Naturally starting with Nene for that one AnonPrevious thread >>11346910
CUTE diapers anons here's one for based thread
>>11381185
>>11381427
>>11381429
I didn't get diapers as a fetish until it got connected with secretly having accidents around others. Especially the diaper wearer trying to hold back and get to a bathroom but failing and feeling the diaper expand as they wet themselves. God bless JP omorashi and omutsu writers.
are there any AI sites that allow you to generate open diapers? Most models are only trained on closed ones, and those don't do it for me
>>11382931Just pay someone to draw it, you fag.
>>11381686I didn't get into it until I made a request in the drawthread years ago as a goof and got this.
>>11383004Does anyone have the uncensored version of this pic?
>>11383860The artist's fanbox :)
The screaming eyes return
>>11384637
>>11384638
>>11384640
>>11380842>>11381184>>11381751>>11382758>>11383695>>11384343Artist name? Pretty cute
>>11385207Filename is pixiv artwork ID
>>11385207Lphooves
>>11385868>cute picture>ruined by visible "this is my art, no you can't have it" text.t. main character syndrome of an artist I see.
>>11385961It's not an issue when you look at the image outside of this page.
>>11385961Think of it as a way of interested people being able to find the artist (and thus more things like this) if they like what they see.It saves us from sauce request posts and the artist might get a few new fans that encourage them to make more art. Good things all around.
>>11386113>being this retarded
>>11385961This is such a non issue, artists have been putting their name or signature on their works for ages.
>>11386149>>11386113a signature would have been fine, it's the watermarking it in a way that covers the image that I'm annoyed by. like shutter stock does, but I doubt even if you bought the image that they'd remove the watermark.
>>11386186It's done for Anti-AI reasons I believe. Even if they don't "poison" it with Nightshade or something similar, having an annoying watermark will still affect the data model. I've seen JP art with WAY worse watermarking, hardly even noticed it here.Anyway, diapers and pissing in them (is hot).
>>11386237
>>11385961Maybe if it was something over the "active" part of the art (i.e. the diaper or face) but god damn, you're whining over fucking nothing.
>>11386260I could say the same about you.>one person's opinion>make excuses of why it's okaybut it's not normal, look at every other image posted here as an example, that image is the single one doing that shutter stock shit. but it really IS the artists ego if you wanna say it's to stop it being claimed by AI.I get the real picture here, you're not gonna let off and see how it looks shit, no matter where it's put, you're just going to make excuses for this artist. so I'll stop here if you do.
>>11385961>>11386367Artists have been signing their works since humans started drawing in caves, nothing unusual in it. It's fine to say you don't like it, but it certainly is not some bold ego bosltering move that is outlandish for an artist to do.
>>11386441you're not reading what I said. I don't give two flying shits that it's signed, it's not the signature in that image that's I'm talking about, it's the watermark. what I'm calling a watermark is the repeating grid of their name on Camimi's hand that she's pointing at the diaper with, or on her wings. the one on her thigh is not a watermark, but an actual signature.again, I'm good with signatures like on the thigh. but not with the grid watermark on her hand, shirt, wings, parts in the image.
>>11386449Convince the AI dudebros to stop slurping up art for their data models without asking, then? You're not gonna accomplish anything by bitching in an ABDL fetish thread on 4chins.
>>11386459you know what's not self aware about that image too? the turtle in it is a dev for an ai vtuber. so it's "here let me draw this art about a girl who is known to hang out and talk with an AI, and also let's have her talking with the ai's father, but then let's try to fuck up an AI too while we're at it." it's ironic I suppose, but not in the fun side of the word.
>>11386449Ah, now I see what you mean. Still, I think it's very subtle compared to cases where a repeating watermark roll has been plastered over the entire image with barely any opacity
>>11388007
>>11385961Okay now THIS is too much watermarks
>>11388389I hope these disappear when "work in process" is over
>>11388389>2953x8859holy autims
>>11388389I could prolly finetune this process a bit...
>>11388389yeah seriously why the fuck do they do thishow huge does your ego have to be to automatically assume someone anyone wants to make money off your fanart let alone use it to make merch.
>>11388389>>11388390how about you stop posting this /aco/ tier garbo?
so I'll be working on a lora for goodnites (pull-ups) because I haven't been able to find a model and maybe the japs are gatekeeping. or maybe this is using an old flux model: https://x.com/degen_reality/status/1974659663947083863I have my own dataset, but if you have tips, suggestions etc I'll factor it in during the training process.>>11388501amazing work. for the average joe, watermark.io seems to do a pretty good job. picrel good result with minimal distortion
>>11390199I think this might be the pullups loras already existing on civitaiarchive. Idk if they have some working link tho.What model do you have in mind?
>>11390275These were audios or something, right?
>>11390320almost looks like a high chair in the thumbnail.
>>11390321Apparently yes
>>11390674Now that I have a better look she looks like one of my friends.
>>11390922okay, who forgot to put the baby in the diaper? guess they'll learn from it by cleaning the bab and the floor. just gotta hope it's only pee they have accidents with.
New Shasei-byou doujin from Mitsuhime Moka, cannot WAIT
>>11385961Artist is putting a watermark or signature on their work is a non-issue though, helps people find them when it’s reposted like here for example.
I miss babybrained anons
>>11386459>AIDo you really think those watermarks do anything negative to training data?
>>11395573This guy makes so cute art
>>11380845Translation. Adorable. I wish I could be invincible like this.
>>11395898"Meow" should be "smirk", but it's decent for being a MTL.
>>11395898"Yes! I'm INVINCIBLE!"
>>11394707>Wheelchair bound girl wearing diapersHot
>>11397587
>>11399502Blood filled diaper, did she have a period?
>>11400357
>>11400358
Request because I've seen it once and then never again. There was a video of a Furina cosplayer at a convention wearing a diaper. Anybody have it?
>>11401636Never heard of it, but it sounds really hot so hope an anon finds it
There's a very old piece of art I've been trying to find, it was a Japanese piece (not western) with a girl in a diaper and baseball uniform standing over the plate with a bat ready to swing. Anybody have it or at least know the artist? It's easily a decade old, embarrassingly I only saved the hands because I was trying to learn to draw at the time. Thanks.
>>11402801I got you bro.
>>11402805You're awesome, thanks! This might be pushing it but any idea who's work it is?
>>11402806SauceNAO had it.https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/21984066
>>11402813
>>11402810Thanks again! I'll quit shitting up the thread now.
>>11402368
>>11402805Not quite a "I recognize that bulge" moment, but still anon knows his porn lol
>>11403026The description of the baseball girl was enough for me to recognize it was something I had saved in my collection.
>>11403088i remember having this bookmarked, but can't find anymore. did the author nuke his twitter?i guess it's fine since i downloaded it, but
what do ai folks use to generate diaper art? I'm using wai illustrious, but it seriously sucks
>>11407473
>>11407473>>11407474rare diaper art of girls frontline
>>11407041So like, are their souls embedded onto the diaper? I could imagine that happening
Which anime girl could you imagine going as a baby for Halloween? Maybe they lost a bet, or was gullible enough to be convinced by another character, or is secretly into it, or because of other shenanigans in relation to the source material's happenings
>>11410739I don't know who could, but they all sure should
