Endgame Watch - Edition.Post your will-be endgame-watch. Did you already buy it? Tell us more because:This thread offers a forum to discuss and debate wristwatches, pocket watches, and clocks. Several members here are highly knowledgeable in specified areas of horology, so please contribute to the thread by asking questions and/or asking for advice if you are planning on purchasing a watch from an AD or the grey market. Please post pics of your watches here; it doesn't matter if it's worth 5$ or 50000$, because there might be someone who wishes to eventually purchase the same model that you own and would love to hear some real-world advice regarding ownership. The experience matters the most, not the price.Everyone is welcome in this thread, because we are all Frens here.
>>18673580Is endgame watch like a dream watch I'll almost certainly will never be able to afford comfortably, or one I could see myself buying one day?
I scratched my watch :(
>>18673588An endgame watch is the one watch after acquiring it you can say with confidence you're done and no other watch will satisfy your as much as this one.
I think i found love!Please stop me from buying it
>>18673615
Casio time
>>18673634This.
>>18673634You seem angry anon, perhaps this is not the right thread for you.
>>18673641Stop posting your watch so much.
>>18673621How well or bad does the negative display work in daily use? I had to sent back pic related, Casio 5600, because the negative display was barely readable without major struggle to get a right angle to look at it.Basically this but worse:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMpwQE1IxYgOn the other hand, I have read that there's a next generation of negative displays that resemble e- ink and it supposedly has much better viewing angles (but still worse than positive version).
>>18673634He’s in a nursery home and can barely walk. Being the janny of this board is his only achievement in life, have pity.
>>18673644That's what the thread is for. You don't like watches?
>>18673650Bad, you will regret it.
Is it difficult nowadays to swap between a bracelet and a leather strap? If I wanted to get a watch that I could comfortably do that with, should I look for something special, or just grab like one with a bracelet and a matching lug-width strap or the other way around? Any brands or models to look out for?
>>18673658I want YOU to stop posting THAT same fucking Citizen. Are you dense?You post as if it's perfectly normal in a watch thread to just do the same fucking thing over and over. You're an insufferable pile of garbage. People like you make 4chan suck. I guess it's a small price to pay for anyone in your physical vicinity who'd otherwise have to tolerate you were you not glued to the internet. But for this board it's hell. I don't like your watch. I don't like your beliefs. I don't like your OCD nature. I don't like that you can't put the $ where it belongs. I don't like you one fucking bit.
>>18673660What's with these vague and general pointless question? Are you just trying to generate traffic any way you can? Who is this stupid?
>>18673662No, I'm just new. Google gave me conflicting answers (God, Google is so shit nowadays), so I thought I'll ask here.
>>18673580Endgame for me is these two. The Richard Lange for technical prowess and the Lange 1 for design. Tried them both on half a dozen times and I still can't make up my mind.
OP is a pile of shit.
>>18673673yeah he's a real tool, 100% piece of shit
>I just bought ANOTHER Rolex! lel! I'm such a quirky gurl XD
Not a watch guy and I thought about buying my first real watch but I really don't understand the difference between an 8,000€ Rolex, a 4,000€ Omega and a 500€ CitizenIs it mostly just a matter of brand name and status?If so what's a Rolex-equivalent that's not Rolex? Ideally one I can just walk into a shop and buy it.
>>18673669which one has the nice movement? Get the one who won't take 6 months to return from a service.
>>18673685Get a Grand Seiko.
>>18673650It sucks. There's an auto light on setting for low light use when turning the wrist, but it's also not a perfect solution.You can change the polarized film inside the module to make it positive, or swap to a positive TN or STN display module. Both can be done via DIY.The new negative MIP display is very readable upon testing on my wrist, but the bezel of the current 5600 lineup doesn't fit on the new and bigger 5600 MIP module, so I can't swap bezels.
>End-game
when did you realize tachymetré is the most useful watch complication?
>>18673694ID?
>>18673685>I really don't understand the difference between an 8,000€ Rolex, a 4,000€ Omega and a 500€ CitizenThere's a big gap between a Shitizen and a 5K Omega, then above that price there's a diminishing return but still a Rolex is usually better.Rolexes have a perfect wearing experience from the watch to the bracelet (that's why people almost never change a bracelet on a Rolex).A newbie might think that a bracelet is the same from a $500 to a $10K, but a bracelet on a Rolex will have: >no gap between the case or bracelet (less than 1mm)>a good tapper, screwed last links (not pins)>ceramics used inside every link so overtime there's no play in the bracelet>micro-adjustments>better finishing on the metal (exact same brushing than the case, alternate brush and shiny parts), 912L metal as well>...Then the movement, the reliability over DECADES. You can still service a Rolex from 1950 and it will work, it's made to last a lifetime.
>>18673696Seconding this>>18673694Need an ID
>>18673696Shitizen Fagman
After lengthy discussions with my watch mentor and self analysis I've come to the conclusion that all watches are shitters.Yes, ALL watches. Your Rolex is a shitter because you overpaid for outdated brand slop. Even your Casio is a shitter, but at least it's cheap.You may think this seems depressing and defeatist, but it's no use trying to argue against logic.For me, this revelation ties horology to something called positive nihilism; nothing really matters and that's a good thing! You can do whatever you want, go anywhere you dare, eventually you'll still end up in the same place.This way of thinking has led me on a true path of discovery in horology. I am not seeking status recognition, I'm not trying to impress anyone, I am simply following my heart, buying what I truly want and I'll continue doing so till the day my short stay on this ball of dirt is over.All watches are shitters, and that's a good thing.
>>18673685>what's a Rolex-equivalent that's not Rolex? Ideally one I can just walk into a shop and buy it.IWC
>>18673701omg you're so right! so so so this
>All watches are shitters
Is this a shitter?
>>18673709Quite literally yes.
>>18673696>>18673699THE Shittywatch
shittercel crash outhe doesnt want you to know his family left him so he has nothing left to do but fill his hovel with chinese products
>>18673723You seem bitter.
Thoughts?>>18673703
>>18673701>and that's a good thing.Yes.
