Is there a more /fa/ backpack out there?
>>18674727that's fa enough for a woman, yes
>>18674727Backpacks can only be /fa/ in context and there's no context when this doesn't look out of place unless you're a fucking astronaut at the space station or something. Just be fit and get a nice molle pack as a man, it fits just about anything, casual or otherwise, if it doesn't then no backpack would be appropriate anyways. Do NOT do this if you're a fat ugy loser though, it will only amplify the fat ugly loser look, but if you're a fat ugly loser there's no saving your look until you fix it.
>>18674727>/fa/ backpackbur
>>18674751>>18674779What the larp?! I work for a tech startup. These bags would look totally out of place...baka. You know what? I'm happy with my Aer backpack. See ya later...FAGS
>>18675298A molle pack never looks out of place on a fit, handsome male. If it doesn't fit, it says more about you than the pack.
>>18674727I'm sure it matches your gimp suit very nicely.