What watch can't scientifically be mogged by other watches?My vote goes to picrel (gold Tank Chinoise).
>>18649618skeleton watches are for garish retards but that is one of the better ones
>>18649625I wouldn't call those "skeleton" watches, the front pattern is more striking than the view on the movement.
>>18649618
>>18649630needs more diamonds
>>18649639There's no more room.
>>18649618Paul Newman Daytona
>>18649618>tricompax UG with moonphase at 12oclock (baton indices, vertical brushed dial)>duoface reverso>patek 3940>vacheron/ap sector dial disco voltante>franck muller’s flinque dial chronographs from the early 90s>roth era breguet (3050, 3330)>funnily enough, gshock
>>18649740old man's watch
It’s 2026 dude. All watches are try hard. It’s literally just jewelry. Just wear actual jewelry ffs.
>>18649618>UN-MOGGABLE watchGotchu my nigguh/thread
Just get a rolex and stop thinking about it.
yeah because of sopranos, what about it
>>18649852
>>18649866That actually looks super cool. Unfortunately they probably want too much money for it. Being that it is Seiko and that's their thing now.
>>18649781This or any $20 vintage watch utterly mog all the new gaudy $2000 chink shit
>>18649618Tanks make Rolex anything look like gay manchild cope toys. I regret selling mine.
mog this
>>18649889You hate to admit it, but where's the lie though?
>>18652477It's not a matter of being a lie or true. It's that Rolexes are not attainable or desirable to most people, so it's pretty lame to keep throwing that out there, especially when you don't even own your own Rolex. >I'm looking for a decent car>Just pop on down and grab a Rolls-Royce, obviously.
>>18652495That's awesome actually.
Both practical and luxury. It simply doesn't get better than this.
>>18652520Rolexes are perfectly attainable. They're expensive, sure, but they make over a million watches a year and there are decades and decades worth of good examples on the used market for (relatively) reasonable prices. And they're nowhere near the top of the top end like Rollers are, they're more equivalent to like, Mustangs or something. Any retard with a good day job can get one.Whether you NEED or WANT an expensive luxury watch is a different question. The question is how not to get watch mogged. A rolex is just objectively a good place to start there. There are better, much more impressive watches, but you're never going to look like an asshole wearing a rolex in any context.
>>18652553>moggedlol, giving a flying fuck what anyone thinks is would be a colossal blunder. Rolex is for a certain type of person who doesn't know very much about watches, has very pedestrian tastes, and is concerned with the status quo. If that's you, fine. You save up for that Rolex. And until you have it you can continue to suggest we all get one. And I think you WILL look like an asshole wearing a Rolex. You specifically. Because you put so much importance on it that you'd make sure everyone was aware of it like the vegans do.
>>18652551I'd love to know your definition of 'luxury'. It's certainly practical.
>>18652551ACKtually, it does
>>18652582What is the topic of this thread, faggot?Fuck you're retarded. I don't disagree that you should worry what other people think about what you wear, but the thread is about people who are worried what other people think about what they wear so I'm speaking to that concern.
>>18652583High end product in its category with high end price most can't afford = luxury.
>>18652606Okay, so Casio doesn't fit. That's what I thought.
>>18652610Is there a better built digital watch I should know of?
>>18652606>>18652610They're not "luxury" by the strictest standard, but I'd say subjectively sometimes they can give a FEELING as if they are. The "vintage" style ones with the chromed cases and metal bracelets are really light and comfortable in the way an actual vintage swiss watch can feel. I was wearing one of these pic related today and legitimately forgot I was wearing it until I looked at my wrist. They're so easy to wear.
