>>18662284i spend so much time at the nude beach that i dont have tan lines anymore LOL
>>18662284No, because real tan lines are a sign of sun damage.
>>18662284/fa/? No. But very sexy, great for gooning.
>>18662284Regular tan lines sure. Weird tan lines like the picrel though? Nope.
>>18662284Lower tanlines yes but breasts/upper back look better without them because it makes for a more feminine look
>>18662384sauce?
>>18662284Tan lines on women are a low status look. Only the lowest peasant women had to work in the hot sun long enough to get regular tan lines. It also makes you as a man look like a poorfag loser whose girlfriend/wife has to work in the sun to run your household.
>>18663677Or a they're a sign of wealth because they live so well they can lay in the sun all day.
>>18663897yeah, sensibilities have changed. Pale skin (on women) now means you have to work.
>>18663897This. What a complete retard that anon is. He's applying logic from 1800 to today. Tans are a status symbol, poorfags can't afford beach holidays. Poorfags nowadays don't even work in the sun. They work in dingy establishments or from inside a car. The peasants who got tanned from working in the sun don't exist in the west anymore. Only in places like China are peasants still a real thing.
