Why do foreigners in Japan dress like utter shit?
>>18537028Because they have to walk around everywhere, retard.
>>18537028Because most people in the world dress like Americans these days, because we live in the end times.
>>18537055do cuckservative suitfags really think a suit will stop someone from chimping out on a plane?
>>18537060It's a start, you nigger. Your clothes affect your behavior and people's perception of you. Dress like a nigger and you will behave like a nigger and people will see you as a nigger.
>>18537068>Your clothes affect your behavioris this why you wrote a racial slur four times in your post? aren't you supposed to be the civilized one, advocating for suits and all?
>>18537071A nigger is a state of mind and culture. He can be of any race.
>>18537075please use actual respectable language in your posts. you contradict your own points
>>18537076I'm pointing out and talking about what constitutes nigger behavior and culture. They will gain my respect when they stop behaving like uncivilized degenerates. Being civilized doesn't mean you respect everyone and everything. You only respect the respectable, or else there is no point.
>>18537028Japan invites the worst kind of whites, that's why they look like shit.You won't see white foreigners in other countries with that nerdy appearance.
>>18537077oh no not the 4chan crybaby not respecting me because i don't wear a suit! oh no
>>18537081Japanese fashion itself isn't all that great to begin with. It's weird, ultra casual and sloppy. So these slobs don't look out of place among them at all.
>>18537084those are great fits though
>>18537086>great fitsLooks like uniqlo (chink version of h&m) to me
>>18537086Great fits to make you look like a sloppy toddler. And the only men who would need to keep their lower buttons open are fatfucks, because their potbelly is bursting through their shirt. That's not a good look. It's not the same as keeping the upper buttons open. It gives the impression that these guys have a pear shaped body type, when a man's ideal body type is V-tapered, with broad shoulders and chest, a narrow waist and long legs. Asian fashion is usually really cucked and emasculating.
>>18537096>muh wrong brandi think watch threads are more up youre alley
>>18537099>a man's ideal body type is V-tapered, with broad shoulders and chest, a narrow waist and long legshere we go with the gay fantasies again. do you at least fit into your own standards?
>>18537055>Want PROOF that Americans weren't "slobs" back in 1968?>Watch this Hollywood production media entertainment with extremely high-paid actors and actresses, marketed to millions-wide audiences!!Look, I agree that Americans are obese slobs, but fuck off with comparing it to Hollywoose.Seriously, fuck off with that comparison.
>>18537068>>18537075>>18537077>Doesn't practice what he preachesYou are not the civilized white man you think you are btw
>>18537060>do cuckservative suitfags really think a suit will stop someone from chimping out on a plane?I can guarantee, if someone has paid $400 on formal attire, takes 5 minutes to dress themselves, and keeps clean... their willingness to "chimp out" and potentially harm their investments or social impression DROPS.
>>18537140It sounds like he can recognize what's called a "nigger." I bet he can also recognize what is called a "tree" or a "lake" or a "blanket" or a "Pharaoh" or a "construction worker" or an "infant" or a "puffin."
>>18537028Wear khakis instead of jeans
>>18537137Sir, you do realize they're playing characters in Hollywood movies, right? They aren't being millionaire actors in those movies. They're playing the role of whatever the story demands. This guy here in the pic is dressed as an actual taxi driver from the 70s, not millionaire Hollywood actor Robert De Niro. He used the example of a movie because movies, books, TV shows are like time capsules of their time, capturing the culture and mindset of the people during their era.