>>18673702I like these despite how tacky they are, the bezel pattern is nice
>>18673669The Richard Lange (left) has an additional bridge plate that holds the mechanism for the heavy central seconds hand, and it also has a Breguet overcoil hairspring. The Lange 1 (right) has the additional complications of date and power reserve, BUT it has a flat hairspring. With Lange, the overcoil is typically found on very complicated watches with a big price tag, so it's nice that it appears on the Richard Lange which is meant to be as simple, legible, and accurate as possible. I asked a Lange watchmaker at a launch event why the overcoil isn't present on the Lange 1 and other models. I thought perhaps the timekeeping accuracy improvement is negligible and it's just a homage feature. What he told me that it really does improve the timekeeping, but accurate timekeeping isn't a key feature of the Lange 1 family, whereas it is for the Richard Lange family.This sort of pissed me off, because for a company that markets themselves as the pinnacle of watchmaking, it sucks to see that they don't include an overcoil hairspring because "we don't care about accuracy on most models." Clearly their Richemont-backed marketing department understands the average normalfag watch-buyer will not obsess over such autistic details, and it is therefore pointless to put in extra effort beyond the pre-defined concept of what each watch should represent as a marketable product.It's a very German approach, really. They could make every watch better but they'd rather have a range of quality-levels to arbitrarily create a hierarchy. They say every Lange has the same level of finishing, which is mostly true, but there are other shortcuts they take.Because I love spring drive though, I already have a watch that tickles the accuracy pickle. I just don't know I will ever be able to justify spending 4x the cost of my next most expensive watch to buy a Lange 1 just because I think it's pretty.
>>18673740Didn't mean to reply to that anon, ignore that.
>>18673773everybody is ignoring you either way
>>18673701>but it's no use trying to argue against logic.But we're not buying watches because of logic. We are buying them against all logic.
>>18673690>There's an auto lightIt will drain the battery.
>>18673782Did you even read what anon wrote? Is your reading comprehension limited?
>>18673661I'm not that anon, I'm not posting the Citizen. This is a watch thread. That Citizen is a watch. A Weekdater is a watch. Casio is a watch. Lange is a watch. ROLEX is a watch. Anons can post any watch they wish here. Why don't you post some watches, anon?
>>18673787We buy watches with feelings, not logic.
>>18673682Stupid dumb whore full of shit
>>18673845incel sour grapes.
>>18673682She really likes larping that she doesn't have a lot of money, too.
What does sour grapes even have to do with it?
>>18673580Sup. Just put this on a strap
Good evening, gentlemen.>>18673877Looking sharp.
>>18673669white gold or yellow gold for these
>pisses all over your Seicope
>>18673888Thanks. It’s a very underrated line of watches. https://oracleoftime.com/corum-temps-mecanique/
>>18673580I'm getting 3 watches from Venezianico, as getting a brand new Zelos Aurora Field from the manufacturer is no longer possible.It's a quest to get THE fancy watch.Expect some simping or rage posting about Venetian happy merchants in the coming week.
>>18673943Filthy Italian scammers that changed their name from Meccaniche Veneziane after they scammed
>>18673955It's 2026, not 2018.
>>18673930Holy shit this is ass.
>>18673783That's what batteries are for. They're fifty cents if you buy them in bulk and change them yourself.
>>18673792That's a super cool watch.
>>18673872A lot of people on this website wield words they do not understand.
>>18673888You totally suck. Maybe switch to posting the black one every other week so we can hate you differently.
>>18673615Zombie brand made in China.
>>18673943I've seen some complaints about their QC and movements on reddit. Been looking at the Nereide Bronzo for a few months now, but the Aluminum Bronze seems to get an ugly patina.
>>18674087So what? He's in love with it.
Kofe time
>>18674127Really?At least I know you live a pathetic life. No one with any joy or satisfaction would do what you do. I pity you.
>>18674130you live a pathetic life. No one with any joy or satisfaction would do what you do. I pity you.
>>18674133What a witty retort. I couldn't have come up with something better myself. Oh wait, I did.
>>18673580I will never understand how they got the depth of the dial to be so deceptively deep but so simple looking at the same time. The reflection of the CITIZEN logo, the seemingly floating markers on the surface, making it look like it's alive. The date window, I my God that date window where does it even begin? What's its height, it's depth? Is it higher than the markers? It misses the hands by how much? And what's going on with that depth perception? It looks like the window will be flooded any minute now by the live dial, swallowing it, and yet, it remains protected. Even to the plebian, untrained eye, it feels like there's so much more going on. That Phoneix at 6? Yeah, that's the stuff that only the best of the best can claim. The dial text? CITIZEN. and NOTHING else. Nothing else is needed. Those who know, know. It truly is an anomaly in the watch world.
>>18674136That watch blows. At least it does now and always will for the rest of time because you've ruined it by posting it every hour.There's just a thin layer of plastic where the logo is printed. That's why there's the shadow. It's a simple and ugly watch. Made ugly by its being spammed on the board by a nazi.
I accidentally washed/dried my Ana-Digi Temp. Everything works but I can't find either of the band pins and it's absolutely scuffed to complete fuck now.
>>18674137you need to go outside man. This place doesn't do you good.>>18674139>washed AND dried>still worksBASED
>>18673877Looks good actually, nice. How thin/thick is it?
>>18674137How much? I scratched my daily watch, i really need to buy myself a beater.
>>18674140Great build quality yeah, but I can't wear thr thing until I can get the band back on. I've never had to buy replacement parts before, and I don't think I can do anything about the scuffing. I wish there were more watches that had this digital/analog style.
>>18674137>Made ugly by its being spammed on the board by a nazi.NTA but dog fucker anon is right on this.
I need advice. I'm considering buying Addiesdive AD2519 watch from Aliexpress (pic related), but reading reviews about Miyota 8215 movement and how it produces a lot of unwanted sound gave me a pause. How loud is it really?I have a watch with Miyota 82S0 movement and it is very quiet but I'm not sure I can directly compare it to 8215 even if they seem to belong to the same movement family.Does anyone here have any hands-on experience on Miyota 8125 movement and can give a comment?
