Previous Thread: >>3086085/edg/ is the home of 1girl posting. Here, we share AI-generated pics of sexy anime girls and discuss latest advancements in 1girl-related technology.Remember to keep it /e/, as per board rules. If unsure about what you can or cannot post here, consult the sticky thread.> FAQ (check here first)https://rentry.org/edg_faq> Local UIsForge Classic (easiest and simplest for SDXL): https://github.com/Haoming02/sd-webui-forge-classicForge Neo (supports newer tech like Flux and WAN): https://github.com/Haoming02/sd-webui-forge-classic/tree/neoComfyUI (node based UI, most extensible with custom nodes): https://github.com/comfyanonymous/ComfyUI>Online Image GenFree no account: https://frosting.ai/ | https://perchance.org/Free Account Required: CivitAI, Tensor.art, SeaArt.ai, pixAIPaid Only: NovelAI>Catbox:4chanX Catbox/NAI prompt userscript: https://rentry.org/hdgcb> Resources and guidesUseful links: https://rentry.org/sdg-linkTags: https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_pages/tag_groupsUpscalers: https://openmodeldb.infoWAN Video Gens: https://github.com/Wan-Video/Wan2.2>Useful Extensions/Custom NodesADetailerTag AutocompleteStealth PNG InfoInfinite Image BrowsingLama cleanerRegional PrompterControlNetDynamic Prompts> LoRAsLoRa training: https://rentry.org/59xed3LoRA Collections:https://rentry.org/illustrious_loras_n_stuffhttps://rentry.org/trashcollectshttps://rentry.org/zp7g6https://rentry.org/hdglorarepo> /edg/ logoOP: https://files.catbox.moe/uc2ntj.png (embed) | Anchor: https://files.catbox.moe/bx1lo2.png (embed) (more color schemes in the FAQ Rentry)> Related generals>>>/b/degen>>>/aco/sdg>>>/d/ddg>>>/g/sdg>>>/h/hdg>>>/trash/sdg>>>/u/udg>>>/vt/vtai>>>/wsg/aicg
request anchor
Current Highlights Here:>>3085001>>3085002
brother, 14 concurrent threads...
>>3086661Jannies and mods don't ban the spammers. What are you going to do?
>>3086772Probably make another /edg/ thread then post in it while seething
>>3086772Kinda makes you wonder what is actually happening. Both on their side and on the spammer getting more active.
>>3086798jannies know that generals are retarded
A while ago, I genned some character reference sheets for a bunch of my more mundane OCs. I decided to continue that idea with some of my sci-fi/fantasy OCs.>https://files.catbox.moe/xsvcv6.jpeg>https://files.catbox.moe/ynvjde.jpeg>https://files.catbox.moe/iot0tz.jpeg>https://files.catbox.moe/5a0c1d.jpeg>https://files.catbox.moe/rbthpv.jpeg>https://files.catbox.moe/tx0r4l.jpeg>https://files.catbox.moe/4b8ayd.jpeg
>>3086767>>3086682Can you keep spamming? This whole board needs to be edg. Accelerate.
>>3086812Realized that the last catbox has a backwards foot. Redid it.>https://files.catbox.moe/4noae1.jpeg
>>3086801hello fellow shiwasu no okina enjoyer gibe box / lora pls
>>3086816I used anima preview 3 base with custom lorahttps://files.catbox.moe/0r0rlu.png
>>3086815Is your OC based on a character?
rqwusting nagatoro alwaysand these DOA girls in the azur lane art https://azurlane.koumakan.jp/wiki/Vacation_Lane
she is happy to see you
>>3086820I don't think it would be an OC if it was based on something.
>>3086819Friendly reminder that the devs shat the bed with preview 3 and you should go with preview 2 instead. hopefully they can course correct before the final release. continued training at higher resolution has diluted the vae and 3 ironically has less detail resolution than 2 when genning at ~1MP. you should ideally be using preview 2 with a style lora of your choice (trained on preview 1 or 2). You can use any style lora so long as it's over 2,000 training steps, it just adds more stability to the anima base and at 0.25 weight it doesn't interfere with artist/style tags too much. DO NOT use pony tags because then Anima will revert to its Pony dataset and you'll have to correct white balance and colors in Photoshop. Remember that Adetailer and things like Controlenet do NOT work with Anima (yet) so I recommend inpainting problems areas with wai-shuffle-noob at cfg 1 denoise 0.15
>>3086800Probably just waiting so they have a good reason to ban generals
>>3086838any sources for this sirs?
>>3086838You can do whatever you want; I'll stick to preview 3, and pretty much everyone else will do the same.Whatever criticism you may have may be valid, but that doesn't change that currently Preview 3 is the thing.You can shout and cry all you want about preview 2 being better, and you can even be right about it.All the little resources and LORAs coming out are for preview 3. No one is gonna stick with a model with zero resources.When the preview 4 or final or whatever comes out, I don't know what will happen. I don't have a crystal ball. Maybe people will jump to the final/preview 4; maybe people will stick to 3. Who knows? It depends on a lot of factors.But that chance of people sticking to 2 already passed—that train already left for preview 2. So, if you want to stick with it because you think it is better, feel free to do it, but you should be aware it will be a super niche thing, and you had better be ready to make all the resources you need yourself because no one else is going to do it.
