Dressing "sharp" like many millenial men still do is on the same path as 1980s pedo stache and serial killer glasses were seen throughout the early 2000s? Today both safe sleazy and dorky dad fashion is seen as hot by many gen z women, but tailored slim-fit pants and skinny shirts are seen as uncool and something middle aged redpillers hitting on teen girls would wear.
Guy in the dress pants looks like a fag, idk why millenials think skinny pants look good on men
Nobody really cares what this generation finds uncool because they look like absolute shit and are aging like shit. Zoomers are probably the worst and ugliest generation ever. I would rather look millennial than anything resembling Zoomer garbage
>>18512191Because millennials ARE fags. When they were teenagers they used to always fantasized about wearing skinny jeans after seeing girls their age look hot in them. So once skinny jeans for men were more widely available in the early 2010s, they got to fulfill their fantasies and never stopped dressing in skinny pants like fags.
>>18512188I do not care what zoomers consider "cringe", there has never been a time when dressing sharp was seen bad. Obviously context matters so it's not fitting for every occasion.
>>18512191You really think this looks good?Based
>>18512213RetardTailored doesn’t mean skinnyTrousers shouldn’t follow the outline of the leg, they should square out at the trouser hem to balance out the proportions of the shoulders
>>18512223What if big leg from gym?
>>18512223What if shoulder width big from gym?
>>18512213How about wearing normal pants? Have you millennials never heard of regular, straight and relaxed fit pants? Didn't you grow up wearing them until your treens? Why can't your brains think of anything beyond faggy skintight pants anymore?
>>18512223>>18512228Yeah, okay but >>18512213 isn't skinny pants
>>18512227Then you need to lose those bitch thighs and go back to something more masculine and human level. If your thighs are too thick to fit in even relaxed fit pants, then you've got bitch thighs.
>>18512234No
>>18512227The tailor would probably taper it a bit more than the drawing but skinny fit on his leg would look ridiculous
>>18512234Big boy can't slim down, boats need carry>>18512229
>>18512188I'm a millennial and have stopped wearing slim fit anything really, I just try to dress like a 90's celebrity at the airport
>>18512243Looking good
>>18512229
>>18512243me too. Its goofy how fast guys get stuck into some fashion that molded their teenage years.
>>18512252There's a reason why you don't see men wearing that when they actually need to move without hindrance
Op image looks like the costume designer was going for two extremes for a comedic effect
>>18512254based
>>18512255Baste
>>18512237Then keep being gay.
>>18512266May Allah forgive you
>>18512266Mogged
>>18512234BTW, this is really all you need. It's the ideal physique and outfit for any guy. You don't need anything more. It used to wet the panties of every woman when this show was airing.
THE RUS PANTS THREAD WILL NEVER DIE
>>18512276That was a good threadhttps://desuarchive.org/fit/thread/73646189
>>18512188Millennials never dressed "sharp". They dressed like sexcore fags. This is dressing sharp. Your shirt shouldn't hug every inch of your troso. That's gay. It should drape elegantly on your body and look ironed.
Imagine wanting to wear the least amount of fabric possible like one of those funny poors
>>18512284Indeed, its not world war 2 anymore
I will never ever wear baggy jeans, that's for sure. Jeans must be slim fit or they look retarded, see:>>18512234I think that wearing baggy clothes as +25 yo gets real cringe. Slim fit it is, maybe even skinny if you go for sports core and are /fit/.
>>18512302Are you saying those are baggy jeans?
>>18512302Good thing I don't own jeans then.
>>18512273I liked X-Files more than Supernatural but the pilot about the hitchhiker ghost was fun
>>18512314Those jeans are made for someone taller and fatter than him.
>>18512314Look at the knee, baggy
>>18512343No they aren't you fag. That's how jeans were always supposed to fit, not like your faggy skinny jeans that were designed for women. Men don't wear skintight pants because it's gay, uncomfortable and hard to move in. Only a ballless tranny with a micropenis would feel comfortable wearing skinny jeans.
>>18512364Based based based
>>18512357Just because they're not skintight like your gay skinny jeans, doesn't make them baggy.
