[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/fa/ - Fashion


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Burberry jackets - based or cringe?
>>
Poorberry lmfao
>>
>>18528715
Cringey, too tryhard. Performative consumption.
>>
File: burberry.jpg (443 KB, 1600x1600)
443 KB
443 KB JPG
>>18528720
This is £200 on eBay, do you think I should? I need to save money.
>>
>>18528723
Isn't that the same for all labels though? Or do you think Burberry is particularly bad?
>>
>>18528724
If it's cheaper than new, yes you should. Fuck retail prices.
>>
>>18528730
It's just gay because it tries to label itself as high-end, but the fabric looks like mid and I don't like the color. It's also what every middle class redditor recommends because that's what they know most.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.