>puts an ugly red bumper on your neutral black and white canvas sneakerheh
>>18578030Vans are garbage anyway. Truly garbage
Vans or Converse?
>>18578078For a 7yo? Vans plims because they're earier for them to put on and take off
>>18578078converse because it doesn't say OFF DUH WALL in a giant red brick on every shoe.
>>18578139just shave it off
>>18578030a small price for fashionable and cheap shoes vans are GOATED
>>18578374The name brand is called keds
>>18578078Imo converse but vans have more toe room so its more comfy
>>18578078converse with cholo outfit, vans with skater outfit
>>18578030You can choose from a few colours if you do a custom design.
>>18578078lugz because they're converse without the branding on the side. same exact shoe, but for 20$
>>18578078you have to be a flat footed mongol to wear either
>>18578078neither, yuck
I personally don't think the bright red brick on the back is all that bad. The bold contrast and instant brand recognition makes an otherwise tremendously boring and ugly shoe design stand out. The swoop design on the side is fine, but they're ultimately so bland and boring it's no wonder teenagers who haven't developed a personality yet flock to them.Also, after wearing shoes with actual support, Vans are atrocious and are not even worth the price point which used to be the only really good thing about them. If you're buying a skate shoe, you might as well invest in something better designed aesthetically and construction-wise.>>18578078I find Converse to be more aesthetically appealing, but suffer the same support and construction issues. Invest in your feet, get better shoes.
>>18578969cool i always wanted to pay 50 extra dollars for a shoe just to not have an ugly red brick on it
>>18578078Neither because I am no longer a teenager.
