Post all about /diy/ robotics, robowaifus, kits, hardware, careers, ideas, etc.
>>2947917My design, the Galatea Multipurpose Companion Maid RobotRight now, I'm working on upgrades to the leg design and a backscratcher attachment.
>>2947917What are all these pictures?
>>2948327A collage I made for /robowaifu/ before. I chose it to represent robotics as a whole.
One good field for robotics is elder care. I heard that a regular caregiver costs thousands a month. So even if a robot caregiver costs a few thousand, it'll still be a good deal.
>>2948578That makes sense.
>>2947917>China is selling humanoid robots for 20kIt can't be that complex right? A bunch of sensors and motors in a case made of chinesium with some movement software?
>>2949514Yeah. The age of robotics is here
>>2949604But how do I make my own? No way that shit is worth the price of a used car.
>>2949605Start by learning humanoid robotics topics. Do you have Youtube?
>>2949776I don't want to watch Sandeep butcher my language to learn about stepper and brushless motors. I'm too ADHD for that shit.
>>2949808Lol. Fair enough, but there are plenty of White men producing content in this area. In fact rn we dominate. Here's a fun channel to watch. There's at least a dozen others.https://www.youtube.com/user/jamesbruton
>>2949828Thanks I'll check it out.
>>2949843Y/w. AMA.
>>2947917How soon until there is a news story about someone trying to fuck their Tesla bot accidentally getting their duck ripped off?
>>2949934Should be quite a popular feature for Trannies to cope, seethe, and dilate to? Maybe Tesla can brand it "The 41% Kit"! :DFor the rest of us, two words:Jailbreak.
>>2948532sex doll?
>>2951434Not really
>>2949604having one of these in the house that are remotely driven by AI would scare the shit outta me. somebody WILL fuck with these.
>>2947918I haven't popped over to /robowaifu/ for a while. Your project looks pretty interesting! Do you mind showing us a bit more about what it can do?
>>2955111it's a 3d print mounted to a roomba it can't do anything. It's not a robot even it has no motors no electronics, nothing.
>>2955314Tell us Art, what can your robot do?Not "what will it be able to do". What can it do right now?
>>2955314Oh, I see. You must have a much more impressive robot then, right? Surely something more than a pile of hot glue and crudely crafted pulleys.
>>2955331isnt he/Arby the guy who wants the AI to code itself? I'm guessing it cant do anything right now
>>2955371Yeah, that's him.It can't do anything because it doesn't exist. He has a thread up on here right now. His latest update is he twisted two short bits of wire together and put some tape over them. Elite roboticist.
I'd like to see more hobby robots on this board. It's something I always wanted to get more involved with but never pursued too much. I should get back into that.
>>2955111Thank you! It can clean floors with the robot vacuum base, hold a UV light for sterilization, act as a security camera, help facilitate virtual childsitting, use it's speaker with local AI to talk, use it's speaker to play "live" music, be a cuddle buddy, smash poisonous spiders, scratch your back, and be an emergency light.nice digits btw>>2955331>>2955358>>2955371>>2955433lmaoYeah Artbyrobot, let's see that self-improving code and robot building itself.Surely you're not one of those boomer Christians who think anything that helps men is a sin.
>>2955455>I'd like to see more hobby robots on this board.Me too.
Today is actually Galatea's birthday. Here's to more years of IRL, open source, and practical robowaifus and robotics!You can also see how she can sit at tables.
>>2955468What's the next thing you're looking to incorporate into the design? Head tracking? Object tracking?
>>2955475I'm currently focusing on promotion of the Galatea design and other projectsMy immediately next update is to further update the AI, and maybe a homemade tablet solely for the AI.>Head tracking? Object tracking?Interesting idea. I'll definitely consider it if I have more independent AI hardware (like the aforementioned tablet. It did give me the idea to make the eyes blink with a short animation.
>>2955489Could you elaborate on this a bit? I understand it might be early in the process.Are you looking to run models locally on the tablet? I would avoid that if I were you. Have a desktop PC that the tablet remotes to. Tablets can't run AI as well as PCs can, and the remoting doesn't add much complexity, as long as she can reach a router (which she probably can throughout the house).If you do it this way, you can have a pretty immediate upgrade to STT and TTS using Whisper and whatever the best TTS is at the moment (VibeVoice? There are many and it changes from time to time).>blinkingYou could do a little wink as well. That'd be cute.
>>2955544Currently, I'm promoting Galatea all over the internet, because I want others to build her, and I think it can genuinely change the world. That's why I made full instructions for others.>Are you looking to run models locally on the tablet? I would avoid that if I were you. Have a desktop PC that the tablet remotes to. Tablets can't run AI as well as PCs canThe AI is very open ended, with many AI software engines to use (software to run the AI model). In my manual, I detail how to run the AI on a smartphone (or tablet), or a Desktop PC. But since the speaker is a bluetooth speaker, and you need to press a microphone icon or type with the software, it's definitely much more natural and freeing to use your phone. The idea for a "homemade tablet" was so you have a dedicated device to run the AI (concept: touch screen with Raspberry Pi 5).>and the remoting doesn't add much complexity, as long as she can reach a router (which she probably can throughout the house).Having the audio work over Wifi is a good idea. I'll need to look into how to set that up. Another problem is needing a system for the robot to know when to listen. With my current system, the solution is to either use a STT mode that you have to activate manually, or have a STT typer, then submit the text input. With things like an Amazon Alexa, it always listens for a wake word, and disengages after sometime. Maybe I can do something like that, which would be really cool.>You could do a little wink as well. That'd be cute.I have a blinking gif I made recently, as well as some alternative eyes.