>>18512364No, some jeans are "meant" to fit like that because back in the day having fitting pants were for the rich people and poor people had poorly fitting clothes because they couldn't afford to be picky or go to the tailor. Granted, jeans were working class clothing, so it sort of became trend to have unfitting clothes in some point, but it was never "meant" to fit that way. I have 20 cm weiner and average size (?) balls, slim fit jeans feel amazing around my junk. Idk, bro it tells a lot more about you if associate manly leg shapes through pants to something gay...
>>18512191I will not take this Ryan Gosling slander Bro is /fa/ af
>>18512385Fitted clothes doesn't mean skintight gay clothes. And people back then could afford to go to a tailor much more than today because unlike these days they had tailors on pretty much every street corner. And the clothes they wore were much more expensive (adjusted to inflation) and of higher quality than what you wear today.
>>18512391Slim fit /=/ Skinny fit, like in OP, Ryan Gosling ain't wearing skinny fit aka skintight clothes. Skinny fit requires /fit/ body to pull-off, it may look gay if one is a twink yeah.
>>18512385Bullshite, 6 yards of wool, silk, or linen was expensive
>>18512399Educate yourself, Hoho lover
>>18512400You just proved that the amount of fabric is expensive
>>18512398Skinny fit requires a skinny body to pull off, because they are designed for skinny guys, not fatties with bitch thighs. Skinny guys can pull them off because they look like normal straight or slim fit jeans on them. If regular men or gymcels wore them, they'll look like women. Why do you millennials have everything backwards? Who did this to you? And yes, those in picrel are skinny jeans. That's what real 100% cotton skinny jeans look like. Your spandex filled skintight jeans are women's skinny jeans.
>>18512411You have never lift
>>18512411might sound like DYEL cope, but this is true. The only guys who looked good in slim jeans are guys who are slim and without a muffin top. Basically you need to look like a cock addled rock star to pull it off.
>>18512415he doesn't need to. You bitch thighs however look like packaged prosciutto in those jeans.
>>18512411>>18512421Why don't you take it easy and sit down twig boy
>>18512421What the fuck, they aren't jeans?
Reminder that skinny pants are anti-Semitic
>>18512188Slim fit, skinny jeans etc are for fags, when I see a guy wearing them i automatically think he is gay, and most of the time they are gay lmao Wear relaxed fitting jeans, they look better, go with more styles of shirts and you wont look like a fag trying to attract men
>>18512444You’re limiting yourself fashion wise because of a self perceived imagine.You’ll never be /fa/ Sorry kid
>>18512188Modern times got people thinking the guy on the left is fashion and the guy on the right is cringe fashion peaked 10 years ago and I’m ashamed of my generation
>>18512455I dont remember asking a faggot? Lol lmao even
>>18512461bro probably shops at Gap.Buys the fits set of baggy pants and calls it a day lmfaooooo
Sharp? I guess so. But traditional menswear won’t go out of style. It’s the culmination of centuries of innovating cultural dress and whenever you need to appear before a judge or attend a business meeting that’s what you’ll be wearing. Even if you own all the companies in question you wouldn’t show up in sweats. You’d show up at a minimum in a jacket, dark pants. There’s just a certain dress that’s associated with class and decency and that’s not going to change. You want to dress like a hobo on weekend nights? Nobody is stopping you.
>>18512191Those appear to be standard straight fit trousers. You don’t even know what you’re talking about. Talking to zoomers is like talking to a wild animal. Your brains just don’t even work like other people’s and your language is nonsense.
yes its cringe and tryhardeveryone knows you're trying to dress like GQ or worse you're actually a corporate goy larper
>>18512468What if I just like the clothes?
I've been on this shithole of a website long enough that I still remember people unironically posting this advice on how to dress like a slim fit faggot. I dearly hope most of you have grown out of this by now
>>18512466Too slim fit they look gay and effeminate, should be wider at bottom, tailoring doesnt mean literally following the lines of the body so it looks like a wetsuit etc etc etc....
>>18512465Based anon
“where do I cop bro on the lefts fit! That shit is fire!!!”“bro on the right is cringe”it’s over bros
>>18512465That's not sharp. That's gay sexcore. Traditional men's wear isn't that tight and low rise.
>>18512515bro sees slim fit and things it’s skinny bro gotta be like 17
>>18512188safe sleazy and dorky dad core is out. once you start seeing a style in ads and shit, you know it's done for. nobody thought that looked attractive anyways. it just made you look like an approachable dad, non threatening.
