Has this become a thing anywhere else? I always thought see through tops were trashy but now they're doing it without bras and to me it's just like why not just go topless at that point? We can already perfectly see your nips and shit. And then they go on about men objectifying them and shit. Females have only been getting more retarded.
yea i see it all the time. women have no shame and just do whatever they want at this point
>>18682098unsure how perfect of an example the girl in the video is supposed to be but her top doesn't seem to be THAT see-through. just seems like she's wearing a really dark bra that shows through the lighter colored top but when the bra is off you can't really see anything anyway
are you a queer or something
>>18682116>shows through the lighter colored topDumbass, how the hell is a wine red top a light color? >when the bra is off you can't really see anything anywayAre you blind? It goes through quickly but at the last second you can clearly make out both her nipples plus her tits sagging a bit naturally. It boggles my mind how you can watch that webm and not come to such obvious conclusions.
>>18682098It's become very very normal as it was until the late 80s. It's female nipples, not something men should be scared ofWomen usually dislike bras.Most women will go topless at the beach/pool as they get more and more comfortable. Social norms are cycles and prudishness feels like too much pointless hassle
>>18682098huh. genuinely can't decide whether i find her hot or not. it's like she's almost hot but just not quite there
>>18682228you just described a 6
>>18682118it's not about being queer it's about women dressing like skanks and then proceeding to complain when you glance at their exposed titties for like 1 or 2 seconds
>>18682250Bro it's a shit test. Stare at their fucking tits if they have them displayed. If they say something about it tell them they have nice tits.
>>18682271That only works if you look good, otherwise it's sexual harassment or 2015+ >rape
>>18682098WTF? the first 6 seconds of the video are NOT her with no bra on. You focused on the wrong part. At least it's a normal aspect ratio and not some phone shit.
>>18682112Why should they be ashamed of their tits??You one of those virgin manchild woman-haters? Just bitter because you haven't touched one or had one talk to you?I wish you people would keep that to yourselves. It's just negative.
>>18682186Incels really resent women being free with their bodies. Just like puritan religious prudes were. It's basically "If I'm not getting any, cover that shit up!"Really pathetic.
>>18682250Who has ever complained to you that you were staring at her tits?Never happened.>>18682282Also never happened. Stay off /r9k/ and out of that 'blackpill' nonsense.
>>18682282I've gotten laid several times doing this, this is why I'm telling you to do it.
>>18682098Women only wear bras to not scare the cows. tight underwear sucks, I go commando all the time, sometimes I'm pants where you can kinda see the outline of my junk. I see no reason why girls are any different.
>>18682297>go commandoNever say or write that again.
>>18682292It's very weird bc this shrill fringe of incellish types are straight and have no skin in the game. They should what most people do: enjoy the view and let it brighten your day-- just as women feel better when you look at them discreetly and without ogling. It's the normal pace of nature, no big deal
>>18682241If this a 6 to you, then what is a 10? A once-in-a-century perfect being me fight over, like Helen of Troy?
>>18682427For real.
>>18682433NTA and I don't really like 10s, but she is a 6. The women considered classically beautiful or "hot" really when you're using the 1 - 10 scale have a very specific generic symmetry to them. I don't find them all that attractive usually. Especially not the generic blondes. Catherine Zeta Jones is someone who's a ten that I like. Most I am not even really attracted to because I think subconsciously I just know they're unattainable. That's the only thing that would really explain it. I think 6s and 7s are probably my favorites. Just turns out that way. Probably because I'm a 6 or 7. I could even be a 5. I'm not sure. But people tend to pair off with who's their own level of attractiveness, and it's not just because they're settling. They do find each other attractive. I see some pairs of 3s and 4s though and wonder how they do it. Must have a higher sex drive than me. I won't settle for anyone I'm not attracted to. I just like women that look a little different. Bjork is super hot to me. The waitress from Always Sunny. This bitch.
>>18682438>Bjork is super hot to medon't blow your brains out
>>18682441Why would I blow my brains out?
>>18682298What, why?That is the most common term for not using traditional underwear
>>18682186>as it was until the late 80s
>>18682291>>18682292>>18682294>>18682427
>>18682438Thank you for effortposting, I still don't know why you wouldn't rate her a solid 7 and don't get this /10 thing, but thanks for the post. I agree on the "birds of a feather fly together stuff" thing.
>>18682651I don't really buy the rating system. She's like a 7 or 8 to ME or you, but I'm saying the general consensus (which I don't go by) would call her a 6.
>>18682574Watch any movie or even tv series from the 70s/80s. Even Fawlty Towers had an episode where a character would go about her day in a braless t-shirt.Then check out the pics from back then: Kate Bush's pics, album covers, pap street/vacation pics etc. The strange, dour prudish interval that's now gradually being laid to rest was an anomaly and those who assume it's standard are out of the loop outcasts and/or living in the boonies/muslim countries etc
>>18682689This.