Hello. I am an extreme noob at this. I work as a tech at a factory and I'm fascinated with our pallet stacker robots, so I decided to try and build my own.Yes, those are cheap aliexpress servos. Yes, that's a RP2040. No, I will not be using external PSU's.
Wait, is this thread schizophrenics duct taping smartphones to mannequins, or is it actually about robots?
First ever robot is a failure. Aliexpress servos are not up to the task.Back to the drawing board!
>>2956936>>2956845That's very cool! If you have some money for more expensive servos may I recommend the SO-101 arm. Pic related are my arms
>>2947917I really miss the threads on 8ch they seemed to have a load of actual useful info and industry folks posting
>>2949514>>2949604>>2954799Want to know why they are so cheap? They are sold at a loss to collect data. These Chinese bots send data to Chinese IPs every 5 minutes. Not to mention they have multiple security vulnerabilities some reported and some not reported. Hardware sold at a loss for hundreds of thousands dollars in data siphoned back to China. That is why they are cheap.
>>2957305Which is why I'm not buying the Chinkbot 9000. Let me know when there's an open source robot build out there.
>>2957307The closest thing I know is mevita. Obviously needs work/redesign for more human aesthetic, but the hard work is done. https://haraduka.github.io/mevita-hardware/
>>2957308Someone should just reverse engineer the unitree robot and put the specs and code on GitHub. What are they gonna do? Take then to court for intellectual property theft?
>>2957305I well believe they are sending data back to China, but what I do not believe is that that data is worth $100,000+ per robot. If a 24/7 recording of my life was worth that much, I'd be selling them that data myself.They're probably trying to capture the market/establish themselves as a common name, probably state backed as they see it as a fair fee to increase their chances of becoming the goto supplier. I've been at some of their product show-offs and it feels that way.Their dogs are pretty awesome to be fair. The humanoids weren't that great, though it was an earlier version than the G1 I saw.
>>2956845>>2956936Nice work so far!
>>2957298Try /robowaifu/. That's where the refugees went
>>2957305>>2957307>>2957308>>2957309K-bot is at least partially open source
>>2957353It's worth it to have an army of hikackable bipedal suicide drones in every corner of America. China has perfected the art of the exploding lithium ion battery.
>>2957463Nah, if the loss is as is being suggested out, it'd be cheaper to send some MKULTRA'd mook on a holiday visa and have him go crazy with jerrycans and matches.Think efficiency. Killer robots would be such a hopelessly inefficient way of doing it, even if it does sound like a cool scifi movie plot.China might well just be screwing you over in a boring economy way rather than an excited death machine way. I know it's no fun.
Im 3d printing the new mask. I cant help but feel it might be too small by looking at it though. But as they say. Move fast and break things… sometimes… ugh
>>2957546Yeah no im doing this backwards. I stopped the printer.
>>2957550my brain finally collapsed now that im 36...Its over... sips
>>2957557You really should be using cad for mechanical things. Plasticity is good for beginers since it has a UI that is meant to be understood by normal people instead of engineers.
>>2957645I go back and forth between fusion 360 and blender
>>2947917Can you make robotic stuff at home? Would be nice to have someone to talk too
>>2947917how long until we have rideable robot mounts that can gallop or fly faster than cars?
>>2948578that's a lotta killed elders.... like allowing robot doctors would kill people without enough cash or insurance.no conscience means more death
>>2957670I make robotics stuff all the time>>2957744And human doctors don't do that?You could probably write an encyclopedia of human malpractice from the last 20 years alone.
>>2957353>Estimated value: $110,000/220,000 per robot over lifetimeEnvironmental/Spatial Intelligence: $30,000/50,000>High resolution 3D mapping of interior spaces>LIDAR generated floor plans and facility layouts>GPS tracking of robot movement and location patterns>Identification of valuable assets, security systems, safe locations>Industrial facility layoutsAudio Surveillance Data: $15,000/25,000>Continuous microphone access capturing conversations>Voice pattern recognition and speaker identification>Business meetings, trade secrets, confidential discussions>Household conversations revealing purchasing intent, political views>Password/PIN mentions, security questions answersVisual Surveillance Data: $20,000/40,000>Camera feeds of people, documents, computer screens>Facial recognition data for household members and visitors>Document capture (contracts, financial statements, proprietary info)>Behavioral pattern analysis>Biometric data collectionNetwork Intelligence: $10,000/20,000>WiFi network credentials and topology>Connected device inventory (IoT ecosystem mapping)>Network security posture assay>Potential pivot point for deeper network penetration>Corporate network architecture in business deploymentsBehavioral/Demographic Data: $5,000/15,000>Daily routine patterns and schedules>Consumer preferences and lifestyle data>Home occupancy patterns>Health indicators from gait analysis>Socioeconomic indicators from home environmentIndustrial/Commercial Intelligence: $20,000/50,000>Manufacturing processes and techniques>Quality control procedures>Supply chain information>Employee productivity metrics>Proprietary operational methodsAggregate/AI Training Value: $10,000/20,000>Real world robotics training data>Human robot interaction datasets>Physical manipulation task examples>Navigation algorithm improvement>Computer vision model training>>2957463this also>t works in robotics: is taken from one of our internal documents
>>2958993I guess each of the values are the minimum and maximum estimated values per robot, right?I really have trouble believing:>Password/PIN mentions, security questions answersThat would be illegal pretty much everywhere. I don't see how you would monetise that, and even handling it is a stupid and unnecessary risk for your company. It brings all the rest of your claims into doubt.Also, if you really value my personal data that much, why don't you just offer to buy it? Many people would take that deal right away and you could skip all of this covert stuff. You wouldn't even need to develop and sell a robot.>this alsoWhat do you make of this? >>2957465Anyone who's thought about this for a little bit would see that suicide robots in homes are inefficient. I don't think you're telling the truth.
