[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/fa/ - Fashion

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: confused.jpg (55 KB, 400x400)
55 KB
55 KB JPG
>be 6'3"
>no one sells pants long enough for me
I thought fashion was for tall people?
>>
>>18649882
i'm 6'2" but wear a 32 inseam because i'm all torso
buying shirts is fucking impossible because they're all too short but XL is too big and boxy
>>
>>18649882
tailor
>>
>>18649918
Tailors can't make pants longer
>>
>>18649883
I'm 6'4 broad shouldered and barrel chested, but small waisted (Levis 541 in 32x34 fit me at the waist but are like skinny jeans through the legs - if I can even find any in 34 inseam).
Even XXL is too short sometimes and for some brands they're too tight in the shoulders/chest. I thought being tall and muscular was the ideal body type, but 95% of mens clothing is made for short twinks. It's worse at the moment because of the cropped trend. Normal shirts are cropped on me anyway. I literally found it easier to buy clothes when I was fat because clothes are designed for extra fabric at the waist not around the shoulders/neck

>>18649882
It used to be better. Even cheapo shops like H&M used to sell different inseams for their pants: short, regular and long (34"). Now it's regular (30"), long (32") if you're lucky enough to even find a place that sells different lengths
>>
>>18649882
Some brand are totally retarded, like "SUPERDRY" they almost only sell they pants in L32.
If you are over 1.75 m you can't wear their shit.
>>
>>18649957
>Now it's regular (30"), long (32") if you're lucky enough to even find a place that sells different lengths
It's probably some marketing faggot who made up stats that most of their sells were 30" and 32" and that it was not worth it to make 34" pants for the remaining 25% of people.
>>
>>18649882
Wranglers go up to 38" inseam
>>
>>18649882
ugh I know what you mean, I'm not 6'2" (I'm 5'9") but I have a 50 inch waist and it's so damn impossible to find proper fitting pants!
>>
>>18649921
Sweatie, you go to a tailor and get your pants stitched according to your measurements. Yes it will cost more, but it's an investment, not consoomer slop. Pants like that will last a lifetime.

>>18649957
They all sell 30" inseam now because most men these days sag their pants to their crotch like subhumans. So what's the point in making longer inseams when they're going to sag their pants 3-4 inches below your waist anyway? That's also why the zippers are in modern pants are so short, because thanks to all the sagging, the fly's top is closer to the dick.

Look at this faggot in picrel. He's wearing mid rise jeans, but sagging them to a low rise level, AND claiming it's a "classic retro" style when nobody used to sag their pants like niggers during the 90s and even early 2000s.
>>
>>18649964
Most manlets buy 34 length despite not needing it. The majority of men buy too long of pants.
>>
this freak thinks fashion is for him lmao the thin air up there has fucking wrecked his brain
>>
>>18649882
woe is you
>>
>>18649882
You're in freak territory you lanky alien fuck
>>
>>18650064
>when nobody used to sag their pants like niggers during the 90s and even early 2000s.
that is just not correct. That is when faggin saggin was first popularized
>>
>>18649964
It's the same reason why shops in Australia stopped selling anything larger than an XL since COVID I guess. Even if a brand sells it in XXL, 3XL and above, they don't sell it in stores here, or their online store. You have to buy it from somewhere like Selfridges or other UK stores that:
1) sells it in the right size in the first place
2) still even offers shipping to Australia (a lot of stores have stopped doing this the past few years)
>>
>>18649882
fuck off dude
>>
>>18651175
>larger than XL
Lose weight, fatfuck. If you need anything more than M, fashion should be the least of your priorities.
>>
>>18649882
You literally fit into a 33 inch inseam, retard.
>>
File: IMG_3478.jpg (197 KB, 1080x1080)
197 KB
197 KB JPG
>>18649882
>he fell for the lanklet meme
lmao 175cm/5’9” has been the optimal male height for millennia, tallcels literally never learn
>>
>>18649882
switch to military clothing, timeless, wide range of size and affordable
>>
>>18653800
He'll just look like a lanklet school shooter.
>>
>>18649882
>be 6' ft 4"
>buy pants that fit, no problem
OP have you considered that you're retarded?
>>18649921
Tailors can do two things, though: 1. they can make you pants, and 2. They can let out and rehem your pants.
Do you buy pants from reputable brands that accommodate hemming right, anon?
>>18649964
I would be surprised if even 5% of male consumers need 34" inseams. 6 ft 4 puts you in the top percentile of Americans, and the top 3% of notoriously lanklet countries like the Netherlands.
>>
>>18653764
I want to make sweet gay love to that black man
>>
>>18653726
>6 foot 2
>waist size smaller than 30
some ppl enjoy getting raped i guess
>>
File: op.png (162 KB, 494x788)
162 KB
162 KB PNG
>6'3"
>L34 is too long for me
is this you in the picture?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.