>>18674149daddy's little diver
>>18674149I have at least five of them. It's a noticeable whirring sound, but I like it. I flick my wrist to make it spin and see how long I can make it go. Like spinning a coin on its edge on a table. But you're charging your watch if you spin in the right direction. This is my favorite watch with a noisy Miyota. But it's a good movement. Most of them come with hacking now too. The 9000 series is a little better I've read. But I think for everyone's practical use the 8000s are fine. I've seen most watch reviewers saying that and I've not had any issues with mine; but like I said, I enjoy the noise. NH35, PT5000, and others don't have a noticeable rotor sound. I have a couple of $40 autos with loud rotors, but they're shitty because they're bulky and heavier movements. The rotors tend to shake the case on those ones. To summarize, Miyotas may be audible but it's not associated with any inferiority. With a lot of Aliexpress brands you can upgrade movements for not a lot of money. I think the SW200 costs a full $100 more when it's offered, but it's a Swiss ETA clone, top of the line. Also, a lot of Addiesdive watches are updated so they don't have that logo anymore. If you don't like it there should be alternatives and even a sterile dial. But as far as those really common pilot designs go, multiple brands and multiple "stores" will sell many versions of the same thing. Especially that one. And there will be different prices and levels of quality and even movements available. Really look at everything. Type in the dimensions in the search and you'll see many options, and sometimes you can find the exact same one but $15 less with free shipping. Sometimes one store will have slightly different colors or straps. Nothing is worse than finding out you could have saved $30 or more on a watch if you just scrolled down further. But Addiesdive is a good brand with a reputation for quality.I've seen a few reviews where they spin the rotor for the mic so you can hear it.
>>18674166Thanks a lot! I will do one more round of sifting through reviews where they actually record the movement noise and then I'll make the final decision if the noise exceeds my tolerance. If so, I will consider buying this watch with NH35 movement, even if it is a bit pricier.By the way, is the whirring noise present constantly, or is it only audible when the watch is charged to the max (when springs are at their maximum tension) and gets quieter over time?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiMWtU8kPochttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiMWtU8kPochttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiMWtU8kPocMORE LIKE SHITSTOCK
>>18674171It's garbage but also perfect in every way.
Pretty good
>>18674169No, the noise is just the sound when it spins. There's no resistance when it fills up like with winding the crown on some older movements. And even if it were that way, it's likely a unidirectional rotor system anyway and is only charging if it's spinning in the right direction. But it's not distracting in your life. If you're by yourself in a quiet room and you do a waving motion you can hear little spins. You can learn to control it so it does or doesn't spin too. It's just momentum. But I find myself flicking my wrist absentmindedly while wearing a quartz or a handwind and then being disappointed, as I often have some kind of automatic with a rotor to flick, regardless of how apparent that is when I do it. I might do a quick video and post to /wsg/ and link to it. Also, there's an entire budget watch thread that Addiesdive discussion would fit better in. >>18674068They often don't appreciate "shitters" in these highfalutin horology threads.
>>18673701TGV is that you?!
Why is the watch thread so toxic? This is easily the most toxic general on the entire site.
>>18674211Because the other faggot with his citizen is ruining it for everybody. That's spam at this point, he should be permabanned.
>>18674191ID on this bracelet?
>>18673888I never realized the polished bevels on THE CITIZEN were so wide. Looks nice. It's not as plain as I thought.
Citizen THE CITIZEN.
>>18674232It's a GW-5000 with the bezel and bracelet of a GW-B5600BC, the bracelet is known as the combi bracelet v2 (part no. 10575397).
>>18674220All because he posted a fit check a couple years ago and he was made fun of for his gyno. Poor boy.
>>18674220Have you tried not seething? Then it's just shittyzen without 20 posts of seethe per pic of shitizen and the thread would eventually get better.
>>18674260>and the thread would eventually get better.I’m actually not sure about that. So many of the good posters with actual watch knowledge left a long time ago. They were not replaced. Anyone who comes to the thread now sees it as a cesspit and only stays because they like to see/participate in toxicity.This is what the thread is now, all because a couple of spergs couldn’t handle it when no one liked their watch.
I miss Omega Drunk bros..
>be me>used to be an important /wt/ contributor>haven't posted in a watch thread in months because the quality has gone downhill>decide to see what's up>it's the same retards posting the same shit over and over just like a year agoFucking hell, this is nightmarish.
I'm slowly becoming an appreciator of smaller watches.I can sort of pull off even a huge watch, but truth be told, it's just less comfy. A huge watch I need to wear a bit high on my wrist to truly stop it from interfering with hand movement.
>>18674289>used to be an important /wt/ contributoryeah sure.i coined the terms reversocel, bittercel, shittercel, poorlex, gay sexo, shitizen, poojeet filthippe. what have you done?
>>18674303>I coined the terms…Well Reverso anon named you Bittercel, but yeah, I’ll grant you the others.
why aren't whores bitter?
i mean ugly whores, feminists, those cunts are bitter. but the sexy pretty whores, why do they get to have fun?
>>18674308>post a non answeri accept your concession. now fuck off back to redit with the rest of the poser faggots.
>>18674311Non-answer? Calm down, Bittercel, I was just making a minor correction to your post. No need to go from zero to malding in such a short time. Relax. Watches are supposed to be fun.
>>18674295Yeah, smaller = comfier.
>>18674320shitter time?
>>18674316How small is too small on an average man though?
>>18674332There’s no hard and fast rule since it depends on your wrist size and shape, along with other factors like the shape of the watch. (i.e. square watches wear much larger than round watches)The style of the watch matters too. A 34mm dress watch with a narrow bezel might look fine but a 38mm dive watch might look elfin.
My new grail
I think it looks super cool, especially in motion, I kinda want to get one.
>>18674344A 36mm dress watch with a narrow bezel sounds like a good idea for my next purchase.
>>18674130I know this watch is a joke about having all the time in the world to do what you want to do in retirement, but I think it's actually a terrible idea for a retirement watch for the same reason a Daydate is a great retirement watch. Not only is it easy to lose track of time as you grow older(a lot of clocks intended for senior people will have the day even if they don't have the date to make sure they can remember their day to day routines) but it can remind you to be mindful of the day and savor it for what it is.Also it's SOLID GOLD, FUCKERS!!!!!
Kofé time.
>>18674413Ok. See you tomorrow.
>>18674413Negga tf is that citizen
>>18674414Tomorrow? He'll be back within the hour.
>>18674413wait That's a citizen? ID?
>>18674320K I N O
>>18674303>I coinedAnd you're the only one who uses them. This is all in your head and we desperately wish you'd leave.
>>18674320We have a real white man here
>>18674349This thing looks terrifying. And I don't mean the nig.I have no idea what were they thinking. It would make sense only if it was a weird limited collector series.
Sup watch nerds. So i have this Seiko 5 daily beater but my strap broke and I need to get something to replace it. Summer is coming so I don’t want leather, I don’t want a nato or any nylon really. I don’t want rubber because the watch isn’t waterproof (yes I’m autistic) but I was thinking maybe a Milanese. What do we reckon? Is a Milanese going to be too dressy and formal or is it kind of sporty? Are there any other choices? I was looking at apple leather ones but do they withstand sweat?
