The kings of denim. Which is better?
>>18676335all of Diesel shits on Levi's
Wrangler
>>18676452dumb cuck
>The kings of denimCome on now
>>18676335True ReligionRock Revival
>>18676589do you know what these are?
>>18676335MAVI BVLLs have entered the chat
>>18676501They're better, and don't have the annoying twist. Plus, my ass looks fantastic.
>>18676335Can't go wrong with 501's.>>1867645213MWZ, patrician choice
>>18676448>Dieseledgy euroslop
>>18677207>my ass looks fantasticThat’s exactly where you’re fooling yourself. Compressed boxy ass with two gigantic Ws on the cheeks and 45 belt loops like candles on a birthday cake is never gonna look good. Here’s what a good denim ass looks like.
Since we're discussing mall-tier brands, how are GAP 1969s?Also kinda like G-star denim. At least tge stuff that doesn't have all those extra seams, lines and details that G-Star usually fills their stuff with.
I wear Boss Delaware, they are decent quality and have enough give to move freely in.Tried on some Rag and Bone Fit 3 and was appalled by how it looked. It's an athletic fit but tapers way too much from the knee down, was just a baggy top block even though my quads are decent size (24inch). Finding the perfect jean for athletic legs is difficult, should just stick to straight leg.Read in the archives Sugarcane make really good stuff, also the IronHearts 888 could be good for athletic legs, don't think I want to fork out 300 for jeans though, it's a bit outrageous.G-star make good jeans and Chinos, they are good quality and last years. My only issue is it's a street wear aesthetic, good for 35 and under.