>>18512258bros got that shit on
>>18512281this is business casual at best
>>18512281bros showing us how to dress like a middle aged teacher lmao
>>18512812The point was the fitting of the clothes, especially the pants, not the colors. You can swap the checkered shirt with something plain or pinstriped and the khakis with black, grey or navy pleated slacks.>>18512813As opposed to wearing slim fit low rise fag pants and a tight blouse like a faggot? That pic is what straight, masculine men wear. Slim fit men's wear is for homosexuals.
>>18512281So at what point does the tight shirt compel you to fuck dudes? Is it like a circulation thing? Is it some kind of cursed shirt?
>>18512188>safe sleazy and dorky dad fashion is seen as hotthat went out of style 5 years ago
>>18512823If your shirt is too tight, you'll look like a fag trying to flash his body through his clothes wherever he goes. Men don't do that. That's an effeminate/homosexual trait. Your shirt should fit at a few places like the shoulders, wrist and hem (long enough to be able to tuck it), but be reasonably loose at others, like the chest, waist, back, arms, to allow good airflow and movement.
>>18512830You sound insecure and insufferable.
>>18512834You sound gay and NPC.
>>18512188>cringe now>nowFashion trends are meant for children and women. There's nothing more cringe than being a grown man and worrying about which styles are currently "in".
>>18512521That shit is comical to women in 2025, sorry bro, you gotta RP as something else.>>18512188The only thing that will stand out as bad to women is the shoes on Gosling's outfit. The rest is still peak in terms of attracting positive attention, provided you are of the right age and it fits your lifestyle - ie. you're not 19 wearing that shit, and you have a proper job.>>18512258This is super cool in today's landscape but it's not sharp at all.Sharp isn't about being stylish or modern, sharp is about looking like you care a lot, most of today's online media is about nonchalance and not about looking sharp, but there isn't a 20 year old woman that won't get wet when you talk to her if you're tall, broad, lean and wear a nice shirt and fitting pants like Gosling there and you tell her you're whatever-management-position-in-whatever-firm.
>>18512850I was talking about formal men's wear, not casual wear. Wearing skintight formal men's wear will remind women of cringe millennial fashion, and nobody likes millennials now (or ever did). Young guys and girls are all wearing boomer and GenX era clothes from the 70s to early 2000s.
>>18512901Women don't even care about formal wear, how it fits. They just care that it's as formal as the occasion suggests. There hasn't ever been a woman looking at someone who looks like this pic (body, face and suit) and said mmmmmmmmmm the pants should be looser and higher waisted, something is a bit off.For business casual, or when you take your blazer off, more fitting shirts are obviously more attractive to women if the wearer is attractive already (meaning, fit body).
>>18512904"Fitting" shirts (i.e skintight gay shirts) are millennial cringe. Modern fashion is all about looser fit, similar to 80s and 90s style, or just classic style from the 20th century as a whole when even dress shirts worn with suits weren't all that form fitting.Millennials were the weird ones who strayed away from classic and timeless clothing principles and went full homo by wearing everything skinny fitting.
AS@P Carrell
>>18512850> there isn't a 20 year old woman that won't get wet when you talk to her if you're tall, broad, lean and wear a nice shirt and fitting pants like Gosling thereHahahahahaha omg
>>18512948coping hard huh anon
>>18512970No i just think it is funny reading an incel tell other incel what makes women ‘wet’ hahahaha
>>18512850this whole thing sounds like aging millennial cope that people think your skin tight stretch suiting is passe and dated and the opposite of timeless
>>18512521I don’t think it’s sexcore. Sexcore is really tight. This is just traditional menswear with a bit more flare via the colors and patterns, a more modern cut. I don’t disagree that it’s not traditional but it’s more traditional than many other things and frankly acceptable.
