Have you ever seen a man irl aged 20-40 with a moustache that looks good?
Which style are YOU repping?
Mustache only no. I do mustache plus some stubble and it looks good, so do a lot of other people. That said, it's often despite the mustache, not because of the mustache.
>>18545612Based
>>18545612Yes, I see one every time I look in the mirror>>18545615The chevron
>>18545612Westoid "men" nowadays are too low T, dysgenic and effeminate to pull off a mustache. You need to be high-T and have a masculine aura to you for a mustache to look good. Most men these days can barely grow patchy face pubes. Even when they are high-T and can grow thick, dense facial hair, they still look like complete fags in a mustache because they have big girly googly eyes and effeminate speech, expressions and body language, because they were raised by single mothers, or had a pussy whipped father, and grew up in a society that actively tries to feminize men.
>>18545612Yea, he looked good
>>18545656the guy you posted has big googly girly eyes tho
>>18545612why grow a mustache when you could grow a luscious long beard. women love long beards
>>18545688That's why I posted him. He is the quintessential example of the modern mustached man. He looks like a complete fag even if he has good facial hair coverage, because he is an effeminate bitch.
this Turkish barber https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWburL01bcs
>>18545656>Westoid Hello saar, you look very dandy in your moustache!
>>18545656I'm low T and look feminine without beard, but once I grow it for more than a month I look like a fucking neanderthal and friends say I look like a criminal. It's about genetics and type of beard you are able to grow
>>18545612Yes, myself.If you have a square jaw, pair it with stubble - it can look good. It's just one of those things that only sometimes looks good. >>18545656Kinda get your point but Albert looks fine although he is a faggot
>>18545656holy based and stachedpilled
>>18545612Yes, myself
>>18545615
>>18545838>Yes, myself.Prove it
>>18545985Here you go, stupid nigger.
>>18545990Oh, I enjoy your Youtube channel Man Carrying Thing. Cute shorts.
>>18545612Yeah, very few can make it look good thoughSome guys use it in like a post ironic way, like it looks good and bad but it works? I have a musician friend he''s also a druggie and looks ok with the moustache, like a videogame character
>>18545990You look like a nonce
>>18546082No, sir. I reject the advances of wanton Jezebels.
>>18545990This is a Canadian phenotype I’ve ever seen one.
>>18545612no. it's always performative, insincerely aping an older style.
>>18546220What was he aping?
>>18546220Correct and if you don't tuck in your shirt, your aping a medieval peasant who can't even afford a piece of rope for a wiast belt
Mulldog
>>18546230The belts outside of tunics were meant for holding things such as a wallet or a tool, not to hold up the pants. It was just a primitive utility belt.
>>18546227japanese people can grow cool beards
>>18546265It was to keep the tunic from flying around in the wind and exposing the genitals or undergarments since the pants they wore didn't join in the middle.
>>18546227he looks like a cholo lol or the other way around
>>18546282Lads enjoyin' the jig-jig don't be needin' their breeches, lad.
>>18546282Sorta. The hosen you’re showing were a protective layering for working around in the tall grass and weeds. Pants with crotches did exist, Celtic pants for example.
>>18546293Those types of trousers were not in use in most of western Europe during the split hose period. Really, only in Ireland were whole trousers used during this period. Giraldus Cambrensis mentions it at the turn of the 13th century:"... with breeches and hose of one piece, or hose and breeches joined together, which are usually dyed of some colour."
>>18546227The difference is, everything zoomers and millennials do is an ironic performance to mock and ridicule things that came before them. Nothing they do is sincere. That guy in your pic didn't grow that mustache to be ironic. He did it because he genuinely thinks it makes him look cool and masculine. The same reason why men have grown a mustache for thousands of years. It's a symbol of masculinity. Until faggot millennials and zoomers started doing it as a performance in irony.
I don't know what the exact terms are, but if the area above your upper lip is wide enough, a moustache will look good.>>18545990 is an example of that area being narrow, and the moustache looks like shit.
>>18545615Astérix
>>18545612fuck no,Shit like that was best left in the 80s.
>>18545612
>>18545612No. They all look like pedos or about to rant about their indie soundcloud project
>>18545615Van DykeBad pic from a month ago because I fucked up the goatee part when trimming it so I'm growing it from scratch