>>2959003>That would be illegalSo is putting lead in baby food and children's toys and yet every single year somebody has their kid die because China is an Anarcho capitalist country with the PR firm of a Communist one.
>>2959006So this guy is Chinese, and he's just casually spilling state secrets about China's plan for a robot uprising as a reply to a robowaifu thread on 4chan? Get real.
>>2959007Who? Where did I accuse anybody here of being Chinese? Are you ESL? There unitree robots have a high value to the manufacturer that is in itself a state owned enterprise BECAUSE of the valuable sensor data being sent back to China in an unencrypted format. You can say "they can't do that, that's illegal", but they prove time and time again that they really don't give a shit about laws. Even the common sense ones like don't use lead in products meant for human contact. Why the fuck would they care about your faggy laws around data privacy? If you are dumb enough to buy one of these chinkbots and put it in your home you deserve to have your bank account drained before it self destructs and locks you inside your burning home.
>>2959011>Where did I accuse anybody here of being Chinese?I said he would be breaking the law, you say Chinese people don't care about breaking the law. How would that be relevant unless the implication was that he was Chinese?I don't have anything to say on the matter other than what I already wrote here >>2957353The privacy thing is not about laws. I know they'll happily break those. What I'm saying is:>1. Personal data is not worth as much as is being claimed>2. Suicide bots are ridiculous, and if this were real then >>2958993 would be posting huge state secrets for no reasonAlso, saved your pic. Very nice.
>>2959014The implication that he needs to be Chinese to know that the bots are sending back data is the part where I think you're wrong. It's already known that the robots all have a security exploit that the manufacturer refused to fix. https://spectrum.ieee.org/unitree-robot-exploit#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17636547212550&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fspectrum.ieee.org%2Funitree-robot-exploitAn exploit that allows remote takeover of other robots in the vicinity. Basically stuxnet all over the world with the ability to do all of the things that poster said. You don't need to be Chinese to understand that those sensors combined with that intentional vulnerability are worth way more than the robot itself when placed next to the right target.
>>2959016That's not what I'm saying. I'm that because I said that would be breaking the law, and you said that Chinese companies don't care about breaking the law, you must be suggesting he is Chinese and therefore willing to break the law, otherwise your statement is non-sequitur and I assumed you wouldn't do that.Do you at least recognise that publishing state secrets in a coombot thread is absurd? Any killer robot plan has to be in collaboration with a state, and he would have just posted about things which obviously wouldn't be cleared for publication.
>>2959024That's why I'm asking if you're ESL. >Doing those things with the data would be illegal>Chinese companies don't give a shit about what is legal or not>The poster saying they could do those things with the data making the robots more valuable than the MSRP does not need to be Chinese to know this
>>2959028So you're saying you think that the company this poster supposedly works for is an integrator of Unitree robots? You're posting about Unitree security flaws, but you don't think he's Chinese, so that's the only conclusion left.Why would Unitree even tell the company they're selling to "hey, we're going to to do covert illegal things with the robots we sell you"? Any company would be stupid to take a product like that where they're being told outright that the provider will be stealing PINs and passwords.Just, think about it, think about whether it sounds believable to you, or whether it's just some made up shit online.
>>2959032Ok I'm certain you're ESL now. At no point did he claim to work for a Chinese company and I didn't imply he did either. It's publicly known that the unitree robots have an exploit of hard coded admin access that can be used to control an entire network of robots if they're in range. The rest is just inferred from logically understanding what those sensors can do with malicious intent.
>>2959046English is my first and basically only language.You're not addressing any of my points. You're so committed to your Metal Gear Solid killer robots idea that you can't even read anything that might bring that into question.Who is doing the spying, in your opinion, and paying over $200,000 per person? Who is going to control these killer robots?
>>2959047>PayingSomething having a high monetary value doesn't imply that somebody is paying that monetary value. In fact it's better that they get it for free because people all fucking retarded and would gladly let a trojan horse into their homes if you sell it at a discount. Unitree makes the robots and part of their funding is from the Chinese Communist party. Article 7 of the Chinese National Intelligence law requires all organizations and citizens to comply with state data collection demands. That means if the CCP wants to access the various sensors of the network of robots, they can. And so the question becomes, how much is a bipedal remotely controllable robot that can self destructs at will worth to an intelligence organization? The answer was provided by that poster that you think needs to be Chinese. In reality you just need common sense. Honestly it would be better if you were ESL. Now you're just being obtuse at best and retarded at worst.
