Start being a real man, you fucking retard. Buy quality clothes. Layer. Reimagine that pile of shit that is your wardrobe. It’s not that hard.
>>18589598We all know that, you poser retard.
>>18589598yeah let me just wear that in 90 degree weather in my house
where to get a shin length camel hair overcoat that won't cost an arm and a leg but is still decent quality
Start being a real man, you fucking retard. Buy Sexcore. Layer. Reimagine that pile of shit that is your wardrobe. It’s not that hard.
>>18589598you dress for your environment, it's as simple as that. so sick of you fucking larpers. yes if you work as a stock broker or day trader in the city you can walk around in a suit and overcoat and gloves. if you work in retail and live in some multicultural shithole you look like a larping spastic.what do you do OP? tell us what your job is and then post and average daily fit you wear. let's be real, you're probably Indian or don't even leave the house.
i only go to a pool hall. i'm not wearing a suit to a pool hall.
>>18590236You’re dumb. When the world was not yet an ocean of steaming shit people used to wear tailored trousers and shirts (or jackets and coats if winter) even for sitting at a bar table. Learn, instead of seething like a subhuman.
>>18589978Why are sexcore manlets so /fa/ compared to taller ones?
>>18590236Why is Kim Jong Un hanging out with the cast of Peaky Blinders?
>>18590236>tell us what your job isim a fluffer
>>18590289We don't do that anymore. It's as simple as that. It's as if someone during the so-called "golden age of menswear" were to suggest that you walk around in clothes from the 1870s. He would be rightly mocked. Everything changes and nothing stands still. If you don't understand this, you're fucked.
>>18590342Post a picture of the favela street you live in
>>18590434>Anon makes a coherent point>Retard pretends he said something incomprehensible and accuses him of being Brazilian.
>>18590436>coherent point: bro just wear jeans, tee and hoodie! nothing else! jeans tee and hoodie!Kill yourself, retarded samefag pig.
>>18590472He didn't say that, now did he? He said people don't wear tailored suits to go out anymore. He is correct, and you would look out of place doing so. Cope as much as you want, but that was his point. If you think that means you should do something, that's just social pressure working on you. You're seething at society, not anon.
>>18589598Sure, I'll just tell global warming to fuck off.
>>18590701Lose weight, fatty.
>>18590473>you would look out of placeNTA but that's kind of the whole fucking point in fashion, it's just if you're going to peacock you'd better be sure to back that up with an actual worthwhile personality once you get people's attention, which as a smoothbrained conformist you wouldn't understand.
>>18590342Except, most people still wear button up shirts and slacks, retard. The only thing usually missing is a suit jacket/blazer and tie. But plenty of people still wear suits to this day. Nobody was wearing clothes from the 1870s during the 1950s. Men's fashion was perfected during 1950s. Nothing new and enduring has come since then. The only changes you see since then are in the fit. They keep oscillating between loose to slim fit every decade or so, nothing else.
>>18590725Then why complain about nobody wearing suits? Seems to me that everyone has made it easier for you. You can't have it both ways, m8. Either it's a tragedy that men don't dress like that, or dressing like that is about individuality.
You are fucking subhuman trash and I already destroyed you yesterday. Stop replying to me.
>>18589598That's a shit fit.
>>18590342Change for the sake of change and nothing else is not necessarily a good thing, it's actually quite detrimental and pointless at best.
I wear suits or jeans with hoodies almost exclusively.
>>18591180It is neither good nor bad. Struggle and change are part of the natural order. Therefore, conservatism or for that matter reaction is always doomed to lose. Like everything else in the world, fashion is not static.
>>18589598>muh heckin LAYERINOS!1!11!!!1Counterpoint:
>>18591205NTA. Nigger, we're talking about change for the sake of change. You faggots wanting to complete discard the past just for the sake of it because "old bad new good" is the problem here. Nobody needs completely new fashion trends every few years. That's what the corporations want because they want to keep selling new products to retarded consoomer NPCs like you. And it's not "conservatism". It's good designs surviving while unfit designs dying out. It's evolution through natural/cultural selection. If it isn't broken, don't fix it.
>>18591361The main issue is that you're still taking someone describing what is, for what should be. I don't disagree that I'd love to keep wearing things I already like forever, but that's not the way the world works.