>>18674478Not wanting a NATO is actually a very positive trait in you, congrats chap. Cheers!
>>18674141thank you. its thin, maybe 4.5mm
>>18674376Indeed, by the way I just read that this is one of Donald's favourite, which is not surprising at all since it's gold and he doesn't know shit about where he is on earth.
>>18674310I never thought I'd see Igor posting in /wt/.
Took this yesterday.
zogbot hours
Kofe time.
>>18674531Very nice. I took this a minute ago. Sun is shining, coffee is still warm, the cat is purring, life is good.
>>18674478Perlon, sailcloth. Also hybrid straps with leather upper and rubber underside. Milanese would stand out a bit due to the black dial, but you can try.
>>18674332As >>18674344 said it depends, but by today's standards anything under let's say 35mm will look small. Smart watches have skewed the average way up, it's better now that they're getting smaller, but half the people walk around with small black pucks on the wrist. Smaller might also mean harder to read. Some youtuber once said that the ideal dial size is 29mm.
>>18674488That's very thin for an automatic. It must look like a fat coin on your wrist. Nice.
>>18673580>Endgame WatchI'm a humble man.
Mother of God, my entire life since buying these clocks has been a lie
They are supposed to sync multiple times a day. Motherfucker!And even when syncing them next to the window, they don't 100% lockstep. See videohttps://streamable.com/7cqpzg
>>18674545>catEwwww
>>18674557>>18674558Only in /wt/ we find such indepth exposes.Thank you for your contribution. I expect the Techno clock sales to tank once this spreads around the collective mind.
>>18674560I should have done this before the return window ran out. Maybe contact them directly and threaten to run their business into the ground. By the way I also have pics with the "radio synced" button on!!!
I can't put into words how upset I am (srs)
When I compare to time.is it now shows the same time but I feel that the changing of the seconds is not 100% in lockstep. It must be 10ths of a second off since it can be perceived with the naked eye
>>18674560>Thank you for your contribution.You are welcome and if you are sarcastic then I hope you get run over by a truck
Maybe one clock is receiving signal and one is not due to obstacles
>>18674561>>18674558You should contact perezcope, he'll get this out to the world.
>>18673682have you seen the faggot guy who is making conspiracy/stalker type videos about her?
>>18674580Like what? Link?
>>18674580You mean the people exposing her lying about getting money and/or product from brands for doing videos about them, and(less critically) how dishonest she is pretending she's a broke loser that can't afford watches like the audience she's trying to cultivate?
>>18674561high accuracy quartz wins again
>>18673871This part always takes the cake for me. She and her husband are loaded, but she likes to pretend like she's not while also sporting several 5-figure watches. It's comical and really nonsensical to be 'le-poor-quirky-girl-wearing-FPJourne-and-Rolex.'
>>18673682Look at that scrawny ass build, even for a woman.
>>18674561Did you used to own an Armani watch?
>>18674645Who's her husband? Apparently she's using a fake name on Youtube.
>>18674720I may be misremembering but didn’t she set up a GoFundMe when her Journe got stolen?
None of the Journe watches are aesthetically appealing enough for me to want one. Have you tried one on? The dials suck, they're flat as paper with no luster or intrigue. Lange are the only ones that make conservative dials properly.
>>18674725Yes, but it didn't get stolen according to the video and comments, it got confiscated at customs because her husband didn't report it.
>>18674733I actually laughed out loud.
>>18674733>>18674725KEK
>>18674359what does it say? bayblade?>>18674730yea they're shitinvenit et feces>>18674531what is this strap? looks like someone took a dump>>18674191perfection
>>18674738Drink bleach, Ranjeet.
Can you bros suggest me some watches that match these criteria?>quartz>solar>36 mm>narrow bezel>dreess-ish (optional)
>>18674580i need to see that, update me on this
>>18674580>>18674595>>18674756I'm not sure if this is the best one or nothttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8sTC44b5cQ
>>18674757Oh yeah, this old fag is unhinged.He's attacking every other big watch youtuber, kek, he thinks he's in the WWE or something.
>>18674758He’s hoping that one of them will start beef with him and boost his own view counts. Christ, social media just makes everyone fucking rotten.
>>18674501who tf is donald?
>>18674757His eyes are a red flag immediately,,,
>>18674730That date window frame is a bit meh, the markers too, they could have a word or two with GS.
>>18674720He's a watch dealer, isn't he? Or did i mistake him for Jenny's husband, who i'm sure is a watch dealer?
>It's a conversation pieceGod, I hate this dumb argument.
thoughts?
>>18674807
>>18674437AE0432-07T
>>18674805I imagine it's for the type of conversation you have with yourself in the shower.
First watch that isn't a casio that I bought. I'm enjoying it very much
I really dig how this looks, but how does this only have a 38 hour power reserve? My seiko prospex has 72 hours and cost 3 times less.
>>18674149Buy the version without the ugly as shit logo at least.
>>18674905Your Seiko also gains or loses 30 seconds a day.
>>186749116r35 movements go like 90+ per day out of the box. They have to get regulated the moment you buy them.They're absolutely garbage in that regard, and I blame watch reviews for never pointing this out.
>>18674754CITIZEN STILETTO
>>18674918Yeah, I love my new baby alpinist but it gains like 30-60 seconds a day, it's awful. Bought it brand new too, like you said. I didn't think inaccurate watches would annoy me this much, but going from a Tissot PRX, which only gained/lost like 4-5 seconds a day from my experience, to this was pretty insane.
So I finally pull the trigger on a Grand Seiko and just pick this up today.
>>18674905the rest went into the brand name chuddy
>>18674965Hell yeah, nice. Post pics once you get it.I'm trying to narrow down my next watch purchase, and while I definitely want a GS I think it would be cool to get one in Japan once I get around to visiting there since it would be a cool sort of souvenir.
>>18674965Nice dial, post pics when you get it. I'm interested if the dial is anything lime the one on my vintage Seiko.
>>18674805Here is my personal most hated argument>it allows you to check the time discretely in situations where it shows lack of culture if you check the time on your phone
I couldn't sleep at all last night and I lashed out with extremel anger at my wife this morning over a meaningless thing. I think it's caused by the radio clocks not syncing
Part of me regrets lashing out so hard, part of me regrets not having stayed single. I really really wish to be single with no woman weighing me down. I often cope by saying that I would want a woman if I were single so I should calm down.Any guys here who actually had the balls to do what it takes to reclaim their freedom?
