropping a pop-philosophical flowchart doesn't save your position, anon. In fact, you just fell into a massive self-contradiction.The chart claims God could create "free will without the possibility of evil." That’s a logical absurdity (like a square circle). Free choice inherently means having the capacity to reject the good. Force someone to only choose option A, and free will ceases to exist.Evil isn't a "thing" God created. Evil isn't matter or energy that God crafted, it is the absence/privation of good, just like cold is the absence of heat.The entire Epicurean Paradox relies on the premise: "EVIL EXISTS." But earlier, you argued that wrong actions are only bad due to practical/pragmatic reasons (health risks, laws, disease). Under your atheist view, "evil" doesn't actually exist in objective reality it's just biological disgust or social taboo.You can't invoke "Objective Evil" to disprove God while holding a worldview where Objective Evil doesn't exist.If evil is real enough for Epicurus' paradox to work, then objective morality exists which proves my point, not yours. So which is it? Is evil real, or is it just subjective?Hell, even this episode here refuted the paradox.
>>154867166So if God said 2 + 2 = 5 and said you could fuck a dead animal, you would?
>>154867395Anon, this is already answered here >>154867015
>>154867427A lotta words to say yes
>>154867395I think you are projecting on us. We have answered your question, and you have yet to answer ours. What argument you have objectively that isn't just 'I just don't do it because its dirty'?
>>154867447>A lotta words to say yes
>>154865791In the Nolan movies he makes Bane an occupy Wallstreet proxy and treats the wealthy like innocent hostages. It’s surprising how pissed off conservatives got about the odyssey considering Nolan is one of the most conservative working directors.
>>154866408>When intellectually cornered in an argument, the leftist opts for violence as the last resort in order to claim the closest thing to a win possibleFrom your perspective, God isn't real, truth and morality are subjective, laws are arbitrary and only reflect the most current societal values, that we came from nothing, will return to nothing, and that we're no more special than flies or homosexual monkeys. In the grand scheme of things, who gives a shit about brown people getting round up by a nazi regime or troons 41%ing?
>>154867298Daredevil does pro bono work. Thats the opposite of conservative.
>>154867524Says you.
>>154867522If you gotta review your spiritual texts to know where or not it's okay to fuck a dead animal, you gotta know you fucked up somewhere
>>154867501>images (2) (7).jpg>had to google his reaction image>had to check the bible if necrozoophilia is okay
>>154867447You can just say that you couldn’t understand anon. When you leave pop philosophy for the deeper stuff there is a certain quiet sorting that happens. Some people keep walking, and some get left behind.
>>154867659It's pretty easy to understand: You believe God is the only thing stopping you from fucking a dead animal, despite humans not fucking dead animals even before religion was conceptualizedYou're an abnormal human being
>>154867595>>154867610Lil bro, you lost.Your only argument was that the carcass wasn’t washed enough for you.Which is very weird.
>>154867688Anon, according to your logic, good and evil, right or wrong don't exist. Own it or bow.
>>154867697Wait, I'm not that guy, but you've been arguing about fucking a dead animal for 3 hours and the real only line in the sand you had was that God told you not to?
>>154867732>h-he is not me!!!!Can't even own it.
>>154867727Good and evil definitely exist, but it's not defined by your theology. For example, a pedophile that takes advantage of children is objectively evil even outside the scope of theology, since their theology often supports that behavior. You're just straight up admitting now that if God told you fucking a dead animal was morally good then you'd do it. You're what someone would call a "pseudo-intellectual"
>>154867763Do.........do you think there's only one person in the world that's opposed to necrozoophilia?....is that the argument you're trying to wrap this up with?
>>154853118If superheroes existed irl most would be right leaning or adjacent
>i would totally have sex with an animal corpse if the invisible man in the sky said i could>everyone else thinks this, youre the only person that thinks this is weirdwhats going on in here
>>154867771>Good and evil definitely exist, but it's not defined by your theology.Calling something "objectively evil" while rejecting any objective moral foundation is a complete contradiction, anon.You claim pedophilia is "objectively evil outside theology." On what grounds? In a purely secular, material universe, there are only physical laws no objective moral laws. If a culture normalizes a horrific act, your framework has no objective reality to appeal to only your personal disgust vs. theirs. You are borrowing the concept of "Objective Evil" from us christians.Repeating the "If God told you to do [X horrific thing]" strawman just shows you don't understand the argument. God is the objective standard of Goodness.You conceded that Objective Good and Evil exist. My system actually grounds that objective reality in the nature of existence itself. Your system calls things "objective" while treating morality as subjective social preference, and resorts to calling me a "pseudo-intellectual" when the logic collapses.Literally no serious philosopher takes your stance.
>>154867808Christcucks are always a second away from raping kids, didn't think that included animals too
>>154867808/pol/tards as usual.
>>154867841Data shows that its trannies the most likely group.
>>154867808Shut up, Diptard>>154867841>>154867861You lost
>>154867832>oTNS9iT.jpgYes anon, fucking children is objectively evil to all human beings, even before your Bible was written (which promotes fucking children strangely enough)Pedophiles have been beaten and crucified all throughout ancient history. I can't believe you needed to have this conversation
>>154867872>Yes anon, fucking children is objectively evil Objective based on what? >to all human beingsEntirely wrong.It was normal of Greece for example and several societies, NAMBLA who is a LGBT org defends it, and several cultures pratice it.
