>>11435038Source?
>>11435447Alterkyon Thea for sale kimono
>>11435611
Thoughts on petrification as a means for bad end scenarios/angst?
>>11436018Imo thats the best case. I just love classic scenario of heroine(s) in dungeon falling victim to trap/monster that leaves them as nothing but sexy statues.
>>11436018I don't know why you'd use petrification as anything other than a bad end. >angstWhat?
>>11436018I like the idea of a victim being really put through hell, and then as a final cruel send-off being petrified for all eternity.
>>11436406>am i glad he's frozen in there and that we're out here
How much could a girl get nut on after being petrified before being considered a huge slut?
>>11436438YesImagine with clothes unpetrified though. Cum soaking in, plastering it to her stone body, loads from days before still there as more visible dried stains. That barrier of modesty helping to underscore what she's become now, because instead of them being stone too for it to all drain away, or the clothes being ripped off, it's just holding the degradation longer.
If a woman's turned to ice or chocolate, what pain would they be put in from melting (assuming they are still conscious)?
>>11436991I don't think there's any pain from melting (at any temperature really). Specifically ice or chocolate probably feels like taking a hot bath after an exhausting day, you can finally relax all your solidified muscles and become a warm puddle of liquid material.
>>11436438Doesn't matter. Once you've petrified her you have all the power. You can put her on a pedestal labelled "slut" and that's all she'll ever be ever again.>>11436441Imagine the cum soaking into the cracks and pores in the stone and staining it as well. Dark patches all over her body show the targets for loads sprayed centuries ago. Long after her clothes have soaked through and rotted away, you can still see where the cum ran down her chin and dripped between her cleavage. Also my god those clothes would be rock solid within a week. Disgusting, but also really hot.
>>11436991I prefer to keep that ambiguous. Candles neither talk nor scream, no matter how much they wish they could. I do think their consciousness would vanish at some point, though. I don't care for the notion of sentient piles of melted wax. Same for stuff where statues are ground into gravel. There must be a limit to these sorts of things.
>>11437753I agree. Ambiguity is the best choice. Her story ended the second she turned, as far as we're concerned. Obviously for her it's the start of a new and exciting endless nightmare but for us, it doesn't matter. Why would we care what it thinks? It's a lump of rock with tits.And I kinda like the idea of conscious gravel. For one thing, it's a whole other level of degrading to reduce someone down to literal construction material, especially by destroying her so utterly. And the body horror aspect is kinda nice. Plus, you can always do the whole 'every part of her body is now sensitive' thing. It's said of the driveways of some prolific petrifiers that if you walk up them on a quiet night, you can almost hear the moans.
>>11437756What if you turn them into something that can be recycled? Metal melted down and recast into other things, the conciousness spread out.Added irony - the metal is used to make tiny copies of the original person as their statue self. All these little tiny copies spread out, aware. Maybe they're all one very bewildered mind seeing and feeling from all these copies. Or maybe they've all split and now they're mental copies too. Each tiny statuettte thinking it's the sole one, where the person wound up when the body melted.
