Say goodbye to actresses wearing dresses showing off their nipples at Cannes's red carpet:https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20250513-the-meaning-behind-cannes-naked-dress-red-carpet-ban
not going to read the exact rule but can't wait for the dress that covers only what the rules say they have to
cool, still not going to watch it
All these celebrity worship events feel so dated and cringe
Nobody cares, Moishe
Free speech really is dead
>>18538506>>18538537>>18538544>>18538553>>18538555To be honest, I support Cannes's decision. Lots of these dresses look utterly tacky, garish and exhibitionist. Would you want someone prancing around like this?
>>18538558No one cares about celebrities but the most absolute zog pilled retards
>>18538558>Lots of these dresses look utterly tacky, garish and exhibitionistjust like the people who wear them
>>18538561I "care" less about celebrities for the people themselves and am far more curious as to how they function as a barometer for elite set values. These people function as puppets for the elites.
Another thing: this is /fa/, so if there's any place to discuss this topic, this board would be it. I know dick about fashion, but others here would certainly have something to say.
>>18538566Most celebrities aren't smart or educated enough to have too fine a degree of personal autonomy, so it works out. I don't find celebrities or their puppet status interesting.
>>18538570All these dresses are designed by carefully selected teams and arranged with fashion houses and designers. While these women do have a final decision in what they wear, they all make calculated moves motivated by pageantry and networking. Getting your feet in the room and being in the orbit of powerbrokers and industry leaders who could expand your influence or opportunities are far more important than dressing for popular approval.
>>18538505Whores. All of them
>>18538505Good riddance
>>18538505>>18539077Some looked particularly whorish. Google Leila Delpina Cannes 2023.
>>18538505based
>>18538558>>18538574Take, for instance, Maggie Rogers's appearances at 2022 Meta Gala and 2023 Glamour Women of the Year:https://www.teenvogue.com/story/maggie-rogers-met-gala-2022https://www.glamour.com/story/maggie-rogers-was-glowing-in-a-sheer-mesh-dressHer dress at the Glamour gala was particular egregious yet here she is praising it to the heavens and openly wishing she could go out to the supermarket dressed in it:https://www.tiktok.com/@glamourmag/video/7299148179528830251Catering to popular will did not influence her decision to wear that dress. In fact, the howling majority of the responses received on Glamour's FB post featuring Maggie in this dress were negative, with one calling it "whorendous":https://www.tracebook.com/glamour/posts/pfbid02jtzww8g71X1Haq2E1Yo75PcJsXBLHMhLQ5MwNWcRd4Sy8YjVXvcVYQJ1L9h1VSnglThis is particularly rich because she made headlines in 2019 for telling off a heckler who commanded her to take her top off:https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-50123733She was more than right to shut down the heckler as he overstepped his bounds and was disruptive. On the other hand, openly appearing in these dresses with her areolae visible undercuts her shutting down the hecklers and cheapens her entire image from the girl-next-door aching for permanence into a gross libertine hedonist.