>>154867872Anon, this is not how atheism works.
>>154866107Saar the indian man is king of the jungle saar.
>>154867872Like, 30% of all marriages among palestines are with children.
>>154867907Anon doesn’t know the difference between subjective (culture, time period, opinion) and Objective (the laws of reality says its right or wrong).
>>154867808>>i would totally have sex with an animal corpse if the invisible man in the sky said i couldNigga can't fucking read NTAIt's yall fucking animals along with Muslims.
>>154864811>democratically electedIgnoring the undemocratic nature of the electoral college so fucking what? He is still a wannabe fascist
>>154867972I could try being more didact Tho he is samefaging shamefusly.
>>154868078Basically subjective morality is why leftists think that cuting one's dick is morally good and makes the individual a woman.
>entire thread is the same fag having a meltdown >>154867801Indeed
>>154868046
>>154868150The retard being here means that he is not shitting other threads.
>>154853132Most of the cast really.Hell, can you imagine how awful Peg would be if she was a lib, taught to be a lib?
>>154867872>three seething replies>none of them actually try to refute besides deflectionhmmm.....
>>154866515kek
>>154868428Keep coping
>>154868428It's one christcuck and a schizo ESL that replied twice, one actually would fuck a dead animal, the other wants a win.
>>154867785>>154867808/co/ is a deeply mentally ill board
>>154867808it's your average conservative comic threadi think get subverted by falseflagging mossad that spout degenerate garbage to make conservatives look bad
>>154868428>>154868512Anon, your post made no sense or had no argument. Its just throwing shit around.
>>154868590That's plausible, usually fucking dead animals is what the other side does, so it's strange that so many "based anons" are trying to defend it
Leftranny thread?
>>154868680Who is defending it?
>>154868651you never answered his question if you would fuck a dead animal if god said it was okay yes or no it is a simple choice
>>154868537I mean, its full of trannies.
>>154867375why does god let people rape newborns?
>>154868701Leftists and trannies aren't the majority of posters but they are the majority of meltdowns
>>154868428They already dug themselves in a hole when they couldn't answer a simple question, so they're trying to avoid it as best they can
>>154868697The answer is that God would never ask such thing, as it's contradictory to the nature. Its a question that doesn’t make sense.
>>154868719And how would you feel if you didn't have breakfast this morning?
>>154867375>The chart claims God could create "free will without the possibility of evil."So he's not all powerful.
>>154868727God wouldn't let me go without my lucky charms and chocolate milk in the morning, so that question is also contradictory
>>154868697That was answered several times.You in turn never answered where objective morality comes for an atheist.
>>154868743humor me, yes or noif god told you that you could fuck a dead animal, would you do it?
>>154868727If you are changing God's nature for the answer, then its not God anymore.
>>154867375>To use the Epicurean Paradox, you HAVE to admit that objective Evil exists. Why? The chart only mentions evil. not objective evil.Subjective things can exist. >Free choice inherently means having the capacity to reject the good. Force someone to only choose option A, and free will ceases to exist.If you put a serial killer in prison, do they still have free will? Is it bad if humans remove free will from another human?
>>154868768>But i wouldn't be me if i didnt have breakfast this morning.
>>154868768gods nature has changed many times and he made many promises throughout his scripture, so if god told/commanded you to fuck an animal to prove your devotion, would you do it?
>>154868743Where did he say atheists have an objective morality?
>>154868774>>154868740Accusing God of being "not good" because humans feel subjective disgust is like accusing God of being malicious because some people dislike the taste of broccoli. For the paradox to hold any logical weight against an all-powerful being, the "Evil" being allowed has to be an actual, objective failure of reality, not just a subjective preference.A serial killer in a cell still has free will. He can choose to repent, hold hatred, plan a crime, or seek redemption. Locking his body in a box restricts his physical mobility; it doesn't delete his agency or capability to choose bad over good in his mind.God creating a universe where creatures literally cannot choose or conceive of wrong is not "putting them in prison", it's creating pre-programmed robots.
>>154868727That only works on black people not anons
>>154868824worked on him >>154868768
>>154868809Here >>154867872
>>154868835Are you the leftist ranting about fucking animals? If so then he's right and you're a fag
>>154868842not me, zoofag, now answer my posts >>154868764>>154868794
>>154868821Why does god let people rape newborns?
>>154868861if being a leftist means im not fucking dead animals, then you can call me mao zedong
>>154868824it doesn't work on them.
>>154868867So objective morality doesn't exist in atheism?
>>154868895The leftist is the one who brought it up though you dumb tranny
>>154868150Every time. It's quite telling that they naturally start attacking God when they get worked up and angry.>>154868697I know you think you have an own, but the answer is that he wouldn't have to. God said that you could abstain from marriage and having sex if you wanted to, but also said you could get married and that marriage is between one man and one woman and to abstain from fornication and pleasures of the flesh (any sex that is outside of marriage I.e. one man and one woman who are married to each other) so Anon is right is obviously a contradiction to the Word of God, especially considering bestiality is explicitly condemned. It really only makes sense if you're ignorantly thinking of them as random rules instead of infallible wisdom from Almighty God.
>>154868905depends, would you fuck a dead animal if god said you have to?
>>154868913Leftist bootlickers seem to think everyone who disagrees with them is really religiousIts quite funny given they're the ones pushing for islam, which is more extreme than Christianity
>>154868913>>154868924if god said you had to fuck an animal to prove your devotion, would you do it?