>>18512850> That shit is comical to women in 2025, sorry bro, you gotta RP as something else.It depends on the circles you run in. If you’re a banker, lawyer, professor, any sort of white collar professional more typically associated with being higher brow it is more or less normal to socialize in something like a OCBD with a blazer and trousers or even dress clothes or even a full suit. For women who run in those circles, it’s common so they don’t hate it. If the circles you run in are 20 year old undergraduates or 25 year old barflies with sleeve tattoos that work as cashiers then they might dislike it. Still, there is a middle ground that works for basically everyone. An OCBD can be pulled off by basically any guy in any situation. Loafers are en vogue now even as streetwear. Classic jeans can provide a classic look. So there are traditional pieces you can wear for pretty much any occasion in pretty much any scene. Pic related would look good on a banker at a country club or a sleeve tattooed welder at a dive bar.
>>18512901Wearing any kind of formal outfit will make you look like you're wearing a formal outfit.Most people see a suit, regardless of the cut and color (unless it's a really unusual color) and think "suit", nothing more.>>18512911Form fitting clothes allow people to show their form more, and, perhaps coincidentally, this type of clothing is a core associated with having sex.
>>18513163People used to have sex before sexcore existed. You don't need your clothes to fit like a wetsuit for people to notice that you're fit. This is the problem with modern aesthetic sense. People don't understand subtlety and grace anymore. Everything needs to be loud and in-your-face or else they think nobody will get it.
Mogged
>>18513179People used to survive before vaccines and to travel the world before low cost airlines, now they just do it a lot more conveniently.>you don't need your clothes to be like thatI agree, but there's no reason for me not to want others' clothes to be like that either.>subtlety and graceWhat about wider cut clothes (but just the amount of wide that you personally like, nothing more) is more subtle and gracious than slim cuts?Is this just another case of I was born in the wrong generation, old = good // new = bad, the west has fallen... ?
>>18513220>People used to survive before vaccines and to travel the world before low cost airlines, now they just do it a lot more conveniently.There is no evidence to prove that gay skintight clothes increase a millennial's chances of getting sex. If that were the case, most millennials wouldn't be sexless incels, unlike Gen X and boomer men who used to wear looser clothes and not only had sex very often, but far more of them also got married and started a family than millennials.>What about wider cut clothes is more subtle and gracious than slim cuts?It's not what "I" personally like. As I said, millennials are the weirdos who went full homo with skinny clothes. Until even the late 2000s, people didn't wear skin tight clothes, because it's gay, too attention whorish, they're fucking uncomfortable, and they make you look poor as if you're wearing your younger brother's clothes that are too small for you. Clothes are supposed to fit you at a few places (like the shoulders and sleeves ) and be loose enough at others, to allow good airflow and mobility. The only reason most slim and skinny fit clothes are feasible is because they're filled with spandex, or else they would rip apart. Also, nobody wants to see all the contours of your body. Not only is it disgusting and ugly, since it only looks good if you have a 10/10 body (which 99.9% of people don't), it's also stupid, boring and unimaginative from an aesthetic and fashion point of view. There's nowhere you can go with it beyond that besides complete nudity. That's what makes them look graceless, undignified and unsophisticated.>but there's no reason for me not to want others' clothes to be like that either.You can, but know that you have shit taste.
>>18513230Based, you are invited to my birthday party.
>>18513230>there is no evidence that people who wear sexcore have more sexThis is obviously a difficult subject to investigate, though there's plenty of anecdotal evidence suggesting there is a correlation, not lastly the name sexcore.>most millennials wouldn't be sexless incelsMillennials don't have any less sex than previous generations, seehttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-015-0540-2or just do a quick online search.>more boomers and gen x are married compared to millennialsI won't bother looking that up to confirm it, but even if it was the case it would stand to reason, since boomers and gen x are older than millennials.>millennials are weird homos>until the late 2000s people didn't wear skin tight clothes because [...]The preoccupation with not looking gay is actually quite millennial itself, and previous generations had no problem dressing in slim fit clothing, even though it was flashy.Just skim through an episode of Miami Vice, watch Saturday Night Fever, a music video from the Bee Gees.Even the drape cut suit was a slim cut.>they're fucking uncomfortableEver tried a pair of leggings?The kind people use for running and working out when it's cold outside.They're comfortable.What about a good quality slim fit shirt?I have one from D&G that's pretty comfortable.Are you not confusing slim fit with one or two sizes too small?>clothes are supposed to fit the way I like itThat depends on personal taste, culture and period.>nobody wants to see the shape of your body, it's disgusting and ugly>showing your body is stupid, boring and unimaginativeDo you see how this sounds like you're generalizing the way you think people feel about you?If it's not true, the way to prove it beyond a shadow of doubt is to post a fit pic.>there's nowhere you can go with it beyond that besides complete nudityIs the fact that you can very well dress like a hot air balloon the reason why loose fit is better than anything else?
