>>18610184
for me? 1936

File: 1939-glicksman-mens-fashi(...).jpg (113 KB, 577x900)

113 KB JPG

>>18610184
It's crazy how you can the progression from 1920s tomboy feminists at the beginning of the decade to 1940s/50s busty tradwives by the end. For men too at the beginning of the 30s they were dressing like metrosexuals in crazy patterns colors with tight fitting suits and by the end of the decade they were dressing in drab superhero muscle suits. Im convinced good economies mess with gender roles and depressions and wars set them straight.

>>18610184
>women: all possible variants of fancy shit
>men: workwear in a different color
Great

>>18610226
Just shut the fuck up you terminally online faggot god damn I couldn’t imagine talking to your insufferable ass irl

File: cunt.png (880 KB, 957x532)

880 KB PNG

>>18610254
>how dare you use internet words on the internet

>>18610256
underage autistic beaner actually kys

>>18610263
jeez you don't gotta be mean lady what the hell

>>18610184
I have a pair of heels similar to the 1935 ones
they're so beautiful
1934 dress is the best one, best 2 piece is 38' or white 37'
very chanel
I cant wait for this style to come back