>>154868924>>154868955Why are woke trannies like this?
>>154867872Well, that's not true. It's explicitly allowed in the antichrist belief system and among many third world cultures. Most of what people take for granted as common sense and human nature is actually Christianity being deeply ingrained in their culture.
>>154868924Your question is a logical paradox. It’s like asking: "What if God drew a four-sided triangle?" or "What if cold fire froze the sun?"Because God’s nature is the bedrock of moral goodness, He cannot command something that directly contradicts His own holy, rational nature. Bestiality inherently degrades human dignity and creation, making it intrinsically contrary to who God is.So the answer is no: God wouldn't command it, because God cannot act against His own nature. To say "What if he did" is to say "What if we ignores the Hod you are talking about and was the one that I made up". In that case no, because your god is not God.
>>154868821>A serial killer in a cell still has free will. He can choose to repent, hold hatred, plan a crime, or seek redemption. Locking his body in a box restricts his physical mobility; it doesn't delete his agency or capability to choose bad over good in his mind.So, shooting a serial killer who is in the process of killing someone is bad because it removes his free will?>God creating a universe where creatures literally cannot choose or conceive of wrong is not "putting them in prison", it's creating pre-programmed robots.Or he could just put them in prison.
>>154868971BasedI've noticed low IQ leftists try to be as repulsive as possible when they're losing arguments
>>154868962Bestiality is natural to them.During the 20th century on France, defense of bestiality and underage fucking was common on leftist french academia.
>>154867771Yes, it is. That's why God is I Am. God is, and everything else is defined by the way in which it isn't God.
>>154868986>So, shooting a serial killer who is in the process of killing someone is bad because it removes his free will?Leftists will pretend to not understand to make discourse impossible
>the "leftist bootlicker" schizo from the other threads is also a necrozoophilechecked and keked
>>154868971>Asking me how would I feel if I didn't eat breakfast this morning, is a logical paradox. I ate breakfast this morning and If I didn't eat breakfast this morning I would not be me.
>>154867524Defense attorneys are legally required to do a certain amount of pro bono work in order to keep their license because it would be impossible for the public defender system to work otherwise.
>>154869008What other thread? Why did you immediately start ranting about fucking animals?
>>154869008No
>>154869006I noticed you don't have an actual response. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought-terminating_cliche
>>154869026he was spamming the same shit a few days ago in a political thread
>>154868971>>154868992and how would you feel if you didn't have breakfast today? it's a sign of low IQ or just general desperation that youre clearly so adverse to this hypothetical but simply cant admit your answer its okay you can say it, repeat after me:"no, I wouldn't fuck a dead animal even if my god in heaven commanded me to"simple, now you
>>154869029Yes.
>>154868986Shooting an active killer in self-defense stops a physical body from executing a choice that the killer already freely made. It doesn't rewrite his mind or erase his agency. He used his free will to choose violence, and physical reality reacted.What does "God putting them in prison" even mean in practice? Are you suggesting God should drop a forcefield around anyone the exact millisecond they decide to do something harmful?If God physically blocks every single bad action before it can manifest, moral choice becomes an illusion. You would no longer be a moral agent making meaningful decisions in a real world... you would be a child in a padded playpen where actions have no real consequences. A world where bad choices are physically impossible to carry out is functionally no different from creating pre-programmed robots. At worst, Hell is punishment tgat those who did evil march to.Also if morality is just subjective social consensus, why should the creator of the universe intervene in human preferences? You can't judge God for failing to enforce a moral standard that you claim doesn't objectively exist.
>>154869008he's just some schizo necrozoophile that follows around political threads, don't worry about it sweety
>>154869078>killing someone doesn't erase their agency.
>>154869097most sane /pol/cel
>>154869097Oh you're that brown leftist who got banned last week
>>154869013Comparing a contingent historical event (eating breakfast) to an essential logical contradiction is a category error, anon.Skipping breakfast is a physical possibility.it doesn't violate logic, geometry, or the nature of existence.Asking "What if God commanded an intrinsically evil act?" isn't like asking if you skipped breakfast. It's like asking:"What if a square had three sides?""What if a triangle was made of loud noise?"
>>154869008>>154869097What a fucking freak
>>154869078>What does "God putting them in prison" even mean in practice? Are you suggesting God should drop a forcefield around anyone the exact millisecond they decide to do something harmful?>If God physically blocks every single bad action before it can manifest, moral choice becomes an illusion. You would no longer be a moral agent making meaningful decisions in a real world... you would be a child in a padded playpen where actions have no real consequences. A world where bad choices are physically impossible to carry out is functionally no different from creating pre-programmed robots. At worst, Hell is punishment tgat those who did evil march to.Why does god let newborns get raped to death? Why does he let babies die in fires or die of cancer. So, does moral choice cease to exist if police are efficient enought to put most bad guys in prison? Or like superman in a world without other superhumans?
>>154869008>>154869097>>154869121why do you respond to your own posts?
>>154869131>God is good because he's goodthis is circular reasoning
>>154869008>>154869097This is what not having a job or girlfriend does to you
>>154869105In the context of moral philosophy and free will, there is a crucial distinction between cutting someone's future agency through an action within the world versus denying the fundamental existence of free agency altogether.