If it’s literally that exact type of sharp, yes. You’ll look like a gay millennial office worker who carries a laptop in a satchel. Basically, do you look like you work on a Macintosh for work? That’s cringe. Do you look like a corporate executive, an eccentric artist, or a fashion mogul? That’s not cringe.
>>18513266
>>18513312Heart eyes this is a good outfit.
>>18513266That's a lot of gaylennial coping. Sure, go ahead and wear your skinny gaylennial jeans. You go girl! Make them as tight as possible, like a slut in heat. That will get you lots of attention from other zesty men.
this is one of the worst threads I've ever read on /fa/congrats
>>18513499Coping with what?
>>18513266Are you actually comparing fucking leggings with skinny jeans? Leggings have a thin breathable fabric. Jeans on the other hand are thick, rough, stiff workwear. They don't bend with your movement as much as a paper thin fabric of leggings, and constrict your blood vessels and nerves, making them uncomfortable, especially in the groin. Your balls aren't meant to be packed tightly in a thick fabric. This isn't some CBT S&M session. That fucks up your testosterone levels, sperm count and even the balls themselves from too much pressure. No wonder millennials and zoomers are low T, because they've been wearing these CBT jeans for half or most of their lives.
>>18513509There another thread where are some people defending using cargo shorts.
why do gen zoggers seethe so much?
>>18513536>skin tight clothes are disgusting and uncomfortable, clothes aren't supposed to be like that>actually leggings are comfortable and convenient>ACTUALLY SKINNY JEANS ARE BAD FOR YOUR HEALTH ON TOP OF BEING GAY AND LOW TESTHuh.
>>18513542Yeah that is another millenial fashion standard that no other generation seems to find an issue with; everyone else likes cargos
>>18513499This is quite different from the slacks worn in OP
>>18512813>middle aged teacherAt least the teacher can afford to buy a house.... god i hate millenials
>>18513614Did I feckin stutter, wee lad?
>>18512227 Go slightly wider in the trouser with no break. Flat fronts are preferable. My ass + quads blew up from pause reps years ago so I don’t even look at pleats or anything slim. If you still wanna have an option that retains a trim silhouette, look for carrot fit bottoms.
>>18513614Men don't walk around wearing leggings. Maybe faggots like you do, but to the vast majority of men, the skintight pants of choice are jeans and chinos, both of which have a thick and constricting fabric. So not only do you look effeminate and gay, but are also fucking your legs and balls up.
>>18514025That buck looks quite dapper.
>>18512482seethe more, zoomoidme, i'm a zoomer like you, but i have decided to take after the millenials (minus the excessively short jackets because that just doesn't look good)i don't have the irony-poisoned apathy required to think "oversized" suits are somehow stylish
>>18514124this looks really bland and, by extension, gay. youre wearing the second softest colors after black/white in the second safest form after pants/tshirt. the tie doesnt stand out, the belt is not color coordinated and also doesn't stand out, the chain is completely random in there and also doesn't stand outas always, the guy posting his fit on a fashion board can't dress at all. i wonder why its such a frequent occurance
>i don't have the irony-poisoned apathy required to think "oversized" suits are somehow stylishalso this is wrong and gay. oversized suits are cool and the big fashion is bringing them back which is awesome
>>18514155for me its
>>18514157You finna do violence, like those men, Anon?
>>18514149the fact you can't appreciate the finer details of this outfit that make it unique is no fault of minei can do whimsical and contrarian color and garment combos no problem, but I like the understated simplicity of this lookplus, if it helps, i was wearing these jeans with a nice tall cuff and some black chuck taylors, for even more indie rule-flouting swag
>>18514155That's too baggy. They look more like bathrobes than suits. Suits are supposed to be tailored to your proportions. This is as baggy as they should get.
