>>18671706I personally love seeing girls in tight crop tops and skin tight leggings
the 1900s
>>18671706love slutcore these days because it keeps the test up, but 70s clears
>>18671706Recent era is best
>>18671714Dude's really proud to be fucking fat 2's.
>>1867170690s looks best. 2026 looks like Paige Owens.
>>186717061930s
>>18671706this picture is funny because it implies the 2026 girl is modest hahahahaha
>>18671706I know most of this board is larping Nazis whose wet dream is a girl in a dress churning butter in a field but I love how girls look now
>>18671763How do you figure? It looks to me like the previous eras are bullying the current one for her boring, unimaginative style.
>>18671706Obviously the 1950s to 70s. https://youtu.be/1u5Gkh2t1ZI
>>18671763When she's the only one flashing her camel toe and doesn't even see anything wrong with it.
>>18671776This guy got it. Everyone has become afraid of colour. Leave black and white for formalwear and bring back colours to clothing.
>>18671706Based on the picrel 2000 because I like sluts (and am not afraid to admit it)
>>18671787Women being afraid of colors is the most pathetic and masculine trend in women's fashion. There's zero femininity in wearing minimalist outfits in black, greys and white. They end up looking like they're wearing their boyfriend or dad's clothes. It actually makes them look low class, like they're poorfag factory workers who can't afford to wear nice clothes and get dolled up. Picrel is how teenage girls used to dress in the 70s. That's better than what you see in Hollywood's red carpet events these days.
>>18671706To be honest the 2026 girl in the middle looks best here in terms of looking good with outfits, I don't really like that kind of outfits but she looks good with that, better than others in the picture
>>18671804tf are you talking ab
>>18671806I'm talking about the image op posted
Bros, I was in line at the gas station and some MENA looking girl was in line wearing blue leggings and her ass looked so good I wanted her to sit on my face and cock and I'll probably jerk off to her in the bathroom of my work I love girls wearing leggings and I will never pretend to hate it
>>18671706You can tell this was made by a flyover gen-x/millennial lol, the 2026 fit is ten years behind.
>>18671706i want this to be my harem
>>18671804Because you're used to seeing that basic bitch low effort "athleisure" slop on every female for the past 5-10 years.
>>18671788plot twist: the 2000 girl is the only virgin in the picture
>>18671848That's the most modest one in that picture, others have some part of their body open, which is not good looking, skinny pants on girls definitely look better than baggy pants, and she also don't have large fake breasts, she definitely mogs this Avril Lavigne
>>18671864LMAO people actually think gym clothes are modest? You do realize women wear those tight gym clothes to flash their ass, thighs and tits, right? A lot of women even go braless under those tight tops. Just because the 2026 girl isn't showing her bare skin as much, doesn't mean her outfit is more modest. Out of all those girls (and Avril Lavigne) the she exposes the contours of her body the most, down to, I'm sure, even her camel toe. She's pretty much wearing a body suit, which is not only immodest but also boring as fuck. It says nothing and leaves barely anything to the imagination. She may as well be naked.
>>18671871That's not a gym clothes, that was black pants, probably jeans or other fabric, and i also don't like gym clothes, I hate even, especially I hate yoga pants
>>18671871The girl in the middle is wearing something like this
Late 80s through 90s into early 00sShit got too basic or whoreish after
>>186718832020s is the best, previous decades were cringe, 1950s and before that is good, but after that almost everything is cringe until 2020s
Girl in the middle is young and cute. Every other one looks like a mom trying to look young at a club.
>>18671848Basic bitch girls have always been the hottest girls. Every other girl who isn’t attractive has to hide behind a subculture. It’s why goths aren’t very hot once you take off the costume.
>>18671887There is no 2020s fashion. It's just 90s to mid 2000s fashion but with a minimalist color palette and next to no patterns. Most clothes zoomers are into are literal 90s clothes from thrift stores, while the newer ones are ripping off the design of those 90s clothes.
>>18671887Modern ripped jeans are just 90s grunge and skater fashion's revival.
>>18671891I'm not talking about basic bitch girls but basic fashion. It's not basic bitch girls who are doing it but all girls. It's safe, lazy and boring fashion. It says nothing. And it's not even regular basic clothes styled in a simple way but literal gym clothes that they wear everywhere, no matter the occasion. They just throw on their spandex pants and t-shirts basic colors like black, white and grey and call it a day.
>>18671706"Euphoria . . . Victoria"
>>18671801Where can I get a shirt with a big ass collar like the ones in this picture?
>>18671706I assume that you refer to American trends, so my answer would be 'none'.
God I hate these liberated fucking WHORES being of higher value than my aging incel ass
>>18671873that's 2010
>>18671873The girl in the middle is not wearing skinny jeans. They're clearly yoga/gym pants.>>18672028Those are 70s style wide collars. They're hard to find today because they were typical 70s trend. Maybe look in a thrift store or get a tailor to make one for your shirt.