>>154867395Oh my, I didn't realize this entire nonsense started as a response to me. So, let me answer in depthly. > If God said 2 + 2 = 5 Well, the LORD doesn't lie, so he wouldn't, but for the sake of the argument, yes. God made everything, including numbers, math, and the concept that 2 + 2 would equal 4 so if he declared it was actually 5 it would just become that because God is all powerful. I feel like that's why you added on that half baked addendum to the end, but to illustrate a point it's sort like what happened to the antichrists. They were once Jews like us, but after rejecting Christ the Lord declared they were no longer Jews, but antichrists instead. They were a part of us, but went out from us to become apart from us, and are no longer considered to be descendants of Jacob as Ishmael's children would be. Instead they are antichrists and the Synagogue of Satan and Jesus Christ himself declared it to be a blasphemy for them to say they were Jews. If God says it's so, then it is. If he says it's not, then it is not. > Nonsense about bestiality Well as I said above is pointless because he would never but to illustrate a point the Lord said you can remain a chaste bachelor for life of you think that marrying someone wouldn't be desirable and you would just ruin that person's life, but also said you can get married, as well. So, I just wouldn't do that the same as I chose to get married rather then remain a chaste bachelor, which was something he said I was allowed to do.
>>154868387Peggy is actually kind of a lib.I mean, she tends to be the one to like to try out new things.She even pushed back on hank for not letting her drive the motorcycle.
>>154869140>>154869161A minute apart, you're going to get banned again brown anonPalestine lost by the way
>>154869159God invented good and good is defined by how it relates to God
>>154869008>>154869097hot fucking damn what am I even looking at
>>154869131>I ate breakfast this morning. Skipping breakfast in the past is a logical impossibility, because The past can not be changed.
>>154869008>>154869097>>154869140I can't say I'm surprised. Lack of God makes you very sinful
>>154869159That's not on the post>>154869161Wait wait wait Is leftranny trying to copy the time he was so utterly btfo earlier, but by samefaging?
>>154869169God hasn't lied, but he has changed his mind, so if God told you that 2+2=5 and you should fuck a dead animal, you would?
>>154869209All those images in that screenshot from the archives have different file names.
>>154869008>>154869097put me in the screencap
>>154869166So, why can't god do that?
>>154869218Lmao you really is that anon You admited it was all you on the same thread, probably saved multiple times on phone.What a shady loser.
>>154869008>>154869097>even the christcucks are clowning on him now
>>154869244>You admited it was all you on the same thread, probably saved multiple times on phone.where did he admit that? can you link the post?
>>154869209>>154869218Oh fuck, Lefttranny is back
>>154867051All humans are sinful, those without God typically just try to say that their bad things aren't actually bad
>>154869265>>154869008>>154869097>>154869121>>154869140>>154869161>>154869192>>154869207>>154869218>>154869231This is the same leftist replying to his own posts
>>154869266Look the thread on the archive, but you was there, so you know.
>>154869008>>154869097wtf
>>154869218DAMAGE CONTROL
>>154869290i looked and didn't see where he said that:https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/154859812/#154861314
>>154869008>>154869097why does this dead board attract these people
>>154869269I was actually in the thread where he got labeled cherrypick anon because he was spamming the same images so he had to look up how to change filenames. Given how long that takes it still makes me laugh
>>154869269>>154869281you are quoting multiple different people.
>>154869008>>154869097I seen this guy on /v/ too, so it's really funny that we have roving bands of zoophiles that shit up 4chan with /pol/shit
>>154869078>What does "God putting them in prison" even mean in practice? Are you suggesting God should drop a forcefield around anyone the exact millisecond they decide to do something harmful?>If God physically blocks every single bad action before it can manifest, moral choice becomes an illusion. You would no longer be a moral agent making meaningful decisions in a real world... you would be a child in a padded playpen where actions have no real consequences. A world where bad choices are physically impossible to carry out is functionally no different from creating pre-programmed robots. At worst, Hell is punishment tgat those who did evil march to.So, if regular people are around a (would be) single would be serial killer and are luckily able to stop him every time he attempts to commit a crime, does he stop being a moral agent making meaningful decisions?What if god was only doing that intereference to that single would be serial killer instead?
>>154869338>no uI love how much you seethe it's funnier when it's about Palestinians though
>>154869313He got clowned hard there
>>154869078Does free will exist in heaven?
>>154853118BatmanSupermanHawkmanTechnically every member of the justice league is conservative
>>154869313Lmao Leftranny is such a loser. Literal 6 hours spamming.
>>154869209>Is leftranny trying to copy the time he was so utterly btfo earlier, but by samefaging?seems like a cord attemtping an ebin collage
>>154869313This is when we first realized all the spam was coming from one obsessed tranny
>>154867170The things he said were wrong. They were his own inferrings based on his own opinions and they were flawed. Much like the next poster I'm responding to. >>154867219This doesn't make them corrupt. The baseline logic of the law is they are illegal invaders who aren't allowed to be here, otherwise they wouldn't be able to be deported. Those judges are activists who disagree with the law and are attempting to legislate from the bench because they're rulings set the precedent for common law. Often common law and legislation will be challenged against each other until it either reaches a higher court or a new piece of legislation is passed to settle the matter. The rainy you find out "corrupt" is because, like those judges, you disagree with the current law and want to subvert it until common law and eventually new legislation will change how things when so they wouldn't be considered illegal anymore just as the other side wishes to do the same until they aren't able to not be considered illegal and can be deported more easily. None of that is corrupt. Corrupting would be like taking bribes or telling illegals they'll "look the other way" in exchange for sexual favors, or even arresting them and then selling them to human traffickers or live streaming iate fist fights or something like that
>>154869367Yes I think that's likely. We know that some number of angels did so.