>>2959051It's a nice sounding bit of conjecture, but where is your proof that these values given are based on anything at all?Where are you pulling this "self destruct at will" stuff from too? How do you suppose that will work, and how will it be better than just sending a person to cause harm?The truth is, it would be fairly easy for a state to kill almost anyone on Earth. Just look at the United Healthcare CEO assassination as an example of how you don't even need state-level resources, then look at some more extreme cases like Iranian scientists being killed by Israel, which can get very advanced. The problem is it's usually easy to trace that killing back to a state, which has significant political implications, and is generally more trouble than its worth.The CCP using a Chinese made robot to somehow (unspecified how at the moment) kill a person has got to be one of the most traceable methods available.>Honestly it would be better if you were ESL. Now you're just being obtuse at best and retarded at worst.There's no point in trading petty insults.
>>2959051>>2959065And a bit more as well because you still haven't addressed this. Why is Unitree, the CCP, or anyone else, making this password stealing killer robot stuff known to anyone at all, and why is that person then posting what would be a globally significant secret here?Use Occam's Razor. Which is more likely? What you are proposing, or a fake post?
>>2959007No I'm a White American who's a contractor and works in robotics. That estimated value per robot was taken from an investigation on companies selling humanoids at a loss like optimus, unitree and neo. We cannot even come close in price ours will be close to 50k (industrial market who need a larger and stronger bot over other offerings), which is almost double from others. BTW almost everything on that list is illegal, but if you really think that's going to stop anyone even someone like Tesla, I have a bridge to sell you. Tesla/Amazon/Google/Apple already siphon insane amounts of data, much of which would be considered illegal. Unitree doing the same is no different. The killer robot stuff is a meme but it's still a real possibility. If you can't realize this, you deserve to be robo executed. >>2959024>MUH LAWSDo you realize no one gives a fuck? This era is literal silent WW3, the information war. If you think adversaries who want nothing more for your country to fail and for you to die are going to follow your laws, I have a second bridge to sell you.>>2959066>Why is Unitree, the CCP, or anyone else, making this password stealing killer robot stuff known to anyone at allIf you actually look into it, it was discovered, Unitree/CCP weren't advertising they have security vulnerabilities and are siphoning data. You're arguing against strawmen. They were caught doing it and didn't fix it. This proves the security stuff is intentional and when questioned on the data being sent back, they never responded, which proves they don't want to talk about what's being captured at all.that list is just a bunch of stuff that CAN be stolen via a robot, not that this is exactly what was found to be stolen.>globally significant secret herenot really, they printed that estimated value per robot being sold at a loss on paper which was never tracked and recollected, it's not some major secret. anyone could have taken the paper home (many did) and it get lost
>>2959205>No I'm a White American who's a contractor and works in robotics.I believed that to be so. The clause about you being Chinese is part of the question posed to the other poster. I think that might be part of why he and I were not able to talk properly, because he thought that was something I was claiming, and only the second part was a question.>That estimated value per robot was taken from an investigation on companies selling humanoids at a loss like optimus, unitree and neo.This would have been a lot clearer if we knew these were speculative values rather than planned values.>The killer robot stuff is a meme but it's still a real possibility. If you can't realize this, you deserve to be robo executed.It's a possibility in the same way that any type of assassination is a possibility. People get all worked up about robots because they've seen too many scifi movies. If a state wants you killed, they already have a way of autonomously moving and firing a gun. A man with a gun. They're not going to be mass executing civilians with these things anyway. Maybe they can clumsily execute one or two people before everyone catches on, and then we all switch off our robo maids. It's a one and done technique that requires a whole industry to be built up and then knocked down again after use. There are far easier ways for a state to assassinate basically anyone that already exist and are in use. e.g. Novichok assassinations.>This era is literal silent WW3, the information war.Metal Gear Solid.Sure, China isn't going to follow laws it doesn't want, and I found most of the rest of your post believable because of that, but after a point in a BCA breaking the law has a higher cost in terms of detection, reputation loss, and product disuse than benefit. The password stealing one crosses that line, and when I replied about laws it seemed your post was purporting to contain actual budget values rather than speculative ones. That was the claim that was unbelievable.
>>2959065It has a battery so All it has to do is overload it/overheat it to get it to blow up and you can easily say that it was an accident/mistake
>>2961157It's not just that simple. When batteries explode it's not like a shrapnel grenade.Still doesn't address how it's a better method than sending a man with a gun either. It has to beat "man with a gun" to be worth destroying an industry over.If they claim it's an accident, how many times do you think that will work as an excuse against meaningful targets? Once? Maybe twice? Again, it's not worth building up and tearing down a whole industry when they already have men with guns, men with jerrycans of gasoline, men with grenades, rockets launched at aircraft, Novichok style poisons. There are so many different ways states have available to assassinate people they think the payoff is worth it for, and none of them require destroying a billions of dollars industry so they wil always be preferred over this ineffective and inefficient method.Just think about it. That industry worth billions is a much better tool for harming America economically than any potential gains to be had from killing maybe one person in a stupider way than methods they already have available.
This robot is missing a facehttps://youtu.be/l63OrgqqWPU
>>2947918Movement Demohttps://youtu.be/tMykj03-rsk
>>2962147The doll part wobbles around quite a bit when the roomba stops.How are you controlling the roomba? If you have direct control of the motors maybe you could have them come to a smoother stop and prevent this rocking when the base stops. There are open source firmwares for robot vacuum cleaners out there, though their availability will depend on your model specifically. (Many of them are just reskinned versions of each other, even from different companies, so you might be able to port it if not.)