>>18674968It’s the first nice watch I own now. The only current decent watches I own is my Casio F91W and a Garmin Fernix 7X I only owned for three years before it shat on me. I went to the only two GS stores in LA and sales rep was really nice, I was honestly nervous as this was my first browsering these high end luxury stores without being scoffed at for looking like a poorfag. I got to try on a few different watches before this one caught my eye and decided to pull the trigger on it. The Sales rep had threw in some Japanese whiskey tasting and a GS branded pen while he was fitting the links to my wrist. Overall really pleasant experience.>>18674971The hand is more of an emerald green than a lime. I originally wanted to get a used grey dial with lime hand but once he showed me this I knew I wanted it.
>>18674976>but once he showed me this I knew I wanted it.Ah so you've tried it on slready? What's the dial color? Is it just plain silver or does it change colors depending on the light? Mine goes from white to silver to gray, and it's very reflective, like they've coated it with rhodium or something.
>>18674945They come out of the factory unregulated, take it to a watchmaker (ask for the price first), he can regulate it and it'll perform much better.
>>18674976Nice man enjoy it. The only nice watch I own is a used Tudor I bought off ebay, but I've gone to look at watches a few times and all of the sales reps have been cool except the one at Rolex lol
>>18674976are the case and the bracelet even the same metal?
>>18674976right sizing and nice watch thoNot like that absolute cancer and his SHITIZEN
Why are these threads mostly resellers?
>>18674991Who? No one in here is selling anything.
Would you guys trust these "new" Murphs out of Poland?They're not absurdly cheap, but about half of what new ones should be.
>>18674905I dislike everything about that watchIf you go two tones, you have to put some gold on the bracelet, otherwise it just looks like the dial belongs to another watch.That moonphase looks like shit, it doesn't inspire a majectic night sky. It doesn't inspire a retro style either, it's just a tasteless mall design.Moonphases go better with leather straps anywaysBadly integrated date.7 row bracelet is 3 different widths of links is not a clean designThe shield logo is shit, i wish Tudor would use the Rose logo instead.You just know that it's their entry point, they try to make those kind of shit on purpose.
>>18674995China now makes clones of Tissot PRX and of micro-brands models. So yeah, i wouldn't be sure those are legit now.
>>18674965>>18674968GS-Chads....we can't stop winning
>>18674968>it would be cool to get one in Japan once I get around to visiting there since it would be a cool sort of souvenir.wow, so original, you fucking NPC.Do you have one original thought or do you just outsource it to whatever is being pushed by the algorythm?https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=buying+a+grand+seiko+in+japan
>>18674999Damn. Too good to be true, huh? I won't take that chance again. Actually, maybe I should. If I can prove it's counterfeit ebay will refund me AND I get to keep the watch again. There's money in escrow while everything is determined. But in the end I win either way.
>>18675012Do people really watch those vertical "shorts" on Youtube? I refuse to click on them. I don't really ever use the internet on my phone anyway. So that orientation just looks stupid on widescreen.
>>18675012Post watches with timestamp or you're just poor and jealous because you can't afford a plane ticket or a Grand Seiko.
The watch reviewers on YouTube are at best full of shit and at worst actively paid shills. If their positive reactions to the new Christopher Ward GMT watch don't confirm that for you nothing will.
>>18675024If you're gullible enough to buy a Christopher Wart, it's on you.
>>18675014Just replace "shorts" with "watch" in the url and you can watch them as normal videos.
>>18674991Meds
>>18675024Plenty of reviewers aren't full of shit. They just don't have millions of viewers. But I'm not that into super expensive luxury stuff, so there are many reviewers I pay no attention to who probably are shilling.I like the really honest guys who just point out all the pros and cons of each watch. I haven't seen many videos where it's just all praises. Watches without anything to critique are out of my price comfort zone. I'm blowing up this Polish dude's ebay messaging inbox about the $438 Murph. It's a curious case. He's got nothing but the Murphs for sale, and they could even be the same one that he has two straps for. First time seller. But he accepts returns. And like I said I'm covered either way. If I crack it open and find out it's counterfeit (or if it's just brutally obvious from first sight like my "Alpinist") ebay refunds me. The only reason I haven't bought it already is just because that's a bit of a splurge even if it's all legit. I guess since I can't lose I should just jump on it before someone else does. May as well get the bracelet one too. I can easily change it down easier than up, and for just 20 some dollars more IF it's the real deal that's the smart buy. Resale value wise. And if I decide it's not better than my homages I guess I can just "flip" it and sell it for $600. See, I don't know why he's not doing that. He could still undercut everyone else selling them at $800 to $1,000. The Alpinist I should have seen coming. But this is different. He could ask $700 and still do better. Is it true, those jokes about the Polish? LOL
There are at least 3 different sellers in different countries (including a guy here in USA) with sub $500 Hamilton Khaki Murphs for sale. They all have no sales history and the same exact info listed for the watch. Only the Polish guy offers returns. Even with my money back guarantee I think the main thing holding me back is not that it might be a fake watch, but that it might be real. Then I'd have dipped my toe into Swiss watch territory and suddenly spending $500 for a watch is not so intimidating. Will I hold it and the snobs here will all have been right and I'll really *feel* the craftsmanship and the "high horology" of this higher level? Will I suddenly think all my shitters suck? And then start wanting my first Rolex?I don't want that to happen to me. The Murph is really supposed to be the watch to end the hunt. Just get it and be done. But I see people who just got deeper once they got that watch.
But if I'm going to spend that kind of money, maybe I'd rather have this. Fuck. A $50 coupon that's about to expire is fueling this whole thing. I should just get a cool $125 watch so I can redeem it in time and stop drifting into spendier territory. I don't know if I'd be able to wear them without fretting about damage.
Did the Resident Evil guy ever get his 42mm turtle watch?
>>18675040Murph is far, far, far better than this glorified quartz battery hog.
>>18675040>A $50 coupon that's about to expire is fueling this whole thingI would just wait a little while and see how you feel instead of rushing to buy. Use the coupon on something else or just let it expire and wait until you've saved up another $50 so you can make the decision without fomo
Holy Shit! I want this! 39mm, $200.
Can you please stop reposting this? It's just getting embarrassing now.