>>154869008>>154869097He's probably old enough to voteLet that sink in
>>154869313He was doing all day Wednesday, so his ban must have run out and he immediately started spamming again. He's like /co/'s Chris Chan
>>154867236Based and truthpilled>>154867274This is flawed because God makes the definition for these terms. The LORD makes foolish the wisdom of the world.> I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things.— Isaiah 45:7
>>154869313It's funny that newfags don't know you can see the normally hidden post ID on the archive, so it's genuinely very impressive that one guy managed to spam his own post 40 times over and tries to pass it off
>>154867283Yes. >>154867287Yes, but God made that.
>>154869349When regular people stop a serial killer, they are operating within natural physics and human agency using their own free choices, courage, and action to prevent a crime. If God steps in directly to alter physics, jam guns, or drop forcefields every time someone tries to do wrong, He alters the fundamental rules of reality.
>>154869420Its flawed because evil is a consequence of free will, not a loophole
>>154869008>>154869097>>154869338>>154869351He's right thoughever, you do spam every board like this
>>154869461not him but calling anyone a bootlicker is a common insult
>>154869008>>154869097>>154869461HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>154869461You tried this yesterday tranny and I wasn't in that thread >>154869313I was the one laughing at you on Wednesday
>>154869400so, no bad things happen in heaven but there is free will. How is that possible? and why couldn't god just do that on earth?
>>154869476yeah everyone starts their sentences in the exact same way every time, totally normal and organic
>>154869494Where I said that.
>>154869215I would do anything God commanded me to unless my nature as a human being made me fail him, but part of the reason I have such strong faith is because God is God and the thing you are saying is contrary to God nature. You're probably too emotionally invested in this to see why the argument is absurd and a blasphemy but it would be akin to walking up to a Democrat and going: "Oh, yeah? You're a Democrat? Well, what if the Democrats told you to screw a dead animal? Owned!" or walking to someone who likes Dr. Pepper and said: "Oh, yeah? What if Dr. Pepper told you to stop drinking their soda unless you screwed a dead animal? Idiot!" It really doesn't make sense and this isn't based on one passage, it's based on an multiple points and lessons taught across many books which compromise both testaments which make up the Bible.
>>154869476He spams the same images in every thread and when he gets called out he searches for terms like "troon" to claim other people spam too. He'll be here for hours until he gets another 3 day ban
>>154869008>>154869097>>154869461add me to the meme in the end
>>154869524>Oh, yeah? You're a Democrat? Well, what if the Democrats told you to screw a dead animal? OwnedI would refuse to do so.
>>154869281You probably quoted every Anon ITT, revealing how wrong you were before you even began
>>154869525Leftranny is unhinged man Like, actually mentally ill
>>154869524so if you would fuck a dead animal if god commanded you to, what does your human nature say? does it want to fuck a dead animal?
>>154869400Angels are one thing. What's most pertinent is us humans. In which case, I would you suppose that? Any Bible verses that backs up that assumption?
>>154869520Ok, you aren't the other person i was talking to then.
>>154869544Your posts are all a minute apart and you make the same comments in every thread. You're also the only one spamming reaction images you bootlicking faggot
>>154869400why would you*
>>154869567He is just going to deny. As said, literaly mentaly ill.I will eat a burger with the family.
>>154869567The second to last and 3rd to last post in here are made under a minute apart:>>154869281how are you even quoting so many posts?
>>154869367Yes, but sin is like being in a burning house and breathing smoke. In paradise we will be free of that smoke and breathing fresh clean air. So it's sort of like asking how could breathe and not cough in a clear field. Also people aren't going to live in Heaven that's the realm of God. We'll live on Earth in New Jerusalem with Jesus Christ
>>154869558I'm the exact same person.
>>154869582Yeah but I want him to join the 41%
>>154869008>>154869097>>154869461What has 4chan become? When did this behavior become commonplace here
>>154869447Evil is defined by God
>>154869601What's wrong with it?
>>154869008>>154869097What's going on in this thr- OH LAWD
>>154869606Its a consequence of free will regardless. The lefty tranny uses his to spam 6 hours a day which most consider evil or atleast pathetic
>>154869595That's inevitable.
>>154869630You've replied to your own posts 20 times now what the fuck
>>154869625The way that a single /pol/ schizo can reach into so many different boards and completely destroy any hopes of discussion on a whim, without any janny intervention? This website has less traffic than ever because of this schizoshit pushing out all the oldfags that actually cared about their hobbies
>>154869657It's bizarre, because we can see it in the archives that it's the same anon.
>>154869657First post in the thread, but I'll leave you to your madness
>>154869664Anon, bootlicker is a common insult. You are being schizoid.Will you look now how many times this word has been used?
>>154869548Mine, no, but there are a lot of people who would. For example it's said that it was a popular activity in the Weimer Republic for people to sodomize geese then cut their heads off and let their sphincters contract around their members because it was seen as the "ultimate experience that combined sodomy, sadism, and bestiality."Different people are tempted to different sins, the only way to salvation is through God. It's easy to pick one, especially one that's isn't very popular, and say: "see, most people ITT at least wouldn't openly admit to wanting to do this, so what do we need God for?" but anyone in this thread has sins they are tempted to do that are reprehensible. It's only through faith in Christ that one can gain the strength to resist temptation and iniquity, because if nothing else, you won't have the knowledge to recognize certain sins as being reprehensible when they've been normalized in your society. Homosexuality is a good modem example of this.