>>18591330Then drop the suit jacket, retard. Dress shirts and pants are far more comfortable and breathable than t-shirts, jeans and sweatpants. Just because it's hot outside doesn't mean you dress like a toddler or a nog.
>>18591362Nobody is stopping you from wearing what you like. That's the definition of fashion and having a personal style. Following fashion trends is for NPCs. Be the trend setter, not a mindless follower.
>>18591366Sure, but you know this is exactly why that style fell out of fashion, right? Nobody actually likes dressing like that. I like it, except I don't wear coats most of the time, but most men would not wear even that if given the choice.
>>18591372It fell out of style because it was pushed out of style by Hollywood, the media and clothing brands after the 50s in the name of rebelling against traditions. The hippie movement was the biggest blow to traditional menswear.
>>18591378Anon, you know that's not true. Men still wore shirts and slacks to the office all the way in the early 2000s. The financial crisis killed a lot of white collar work, and when the jobs came back, offices tried to go the techbro route and stop requiring men to get dressed to go to work. That's what killed it: choice. Most men do not want to dress that way. It's not some evil conspiracy. > The hippie movement was the biggest blow to traditional menswear.The hippies are the boomers that still wore suits and overcoats at their office jobs when they got over that. Picrel, one of the hippies.
>>18589598You morons know that you can "Buy quality clothes" and "Layer" without being a suitfag, right? You don't have to larp as a 20th century businessman in order to dress well.
>>18591570>20th centuryNigger, the 90s were just 25 years ago. And people still wear suits to this day. They were pretty common even until the late 2000s. And a suit is the outfit of a gentleman, you retard, not a businessman. Businessmen wear suits because it makes them look like a gentleman, not because it's some kind of a uniform of businessmen. A suit is an outfit you wear when you want to look proper and dignified. That's why men wore it to the church, weddings, funerals, restaurants, parties, important meetings, work, etc.
>>18590472yeah, jeans/tee/hoodie is the same thing as dress pants/dress shirt/sweater in terms of performance yet costs 5 times less, can all be thrown in a washing machine, and is infinitely more customizeable. just quit it, boomer simp
>>18591643>not because it's some kind of a uniform of businessmenit quite literally is. all politicians wear navy suits because that's the politician uniform, not because they care or whatever. same thing with businesspeople and lawyers and salesmen - they wear it because they're expected to wear it because it's the formal uniform of the time we live in
>>18591643My comment was actually directed at the retards in this thread seething about suits, but you seem pretty retarded and butthurt too. I think it's great to wear quality suits in the appropriate context, but in the current era that window is fairly small. I haven't had an opportunity to wear a suit since my wedding over a decade ago, and even that was necessary I just wanted to. My point is that you should be dressing well in any context, even if that doesn't mean wearing a suit. Buy high quality clothing, layer, put in some damn effort.
>>18591205>Struggle and change are part of the natural order.Meaningless jewish word salad babble. Change is necessary to adapt to a changing environment, not because you have several generations of spoiled large children that are so overstimulated they are desensitised to any and all stimulation and need constant change to feel anything. Buying new clothes every several months just because you are a woman and already have several hundred photos with the old ones, despite them only being worn three times, is rampant consumerism and materialism, not any change caused by necessity.
>>18592074Sorry dude, but we can't talk to you if you insist on being a schizo.
>>18591364This. You can wear linen/cotton chinos as long as they are thin and loosely-knit all summer, even in 38C weather. It's actually better than shorts because your legs don't get sunburnt. Then you roll your shirt sleeves at the elbows and unbutton the first two buttons. voila.
>>18592076>Sorry dude, but we can't talk to you if you insist on being a schizo.That was quick. Not sure if a bot or a ranjeet kike sympathizer.It's all cool, I don't need to talk to you in particular anyway.
>>18589598>buy overpriced sweat shop garbage bro it's not that hard
>>18592078>"Change happens">hurr jew pajeet blah blah blahKill yourself, anon.
>menswear victimwaste of money. looks like a grampa. costly to maintain.>buy a suit>spend a week and pay $$$ to have it fitted and tailored>gain 10 pounds>now completely useless and unwearable
>>18592083Ignore the larping Incels here. Take the sexcore pill instead.