>>18675044>just let it expireLOLOLOLDude, I became an ebay seller just to get this stupid coupon. And it has not been worth it. It's like when Elaine lost her punchcard for the free sub. The subs taste bad, but you have to hang in there and eat the free one. I went through a lot of shit and barely even made a sale in time. I've come too far to not use it. I'm aware I'm being a totally idiotic consumerist piece of shit right now, but I'll make it up somehow later. In the meantime, I need to make a decision. >>18675043Batteries are cheap. But I realized those are 38mm which is too big for that style. I love my Timex E-line at 34mm. I would have gotten a Precisionist if it were the same size.But more importantly, is it possible that those Murphs are real? I'm not dropping $800 for a watch. $400 I will do, especially if it's for something that's $1,000 new. I even told these guys I don't mind if it "fell off a truck", wink wink. I might see what the best deal I can get on a watch with at least a 70 hour power reserve is. I have lots of research to do still. I'm really going to stop buying watches for a while after whatever I get. So maybe I should get a big one. Shit, this comes in green too. Bulova is no shitter. There's one at a local department store that's $500 and I can't find it anywhere online. It's maroon and made of enamel with an enamel bracelet. I think it had subdials but it wasn't a chrono. Mystery watch I've had in my head a couple months since I saw it. If it's at the store it must exist online, but I haven't found anything like it after a lot of looking. I'm going to go back and try and see it again.
>>18675047This is the most mallshitter automatic watch that ever mallshittered.
>>18675054I don't even know what that means. Do you think it has a poor movement? What's the issue? It looks nice to me.
>>18675019Post your asshole with a timestamp and prove that you're not an AIDS-ridden gapped faggot.
>>18674976Enjoy, anon. Keep us posted on the accuracy.
>>18674945I have the regular sized alpanist (pre-2025 update, SPB121) and I don't have nearly that bad of a problem with losing seconds.
>>18674995>buying anything from shitstern poorope ever
>>18675040>A $50 coupon that's about to expire is fueling this whole thing.That's by design btw.
>>18675055I don't know what country you're in but you probably have something equivalent to a kay jeweler or jared galleria of jewelry in or around your local shopping mall that stocks bulova and citizen. Go there and take a look at the watches in person. When a watch has polished finish all over the case and bezel and a really shiny pale colored sunburst dial like this it just looks really cheap in person in the way that cheap chinese fashion watches made of chromed brass rather than steel look. When everything is shiny there's not enough visual contrast to make it look interesting or show that someone carefully considered how the watch would look and wear or how comfortably the wesrer could read it. Also they're on the thick side for what they are.I basically had to navigate this choice myself because when I got married my wife waited until the last minute to make me aware that she got her family and friends participating in the wedding ceremony nice purses and stuff to thank them for being in the wedding and I didn't want to be unfair to my best man so I had to make the last minute scramble through the nearby malls to get the best gift watch I could find. The choice was basically down to the 38mm murph, something from bulova (probably this thing) or something from citizen. I knew it had to be the murph because it's the most classical and versatile watch in the price range(you can often talk stores down to around $500 or so) and it's thin and has 20mm lugs so you can put it on whatever straps you want. (I think the bulova had 21mm lugs?) The bulova and citizen models with magnifiers on the dates also look retarded.
>>18675070Why the fuck are you so obsessed with feces?! You sound like a nut.
Why aren't watch cases/protectors more popular?I always buy glass tempered screen protectors for my phone, it's a normal thing to do and I can't even tell it's there. So why isn't it normalized for watches too?>but the sapphire will protect itnuh-uh, scratches still happen. Look at this poor anon >>18673599Watch makers want you scratching and buying new watches every year, it's evil
>>18675078I don't mind the citizen tsuyosa watches, not sure about the sunburst but I have the more "cut" NK5010-51L and I think it looks nice. I don't think you can compare it to the Murph though- it costs more than three times as much as citizen/bulova. The "look and feel" difference between a 300 dollar watch and a 1000 dollar watch is night and day.
Ehh... the Murph won't make me happy. Just looking at it on the screen and looking at the homage on my wrist, the crown sticks out too far. Even that 'mall shitter' Bulova has a better crown than the Murph. It's always something. The true Murph has longer lugs than I like anyway. And $400 is probably too good to be true. Those guys probably figured out a way to not get in trouble or lose money selling scam watches even when ebay sides with the buyer.
Jomashop has an ebay store too I just discovered. So I can get another one of the ones I always look at and get $50 off it.I just got a solar Orient from them that should be here soon.
>>18675078You can talk a Murph down to $500?? Maybe these $450 Murphs on ebay aren't bullshit after all. There are just SO many people asking $900. One guy want's $1,200. Same fucking watch, all of them. I don't get why there are wildly varying prices. There are lots of pretty sweet deals though. I don't know if the coupon expires at midnight or I have all day tomorrow. >>18675072Yeah, I know.
I won this 10k gold filled Wittnauer in an auction. Pretty excited to get it.
>>18675100looks like shite, mate
>>18675100Looks like the shit you find on the beach. And even then i'd throw it away.
Why is this place so fucking toxic?
>>18675100Neat piece, wear it proudly brother.>>18675110this is 4chan, always has been
>>18675100nasty dogs hit with retarded nazi motifs. you have to be a fucking retard to spend money on this. what a disgrace. >>18675100
I'm literally vomiting.
New Tudor Black Bay Pro B&W leakedthoughts?
>>18675117There's no Nazi shit on that watch. I don't know what crawled up your butt, but I'm sorry you're having such a miserable time. You should buy a new watch to lift your spirits. :)
>>18675119Awful, I seriously hope this isn't the 100th anniversary reveal.
>>18675051I prefer that to the endless flow of shitters and shit in here.
Thinking about this one. But I'm worried whenever I see "refurbished" because I think it means Frankenwatch. This seller has a good reputation though. Canada isn't India. The closer to home, the more I trust it.Vintage watches are such a gamble.
>>18675119Look to the cookie
>>18675127Fuck yourself. You don't like anything.
>>18675128>Canada isn't India.Oh, you sweet summer child…
>>18675128Spend less time thinking about watches and more time working.Perhaps you will have more money and will be able to buy watches that are not ebay shitters.
>>18675130poorfaggot. nobody likes your cereal box shitters.SHITTERS.
>it's not gold plated, it's gold FILLED>see I'm not a poor fag, this is a classy dress watch>yes it's 33mm, b-but I didn't get it because I'm a wristletkeep coping poorfag wristlet.
>>18675133>>18675135>>18675138haha, miserable troll can't handle it. I hope you have a happy day, anon. I like this one. What do you think?
>>18675140shitter
nothing like a classic armitron, am I right?