>>18671706 (OP)That's 2016
>>18671785it's funny that she settled down with a chubby guy shorter than her after being plowed in the ass by the entire industry. poor dude
>>18671709You are mentally ill
>>18671774nazis everywhere
>>18671774Cope, tranny. Medieval peasant women had better sense of fashion and wore richer fabrics than modern NPC women who look as if they're walking around in underwear. Not even fancy underwear but the bare basic Walmart underwear. That's how uncultured and unfeminine modern women are.
>>18672252Shut the fuck up retard, holy shit. Go dig a moat or something
Girls have just more and better options
>>18671706I still love how everyone dressed in 2012
>>18672252Lmao what, peasant women's clothes were barely above burlap sacks, they used cheap coarse undyed fabrics and garments were made to be loose and functional. The fantasy version of peasant women where they wore tight low cut frilly blouses and leather corsets is bullshit Hollywood made up because they needed eye candy.
>>18672252They never wore anything like that.>Quality was betterAbsolutely.>>18673614>peasant women's clothes were barely above burlap sacks, they used cheap coarse undyed fabrics and garments were made to be loose and functional.No way. They clothing back then was definitely higher quality. Flax, etc. You weren't even a peasant if you were wearing a burlap sack equivalent. What is true is that clothing was very expensive so you'd only have 2-3 outfits total.There's lots of good channels on women's medieval fashion but unfortunately they're nearly all shitlib for whatever reason. The quality of the clothing is dramatically better and more practical. You don't want anything skintight and you don't want your tits out in the sun / near weirdos who can overpower and rape you without much retribution legally.
>>18673614Undyed 100% handwoven linnen/wool is a luxury material compared to the plastic slop of today.
>>18673620>>18673627Peasants were literally the lowest rung of the social ladder, they couldn't afford to buy fabrics of anything resembling quality or have a tailor make their clothes. They wore whatever fabric was cheapest and they tailored clothes themselves, which is to say poorly. Pre-industrial textiles were significantly more expensive for comparable or lower quality than what we have today, as the entire process of weaving fabric was much slower and full of imperfections. Also stuff fell apart all the time because they used natural thread with no stretch that would slowly rot away. Not everything old was objectively better, you're willingly overlooking a ton of cons just because of muh plastic as if natural fibers were expensive or hard to come by today, a peasant from back then would trade places with you in a heartbeat if they could.
>>18671706>2026>still posting ai crapJust, le imagine
>>18671713>clearsFuck off, you stupid zoomer. That's never going to catch on. Stop trying to make it a thing.
>>18673646Le?Gay.
>>18672023whamen used to have mad drip back then, what changed.?
>>18671706Best is 2026Second is 1990Rest all suck
>>18673733Men stopped having a say in how the dress and live. (Women's lib basically.)
I miss that trashy skanky gaudy 2000s Kesha look
>>18673733Cultural relativism, an alleged expression of our liberal value of tolerance. For one: Doubts about the merits of British society in the face of not only contrary European cultures, but also an unsureness regarding the Christian culture's future in the colonies; all a matter of us wondering if what customs we held to were actually truly the better. For otherwise the world would have to freely go on with its manifold forms of expression, and the height which was reached in Victorian etiquette may remain or crumble -- It's a Hamletian sort of paralysis. We are arrested in doubt, and naturally what comes is we languish rather than remain. We naturally whither, or at least does our splendour -- It's my main theory: This was a confrontation the west and especially Victorian culture, it's fountainhead being in England and The States, had with modernism -- The newly minted reasons for uprooting the old, all in the name of purported liberal values and reason. Though really just a rigid, materialist rationalism being waged -- a bias against time-honoured ideas for the sake of expressing intellectual prowess and virtue signaling by showing tolerance -- AKA pride.What comes down stream of this thesis: An embrace of work-wear as being the new modest everyday wear -- the salt of the earth kind of attire, and thus the most decent. Jeans becoming no longer the peasant wear that may be worn outside of the workplace only due to necessity, but instead are figured to be suited to family occasions, church, professional settings, etc. (I concede that's only part of the reason we pivoted to blue jeans in global culture in the mid-century. A serious factor is the pop-culture cowboy appeal; it expressing western values because work-wear of the frontier is the epitome of western-ness in a sense; just like how Coca-Cola is the epitome of youth culture and takes on global appeal, etc.)The downfall of Victorian attire also stems from confusion about the subject of modesty
>>18673921This isn't AI by the way. I'm just a sperged out paragraph kind of thinker.