>>154869687Don't try to obfuscate what everyone can clearly see in those images, you can even see his exact same writing style
>>154869664Man, he really destroyed you uh
>>154869699I'm too rational to fall for your mindset.
>>154869567The cool down timer is like 50 seconds Anon, that's not even possible. The thread is just active
>>154869673>It's bizarre, because we can see it in the archives that it's the same anon.no, thats not how archives work
>>154869687he put "leftist bootlickers" in quotations so it would search for the whole phrase and wording. learn to search engine
>>154869726Still.
>>154869719The cool down is 60 seconds on /co/:https://a.4cdn.org/boards.json
>>154869008>>154869097Imagine being this person >>154869664Do you rike gookmoot leadership???
>>154869725Newfag
>>154869758Trying too hard
>>154869664This is kind of projection because we were having a fine discussion until liberal Anon saw that the mention of conservative characters didn't immediately result in a crap flinging fest of seethe so he started flipping out
I'm here to talk about conservative characters and you're all discussing fucking roadkill. I so fucking hate you guys.
>>154869779Conservatives deserve it.
>>154869752That proves my point even more.
>>154869008>>154869097jesus christ
>>154869753BRUH
>>154869779Leftytroon has the same meltdown whenever someone mentions conservatives or the right
>>154869779Liberal Anon is trying to derail the thread so this can't be done
>>154869790yeah i know, he accused me of being the same as all those other posters, when my post was made under a minute from another post
>day old conservative thread turns into a theology debate >which shortly turns into a zoophilia discussion>which reveals a prolific schizo is into zoophilianever change
>>154869816Leftranny being into zoophilia was new.
>>154869779That's what conservative debate about morality boils down to in the good ol' 2026 >>154865526
>>154869816There was also an argument about batman and ICE.
>>154869816Lefttranny is into NECROzoophilia, use the correct term.
>>154869836erm, I was talking about this >>154869008>>154869097but nice damage control
>>154869836>>154869855>so mad he responded twice >>154869008>>154869097LOL
>>154869097Those are from like multiple different days. Is it supposed to be an own that there's supposedly an Anon who sticks to his guns?
>>154869808I doubt he's a liberal, he's definitely a schizo tranny he's been spamming since yesterday see>>154869313I caused him to have a meltdown last Wednesday so he seems obsessed with me, the guy who called him a bootlicker and the guy who spams images back at himIts a race to see who causes him to join the 41%
>>154869863But he is not the one defending it. Hell, we have no idea if this anon is on the thread.
>>154869875>"sticks to his guns">seethes in political threads for 20 hours a dayYeah, it's an ownGet a real job
>>154869846I like how you brought it up then turned around and were like: "Wow, isn't it weird these guys are posting in a thread where that got brought up?" Literal grade school tactics
>>154869813Anon if you can't see that >>154869863>>154869874 is the same tranny then we can't help you. He is spamming the exact same thing over and over a minute apart
>>154869863i don't think he's actually into zoophilia, from what I saw he's just failing what's like the religious equivalent of the "breakfast question".
>>154869883So... you think he's a schizophrenic crossdressing conservative? >>154869902But it was multiple different days
>>154869885He's here >>154868945He even started his post the same way he always does, and he even did the gay ass dickriding shtick he always does when he doesn't have his own argument >>154869097
>>154869905Nta but why are you defending it
>>154869946>quoting that post to samefag this openly
>>154869931Different days and posting styles. He's using a no u because he was caught spamming >>154869313And no he's a leftist, he's having a meltdown because the word conservative was used in the opening post
>>154869919I know you really think you were "cooking" with that one, but it was asked and answered despite it's absurdity.It's quite amusing to see you guys appropriating conservative culture while failing to understand it yet again.
>>15486993124+ hours, my bad
>>154869946Oh, I see that, he really does stick out like a sore thumb
>>154870003Why are you pretending to be me? Schizo.
>>154869008>>154869097Posting in an epic bread
>>154869313>Sat 01 Aug 2026 13:02:10Jesus Christ leftytroon has been spamming 24 hours
>>154869961Lol you must be a greenhorn because you're rather bad at trying to manipulate the conversation. It's neither defending nor opposing the argument to make an observation about your actions but if one had to assign it to either or it would be on the side of opposition since I'm pointing out you are the one who brought it up and are now trying to be like: "Wow, I can't believe they brought that up."It's like those Zionists who would sneak into Pro-Palistinian protests and scream: "Kill the Jews!" then run away and go: "OMG you believe those other guys were TOTALLY talking about killing the Jews?"
>>154869008>>154869097>>154869461i finally get to post this image
>>154870003What did this leftist bootlicker mean by this?
>>154870037oh right, you already said youd fuck a dead animal if god said you should, >>154869524 glad we already cleared that up so we don't have to do that again
>>154869986Anon, the bottom post in the screencap is from May 22. The top post is from July 28th. That's over two months time.
>>154870073Tranny isn't going to like this
>>154870073He gets banned from here and goes to /v/, keep up >>154869461
>>154870069> Would you screw a dead animal if I was going to murder your kid if you didn't?> Wow, guys. Can you believe what Anon said. This is you.