>>18675119If it's still the old thick one, I sleepIf it's finally a thinner version with the new smaller gmt movement, real shit.
>>18675143Somehow I know you would respond with that. Every single brand is a shitter to you. If I bought a Rolex would that shut you up? Probably not. I'd have bought a "cheap shitter Rolex" that you don't approve of. >shoulda spent $15,000 more for a decent one but you're POORlol, so predictable. Sad troll. Very negative.
this one is sweet but the guy says it only runs 5 or 6 hours. Not much of a power reserve. haha
>>18675147There's a difference between a vintage watch and a trash old watch.What you post is depressing;, that was bought in 1978 by some accountant who needed to know the time but had zero money and zero taste. Fast forward 40 years later, that accountant dies in a nursing and even the kids don't want those watches. They said to the nurse "eh, you can throw it all away, my dad had nothing of value, only SHIT watches". Then the nurse, LaQuincha, tries to sell the shitter on Ebay, and you faggot repost it here.That's the cycle, you post jinxed shitters from dead people. You are the butthole of the whole watch market.
>>18675154I actually feel badly when I'm looking around on chrono24 and see old watches that are personalized with engravings and notes to the recipient and stuff. Like, fuck, this guy got a watch through working or having a good relationship with someone else for many years, he was some way or another loved and appreciated, and now probably the grandkids are seeing if they can get something better than the gold scrap value for it. Fuck that's grim.
>>18675154Why would you invent some stupid story? All that matters is that a watch looks good to me. I guess our tastes don't align. There's nothing objectively wrong with any of these watches.
>>18675157I don't think it's always like that. There might not have been anyone left to care. Or maybe it was left in a storage unit and sold at auction. Who knows? Not everything has some depressing story tied to it. Not everyone's kids are heartless, greedy little shits who want to get some money and run off. Everyone here today is such a fucking downer. Even more than usual. THAT is grim.
This one keeps popping up and it seems great until I realize it's 14mm thick. Oooof
>>18675157>I actually feel badly when I'm looking around on chrono24 and see old watches that are personalized with engravings and notes to the recipient and stuff.There's watches like this you find all the time, it's the NOMOS ludwig given to employees by Siemens. Very often they try to sell them immediatly.Those are literally new NOMOS, just engraved and NOMOS does not appear on the dial but a white on white engraving of the Siemens guy (which is a plus imo).
>>18675163and the price is usually very goodI almost bought one once, but i'm not a dress watch person.
This is kinda sweet.
>>18675164i mean, for 800 bucks, it's arguably the best bang for your buck in that price range.
This is new old stock from the 50s. $200 35mmPretty neat.
>>18675163I'm obviously not talking about new watches. I'm talking about gold and gold filled watches that say stuff like "from Bob's heating and cooling, for 30 years of service. 1982" or "to bubby from meemaw 1969."
I keep saying I'm never again buying a Seiko 5 with that movement you can't hand wind at all, but there are a lot of cool ones.This one is mint vintage for $200I kind of don't want any more date complications though.
discovered this weird italian microshitterbrand and now i kind of want one. 24 hour bezel, no date, no numbers. its awesome.
>>18675173forgot pic
>>18675171It's useful to be able to remind yourself that a lot of old watches don't look like shit because they're old. Many of them also looked like shit when they were new.
>>18675176I have not posted a single watch that I think looks like shit at all. I don't really think it's cute to post ugly watches. Sorry you don't like ANY of them. You're a sourpuss.
>>18675174>microshitterThey're at least $600 though. You guys call everything 'shitter'. It's fucking annoying.
"New with imperfections" For $190Another too-good-to-be-true deal I'm sure. Seller of course has zero sales and nothing else on offer. Isn't that always the way?
>>18675178no in house movement and i think 'made in italy' has some asterisks. most microbrands are shitter brands and most shitters are microbrands.
>>18675171total shit, shit brand, shit watch
>>18675182Oh, you're one of these 'in house movement' sticklers. lol
This is cool for $130
>>18675185that always mattered, retard. dont you have a containment thread to go spam?
Turns out I have until midnight tomorrow to use my coupon. I might just get something like this, which is $140 and therefore $90 with my coupon.I'm much more comfortable with watches like this from China that I know are going to be really good quality for the price. Vintage, you never know what you're going to get or how long it will work.Entry Seiko autos I know exactly what I'm going to get, and it's not worth it.>>18675190I'm spreading the joy.
Might grab my first Vostok. This is $160 and 39mm.
I've always liked this one. $50 off is a coupon you won't get off AE unless you spend like $600.
>>18675181What imperfections? For that cheap something must be fucked up with the movement?
>>18675190Stop being such a bitter little faggot, will you?
>>18675191Why do you still care about "entry level" watches after buying like 80 of them? You're still impulse buying shit like an unmedicated and brain damaged retard
>>18673943Aaaand there it is. I was skeptical about the prices, but those things look damn good.My only surprise is that the dial of Arsenale Byzantino features a silver to black gradient with sunburst effect, while on promo materials it looks more like a black dial with sunburst effect. Looks I'm going to have some "fun" with adjusting the bracelets.
>>18675276>>18673943I'm glad you enjoy them, I love the brand but can't justify buying one since anything I would want from it would supplant something I already have and enjoy in my collection.
>>18673943>>18675276>I getting 3 watches from Venezianico, as getting a brand new Zelos Aurora Field from the manufacturer is no longer possible.You sir have immaculate tastes. Those tribal engravings are reminiscient of the tasteful Ed Hardy style that was quite prevalent in tattoos amongst men of culture in the early 2000 era.
>>18675276Wow this is a beautiful, how much it is cost? My grandfather engrave plaque on dentist, very skilled artisan.
>>18675119
Any recommendations for a 38-40mm dressy watch with Roman numerals, dark dial, day of the month and weekday for up to around $1k?
>>18675308I expect something artistic of THE fancy watch. Artistic but toned down enough to not make it look like an Invicta.On a side note, it's strange that with all the modern day machining, engraved cases and bracelets seem to be rare.American Montana has some interesting pieces, but damn their prices are jump scares.
>>18675316This completely mogs the Tudor
>>18675331>>18675308I considered ordering a Palais Royale from Louis XIV, but...>date window>chronograph>giant sizeA lot of deal killers for me
>>18675119>>18675316Tudor copying other brands as usual.
>>18675312900 euros. Craftsmanship or not, I say the brand follows the old Venetian tradition of rivalizing with Jews in the trade.
