Why are they so good?
>>18611780they're not
>>18611781I've owned the same pair of jeans from them for 8 years.
>>18611782
>>18611780theyre trash. i wore mwzpw for years and they always failed in the crotch and knees after a season of heavy use. meanwhile the patagonia hemp pants i got 3 years ago are still going strong
>>18611813>they always failed in the crotch and kneesThen stop sagging your pants like a subhuman and buy your pants in your proper waist size. Stop doing this faggtory in picrel and your crotch won't blow out.
>>18611818its called being a REAL MAN who does REAL MANLY THINGS not walking around at a shopping mall like a little bitch boi
>>18611780Just Walmart shit. Maybe better than basic Levis but at the end of the day it's all the same
>>18611813theyre great for the price but theres much better out there. you can get a rock solid 14.5oz pair of jeans from them for less than the cost of a #1 meal at mcdonald's. thats hard to argue with. if youre getting crotch blowouts stop sizing them like a cowboy and go up a few sizes. i did a decade of roofs and floors in the same pair of rustlers and they're still perfectly wearable albeit covered in paint.
>>18611782yeah so? i've had a pair of gap jeans for about as long.
>>18611780i'm with you bro. For most of my life I only got Levi's because I liked how easy it was to find cuts I liked based on their number system, but now a pair is like 80-100 dollars and they always rip in the same place every time.I got a pair of wranglers from a thrift store 2 years ago and they're probably my best jeans
>>18611780They aren't really that good, it's more a matter of the (((competition))) dropping quality while increasing price over the last 20 years, while Wrangler has managed to remain fairy consistent. They just seem good compared to the utter slop which they are typically measured against.
they still make 100% cotton.most other brands gave up and do 1% elastine
>>18612835round house is the actual hidden gem of cheap american jeansnot corpo owned either