>>18673921>>18673922shut the fuck up
>>18673620No. Just no. I've worn woolens and flax homemade by the side of my family who owns a family farm, and they were very stiff and scratchy. Was disappointed in the wool, I expected it to be much sturdier, but alas 3-ply yarn spinning by hand just isn't realistic.>>18673921Idealistic garbage. History evolves according to material changes, culture isn't some stand-alone magical influence, you fucking retard.
>>18673899I ain't comin' back
>>186717062026 girl looks way too 2010s, goddamn, this board's gone to even worse shit than when I left it years ago>>18672252I agree they had better fabrics, but because you're presenting your point like a fucking retard, I'll shit on you, too. Guarantee you don't even know what a bodice is
>>18673959I wasn't yalking about history. I was ralking about fashion specifically and our cultural norms respective of it. These aren't coming from material changes, or differences in means for the most part. Say, a surplus of x or a scant amount of y, etc. You're being reductive here, not I.I'm not saying an ideology patently overtook the world. I'm saying an ideology was dismantled and that lassitude overtook the world. It is something of a butterfly effect. I do believe some ideas and habits in culture, even at a specific point do in fact have monumental influence -- That said, I am not refering to anything monolithic or magical pervading the minds of the public -- unless we are talking about unconscious preferences, which are real. People prefer the modern, and erred that way increasingly through the 20th century -- It's worth figuring why. The notion that there isn't an ideological component that is in some way incendiary, and likewise a trend in attitudes related to doubt and unconfidence -- is stupid. This is real life described. You are trying to say I'm off base. I can't be.
Most of you guys seem clueless to what women and girls are wearing in this age. I work in a mall, I often see women wearing earthy colors (green is common), knit cardigans/tops/skirts. The use of a tie or scarf as a belt is also common among the more fashionista types. Flare jeans and skirts are also popular. Flat fisherman hats are popular
>>18671913This trend have obviously been going on for quite some time, but lately I've noticed that the people rocking the 90s/y2k style feels less LARPy and ironic, instead it seems to have matured and feel authentic, like I get 90s vibe flashbacks, yet contemporary and modern.
I just want a hot slutcore college gf. What do I have to do?
>>18674886Go to college? What do you expect me to say!
I hate most of these styles. Reminds me of that bitch from 17 Again. That woman from Mad TV. It’s too “MILF” or cougar-like. Ewwww. Young girls are hotter.
>>18674055>I was ralking about fashion specifically and our cultural norms respective of it. These aren't coming from material changes, or differences in means for the most part. Say, a surplus of x or a scant amount of y, etc.Until recently they were, like the fabric rationing during the world wars, or the price of purple that made it a sign of nobility, etc.Just re-read your posts and count how many empty vague terms you've thrown around, like "Christian culture" as if Christianity was a solid monolith. Which culminates in senseless bullshit like blue jeans being a symbol of "western values", when before the 1940s and the Marshall plan very few people here wore blue jeans. In the end, you're just a typical larping amerimutt. Crève, mulâtre, crève.
>>18675094Yes but the forms don't really change. E.g. if I cut my trousers loose post-war vs meekly during rationing. The actual tailoring has metamorphosed, please. You have materialist shit brain. It's values (valuing modesty & formality) that don't recover following a cultural/ideological shift.
>>18675094And thus the forms change, and we wear indecent sweatsuits and hoodies and foids wear fishnets and minis -- if ever they wear a skirt. But rationing doesn't change the form, save for it may have further encouraged the adaptation of denim . . . maybe. But you can't keep up this material point. It doesn't explain behaviour.
>>18671733Well he's a nigger
>>18671733Someone has to do it. Keeps the value of average girls up.
>>18674653>The use of a tie or scarf as a belt is also common among the more fashionista types.Yes that true. Saw a few wearing that
>>18674653Women dont wear Father Steve, their opinion is automatically invalid.
>>18674653I hate ugly women tbqh.
>>18671706The 1950s is only beaten by one eraIt is a mix of beautiful and cool and I personally think womens hairstyle's peaked in the 50s
>>18676594
>>18676596
>>18676594>The 1950s is only beaten by one eraBut no era will ever beat the Belle Epoque for fashion and it is geniunely unlikely it ever will be. Woman will likely never again put as much time and effort into their outfit as they during this period and the amount of sophistication and thought went into the design will also never be matched
>>18676599
>>18676602Its crazy to think that people ever took clothing so seriously but in a society where one's dress is a reflection of their feeling of duty towards a shared society then these outfits become real acts of devotion to beauty as a civic princible of common good
>>18675501who says only black men can like soft yt women?
>>1867170680's goth is my favourite but I have a soft spot for the 90's grunge look too
1960s Faster Pussycat feels like styles that haven't really been mined for gold yet.
>>18671706greco-roman
The one where not every fucking girl had tattoos on their arms and biceps like a fucking sailor.