>>2962440>The doll part wobbles around quite a bit when the roomba stops.Yeah, I noticed that too. Aot of the problems come from the soft carpet my place has.>How are you controlling the roomba?Remote that came with it>There are open source firmwares for robot vacuum cleaners out there, though their availability will depend on your model specifically. (Many of them are just reskinned versions of each other, even from different companies, so you might be able to port it if not.)Interesting. I don't really know the model, I just know what the specific model looks like. I bet a more expensive vacuum has more control.
>>2962553>Aot of the problems come from the soft carpet my place has.I think it's just a leverage thing. The doll is tall compared to the roomba you'll get this wobble no matter what surface it's on.>Interesting. I don't really know the model, I just know what the specific model looks like. I bet a more expensive vacuum has more control.It's not really a matter of how expensive the vacuum cleaner is, because probably none of them have this gradual decceleration on stock firmware because there's just no need for them. Try and find the model (there might be a product code on the bottom you can look up if not the full model name). Take a look here too at other efforts to get more control over these cleaners:https://valetudo.cloud/
>>2962570Interesting, thank you
We have a Christmas party in /christmas/!https://trashchan.xyz/christmas/index.htmlThe /robowaifu/ embassy threadhttps://trashchan.xyz/christmas/thread/3110.htmlLivestreams and more! Plenty other boards are participating!
>>2956845>>2956936How is each arm link done in this design? I mean, are the bars held just by the servos?
>>2957744Elder care already has no morals. Its full of negros.
This kind of stuff really bothers me not just physically but spiritually as well, like a sickness of the very soul itself.Men shouldn't consider a machine to be an actual alternative to human companionship, it's completely unnatural and unhealthy, and I really hope the advocates in here are simply young men with minds warped by isolation and pornography that they can get help for.While I'm generally progressive, I pray that when technology gets to the point of full scale 'companion' robots it is either banned or at the very least highly regulated.
>>2967673Jealous feminist hands typed this postWhile you're free to not like companion robots, and even free to think of me as bad, the fact that you think it's a horrible mental illness, and you want it to be banned, as in against the law, as in criminal charges for making/owning a mere friendly robot, makes it very obvious that you are an angry misandrist feminist with an agenda.
>>2967683Don’t you want kids? Every man wants kids.These things won't be able to provide you with any
>>2967708What if your human wife turned out to be infertile, or simply didn't want kids? Would you still love her? If you met your perfect woman, your soulmate, but she was infertile, would you still love her?
>>2967673r9k chuddite herethis is the only alterative to true isolationnot everybody is a just a "failed" normalfag who can get betterthis is the closest thing to a companion we will EVER getalso who the fuck wants kids in current year lol
>>2967723That's different, and a far cry from replacing her with some plastic sex doll that will never be able to match up to a real woman.>>2967753>True isolationThere are plenty of women who would be open to dating you. The problem is your standards being too high, which, upon facing the reality, leads you to 'give up' and whine about society instead of humbling your ego and looking for someone closer to your level. This is also what most of the hype about robot 'girlfriends' really is: men not wanting to accept they can't have model tier women and looking for artificial substitutes to pretend they can.
>>2967816>it's different because...it just is, okay?!That, combined with your rant about how modern men just need to man up and settle for lower-quality women (despite hoeflation already being a thing), only further shows that you're just a jealous ugly feminist, or at least a completely pussywhipped male feministRemember, no one is forcing anyone to have companion robots, but you're still throwing a fit about men willingly using companion robots
Gonna drop this man made horror here.https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00785
>>2967865Combine dog
>>2967859>Lower quality womenModern men have abandoned their role to provide and protect their women and families - that is why there is such a relationship crisis in the West today, men avoiding responsibility in favour of juvinile, selfish pleasure seeking and women having to respond to that. Until this elephant in the room is confronted nothing will change, but it seems some men would rather abandon reality and admitting fault to live in a delusional, perverted fantasy of walking and talking sexdolls serving their every whim. Peter Pan syndrome for the AI era.
>>2967890Are you saying that it's modern MEN that have left gender roles for hedonistic pleasure? You must be joking. This has to be some sort of Post-irony LARP. No way you actually genuinely believe this, right?
I guess this better than making fuckdolls out of human skeletonshttps://youtu.be/jPiUN8fb3Og?si=zRu8lnJ9ilChijEm
>>2967683nta but you just outed yourself as a desperate loser. I didn't even pay attention to the fact that your robot was "female" until this post of yours. Now it's kind of obvious your project has a sexual undertone and stems from your frustration with women. Women are easier to fuck than robots, considering all the technical issues and hoops you have to go through to get a robot vs scoring on a date. You're actually wired by default to be attracted to women so it makes natural sense that you should learn to play the "game" and get a woman for yourself. Instead you're devoting your life to aquiring an artificial, lifeless copy of a woman. You robot has the feminine features - it's obvious you're attracted to females, but you choose to withdraw yourself and cope with your penis in a recycled plastic bottle because some woman offended you at some point in your life. I think feminism is jewish propaganda but at least women who got hooked on it try to fight back the reality they believe in. You're surrendering.Should robots be banned? Probably not, but people like you serve a good argument that robot companions will have detremental effect on some degenerates out there and it's not healthy. You're a male equivalent of a lonely woman that fucks dogs and as a society we agree fucking dogs is not okay.
Soon...