>>18512243>have stopped wearing slim fit anything really>Posts picture of a celebrity wearing slim fit jeans
>>18512281>>18512813Bros got on the Walter White
>>18512901there is one major difference. the real 90s jeans had a lower rise that didn't make you look like a toddler. usually a bigger leg opening too. i'm yet to see jeans for men made past 2015 that resemble exactly the 90s cuts. for some reason even in this "baggy" decade everyone is still stuck on that dumb carrot silhouette with cropped legs that makes you look like a late 80s mom.
>>18513981No, you rather brought up something that had nothing to do with what I wrote as if you were refuting an argument, hence my being puzzled.>>18514040>skin tight clothes are disgusting and uncomfortable, clothes aren't supposed to be like that>actually leggings are comfortable and convenient>ACTUALLY SKINNY JEANS AND CHINOS ARE BAD FOR YOUR HEALTH ON TOP OF BEING GAY AND LOW TEST AND GAYYou keep calling people gay as an insult instead of addressing the argument, but you seem to be the only one who's preoccupied with looking gay.Some might call this reactive formation or compensating.
>>18514149>guy posting fit on effay can't dressnta but are you suggesting those who post pepes instead of fits can dress better?I'd like to see a fit of yours, seeing with how opinionated you are you must have quite the wardrobe
>>18512188>Is dressing "sharp" cringe now?the motto of zoomers and alphas is that trying is cringe because it won't work anyway so trying = cringe, sloppy = based. those generations are a self fulfilling prophecy of failure
Skinny jeans are actually just fine but they're very unforgiving in terms of body shape and fitness level. Most people who wore them past few years had no business wearing them, sexcore started as a joke from posting pictures of influencers that could pull it off, then posting pictures of men who were clearly too big for it.
>>18514328I think slim pants, not legging tier skinnies (albeit zoomers call everything that doesn't look like a tree trunk "skinny") are classic. But we live in a era where people are either fat or into extreme fitness and thick thighs look bad in them.
>>18514334no, what you posted is just the 60s style. look at some spaghetti westerns from the 60s, all guys wear drainpipe trousers like that, then look at some real 19th century wild west photos, they all wear loose trousers.
>>18514322There is no contradiction here. Leggings are women's pants or underwear in the case of men, like long johns. Most men don't go around wearing leggings as regular pants because they know that's fucking gay and looks feminine. Skinny jeans and chinos are not only gay but also bad for your circulatory and nervous system as well as balls because they are made of a thick constricting fabric that overpowers the elasticity of your skin, unlike gay leggings.
>>18514338>skin tight clothes are disgusting and uncomfortable, clothes aren't supposed to be like that>actually leggings are comfortable and convenient>ACTUALLY SKINNY JEANS AND CHINOS ARE BAD FOR YOUR HEALTH ON TOP OF BEING GAY AND LOW TEST AND GAY AND THEY OVERPOWER THE ELASTICITY OF YOUR SKINThe reason there is no contradiction here is I haven't posted anything about skinny jeans, you got mad about them all on your own, though the fact that leggings are comfortable and convenient is proof that skinny clothing can be comfortable, which is the opposite of what you wrote here >>18513230
>>18513981>>18514253come on anon, post a fit, surely you have nothing to be afraid of and will effortlessly dab on everyone posted itt
>>18514326You sir are a retard…. thinking that skin-tight clothing on men looks gay has nothing to do with irony or apathy…. you just look gay….This thread is too autistic because people don’t acknowledge the middle ground between slim fit and oversized
>>18514324I only concern myself with the burden of theoretical research.
>>18514253well yeah those are runway clothes, the ready to wear stuff will be tamer
>>18514276>implying anything that aren't jncos are slim fit>implying they even produced slim fit jeans in the early 90syou're either 16 or from India or both
>>18514484subhuman zoomoids think this is the absolute pinnacle and peak of fashion
>>18514493Looks very nice and normal if the jeans were a bit less baggy.
>>18514493no this looks like a fashionable day to day outfit wdymits cool
>>18514493It's because of his bone structure, Anon, not to mention the photo makes him look tall
>>18512188Millenials women still like that. And zoomers girls who are into millenials also like sharp. They'd cringe seeing a 30 year old dressed like an eboy.Same thing with stubble. 30 year old who have it slay. Those who fall for zoomer trends and shave are incels or get cheated and cucked by tanned, stubbled guys that follow 10s instagram fashion like Bateman and DiVaio
>>18514455
>>18514488>It's literally a picture of slim-fitting jeans in the 90s
>>18514493>>18514498He looks like a faggot. Like he's wearing a women's top. Why are zoomer "men" such massive trannyfaggots? Bitch, if you want that "rule of thirds" look, then just wear a normal shirt and tuck it like a man.
