So which one is it /fa/?
>>18655763slight
>>186557631) Those jeans are all too skinny2) Full break. Showing your ankles when you sit down is cringe. What are you preparing for a flood?
>>18655911>Showing your ankles when you sit down is cringeSo wear boots.
>>18655914I do. Still won't wear cropped pants LMFAOYou're falling for a literal cost cutting measure disguised as a "trend" (protip: it looks retarded). Get your pants hemmed to your height or cuff if you must.
>>18655915>Still won't wear cropped pants LMFAOYou mean hemmed? >You're falling for a literal cost cutting measure disguised as a "trend" Anon, you were talking about all the pants being too short without a full break. That's simply not true.
>>18655915full break is ugly, crop is dumb. either slight or no break is the only way to go
>>18655763Slight break, wide straight cut.
>>18655763All shit except the full break.
second from the left is how a normal pair of jeans looks, cope all you want but most people who are not in high school are not wearing baggy saggy 90s rapper jeans. you are all in high school.
>>18655928I'm in university, and lots of people wear the baggy jeans.
its obviously either slight break or full break.stacking is a fashion faux pas, and no break/cropped are onions.
>>18655763Bootcut jeans
>>18655763Full break or stacking. Anything less is gay. Jeans are workwear, so they should cover your legs even when you're sitting (not ride up above your ankles) so that they can properly protect your legs.>REEEEEEE but jeans are now fashionPeople wear jeans because they want that rugged look. In order to get that, they should look the part. Cropped jeans are for women and faggots. Men's jeans should be full break or stacked.
>>18656021>real workwear>sagging and bunching upnever worked a day in your life larper
>>18656041You don't have to sag your jeans like a nigger for them to stack, retard. Just size up your inseam length.