>>2970129>I didn't even pay attention to the fact that your robot was "female" until this post of yours. Now it's kind of obvious your project has a sexual undertone and stems from your frustration with women.If it wasn't obvious that the MAID robot with a dress, long hair, and an hourglass shape is a woman, then you need to see an optometrist>yap yap yaptradcuck and/or feminist yapping. yawn>You're a male equivalent of a lonely woman that fucks dogs and as a society we agree fucking dogs is not okay."Erm your robot is just like women committing actual bestiality" you are brain damaged and longhoused. All your yapping about how it's "detrimental" has no actual basis since there's no actual negative effects. Why doesn't your busybody-ass go and protest vibrators and Bad Dragon?Depending on if you're a tradcuck or coping woman, I have a message for your wife-master or you, respectivelyYou're not entitled to male attention, it's giving incel vibes. Go to therapy and unpack this.
>>2970138>If it wasn't obvious that the MAID robot with a dress, long hair, and an hourglass shape is a woman, then you need to see an optometristI was giving you benefit of the doubt that you just picked one of two genders for whatever reason, now it's clear it's your coping mechanism>All your yapping about how it's "detrimental" has no actual basis since there's no actual negative effects.Lmao and what's the negative effect of being fucked by a dog? You're in the same category - butthurt over the opposite gender, sexually frustrated, looking for bizarre outlets. How you can pretend you have some kind of authority in this discussion, yelling buzzwords from depths of your gooncave is beyond me>Go to therapy and unpack this.Says dude that mounted phone and a cheap wig on a sewing mannequin and called it his robot wife
>>2967893Why are you arguing with a woman? Didn't you make a robot to not end up in this sort of situation?
>>2970141>Lmao and what's the negative effect of being fucked by a dog?I don't need to say anything, this speaks well enough about how you see the world>Says dude that mounted phone and a cheap wig on a sewing mannequin and called it his robot wife"I described something in reductive terms, that means I win"Devil's advocate; let's say I'm "frustrated" and "coping". Why are you bitching and whining? Do you have a phobia of robots? Do you also pester and moralize to women with vibrators and "romance" novels? If so, you better leave me alone and get to work, there are a lot of them!
>>2970142Unfortunately, they make their way here and start bitching. Anything that makes men happy, they start bitching about.
>>2970143>I don't need to say anything, this speaks well enough about how you see the worldI say both are bad and comparable. You claim they're not comparable but can't explain how>"I described something in reductive terms, that means I win"it's funny how you throw bunch of demeaning and reductive assumptions in order to offend me and then whine that I didn't describe all your sick efforts in detail. I didn't need to, putting a phone on a manequin and calling it a woman is crazy enough.>Why are you bitching and whining?I'm simply partaking in the discussion about morality of utilizing robots as replacement for human interaction. It's entirely possible to be fascinated by robotics and concept of humanoid robot without having sexual frustration and compulsive desire to fuck it - not that you'd know anything about that, apparently.
>>2970145>I say both are bad and comparable. You claim they're not comparable but can't explain howYou genuinely think fucking a dog is the same as an android partner?! Wow, you really are just a coping woman>I'm simply partaking in the discussion about morality of utilizing robots as replacement for human interactionLMAO, "morality". Sureeeee, whatever you say brave crusader. If "morality" is just Karens bitching, then yeah, I'm "immoral". Funny how you never address the hypocrises I bring up. You're not entitled to male attention, incel. Go back to your minotaur booktok novels. You're just a horse, whining about the Model T.
>>2970152>You genuinely think fucking a dog is the same as an android partner?! Wow, you really are just a coping womanYou genuinely think it isn't? Wow, you really are just a spineless canfuckerBtw the only thing 'android' about your 'partner' is the operating system in phone you mounted on a sewing mannequin.>LMAO, "morality". Sureeeeego figure it's an abstract concept to someone that wants to fuck a robot lmao>Funny how you never address the hypocrises I bring upYou're not bringing up any hypocrises, you're just pointing to other groups of people and saying they're also degenerate as if it was supposed to change anything about you, lmao. Like I wouldn't know that when I mentioned that women fuck dogs for the same reasons you want to fuck a toaster. You're trying to divert the discussion towards judging others because subconciously you understand you're doing something wrong. That's precisely the point I'm making and it's worth considering; faces of 'waifu robotics' are lonely degenerates with bad attitude. Perhaps that shouldn't be promoted.
>>2970162More female cope. Lmao at you trying to elevate fucking dogs, truly a woman moment. And the cope paragraph about your hypocrisy is the cherry on top, I guess Karen "morality" has its limits
>>2970171>More female cope.I'm not a female, your assumption that I am is cope.> Lmao at you trying to elevate fucking dogsYou think I'm elevating it because you think you're better than dogfuckers :^)>yadda yaddaIt's funny how you straight up shit on women yet you spend your time trying to build one. There's approx. 4.1 bilion females on this planet. If you think you couldn't live happily with just a single one out of that 4.1 billion pool then it's simply your fault and you're the problem - no companion will make you truly happy, because you're a miserable person with personal issues. You have your disabled cumcan you're proud of, yet you still come here for validation from actual human beings. The actual solution to your problems is to simply get a grip. You'd save time, trouble and mental health if you just learned how to talk to women instead learning all that technical shit. Robotics isn't meant for human therapy. Robots are tools and weapons.
>>2970175>I'm not a female, your assumption that I am is cope.Well you talk like one>you think you're better than dogfuckersUhhh, yeah. I'm very certain I'm better than people that have sex with animals. Female depravity knows no bounds.And more yapping. Did Fido have a headache Miss?
