Will you buy the Fruit of the loom suit in a bag?
>>18662014/fa/ ia full of laggards so this thread will die and then there will be 10 threads about the same product 2-4 months from now
>>18662014 the price point is honestly way too high, cuz its a collabo with a creative and not just a normal release. so. no. een though it seems cool. i'd like to see people wearing it though!
>>18662014What is to be done about the Japanese? Who will finally stop them?
>>18662014Fuck no. You can get a linen suit from fast fashion sites for like $80. Why spend twice as much to look 4x as bad.
>>18662014Where can I get it and does it come in 2X? If it's under $100 I'll buy it.
>>18662060Nothing. The last time we tried to stop them WE made them retarded.I have no idea how anybody, Jap or no, could think this looks good. You don't go baggy with a double breasted jacket because it makes you look fat.
>>18662014based
>>18662014 i'm a suit in a bag guy. i wear nothing but these. i buy a new one every time the old one gets dirty. it's a good system.
>>18662072it's like 25000 yen or somethingfruit of the loom is a different brand in japan, they actually makes proper clothes
>>18662076The asians enjoy being pear shaped though
>>18662014>suitable for formal occasions ishygddt
>>18662060this is lowkey tuff as hell
>>18663006this looks like shit
It would look better with a shawl lapel and a zipper.
>>18662014is this real?
>athletic formal these two words contradict each other
>>18662014Aside from the 'Mandela Effect-ed' non-cornucopia logo, it needs be said: this should be distributed to homeless shelters as the clothing option and this only. How great; suit in a bag! Maybe Gildan offers a cheap white button-down, and get some black fake-Stan Smith style shoes a-la-Walmart. This should be the only thing the unemployed should receive in alms as far as clothing is concerned.
>>18663006So it's not tough as hell? Or a little? What exactly does 'lowkey' mean?
>>18662060Is that the same guy? I can't 100% tell.
>>18662060looks comfy af, i'd wear it
>>18663503They're selling this for over $100. I don't think its meant to be mass produced cheap crap like their modern shirts.
>>18663565It means anon wants to sound cool