>>3086842none obviouslyfirst time I see this mentioned anywhere across the relevant AI generals
>>3086842Rigorous local experimenting on the three Anima versions released since February this year. Thousands of gens. I take commissions for custom LoRA models so it is in my best interests to know what I'm talking about. I can show you the image grids and spreadsheets if you are genuinely interested but by your impetuous tone I'm guessing you are not.
>>3086845Thousands of gens and you even didn't manage to get Adetailer working?
>>3086843>you had better be ready to make all the resources you need yourself because no one else is going to do it.I train custom LoRA models for a living so that won't be a problem. And I didn't ask for your opinion but yes I will take preview 2 over any other version. I wouldn't trust anybody else's LoRA anyway, there is too much misinformation being spread about training params. I'm also currently working on rigging a Controlenet for preview 2 which will stay on my hard drive. I'll be living in 2036 while you suckers stay in the dark ages clutching your precious preview 4 just because "the latest is the bestest"
>>3086844>I've never seen this info before so it must be wrongWho let the sheep out of the farm?
>>3086845If you do commissions for custom lora you shouldn't be worried for what model is better, only about what model people uses the most.I mean, if people wants to pay you to make preview 3 lora why would you care if its better or worse than 2? You just make the lora they want and get paid for that.
>>3086850Well you gotta try and establish a position of authority when no one believes your bullshit claims. And the initial post certainly didn't help that by showing he can't even inpaint, or by mentioning training steps without any other parameter.
>>3086845>if you are genuinely interested but by your impetuous tone I'm guessing you are not>>3086848>I'll be living in 2036 while you suckers stay in the dark agesyeah right
>>3086848>I'll be living in 2036 while you suckers stay in the dark ages clutching your precious preview 4 just because "the latest is the bestest"You didn't understand anything if you still think is about being "the best". My point is being "the best" or not, is almost irrelevant for success- A model success does not depend on being better or worse but in getting backup from the community or not.
>>3086850I train all my models on preview 2 and I recommend that the client use it with preview 2. they can use it with preview 3 if they wish, that's their provocative and it will still work, however it will be trashier than preview 2
>>3086854Your face is provocative
>>3086855kek
wow the spammer doesn't even need to be here and this place still devolves into this shit lol
>>3086857The spammer is still here and all these are troll posts by him:>>3086854>>3086849>>3086848>>3086845>>3086843Nobody is that retarded to say that stuff for real
>>3086857Eh, give it two-three dozen posts to calm down. At least it's tech discussion, mostly.
>>3086858you know every shitposter isn't the same person right
>>3086854I was believing you when you talked about making money with Lora because, well, lots of people make a living off that; they charge 10-15 bucks for characters' Lora, and they do not seem short of jobs. Is something I can believe.But you claiming you make recommendations to clients and that somehow they accept them and that they can use them on Anima 3 is making me doubt about you making LORA for a living.It is not that I totally don't trust you, but...you are making me doubt. Because clients are like, "I want a pony lora for this character!" and you tell them, "Wouldn't it be more illustrious better?" "NO, I want it for a pony!" And I'm talking about 3 months ago.So you're telling me you are convincing them to get preview 2 LORA instead of preview 3, or convincing them to use preview 2 LORA on 3. Either you are the best con seller ever OR you are lying about making a living from LORA making.
>>3086859tech discussion? it's a retard trolling saying stupid shit about preview 2 and idiots taking the bait
>>3086862Yes, and? Filter textposts if you can't handle it.
>>3086863and my point is you guys might be the easiest people in these ai generals to bait lol. not something to be proud of
>>3086861you're not understanding me. I make a living from LoRA training. I will make a LoRA for any model that they ask for, noob, illustrious, pony whatever. specifically when they ask for an anima LoRA I will always train on preview 2 AND I will give a little note when I deliver the LoRA recommending that they use the LoRA with preview 2 instead of preview 3. the LoRA will still work with preview 3 even if trained with preview 2, anyone here will back me up on that, it just won't have as good details
>>3086864It's /edg/. That goes without saying
>>3086865please say lora more often with exact spelling
>>3086865just so you know i am rooting for you anon. tell these losers what's up
just waiting for PK anon to confirm that the gen is not one of his
>>3086837that's pretty killer, nice job anon.
butt
>>3086875thank
>>3086772>What are you going to do?I'm gonna be patient and trust justice will be served eventually. Meanwhile I will just share lewds like always
Another quick Sailor Senshi (without a LoRA, it really wants to give her a cleavage cutout) before driving to Mother's Day plans.
>>3086447Requesting nude edit.
I'm loving this new model.
>>3086906>>3086908>>3086909>>3086911i see i'm not the only one who still gets fucked hands and toes with it
>>3086927>>3086928>>3086929>>3086929Very cool concept and welcome to the /edg/ community.We tend to post 1-3 images at a time here. 4+ is approaching spam territory. We had a spammer here until recently and people are still traumatised by it.May I suggest that if you're posting a series, you can post one and put the rest in catbox links. It's an image hosting site that we use here.P.S. your images are good enough to be contenders for my next Highlights.
>>3086938it's clearly him
BTW at some point useless nigger mod will ban edg instead of just banning the spammer.
>>3086957good
>>3086957internet ID might be a crock of bullshit on the horizon but I do appreciate the single possible silver lining of it making spamming a little more inconvenient
>>3086881That's really all we can do. It's annoying, to be sure, but I will continue to post, enjoy non-spam posts, and interact with the other people.
>>3086962This.