>>2970180>Well you talk like onehow would you know, the closest thing to a female in your life is a roomba>Uhhh, yeah. I'm very certain I'm better than people that have sex with animalsIf you personificate a robot then you make an assumption that it's just another form of intelligence, another spieces, there's no difference between fucking a dog and a robot. Both dog and a robot have economical use, both dog and a robot get adopted, both dog and a robot are used sexually by lonely freaks.>And more yapping. Did Fido have a headache Miss?I simply pointed out that this robot of yours is a vent for your sexual frustration and you end up projecting that I'm a woman who fucks dogs. I rest my case, you're a freak with shitty character and people considering taking the robopill should ask themselves if they want to become someone like you in their pursuit of happiness.
>>2970184>how would you know, the closest thing to a female in your life is a roombaBecause women come and whine about my roomba>If you personificate a robot then you make an assumption that it's just another form of intelligence, another spieces, there's no difference between fucking a dog and a robot. Both dog and a robot have economical use, both dog and a robot get adopted, both dog and a robot are used sexually by lonely freaks.What the fuck?>I rest my case, you're a freak with shitty characterIf a simp/feminist hates my "character", then I consider it a success. Why would I want to be "normal" if you're what normal is>should ask themselves if they want to become someone like you in their pursuit of happiness.As opposed to a supposedly male feminist who is mentally castrated like you?
>>2970190>mentally castratedmy brother in christ youre literally willingly removing yourself from the gene pool
>>2970409most modern women don't want kids and take birth control
>>2970594So you're saying there's bigger chance one can make a baby with a roomba than a woman? I don't think I get your point.
The point is artificial wombs for babies, sex bots for sex and roasties as trophy wives.Pic related is robot tsunade. They dont make many of those theres the whole genetic engineering too i guess but thats outside of the realm of the garage builder unless they want a room full of dead fetuses. Well and yeah artificial wombs too.
>>2967893I remember the survey asking women what hobbies they liked or disliked in men, the worst was "arguing online with strangers" and "playing videogames" was pretty far down as well.The other commenter told you that modern men behaved like spoiled children which is the impression those hobbies would give a woman. Think about your income and ask yourself whether it'd be feasible to pay for a house with kids. No woman out there is looking for a baby.
>>2971117>The point is artificial wombs for babiesThat's not a thing, artificial womb doesn't work the way you think it does. I also dont understand why you'd want to be a single father lol>sex bots for sex and roasties as trophy wives.Somehow I don't think you will be the one that shapes the new world order, you know. Realistically, fucking robots will be just a niche for broken gooners. Robots will become another way for the government to spy on you and you will have to pay monthly subscription to keep chinaman from deactivating your waifu. Also, it will probably damage your anus during the eventually inevitable pegging>Pic related is robot tsunade.Pic related is a 3d render of a 3d model downloaded from a porn website.>They dont make many of thoseThey dont make any of those
>>2971140An inventor always shapes the new world order. Just like the person who invented the steam engine or the wheel and the plow. All robots are a micro revolution.I do intend to make a portion if the fu opensource for that reason except for maybe the lower half(unless i get a patent ir something but its super tedious)I know they plan to make subcription fus which is why also you should buy if i sell things.
>>2971117>>2971140>>2971151Man, I can't even be bothered to use my fleshlight because cleaning it is a chore. How the fuck do you hose out a sex doll without it being a fucking Broadway production?
>>2971291My "pleasure unit" design uses disposable gloves, so cleaning is as easy as throwing away a condom.
>>2971291With teflon tubing and a jar of water and soap maybe but that can wait…
>>2971151>I do intend to make a portion if the fu opensourceWhat usable intellectual property do you actually own
>>2971483The lower half
>>2971117Ok, when exactly will chores hit the roadmap? Put in a maid costume or not, i really couldn't care less.
>>2971538Wheres the comparative advantage in that? The purpose of the bot is sex bot. Not even elon musk can get his tesla bots to do chores but you might as well wait for him.
>>2971484so nothing, okay
Updated to 3.0.8-Upgraded Shoulder Segment-Made new aesthetically-pleasing forearms with upgraded speaker holder-Rotated claw on (her) right arm by 180 degrees for easier adjustment-Upgraded claw by simplifying design with less parts and easier adjustment nut/dial-Added humanoid hand to (her) left arm-Manual is correctedhttps://greertech.neocities.org/Galatea%20v3.0
>>2972493It has to move to be considered an upgrade…
>>2972495It has been able to move for quite some timehttps://youtu.be/tMykj03-rskHer arms and head are also posable
>>2972498*She
>>2972498Its cool that it can move but do the arns snd claw and i mean
>>2972501Oh, sorry, not yet
>>2972503Just give a couple of small gimbals those arms look pretty light
>>2972509Or servos yeah no use servos gimbals might be a paint in the ass.
>>2972493That looks creepy. Lefeless uncanny valley mannequin strafing in random directions without moving a limb. Plus those gorilla length arms. imagine showing that to a child, guaranteed nightmare fuel.
>>2955458>it can scratch your back>>2972503>Oh, sorry, it can't move it's arms
>>2972718You can remove the arms and attach the back scratcher accessory.
>>2972821and then what, rub your back against that wobbly pvc skeleton like bear against a tree?
>>2967816>some plastic sex doll that will never be able to match up to a real woman.bitch i am very successful with the ladies but if there would be a proper sexrobot id take that over a real woman anyday. you bitches are just not worth the trouble. the more of you i lay or get into relationships with the more i hate. i purely hatefuck women nowadays.as for this thread: i am pleasantly surprised this isnt just a bunch of schizo coomers here. i will be lurking more often now.
