If I wear an OCDB (maybe a looser fit than this) and jeans or dickies work pants, what would be a lightweight layer on top of this? Something in some dark blue?I got a couple denim jackets and a couple of workwear jackets, but I feel there's a bit of clash, but I don't know what's a better option. I'm not going a blazer.I could do something like this but I can't find an alternative for cheaper and I'm not paying this much + tax + shipping to EU. https://www.buckmason.com/products/dress-navy-japanese-jungle-cloth-n-1-deck-jacket
>>18536555I think it depends on if you are going for really casual or not and weather. You already have the staples for light jackets to fit that look. I have worn a similar outfit with a linen chore coat and it works alright.
>>18536555Cardigan
>>18536582For colder weather I have a (half) wool long coat. So I'm looking for something that's equivalent to a Harrington in weight. A Harrington isn't a bad idea either, just haven't found the one I would go for. >>18536591 Not into cuckwear.
>>18536616Yeah I came to say harrington. Could do a standard polo jacket as well. Or even a velvet track jacket
>>18536555total dogshit btw
>>18536555Something too rugged might look a bit odd, but most coats and jackets would be alright I think.
>>18536618
Fucking 100% polyester
>>18536632Who does an m65 in navy or grey for a reasonable price?
>>18536555Harrington jacket, chore coat is an excellent option. Leather jacket depending on the style, a nice brown one would go well
Chore coat in the traditional French blue
>>18536638It's a windbreaker not a sweater. You shouldn't be wearing it shirtless anyway.
>>18536638Why would you want a windbreaker style jacket to be 100% cotton? You realize synthetic fabrics have their uses, right?
>>18536666The jacket being plastic isn't the issue. The issue is the jacket is plastic and they want 250 for it
>>18536666You would have to treat a cotton windbreaker with silicon to make it water and windproof anyway. Or at least oilcloth or wax it. Silicon would be the best option to retain color though.
>>18536671Was $100 last time I checked.
>>18536677Recently Ralph Lauren company decided too many outlet malls and constant sales were watering down the "luxury" aspect of the brand and making them too accessible and did a price increase across the board to make their clothes seem more luxury I haven't shopped at Polo since since nothing changed, not the quality or materials, they're simply more expensive now for the same thing
>>18536691I just go to dillards and buy stuff on clearance. Mostly ll bean and pendleton. I don't really like polo and that jacket fit me poorly. Dillards still has that jacket though it's listed at $185 on their website now. It's kind of a year rounder so I don't know that you could snag it from their clearance like the pendleton and ll bean stuff. I got the pendleton Dude sweater for $130 and a pendleton work jacket for $130 marked 50% off there.
>>18536555this whole style is so ugly. not that a shirt and jeans is bad, but this oxford that's way too slim with pants up to your belly button just looks so costumey
With jeans or dickies, something like an unlined Carharrt Detroit.
>>18536741The shirt isn't too slim. It's just tucked.
>>18536762you can very clearly tell it's slim
>>18536555The true answer is simple my friend
>>18536769>https://angloitalian.com/products/ocbd-shirt-blue-oxford-1>Equidistant is the workshop that produces our OCBD shirts, with their deep ‘S’ roll collar, classic fit and iconic details. It's really funny that people here have opinions on clothes and still can't understand what a basic garment would fit like on a stocky body type.Dunning-kruger - the board, basically.
>>18537008Nta, but Anglo-Italian are infamously known for having relatively slim cuts as far as classic clothing goes.
>>18537044
>>18537056Drakes have a slim fit too you retard, just search Anglo Italian tight or look in the thread on SF