>>18592083>gain 10 poundsYou being a degenerate gluttonous pig with no discipline or self-control is a you problem. Maybe menswear really isn't for you. The usual fatfuck affirming spandex filled disposable plastic slop is more suitable for you (pun not intended).
>>18589598there's a reason why people used to wear layers, because it was alot colder before global warming took over and began cooking us alive
>>1859210610 pounds is nothing>To gain 10 pounds in 2 months (approximately 8 weeks), you would need a daily calorie surplus of around 625 caloriesthis is like, one starbucks drink
>>18592107>global warmingBitch, there's no global warming. People are just fatasses now so they heat up a lot easily. And there's too much urbanization and deforestation. That's why it's hotter in urban areas (where most people live these days) because all those densely packed buildings, concrete surfaces and asphalt behave like heat islands that absorb and retain the sun's heat throughout the day (and night), and raise the temperature of their immediate vicinity.
>>18592114>there's no global warming>proceeds to explain global warming
>>18592116That's not on a global level, retard. So it's not "global warming". It only happens in cities, which make up less than 1% of the earth's surface. Even suburban and rural areas are a lot cooler than the main urban areas. So it's more like urban warming, not "global warming".
>>18592120>happens everywhere across the world>not global???? schizo
>>18592120Hey, retard, global warming is real. We know the effects of CO2 in the atmostphere and have known about them for more than a hundred years. The mechanisms you are describing are not the mechanisms of global warming, per se, but they are mechanisms that would help explain why temperatures that dissipate in areas that do not have these heat-retention properties might be hotter. In either case, the average temperature of all the places does go up. That's why it's called global warming, and before you bitch about the term climate change, that is a different term relating to the secondary effects of said warming. Please kill yourself or read a book. Thanks.
>>18592122Are you actually retarded? The heating is concentrated in tiny specks of urban areas scattered across the world (cities/urban areas, where the majority of people live today), not uniformly across the surface of the earth. So it's not global. It's concentrated locally in a few areas which are a tiny fraction of the total surface area of the globe. The entire world is not uniformly hotter now. So it's not "global warming".
>>18592124It's global. You're both wrong and don't understand the science because you spend the whole time talking about whether or not skinny jeans are in.
>>18592074Hardly a Jewish message. It's basic European pagan philosophy. I've never defended fast fashion. The only thing I've tried to convey is that it's cringe to LARP.
Why would the 1920s-1950s be some kind of "peak" for fashion? Is it really about pure aesthetics or something else? You hear few people say that Roman fashion was "peak" or 18th century fashion was "peak" even though there are aspects of that fashion to appreciate. No, it's about something else. It's social, cultural, emotional and nostalgic. Nostalgia, I might add, borders on a type of depression and mental illness.
>>18592170It's peak fashion because what we have today is just a degeneration and subversion of the fashion from the 1920s-50s era. We haven't done anything radically new since then. Jeans and t-shirts? Popularized in the 50s. Chinos? Again, the 50s after the soldiers returning from WW2 started wearing their khaki colored military pants (chinos) casually. Modern suits? Their design standardized and "perfected" in the 50s and 60s. Even athletic clothes like hoodies and sweatpants, that zoomers think are "modern" and their innovation, come from the 1930s-60s.
>>18592193Exactly, it's not possible to make any meaningful advances in fashion because there haven't been ANY new types of clothes invented for 70 years. Everything piece of modern clothing is derived in some way from work wear, sportswear, business/traditional dress, or military-based clothes. These were created decades ago due to major world altering inventions or events, such as industrialization, the major 20th century wars for America, or the invention of plastic. Without any big wars or material advances to shake up the formula, all clothing manufacturers can do is just remix the fits and fabrics of the basic clothes we already have, and there's only so many ways you can do that.
>>18592170>Why would the 1920s-1950s be some kind of "peak" for fashion?Because we essentially refined and solved it by then. Everything from then has just been pushing boundaries to see how far you can casualise everything.
>>18591361Wrong as usual.
>>18592078the irony is poltards don't know that lots of the clothes they push were literally invented by Indians.
