File: 1758082494251619.png (135 KB, 600x600)

135 KB PNG

>>18539882
I prefer this

File: 637978d11a67f29af0b2057a7(...).jpg (15 KB, 308x325)

15 KB JPG

>>18539882
it carries a bit more dignity and is certainly more timeless, but it's not doing you any favors either

File: 2776bf3d4989cf08501f558d5(...).jpg (200 KB, 839x417)

200 KB JPG

>>18539882
modern zoomer cuts are just this without the mushroom sides they like always prefer shorter sides. the mushroom shape sucks and always will. the image is best compromise betwenn long & short imo

File: 0f19a87d263dd4f4acaec9d9e(...).jpg (10 KB, 234x262)

10 KB JPG

>>18539882
>>18540328
Jut get a side part or a mid part, you fags. What the fuck even are those hairstyle? If you have straight hair, this is what you should be doing. Not that downy retard cut, or try to ape negro nappy hair with a zoomer broccoli cut.

>>18540353
the average white guy has a cooked hair line at age 20 and up. you don't get it.

>>18540355
Wouldn’t having a shit hairline make bangs even harder to pull off from being too thin?

>>18540364
most people have the density it's the framing that people don't have until they lose the density as well.