[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/diy/ - Do It Yourself

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: a7PA4bq9_700w_0.jpg (114 KB, 700x700)
114 KB
114 KB JPG
Dear /diy/,

I am not commonly writing here but I know there are many tech-buffs when it comes to handicrafts lurking around.
My question is as follows: I want to learn technical drawing. Are there any good resources on the matter?
>tl;dr: Please give me resources to learn technical drawing from beginner to advanced level on your own.
>>
>>2979178
https://www.wistechopen.org/textbook/blueprint-reading
i googled for you, incredibly difficult to find so I expect some compensation
>>
>>2979179
also, americans are retarded but that's nothing new
>>
>>2979179
well...
i looked at it and i must say:
i like "Technical Drawing by Frederick Giesecke" better. found it on fmhy.net
reddit had this recommendation for look-up.
but thanks. no need to worry about compensation.

>>2979180
mostly agree there, anon.
never been there, though. so can only tell from web experience and few real encounters.
>>
>>2979180
>ISO
>left on right
>top on bottom
A gay orgy.
>>
>>2979268
ISO rotates around a pivot, simple, makes sense from a top-down perspective, you're rolling a cube. With ANSI you roll and slide, very awkward.
>>
>>2979270
>very awkward
Except for the part where you're not actually rolling or sliding.
>>
File: chad_ansi_enjoyer.webm (3.49 MB, 960x540)
3.49 MB
3.49 MB WEBM
>>2979180
>>2979270
iso faggot tongue my anus
>>
>>2979291
3d perspective die in a fire
>>
>>2979291
OP here
thank you for showing me a replica of a still life in technical terms.
something to practise on.
>>
File: images(9).jpg (18 KB, 320x240)
18 KB
18 KB JPG
>>2979283
mario would die if that cube was ANSI compliant, i rest my case
>>
>>2979227
I'm from there. While most of them are retarded, the same holds true for most of the world as well. You'll find tons of jackasses everywhere you go.
>>
>>2979180
I remember being taught that you only need three views in order to make an isometric projection drawing. I live in Mexico, so I got taught that by default the three views in ANSI-style blueprints are front, top, and right. How's it usually done for ISO-style blueprints?
>>
>>2979291
HOLY MEAT GLOVES
>>
>>2979178
YouTube Indians and Pakistanis
Also get a nice angled table with backlight or just use CAD like normal people
>>
>>2979180
>>2979291
I don't get the difference. It's literally the same images in different order.
>>
>>2979695
See >>2979337
>>
>>2979270
>>2979787
I still don't get it. I can imagine both of them rotating around a pivot, except ISO rotates above the page while ANSI rotates below the page. Otherwise it's still the exact same.
>>
>>2979178
>I want to learn technical drawing
I realize that you grew up in a period of time when you weren't allowed to play outside, and roam the streets or nearby wooded areas. You never knew a time when your parents sent you to the corner store (by yourself) to buy milk, eggs, or bread. that you had helicopter parents, and only ever played video games, but today you grow up, today you learn how to do things yourself. be an adult... be a man. figure it out for yourself.
>>
>>2979867
It's just habit. That said, third-angle is objectively superior because it places auxiliary views next to their location on the primary view (imagine something long like a bus) and it still breaks my brain that Americans (and Anglos) got something right for once. It's also hard to see how first-angle came to be preferred anywhere (except as an act of contrarianism somehow) since when manually drafting it requires you draw/track your guidelines all the way through the existing views when creating new ones.
>>
Is it worth it doing technical drawings on paper for complex things properly just to stay away from the sickly computer
>>
>>2979291
You can shove that piece of metal up your ass
>>
>>2979923
thanks.
read it.
well...
i am 31 years old now and just am amazed by the technical drawings in general. they are the most precise, they are super easy to comprehend and i want to learn it.
we are in the age of computer, but the age of free information is kind of closing. there are certain websites. there are certain books. there is still some kind of connectivity by internet. but it turned... shallow.

well... usa did more things good. thanks for your insights on the matter. despite being a bit rough. i am a bit rough myself.
>>
>>2979227
I'll second Giesecke. I have the 4th edition (1958). Used to be a thrift store staple when every engineer took drafting. Maybe it still is. You can probably skip everything after the sketching chapter (chapter 5 in mine) unless you want to be a draftsman or CAD designer.

Then Henning Nelms, Thinking With a Pencil.
>>
File: 11184283_1000px.jpg (735 KB, 1000x1000)
735 KB
735 KB JPG
>>2979652
i wanna learn those sick freehand perspective drawings which are simultaneously 2d and 3d
>>
>>2979178
>>2981196
As in technical drawing by hand? It's not super hard. I learned it in middle school in the late 90s. It's mainly a matter of understanding space and perspective and working cleanly. The latter was the harder part for me.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.