>>18592170incels seek to appropriate masculinity. Poltards do it with suits to feign masculine conservativism - looking uptight, overly formal, etc.leftists wear faux workwear to appropriate blue collar masculinr esthetics of the working class.
>>18589598imagine wearing a tie in 2025. only corporate gooners do that. not cool.
>>18592358I just think they're neat.
>>18592082I won't. >>18592083>a suit is all that you can wear if you want to dress tasteful and matureTurbo strawman.>>18592114There have been like 3-4 weather scares since the 70s, both global warming and freezing. All of them have been disproven, the methodology of gathering data shown to be flawed and human activity proven to have a negligible effect on Earth's temperature. The polar ice caps have grown back, BBC gonzo journos are still brazen retards measuring the temperature of airport runways freshly heated by plane engines, the weather is still different every year in climates where you actually have four distinct seasons. The reason that rich kikes and kike pets want to eliminate CO2 emissions is that plants need it to grow, but NWO depopulation stooges want to create an agricultural crisis and a subsequent famine. You can eliminate as much CO2 as you like with fucking PLANTS.>>18592285We wear menswear because we appreciate beauty, the purpose of menswear is, first and foremost, to look good.
>>18592841>menswear>beautysomehow not a single fit itt looks *beautiful*
>>18592841>both global warming and freezing.Not in the scientific literature. It was always warming. >All of them have been disprovenThey haven't. > methodology of gathering data shown to be flawedIt hasn't. >human activity proven to have a negligible effect on Earth's temperatureWrong again. >The polar ice caps have grown backThey haven't. >BBC gonzo journos are still brazen retards measuring the temperature of airport runwaysThat's not how climate research is done. You'd know this if you weren't a shit-for-brains retard. >the weather is still different every year in climates where you actually have four distinct seasons.This is a non-sequitur, and has nothing to do with whether or not the average global temperature is rising. Hint: It is. > The reason that rich kikes and kike pets want to eliminate CO2 emissions is that plants need it to grow,You're an actual retard. Do you think they're going to stop animal respiration or natural processes that produce CO2? >NWO depopulation stooges want to create an agricultural crisis and a subsequent famine.Global warming will create more famines than what you think.>You can eliminate as much CO2 as you like with fucking PLANTS.No, you can't, not at this scale, which is why forcing you to carry one around wouldn't fix the waste of oxygen that you are.
>>18592859>Global warming will create more famines than what you think.NTA. We've been hearing this bullshit since at least the 80s. There have been ZERO famines due to global warming since then, despite the global populating increasing from 5.5 billion to 8 billion since the 90s, along with rapid urbanization across the world, especially in the third world. If anything, the entire world is going through an obesity crisis due to over-consumption of food.>Do you think they're going to stop animal respiration or natural processes that produce CO2?They'll cut down forests, force desertification around populated areas, change courses of rivers through dams and destroying mountains, poison the soil to make it hard for plants to grow in it, etc etc. They have their ways. That's how they'll orchestrate the "effects" of "muh global warming" in order to destroy nations and depopulate regions of the world.
>>18592963>they they they>bad people i made up in my head will do bad stuff that would make everyone's (and theirs) life worse because... because they're bad okay?????
>>18589598my wardrobe doesn't get me laid any more or less. my wardrobe doesn't change my salary. my wardrobe never got me in the gym to actually make myself look better wearing whatever the fuck i wanted. adam sandler dresses like a retard and he's worth several million dollars and has a family. it's time to come to terms with the fact that your clothes never meant shit
>>18592114>>18592841I don't understand global warming deniers. Anyone over 40 who doesn't spend all his life indoors has noticed the changes by now. Even if he weren't exposed to any media, education or news at all.I bet you've noticed it too, you just choose to ignore it or explain it away somehow, cause acknowledging it makes you uncomfortable.
