>this will be $15,000 plus tip
>>18615804>plus tipNo one tips on things like that. You're a fucking retard. And I guess jealous that you have no watches and can't even browse without feeling poor.
>>18615839watches like that are a veblen item. Pretending they aren't is weird. Why are you being weird?
>>18616328>finding mutuality with that dumb snow white cuntdisregarded
>>18616339You mean snow brown
>>18616348>You mean snow brownkek yes
anything bigger than f91 is stupid
>>18616380Daytonas are fat and ugly. I'll take the el primero please
>>18615839your an idiot.
>>18616381Based.The daytone will always, ALWAYS be El Secundo.Rolex babbies can cope as much as they want, it will always be true.
>>18615839Bud your supposed to offer you wife to your local AD.Too bad I don't have the meme "what would you do for your AD".
>>18615804Let me give you a situation:-i don't buy funko pops-i don't buy anime figurines-i don't spend $8 everyday on a faggaccino-i don't smoke or vape-i don't do fastfoods, ever-i don't do ubers-i don't pay for NETFLIX-corporate pays for my meals every single week day-my house costs me less than a third of my monthly salary-i have a carSomeone doing the first 6 points would spend like 5K more than me a year on useless spending.Buying a 10K watch every two years is the same cost.
>>18615804I don't understand the reasoning behind buying an overpriced mechanical or automatic watch. There's nothing that would justify the price.Precision? Doesn't matter after quartz got into mass production decades ago.No battery? A battery lasts for years.The look? There's a shit ton of watches looking exactly the same.The brand? Nobody is going to notice that tiny logo on the face.Toughness? A cheap sport casio, not a G- Shock, survives decades of harsh punishment. And let's be honest, you are going to wear it with a suit, not for diving.I'd rather buy a Casio or Invicta to have something that looks fancy and unique in the way I like. Not a Rolex, generic to the point of being transparent.There's only one reason I see to buy one, other than investment purpose: the look of open heart and skeleton watches. The mechanism itself turned into a part of the aesthetics which electronics can't replicate.
>>18616833It's jewelry. Why would you buy a gold engagement ring when a plastic ring could do the same?
>>18616838Perfect post
>>18616833>I'd rather buy a Casio or Invicta to have something that looks fancy and unique in the way I like. Not a Rolex, generic to the point of being transparent.Holy cope
>>18616798Cope
>>18616328veblen? That's not a word. My spellcheck says so.
>>18616769AD? In this context I have no idea what that's supposed to mean.
>>18616894authorized dealer
>>18616798do you know what this reads like to me>I am financially responsible>I am financially responsible>I am financially responsibleoh god i can't take it anymore>I am financially retarded!11!
>>18616957If you don't spend money on what you like then what's the point?Also, Smoking/Vaping is sunk cost. Once it's smoked, it can't be unsmoked. Same for fastfoods, Uber/doordash tips, Starbucks coffee and Netflix...A watch on the other hand, can always be sold, even at a loss.
>>18616838It's not an object made of precious metal. It's a device with a specific function and look. A company logo doesn't turn a device into jewelry. Unless you mean a watch featuring actual gold or silver.>>18616871For the sake of argument let's say I bought a Bulova Surveyor, Orient Bambino or Seiko Presage. I have now an analog watch with actual mechanism inside. What exactly do I miss, in comparison with Rolex?
>>18616907That's not helping either. Dealer of what?
>>18616798What kind of a pathetic faggot buys a 10K watch every two years?
>>18616962your capitalist overlords have tricked your feeble brain into believing that a watch is something that will make you happy. You should be saving that money to acquire land/property, that should be everyone's immediate priority. If you have that already, then good, but then you should be actively using whatever money to grow your empire. How are you gonna tell me you are growing your empire with a rolex on your wrist? Impressing some rich bozo who already has everything you should be working for? maybe that rich bozo got his money from his parents. are you wearing these watches to show people you are financially successful? wealth whispers, you are only impressing poor people who fetishize these watches. good job, you impressed a poor person. oh but wait, that is a mirror, that poor person is you (because you spend your money on pointless things).A watch is a poor investment piece, and its cute you think there isn't sunk cost involved in that, but there absolutely is. That is money spent on a watch that could have been invested.You did good by not smoking/vaping, fast food, uber, starbucks, whatever. But all that money you saved doing that went to the wrong place, and you are stuck in the wrong mindset. Your happiness is ill informed, you don't want this happiness
>>18617016What do you buy? A 30k watch every year?
>>18617046There's a lot of projection in your post, kek.1: having a nice watch, wearing nice sunglasses, does make me happy everytime i wear them. 2: i'm not saving for those watches, i have fucking savings worth more than those watches, i'm not a crackhead from the hood. I have zero debt, zero credit. I don't invest in land because if you don't work it, it's just a liability.3: i'm not trying to impress anyone, i just like nice shit. And if you wear a watch properly (two fingers higher than the wrist bone), most people wont even see it under your cuff.For you, everything must be about projecting and making money. That's YOUR MINDSET that you are projecting on me. You're a slave for money. I don't give a fuck about your rat race, my goal is not to be a billionaire or to have a 1up on anyone, but to enjoy nice shit.
>>18615804I give the tip to yo momma erry nite bitch!
