WATCH THREADWATCH THREADWATCH THREADThe place to actually discuss watches, free of avatarfagging drama, including bittercelposting, pics of food or drinks, or long-ass stories about your lives.>Your budget>Preferred brand or manufacture>Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot, etc>Movement, e.g. automatic, hand-wound, quartz, etc>Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, chronograph, etc>Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet, etc>Wrist size or desired watch sizePrevious thread: >>18603459
>>186100290>good looking, understated watch>sober colors, available in steel and gold>acceptable movement, uncluttered dial>affordable price pointand after all that, inevitably, it's>at least 39mm wideit's impressive how everyone's consistently fucked this up in the last 20 years, whether it's Patek Philippe or any Richemont brand or any made-in-china american microbrand or any proudly chink brand with a stupid name
>>18610038It’s getting better. JLC just released a 36mm version of their Master Control. ALS still makes a 34mm Saxonia.
You can already tell it’s going to be a shit thread.
>>18610050every watch thread is a shitfest
Contemporary watches?CAD shitters and nothing else.
>>18610038Cartier basically makes all their watches in a variety of sizes.
holy fuuuuuggganother post that blew the fuck out everyone
>>18610061Wearing a CAD shitter is immediate proof of being an NPC.
doomed
>>18610029Way too soon, faggot.Stop shitting up the board with your crap.
>have the power over this board>give upel em fay-oh
Post your stone watch.
>>18610070Is that from the 80s or did Tissot remake that?
>>18610080It’s from the 80s
>>18610084They did do a limited edition remake of it a few months ago.
I heard directly from an omega watchmaker in an omega boutique that a 37mm smp is coming.
>>18610135That’s been the rumor for a few months now. Watch Omega still fuck up and make the mid-size 39mm.
Kofé time.
>>18610135>>18610140As long as it’s thinner, I don’t mind the current size. The lug to lug is quite reasonable.
is it truly the watch of the year?
Kofe time.
>>18610591I know that the brand is absolutely radioactive ITT but in the real world it’s quite respected.They managed to make a useful complication in a unique way without changing their signature aesthetic. It’s also pretty reasonably priced.
>>18610683Their signature aesthetic is absurdly long lugs. You have to buy a watch several sizes smaller than what you’re used to for a proper fit.
>>18610595ID?
>>18610299King
I just bought this bad boy, what do you think?
>>18610790I prefer the fluted bezel with the two-tone + Jubilee combination. Nice dial, though.
>>18610790very cool
>>18610790poorlex.
>>18610591Lame and unoriginal.
>>18610061>unc seething at modern manufacturing techniques
>>18610916What else looks like it?
>>18610918>gobbles down overpriced CAD shitters
>>18610923Kill yourself, subhuman.
bitter
Is this a fake Breitling? Found it laying around at an antique shop here in my area.
>>18610790keep it in the box
How big is too big?
>>18611184everything over 40
>>18611184for every quarter inch of wrist circumference above 8 inches you can go up a millimeter in case size above 40. 8 inches or less, 40 is usually the max unless it is an unusual case shape or has unusually short lugs. There are a few 41s out there that are fine on smaller wrists, but not many.
>2000ish USD>No brand preference in particular >Dress or close enough to dressy>Either automatic or hand-wound. >Second Hand subdial>Leather>Nothing bigger than 41mmConsidering the Nomos Tangente, but not sure if it's a good idea since it might take months to get it repaired if I fucked it up.
>>18610299Is that an owl coffee mug?
>>18611208It is slightly above the price range at 2600, but the Longines sector dial is phenomenal.
>>18611208https://eur.farer.com/products/solander
>>18611208>Dress or dressy>automatic or hand-wound>up to 41mm
>>18611208Are you looking for new or used? 2k is kind of a dead zone in watches.
>>18610971why wont anyone answer me :'(
>>18611426Yes, anon. I can tell that it's fake from your images. Sorry for taking so long to confirm that for you. Act accordingly now that you have these facts. Glad I could be of service.
>>18611433Thank you
Post the cute silly watch of your collection. (If it doesn’t have one, it’s worthless).
>>18611426We don't know.