>>18675344Rivalizing? Just making up words, are you?
>>18675242haha, I guess I'm doing it wrong. By now I should really want a middle management watch, right? I should have "graduated" to a "higher" taste and price bracket. I've learned about watches with my little shitter training wheels, and now it's time to start sinking thousands of dollars into each watch. Is that how it's supposed to be?You're so clueless and stubborn. I don't even think you're posting in good faith. It's as if you don't recognize that there are lots of collectors who just enjoy affordable watches. You got sold a bill of goods, dingus. You've been conditioned to believe all the stupid shit you keep spouting. After all these months you act like you still don't fucking get it. But you do. You recognize that I'm different than you are. And you wish to insult me for it. You try to extinguish my joy with your negativity and disapproval. If you were satisfied in your own life you wouldn't be a cunt on the internet. Everyone knows that.I hope you get the watch you're scrimping and saving for so you can feel better about yourself. Spreading misery here is a bad look.Hope things get better for you. :)
>>18675316Actually mogs the Tudor, hilarious. But I guess when you are a discount Rolex and discount Omega, there is only so much in the way of imagination you can capture.
>>18675404Yes, Rolex and Omega are SO much better than Tudor. Yet none of you sniveling bitches who constantly throat luxury watch cock even have any of them. What is the point of cheerleading for watches you don't even own? lol, it's the funniest thing ever. You guys keep doing your work though. Keep everyone in line. Remind us all the accepted hierarchy of brands according to the watch snob consensus.
>>18675409I wouldn't buy any of them in the first place because I'm not a chump. I'd instead (which I have) buy a superclone, post it here, and watch no one say a thing. I've done this before, several times. They're not terribly expensive. They're the price of a "Eh" Citizen, and they're completely undetectable to 99.999% of the people here. No one's ever said shit when I've posted mine, and I will continue to. I'm debating what to buy next just to keep poisoning the well.
>>18675402>You recognize that I'm different than you areyes. you are lesser. everyone is better than you. you are as bad as it gets.>It's as if you don't recognize that there are lots of collectors who just enjoy affordable watchesnone have even 20 watches let alone 80. you're a wasteful faggot. if you bought 80 things you were happy with, you wouldn't keep buying them. you wouldnt even get to 80. you just like spending money and apparently alixpress sellers are perfectly happy to take it. the chinks selling you 'boderry' are just as much of conmen as the ones selling you fake vintage seikos. they all take you for a mark. because you are.so to reiterate, you are alone in your hovel, with a pile of shitters nobody appreciates, including you, searching for any way to fill the void in your soul. your family left you.
>>18675328Bambino?
NEW THREAD WHEN??
>>18675418when shittercel slits his wrists
@OmegaDrunk@Mort@whoreanon@Dadwatch@Weekdaterchad@CitizenGod@Hamibro@PurpleGS-Chad@Protagonistplease, someone, make a thread!
NEW>>18675427NEW>>18675427
>>18675412haha, cool.
>>18675413Lots of collectors have way more watches than me. Just watch some of the channels of the people who review them. Those guys show off huge collections of inexpensive watches. Are you really unaware of that? Do you actually think they have fewer than 20?You should probably comment on their videos. Post things like that, that you're better than they are. That they are "wasteful faggots". What exactly am I wasting? My collection is in great condition in nice display boxes. I keep them shined up and set. I love them and wear them. I don't have any Boderry watches though. I don't care for them. We all make mistakes. I'm not a mark. I got a refund for my "fake vintage Seiko" in return for a positive rating. I always win. I've never paid for a watch I wasn't happy with. A lot of people appreciate my watches. There are comments here all the time that are positive. And I sure as hell appreciate them. Do you think this is all an act? That I'm faking enthusiasm? That I keep buying watches as some sort of goof?And no one left me. My family is here.Maybe I am trying to fill some void. That's what hobbies can be. I know it's been hard to be as happy as I was before my dad died. The watches have helped keep my spirits up. I try and spread the joy of buying watches here, but I know you don't care for it. Good thing I'm not concerned about pleasing you. All of this attitude you're giving me. It's not about me, it's about you. Always is. I'm sorry you don't appreciate what I'm doing here, but I'm not going to stop because of some miserable troll's posts. If it makes you feel better to be a jerk, go right ahead. I have a healthy self image. I can take it.
>>18675420lol, WOW! That one was off-sides.
What does he wear?
>>18675413don't you buy more of what makes you happy tho?
New thread>>18675487>>18675487>>18675487
>>18675416I forgot to add sapphire glass to the requirements...
>>18675521lol, sapphire is for suckers! You really don't need it in watches under $500. Only shitters give it to you to get you in the door. Under no circumstances should you buy an affordable watch with good sapphire crystal and other quality specs. They don't belong on counterfeit watches. Just save your money so you can better appreciate the design language of the TRUE artistes at old Swiss companies. Buy a watch only when you can afford to give the Swiss their due. Anything less is just retarded shitter support, and that's just so wrong, man. Taking the chocolate out of the mouths of watchmakers' kids so you can enjoy someone else's design for money you can easily afford. How dare you? Who the fuck do you think you are?Fucking shitters. Make me sick.
>>18675191The original is better.
>>18675599What original? Some Nomos or something that's thousands of dollars? How do you know? You don't own one. You're just sucking luxury watch cock and repeating things you heard. Fuck off. You shouldn't cheerlead for watches you don't own. It's fucking sad simp behavior.
>>18675555But mineral glass is better option than sapphire for an everyday watch, not to mention a sport watch. You want it to absorb impacts instead of shattering. Shallow scratches can be polished and the glass itself is cheap to replace, unlike sapphire crystal.
>>18675328Citizen NY4050?
>>18675705kekNow I've seen everything. An argument AGAINST sapphire crystal.
>>18673930unbelievably based
bump
>>18675119>CERTIFIEbCertainly.
>>18675161I have it with a black dial and I have the smallest wrists of any man alive and I still enjoy wearing it.
>>18675181I have a quartz PRX and the seconds and minutes are misaligned. I have 3 casios that have perfect alignment. Never pay more than 20 dollars for a game and never pay more than 100 dollars for a watch. Lesson learned.
>>18674754Not dressy, but 36mm, solar quartz. I have one and after owning it for a while, I ended up wearing it for like a year straight. It doesn’t have anything about it visually that bothers me, unlike every single other watch I own whuch eventually has
>>18678063Forgot pic. Timex expedition north field post solar is the specific model
