The cuckold who made pic related account, post and substack is 40 years old and his "creative" hobby is just buying and wearing the same played out brand he put his entire identity into without even styling it uniquely, just wearing it how's it shown in a lookbook. Taking fit pics in a small discord of other millennial losers obsessed with this or that boring brand.Can you imagine how sad that is? Spending tens of thousands of dollars on clothing, burn more than a decade of time on a hobby, and still is no better than some kid who walks into Nike and just buys what is on the mannequin. The people sitting on discords and forums like this are worthless consumer bugmen. their legacy is a closet full of clothing funkopops their wife will dump at good will and a bunch of passive aggressive, insecure snarky messages on a handful of shitty online hangouts.Even the worst retard on /fa/ who posts something unique in the WAYWT is more creative. Feel good about that at least guys. I haven't had such a good laugh as I've had at this Lemaire loser in quite some time.
>>18563274https://lemairearchive.substack.com/>Favourite things is going to be a series on something from my closet that I truly love. A deep dive into the feelings, the desire, the hunt. How I came to own it and then how I came to love it. Sometimes this all happens at once and the piece I coveted on the runway arrives in the mail and instantly becomes one of those pieces. But sometimes, and perhaps more commonly, these items are things that I have fallen in love with after living with them and wearing them in and learning their intricacies and pairings and developing an attachment to.2 posts. Then stopped because no one liked or read his 1000 word essays on his old shitty Uniqlo factory made shoes. Poor Josh.
It took you three and a half hours to write a second post?
>>18564016I actually went back and checked the substack. It was even more sad than I thought from the lame IG posts.
>>18564035So just to be clear:You went to a sub stack from a man with two posts, and those posts were from last year. You then posted about it, kept thinking about it for nearly four hours, and then posted again?You put more effort into whining about a dude no one gives a shit about than he did on his own actual page. And then you bumped a thread that no one was responding to.Are you Josh?
>>18564039No, no. He had an IG account that got rec'd. It looked like fit pics for a while then he tried to take ownership of his content with a blog. I didn't actually look at it, just the really cringe slides on his IG. I mused over how sad it was because I know some other elder millennials like him probably lurk here and pinned it.Hours later, IG pinged me with account recommendation again so I actually clicked the substack link this time. It was worse than I imagined. /fa/ is a very slow board so this was still on page 2 or so.Anyway, what do you think about people in his situation that over invested in a brand and then try to get some kind of ownership over their consumption?
>>18564055lol
Reminds me of this guy who's currently only making outfits from Lemaire for the next 365 days.