>>154870073Meanwhile, leftranny meltdown here >>154869313 has him reposting the same image almost every week on the last months.
>>154870093I can't believe a gamer called you, a tranny leftist, a bootlicker. It's like they want you to join the 41%
Anyways, Spider-Man is a pretty conservative hero when not being written OOC. He even told those liberal protesters to jog off
>>154869976Why /co/ always get the worst retards man?
>>154870186Pretty sure he's mostly on /v/ or from there, either way he never discusses anything /co/ related he just tries to derail threads he sees as conservative
>>154870186>>154870219I won this thread.And so what if I'm trans? I got another thread in my eyes too >>154870086So watch out ;)
>>154870257Another classic of mine
>>154869008>>154869097Saved for posterity
>>154870257> QAnon influencerI don't believe this exists
>>154870257>>154870268man those images really fucked with your head huh
>>154870326BASED
>>154870326>using my reaction image when I was insulting a leftard >editing people's posts Mentally ill
>>154870326Fucking kek
>>154870358Spammer
>>154870326saved
>>154870257>>154870268>>154870326>>154870358>>154870453/co/ mindbroke the tranny spammer again
>>154870326Instant classic
>>154870326LOOK THERE I AM GARY
What the actual fuck is this thread why do we have an actual animal fucker here
>>154870621Because you dipshits deserve nothing but the worse subhumans to shit up your thread for trying to inject /pol/ garbage into this already terrible board.
I deeply regret making this thread.
>>154870659The fuck did I do? I'm here to talk about my favorite comics and cartoons. Please rope and no, god isn't going to save you
>>154870666Anon I don't think anyone here was going to expect a literal animal fucker to make a case for god here so don't feel too bad
>>154870621seems like some schizo is being stalked by a cordthis entire sequence and mass replying thing seems astroturfed
>>154865742this is not as complex as you think it is.fucking a dead animal may be amoral, an action with no actual moral value, it has no relationship to morality. similarly to how sharpening a pencil is not a moral action, understand? but being moral or immoral or amoral doesnt make something not disgusting, and thats how any sane person feels about it. its unsanitary.
>>154870857Always a fucking discord or some shit>>154870902Yes, thank you anon I guess we can start cleansing this thread
>"I'm so sorry anons... I didn't think this thread would get so carried away!"
Thread cleansing is now in effect
>>154869008>>154869097Why do I still come to this shithole?
Jesus Christ
Finally, the animal fucker is gone... God is not gonna let you in through those gates btw
>>154872406Faggot
>>154872413>"I may rape animals and corpses, but at least I'm not gay! I'm definitely going to heaven!"Anything else? LOL
>>154865025Poisoning german blood is a crime. Jews are criminals in the 3rd reich by definition.
>>154870873Good point, Anon, and a good argument for why Jesus Christ is the truth because despite what the spammer has to say the Bible does state that succumbing to the pleasures of the flesh and fornication is iniquity and that bestiality and homosexuality is abomination. The wisdom of the world can intellectualize it's way into our out of most anything but the Lord tells us what is objectively correct or incorrect.
>>154872472Furries aren’t that
>>154872472We go to New Jerusalem, Anon.
https://youtu.be/cNyzjQtgJjA?si=lB8pqdrb5ls0WQZy
>>154872848I never said that they are.>>154872858Let's kiss the new wall too
Jesus christ mods JSID alreadycant have a normal thread without 2 schizos shit flinging at each other
>>154873118>"stealth" /pol/nigger thread>normalI don't know what you expected, desu. Though I doubt anyone would've expected it to turn out like this.
>>154873284i really wish it wasnt a stealth threadwould have been cool so see some actual discussion about characters
>>154853312the mexican girl too?
>>154853118erm homelander
>>154873308It wasn't a stealth thread, OP asked which characters would be conservative and one leftist schizo started spamming
>>154874732Where's the spam?
>>154873308these kinds of threads attract /pol/ crossboarders that want to poison the well. it's the nature of 4chan in 2016+10
>>154855839Based batman
>>154874732those same leftists rant about muh /pol/ boogeyman when they get blown out
>stealth /pol/ thread>/pol/tards have to start defending animal fucking for an entire 30 hours because of a twitter post>suddenly they stop posting and go to sleep >8 hours later, posting resumes right where they left offbasically bots made of meat
>>154874921>>/pol/tards have to start defending animal fucking for an entire 30 hours because of a twitter postIt's mostly that one leftist guy, it seems
>>154874945You really need to get a hobby
>>154874921Are you the same leftist tranny who was crying about /pol/ 8 hours ago?
>>154874921Does /co/ even have any mods at all? How had this thread not been taken down yet
>>154874974I just got here and I'm pretty sure I'm not the guy you imply I am
>>154875000The leftist schizo has been spamming since Friday according to the archive
>>154875000yeah, but he only shows up like one day a week to delete some random webcomic thread then fuck off
>>154875006He thinks we're all the same guy even when we post seconds apart, also anyone who isn't a tranny is /pol/
>>154874921You fokkin bastard, you woke them all up now Thank fucking G*d this thread is only 30 posts away from bump limit
>>154872406he came back lol
>>154875032>>154875047The schizo tranny is back
I can't believe they're still doing this
>>154875056Here it comes!