>>18537156
>>18537167>Sir, you do realize they're playing characters in Hollywood movies, right?Yes.>They aren't being millionaire actors in those movies.Correct!And yet... they ARE millionaire actors. Weird, huh?>They're playing the role of whatever the story demands.Just like a successful Hollywood actor is paid huge amounts of money to do. And do well! And attract audiences.>This guy here in the pic is dressed as an actual taxi driver from the 70s,You say "this guy" like I don't recognize that's 33-year-old millionaire Robert de Niro. Did you think if 33-year-old Clint Eastwood was cast as "Travis" as the cab driver in "Taxi" that I wouldn't recognize Clint Eastwood? Or if Pamela Anderson was cast as "Travis" as the cab driver in "Taxi" I wouldn't recognize there's a time leap and Pamela Anderson shouldn't be playing a male role?Or are you implying that the millionaire successful Hollywood actor Robert de Niro is an ugly man?>not millionaire Hollywood actor Robert De Niro.I'm going to give you a hint; that man is, inherently, Robert de Niro. He's playing a Hollywood film character "Travis.">He used the example of a movie because movies, books, TV shows are like time capsules of their time, capturing the culture and mindset of the people during their era.The mindset, yet. The human average representation of that mindset for that era was "your next door neighbor," not "paid Hollywood actor I want to watch on my television with my family" from that era. Tell me, would you claim casting Timothee Chalamet to play the part of "You, Anonymous posting on 4chan" would be realistic to this era's perception of a "4channer?"Or would you simply defend such Hollywood casting as "I don't want to look at someone ugly?"Another more tangetially related example, just to talk about; do you think criminal homeless slobs in 1912 look like Leonardo diCaprio?
>>18537060>It's Sunday morning.>You, your wife, and 3 children need to attend congregation at church for the next 3 hours.>40 other families will be present.What clothing apparel choice do you think will do a better job at helping to keep everyone awake while you listen to the pastor:Your suitYour pajamas?
>>18537195damn imagine wasting your sunday morning on this congregation shit lol. 3 hours of listening to some dude yapping holy shit
>>18537086It's 2000s cholo cosplay
>>18537084Are they muslim?
>>18537084Where do you buy khakis like on the left?
>>18537180Are you trying to imply only Hollywood actors are good looking? I see a lot of regular men and women on the streets and random McDonald's cashiers that are better looking than a lot of these Hollywood actors/actresses. It was even more common back in the 50s and 60s when people weren't fatfucks and dysgenic.https://youtu.be/1u5Gkh2t1ZIhttps://youtu.be/ePH--widhXk?t=16>Tell me, would you claim casting Timothee Chalamet to play the part of "You, Anonymous posting on 4chan" would be realistic to this era's perception of a "4channer?" Or would you simply defend such Hollywood casting as "I don't want to look at someone ugly?"I don't consider him to be attractive to begin with. Not even Hollywood and most normies do. So he would be a good choice fo represent modern zoomers and their weird dysgenic sickly appearance.
>>18537204You sound like you wouldn't attend church.You also sound like you're wearing pajamas.Am I wrong?
>>18537212>Are you trying to imply only Hollywood actors are good looking?I'm trying to imply that if you compare me to "a specific Hollywood star," the chances are higher that it's positive than if you compare me to "a specific degenerate slob in Wetumpka, AL."wisdom in all fields
>>18537204As opposed to what? Spending 10 hours everyday scrolling through tiktok or 4chan? Do you understand the meaning of congregation? Church is a place for people of the community to gather together, socialize, network, help each other out, and find dates and marriage partners. That's a much more important, fruitful and productive activity than staring at your smartphone everyday.
>>18537212>I don't consider him to be attractive to begin with. Not even Hollywood and most normies do.You seem to mean well, but your assertions are out of step with reality. I was on a train a few months back where these two girls talked about Chalamet for over 40 minutes without ever changing the topic.
>>18537229I take it this is Europe? In the states, girls don’t talk about actors. They talk about TikTok influencers or music artists. Hollywood is a 20th century thing for boomers who still watch daytime TV.
>>18537241California. Again, your assertions are out of step with reality.
>>18537210beams has stuff like that
>>18537242>on a train>californiawat
>>18537028Because everyone dresses like shit these days. Once upon a time you could easily play spot the tourist because they'd be so hilariously out of place contrasted with the native population.
