>>18657421
yeah but he looks like a faggot with 3 unbuttoned

>>18657438
Wearing a tie = 0 unbuttoned
Not wearing a tie = 1 unbuttoned
On vacation = 2 unbuttoned
Being a man-whore = 3 (or more) unbuttoned

>>18657421
lmao what a faggot

>>18657439
it doesn't make you look sexy or a manwhore it just looks retarded

i don't think so. it'd rather show chest vs showing the undershirt when wearing a dress shirt and suit.
i do wear sweat-wicking undershirts sometimes, but i make sure it's not visible.

the only times i show the undershirt, im wearing denim/chambray/flannel and i intentionnally keep the shirt more open

>>18657421
>she

HAHAHAHAHAHA

First of all, never unbutton your shirt more than two buttons absolute max and that’s only if you’re outside and it’s hot. Second, if the shirt is a good quality shirt, there is no reason to wear an undershirt.

What is this style called? This type of taste? This type of man? It’s so stereotypically Napa Valley. It’s so “I’m trying to look French or Italian.” It’s the kind of people who go to piano lounges. It makes me think of an uncle who wears a shark tooth necklace with linens and boat shoes. It’s the type of person who likes Versace.

What is this?