>>18593099skill issueskill issuemental illnessskill issueit's time to come to terms with the fact that you suck at clothes lmao
>>18593106anon i have all of those things and i don't really put in any effort to dress in layers or whatever childlike version of "dressing like an adult" you have in your mind. it's just you faggots will never really understand that your personality dictates everything about how people interact with you. yeah not being sloppy is a starting point but your personality dictated that. you copy pasting some other random persons fashion onto your body didn't make you into a man. you do that yourself. fucking child retard lmao
>>18592859Is the global warming in the room with us right now? Eliminating CO2 in the atmosphere can actually be more detrimental than that hypothetical global warming you are talking about because in addition to the "greenhouse effect" it also reflects lots of sunlight, preventing actual excessive warming of the planet.I won't respond to you anymore, this is a menswear thread.>>18592845Menswear was specifically created to accentuate male secondary sex characteristics (i.e. proportions) and has no other purpose than to look good.
>>18593170>Eliminating CO2 in the atmosphereMan. You really are out to prove how retarded you are. Nobody has that goal, you fucking idiot. >addition to the "greenhouse effect" it also reflects lots of sunlight, preventing actual excessive warming of the planet.This is not how CO2 works at all. Read a middle school textbook. >Menswear threadThen stop bringing up shit you know nothing about.
>>18593109>your personality dictates everything about how people interact with you.Dress like a clown and you will be treated like a clown. If you want to be taken seriously as an adult, then you dress like an adult. Nobody is going to shop at your store or trust their children around you if you walk around dressed like a gimp or a drug dealer as a 25+ year old man.The only style of clothing specifically designed to be timeless outfits for gentlemen (a lost concept in the modern infantilized and negrified society) irrespective of their line of work, is menswear. Any man from any occupation and walk of life can wear menswear when he wants to look like a civilized, decent and dignified man.
>dress like an adultnotice how this guy never posts himself wearing clothes
>>18593289And why would I doxx myself on a website full of feds and psychopaths?
>>18593300bcoz u are ugo
>>18589598nigga I'm a civil engineer, I basically have to wear jeans and boots because I'm in fucking dirt and mud every day
>>18593622Nigger, you're not working as an engineer 24x7. The rest of the time wear normal menswear. Jeans are workwear. You don't need to wear jeans, cargo pants and work boots everywhere all the time, like when you go to a restaurant, hang out with your friends, visit your friends' and relatives' house, stroll in the city, or even make barbecue in your backyard. You don't need to dress like an engineer, blue collar worker or a tradie to do any of that.
>>18593625Why do you want everyone to look and act like they’re 40 years old?
>>18593639>Why do you want everyone to look and act like they’re 14 years old?
>>18593644This is a very Jewish post. You don’t even provide an objective answer.
>>18593645The only thing jewish here is the push to stop men from dressing decently
>>18593647Define decent.
>>18593653A suit
>>18590236What do I wear as an Aussie in a country town
>>18591383Wow. Hair is everything
>>18592841>The reason that rich kikes and kike pets want to eliminate CO2 emissions is that plants need it to grow, but NWO depopulation stooges want to create an agricultural crisis and a subsequent famine.Wow, you went right past normal retardation into advanced retardation. (Unless this is bait). Carbon dioxide levels have been straight rising since coal started to be burned. What the global warming movement is trying to do is to STOP THEM FROM RISING. Lowering them on top is straight up science fiction.Also>>18593105We used to have weeks of snow, now we have days at best. Single days, often.Or you can go to your local mountain range and ask the locals where the glaciers used to be.
>>18592120Go ask anyone over the age of 40 that has lived somewhere rural with four seasons about winters. They will all tell how the winters have gotten noticeably shorter and milder during their lifetime.
>>18593667Navy blue singlet from Bonds and a pair of shorts from Target. Sneakers if you feel like dressing up, thongs otherwise even in winter.
>>18592126oy veyy
>>18593700kike
>>18589598nigga I'm broke
>>18594944Nigger, nobody's telling you to throw your entire wardrobe out and fill it with brand new clothes in one go. Buy one piece at a time every month or so. You can do at least that, can you? Cut down on consooming goyslop by half and you'll be able to afford proper clothes.
>>18594958>can you?no, actually; I can'tand I don't even eat goyslop
>>18589978Buy sexcore, get skinny jeans, buy two.Explore the skanks, get STDs, get two
>>18590289That picture hits hard. The things we lost.
i never see anyone in suits anymore. even a tie is rare. im often downtown in (large west coast city) and see zero suits anywhere. i think even that lawyerly middle upper class that was the last group still wearing suits, even they switched to more casual.