>>2972851*PLA, and no, you can remove the arm completely and use that as a backscratcher. Her arms are modular and replaceable. There's also a poisonous spider smasher accessory for reaching spiders high up.
>>2972931So it can't scratch your back, it's just a janitor closet on a roomba. Want your robo waifu to scratch your back? Call in your roomba praying it won't trip on its way due to a big plastic mast on top of it which displaces its mass center, then deatach the arm, scratch yourself with it and insert it back into a plastic pipe holder.Why not just go all the way with the bullshit and say your robot can defend the home from intruders because you can attach a knife to it
>>2973217>Call in your roomba praying it won't trip on its way due to a big plastic mast on top of it which displaces its mass centerI made sure to balance out the weight and reduce mass to avoid tipping. It shouldn't tip, especially if you have hard floors.
>>2973294your janitor wife moves slower than your grandma and has worse balance than your grandma. At the same time, your grandma can truly autonomously scratch your back, move and moan in bed and has a pussy. She can probably cook, too. You yap about women, many of which are pure 10/10, but settle on something that's outclassed by your grandma. Weird.
>>2973407Oh you're probably the same troll from earlier
>>2973407Would you fuck your grandma?I don't think so
>>2973415>My robot can XYZ>It can't, it's barely stable>No way man, I balanced it all out!>*roomba dubiously wobbles when stopping at insane speed of 0.002mph*>you're just a troll!kek, we wouldn't have this conversation if you wouldn't keep lying about functionalities and performance of your "robot">>2973524I wouldn't fuck a pvc skeleton either, whats your point
>>2973529>I wouldn't fuck a pvc skeleton either, whats your pointFor someone who wouldn't, you sure do talk about her a lot and try to look at every capability. The anon doth protest too much, methinks
>>2973530I came here for the robotics, instead I got a literal incel who put a plastic pipe on a roomba and claims it can scratch your back lolBut I'm glad you're trying to offend me by implying I'd fuck your robot, because it means deep down inside you know it's demeaning
>>2973537>But I'm glad you're trying to offend me by implying I'd fuck your robot, because it means deep down inside you know it's demeaningNowhere did I say that. I said that you put a lot of focus and attention on a robot you supposedly don't care about>I came here for the roboticsSo where's your robot or robotics discussion? Seems like you dedicate all your time to a robot you totally don't care about.>"insell!!!"Okay roastie
>>2973587>So where's your robotI build CNC machines, I'm 20000 leagues closer to robotics than a guy who mounted coathanger on a store bought roomba, sorry bud>robotics discussion?I tried to discuss functionality of your robot due to your misleading comments, also taking into an account that your robot is supposed to be a replacement for women. You make dumb claims to garner attention and then get pissed at responses lol
>>2973598>I build CNC machinesWell, that's good to hear. Is that for a job or your hobby? If it's your job, do you also work with CNC machines on your own time? See how nice it is when we have positive discussion?>I tried to discuss functionality of your robotIf you call that discussion, then you need to work on your interpersonal skills.>also taking into an account that your robot is supposed to be a replacement for womenWell, considering Galatea isn't having continuous hookups, 10 abortions/year, being generally cruel and misandrist, dressing like a hooker, voting for destructive policies, or advocating for censorship while at the same time reading "booktok" bestiality novels, I'm going to say she's doing a good job
>>2971291Enter: removable shover head.1.unscrew the shovering bit, pay attention to not lose rubber seals2.bring in your fleshlight/sexdoll3.j-j-j-jam the hose in4.flush everything out w warm mid pressure water
>>2973604>See how nice it is when we have positive discussion?Is it? You're forcing a discussion about me all the time, only this time with friendly questions, while I'm obviously not showcasing anything and this isn't my personal blogspace. CNC isn't considered robotics, especially in theme of this thread so why would we talk about me and my work>you need to work on your interpersonal skills.You're a shut in that places his affection in a self propelled vacuum cleaner, get off your high horse. You claim your thing can scratch one's back - that's simply not true, what kind of answer did you expect after making such claim?>Well, considering Galatea isn't having continuous hookups, 10 abortions/year, being generally cruel and misandrist, dressing like a hooker, voting for destructive policies, or advocating for censorship while at the same time reading "booktok" bestiality novels, I'm going to say she's doing a good jobYou can't name a single woman that actually does all of this.
>>2973604its not bestiality if they are half human
>>2973681>Is it? You're forcing a discussion about me all the time, only this time with friendly questions, while I'm obviously not showcasing anything and this isn't my personal blogspace. CNC isn't considered robotics, especially in theme of this thread so why would we talk about me and my workJeez who pissed in your cheerios?
We all can stay in the robot thread after we’re all properly credited in the pic on the op. You can use this pic next time ill be done with the head before march hopefully.
>>2973681Wimmin changed from sjw to nazi on the flip of the switch when trump got elected. Theyll flip back again when trump gets voted out. What s bunch of bootlickers.
>>2973784why does that bother you? Are you looking for a strong female authority figure in your life or something
>>2973787Because the authority is the government instead of a man
I can't wait for someone to zip tie a glock to that thing, so the government go full retard on banning assault waifu.
>>2973825You all assume things without taking account that guns have kicks that can break the robot arms
>>2973827They sure don't care about the reality of the material for the 3d printed gun.They do and say anything to push their retarded law.