>>154875058It's okay, soon it will autosage and the pain will be overUntil they derail the next thread with their schizo shit flinging too
After reading this thread, I don't think either of these two(?) wanted to have sex with a dead animal? The one on the left simply calls being in tune and following the God's will common sense and considers it to be more subjective and independent, the guy on the right is more aware that what drives us to be good people is something more objective that's written in the universe's program code, our innate nature as "children of the God" and our (partial) understanding of the beauty of his work.Personally, I believe in the God more from a philosophical rather than from a religious point of view. That the whole world is a part of him and we are like cells in his body, all of us are partially that God.>The common sense>The God's will>Justice>Truth>etc.In the end, most of us are idealists who follow ideals that transcend our physical reality.
>Got IP blocked and banned a few days ago for saying something mean>Some derailed /pol/ thread stays up for no reasonCrap. And we had an August 1st incident through this thread while this thread is up.>https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/154859812/
>>154875235>razorfist OP postisnt he an unironic groomer stopped reading there
>>154875235So the same schizotroon has been spamming for 3 days straight
>>154875255You trying to get me banned again?
>>154875204Thats a seperate conversation, it was after that the tranny spammer began ranting about fucking animals. If you stick around you'll see he does this a lot
>>154875280What the fuck is wrong with you
>the /pol/niggers really did pick it back up as soon as they woke up in the morning This is the gayest shit in the world
>>154875280And I forgot to reply to >>154875277 because I am anxious as usual. I got banned because I said something mean because a Ninja Turtles thread got too many deleted replies. I was being sarcastic, but the temporary IP block thought it meant something else.
>>154875290Well, I haven't read all the posts here. I just found the larger and theological ones more interesting (or more weird).I believe this whole "What if the God told people to do this?" hypothetical is the same thing as "What if humanity's common sense, sense of justice/beauty told them to do this?". It's practically the same ideal that exists beyond our material world that tells us what's more right and what makes this world a better place worth living in. It's a bit funny that the debate has lasted so long.>If you stick around you'll see he does this a lotI probably shouldn't.
>>154865474The guardians don’t seem to give a fuck and have no political establishment to judge them so noClosest you get is other lanter colors fucking with them and they’re all worse except for hope or whatever
>>154874921/pol/ is in such a botted and garbage state nowadays that the remaining real anons get bored and wander away from containment more than usual now. >>154874977>”N-no everyone here is a leftist because th-they don’t like /pol/fags shitting up the threads!”You’re still not seeing the pearly gates, btw
>>154874921>stealth /pol/ threadso even mentioning conservative characters is /pol/?
>>154876923What makes him more Conservative?
>>154876954The schizo leftist hates him I guess
>>154876954He's not, I'm just posting him to give the thread some peace before it finally dies
>>154876946Everyone who isn't a bootlicking troon is /pol/, even Hawkman
>>154876987>>154877043Get a grip, retard
>>154876997And you posted some furry for that?
>>154876997You mean you post some off-topic fetish bait for more activity itt>>154877043
>>154877043Didn't mean to quote you, but fair enoughAnons don't need to visit /pol/ to be the agents of the left or the rightMost of them are just americans
>>154877088>>154877164Why not? I'm bored
>>154877245I guess I'm glad you finally admit being the bestiality shitstirrer
>>154877194This reminds me...>Grant Morrison continues to expound and expand on what went down with Superman & The Authority, 5Gand DC Comics, and Bleeding Cool has been paraphrasing along"When it was still part of the 5G concept and a little more parodic, I had this big daft idea to update the classic utopian Superman story Superman Red/Superman Blue from 1963 by having an older Superman face a literalization of his contradictory impulses towards anti and pro authoritarianism.">In the Superman Red/Superman Blue one-shot in 1998, a trap caused Superman to split into two beings who represented different aspects of his personality, though each believed himself to be the original. Over time, these two personalities grew more and more polarized and individual, to the point that neither entity wanted to become one Superman again. So what were Grant's plans this time?"My suggestion was we split Superman not into Superman Red/Superman Blue but Superman Left/Superman Right – collectivism versus competition – authoritarianism vs. libertarianism with each half starting closer to the centre, then growing ever more hardline as time went by and they remained separated. With dire consequences for the world, of course!"
>>154877355Can't believe that guy mindbroke you to the point where you have to police the thread for any form of dissent Threads at 508 posts, loser. It's over, move on
>>154877407>says the gay furry lover who still stays and spergs about it here
>>154853447Based and Flashpilled
>>154877355I’m not the animal/corpse fucker if that’s what you mean >>154877469Absolute schizo, that isn’t me either
>>154877663I sure hope you don't fuck dead animals. I assume you're just a baiting left wing american zoomer.
>>1548777102 days later, 514 posts at page 8 and you still require an epic clapback at every post that you think could be your boogeyman You're mentally ill
>>154877407>It's over, move onyet you're still here, kek
>>154877663>’Did you switch to some chink phone? Why didn't you use a standard apostrophe?
>>154877748To be fair, the left-wing guy argument that there is nothing inherently wrong with fucking a dead animal corpse was kinda funny, in the black humor kind of way.I'm not saying it was necessarily you, but it would be weird to defend it unironically, and I assume you actually do not, you're just a baiting zoom-zoom.
>>154877983The "Left/Right" wings are a bit misleading (and /pol/ attracting) terms, tho>>154875204It's more about Materialism vs Idealism, with the lefties being more on the materialistic side and the righties being more on the idealistic
>>154878537You're still here?
>>154878537Saved
>>154878537Why are leftiebros like that?
>>154878537kek
