(selection of midsize sportswatches, budget from 2k to 5k, hence no Rolex)
all these watches are ugly and a waste of money you are like women
>>18679892fuck off, pedo jew, no one likes you
>>18679894you are subhuman garbage
no one like Israel and we rule this reality))) you are subhuman
Expensive. The only ones I like are the omega and the iwc really. Not that into white. Or quartz. And grand seiko sure has been ruined by trolls on this board.
>top watches that men without good enough looks to attract beautiful women wear
Schizos already ruining thread
>>18679888Personally I'd only wear 7, 5 or 8. And that's the order from best to worst imo. The rest wouldn't consider for aesthetic and other reasons.
>>18679888Zenith, Omega, Tudor, Tag, IWC, trash, rubbish, crap
>>186798881,8,2,3,4,7,6,5
>>18679905Why not the Omega?
>>18680015Nothing against the brand, just don't vibe with that model
>>18679888The zenith is the only good option.The Aqua Terra and mark xx are both incredible but the white dials don’t work as well as the other dial optionsGrand Seiko is dull and boring and has no real heritage so no reason to pick The BB Pro is too similar to an explorer 2 so you’d just feel like you got a cheaper alternative The tag is ugly The doxa is ok but isn’t versatile at all
>>18679888My favorite of those is the Grand Seiko Snowflake, followed by the Aqua Terra. The Tudor just looks like a worse explorer II. and the Zenith and Doxa are both very dated looking and chunky. The Tag f1 is just ugly. The IWC is okay I guess but never really made sense to me, they're expensive luxury watches pretending to be a 200 dollar tool watch.
>>18679888The Zenith or IWC for me. Doxa has potential too, I'd have to see it on my wrist to be sure. The Omega... meh, just looks too plain. At that point I would just get a Constellation. The Tudor bezel looks cheap. I don't care for GS personally, nothing wrong with them, just not my style. The Tag bezel and red ring make it look like a toy out of a cereal box.