>>18512188dressing sharp only looks good if you're already in decent shape and attractivethat's no excuse for wearing baggy oversized clothes but wearing ultra tailored stuff when you're overweight just looks dumb
>>18514839No it doesn't. Tailored clothes will make you look more dignified, more than what you deserve for being a fatfuck.
>>18512227One of the few times Levi's come in clutch, they make an athletic cut specifically for large quads, I think it's the 541
Wider cut pants can have more stylish designs.
>>18514830>tuck it inAlways looks bad and spergy (unless formal wear)…. but yes the shirt is too short i agree
>>18515047Only because you're used to seeing slobs and other subhumans walking around with their shirts out. Tucking was common until the 2000s.
>>18515052Wearing your shirt untucked became popular in the mid to late 2000s also because people started getting fat and sagging their pants like niggers.
>>18515052>>18515056If you fags want to sag so much, just get drop crotch pants and keep you underwear and buttocks covered
>>18515056I wear an outfit like this and have a similar physique. Just minus greaser hair.
i feel like baggy needs to be worn with attitude, like a skater or a thug. real baggy in the 90s was wearing a size 42 when you were a size 32. today's baggy is fitted in the waist and then you have parachute legs, which creates a very feminine look. who looks for example at this and goes "yup, that's cool, i sure want me some dad wash high water pants".
>>18512243i cannot believe i wore skinny anything. i look back and cringe. not that i'm chasing trends or anything since baggier is in fashion, but it just looks terrible, it's uncomfortable, it's just shit
What I've noticed is people will dress a certain way as teenagers, usually to look trendy according to the times, and then they just keep wearing it and it becomes their default style into their adult lives. It's the reason you still see millennials wearing skinny jeans even though everything about them is objectively shit. It's what they wore in high school, maybe in college, and then they just kept wearing them
>Millennial techies with beards>Skinny fit! Dress classy but with jeans and iron rangers!>Zoomers with wolf cuts>Wear baggy to get Y2K girls! Stop looking at our women, unc!>Me at 36Flared stacked master race. Not boot cut. Not bell bottoms. Actual proper flared.
>>18512482i wish the old sticky and links still worked because it's a hilarious time capsule into a very grim period in fashionalthough the advice in those old links was actually the beginning of me changing my dress for the better
>>18512188Ryan Gosling will always be effay
>>18515177He looks like a generic customer at Zara, H&M, or Banana Republic. My mother wants me to dress more like him in that image and she says “What’s wrong with that!?” I don’t want to look like Scott Weiner.
>>18515178Ryans fashion looked cool in 2012 but now its boring hm millennial core in 2025
>>18515180I still don’t understand how everyone was scene and then was like “Yo, party is over. Pack it up. We’re going vintage and mature now.” That was hardly a seamless transition like how emo became scene, or like how pastel goth turned into e-girl.
>>18515172Y2K girls are in their 40s now. zoomers are retarded porn addicts who think a 40yo woman would be interested in some two pump chump fresh out of school.
>>18515178It's not about the style, it's his charismatic essence. I for one love that shiet. But yeah, the style is very generic and kinda boring, but he makes it work
>>18515168Any extreme looks artificial and tryhard. You look /fa/ when your style looks effortless and you appear comfortable (physically and mentally) wearing your clothes. Neither skinny nor baggy look normal. When it comes to clothes, form doesn't follow function. Your clothes should match your environment, lifestyle, job, and physique/anatomy, or else it just looks like a costume. Even a suit can be worn as a daily wear and you can pull it off if it fits you properly (not too tight or overly loose) and you're actually putting it to good use, and it looks "lived in".
>>18515184Y2K is a style…
>>18515187is it though? it's like the Y2K era without the edge (obviously, since zoomers are faggots).
actual Y2K fashion vs a zoomer wearing slightly wide dad jeans
>>18515190Y2k girls mean girls in y2k style
>>18515193This is what actual Y2K fashion from the early 2000s looked like, with none of the cropped tops and sagging high rise baggy pants.. These brats are better dressed than any faggot zoomer you can find today trying to larp as "Y2K".
>>18515196well yeah but that is the safe pg-13 version of y2k. just look at some fruits magazine photos from the late 90s/early 2000s to get a feel for real y2k.
>>18515200Japanese fashion was always weird. Nobody dressed like that in the rest of the world, or even in Japan besides a few fruity headcases.
>>18515196>Red cuffs Where to cop pants?
>>18515203In 2000 AD.
>>18514815>thinks anything but picrel is slim
>>18515046if you think those faggot clown pants are stylish you have severe autism and need to kill yourself immediately
>>18515168sounds like you're chasing trends and influenced by the Jewish fast fashion machine telling you I KNOW WE SAID SKINNY IS BETTER BUT BAGGY IS ACTUALLY BETTER NOW GOYIM and you just letting it influence your tastes
>>18515170yes which means the zoomer look now, which is objectively shit and irrefutably objectively the ugliest least effay cuts/fits ever, is what zoomers will still wear when gen alpha is calling it cringe and dated and gay in 3-5 years
>>18515194y2k style is literally millennial style
>>18514149post fit
>>18515200no those are Japanese insects and objectively do not represent the 2000s in any way
>>18515052Idk i always see autistic guys doing it like my boyfriend…. i hate it because it is uncomfortable and looks derpy
>>18515200Fruits magazine photographer captured young people in harajuku district tokyo… has nothing to do with y2k fashion trends in america in fact its the opposite….
>>18512188steve carrell is unironically dressed like shit here. at the time this was taken, his attire was associated with being style blind and unaware in constrast with gosling keeping in touch with trends or at least trying. zoomgroids will never understand how derivative and counterculture it was to be a man that looks well groomed in tailored slimfit clothes. dressing like this in a time where calling people gay and faggots was more accepted for wearing anything tighter than bootcut pants will always be more brave than wearing crop tees and totes.
>>18515407>Dressing identically to gay men was punkThe counter culture you are referring to is homosexuality bud.
>>18515352There's nothing uncomfortable about a tucked shirt. It's only uncomfortable if you're fat and wear slim fit low rise pants and slim fit shirts. A tucked shirt makes you look proportionate and sharp, if you don't sag your pants like a fag and are fit/thin with a flat belly. Most people are fatfuck ogres these days who wear low rise pants and/or sag. Which is why they look retarded when they try to tuck their shirt.
>>18515407Keeping up with fashion trends is for women and homosexual men. Straight men don't follow fashion trends. They wear comfortable clothes (that allow good mobility) in tried and tested styles, and have their own personal style that reflects their work, lifestyle and personality.
>>18512266>
All the gay faggots and women nowadays wear baggy y2k stuff. I'm confused what this anon is on about. Is he a schizo?
>>18516853>Is he a schizo?He probably doesn't go out. And that outfit Ryan Gosling is wearing was never considered to be sharp. It was more of a business casual and sexcore outfit that probably evolved from hipster styles of early 2010s.
>>18512188>no one talking about how skinny jeans are inDo you people actually exist? So many underground communities are filled with skinny fits right now. Its trendy again to wear skinny. zoomers are pioneering it. this thread sounds like it was written 2 years ago, not in the middle of 2025
>>18516844>straight men don't do x, only gays do x, im a straight man and i don't do x! sounds like you have some complexes you need to work on. being straight is only characterized by who you're attracted to
>>18516901>dress like a fag>like pussyFag
>>18516895Skinny is in trend right now in reaction to demna balenciagaTrying to look like nicholas ghesquire balenciaga, tom ford gucci and hedi slimane dior hommeHowever…. it is just a trend, doesnt mean it is fashionable or looks good.
>>18516901No straight man would dress like a faggot in the name of "muh counter culture" and as an act of rebellion just to "stick it to the man". That's a woman brained behavior only faggots would do.
Young people have no hope/aspiration of being white collar anymore, so they don't dress like this.
>>18516969Why would anyone aspire to be an officecuck
>>18516907>homosexual is when people dress the way i dislike and straight is when people dress the way i like>>18516915>no true scotsman
>>18512188I wanna drain the balls out of his cum
>>18512188Dressing smart anno domini is definitely not lameSkinny cut trousers and coats have got to go though
