New ROLEX OP 100 YEARS editionhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGzUe7QbFZkhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFr63J26TdgWatches and Wonders is starting early!!!https://www.watchesandwonders.com/en/geneva-2026/event
>>18683425
rolex :D>>18683426looks gaudy but could be good irl
kofe
kofe time
time
>>18683449now that's a fucking collection!
>>18683425Thanks for the designs, Rolex! I know if I’m interested in any of your watches there are probably a dozen different price and quality levels of shitter brand to choose from. What a time to be alive.
>>18683458It's not the same feeling than wearing a real one, believe you me.
>>18683461According to multiple reports it feels almost exactly like the real thing.Perhaps without the anxiety about scratching it.The time I tried on a Datejust it didn’t feel like a different experience than other watches of its size and style. I’m probably too poor to feel it. Haha
But I haven’t tried an Explorer or whatever diver the Batman thing is. Can’t say.
>>18683464>According to multiple reports it feels almost exactly like the real thing.kek>Perhaps without the anxiety about scratching it.I have no anxiety to wear mine, i will never sell it. I wore it traveling even.But you're kind of right as I would not wear it in the London subway tho, but i don't take the subway in the west either way (in Asia no problem). If anything, it's an incentive to live a better life, i have nothing to do in ghetto cities or tourist traps.
>>18683466No, I've seen plenty of youtube videos of reviewers doing side by side comparisons, weighing them, wearing each and speaking of the few differences, and it's rarely in feel.I know you're talking about the sense of self-satisfaction that you're a highfalutin Rolex owner, but other than that and the movement and the tiny details and flourishes, they're comparable watches. And the cheap ones are durable good watches in their own right. Pagani has an NH34 GMT and the Cronos has a PT5004. Both have all stainless steel, sapphire, screwdown shit, and good WR. Even all the "signed" crowns and bracelet clasp nonsense too. I haven't seen any negative reviews of either of them. I don't buy watches that people are commonly unhappy with.The main thing is that they aren't fucking ten grand. So anyone can enjoy them.
I don't have anything against Rolex. I just think that's serious money for a watch. I'm sure you guys who own them enjoy them. I'm fine with the homages. I'm not that into their stuff besides those two anyway. Everyone should enjoy what they enjoy. There's no wrong way to be a watch enthusiast.
>>18683469A flesh light can feel like a vagina. The sensations for your dick can be 99% the same. Is it the same tho?Do you own a Picasso painting or a copy of a Picasso made in a chinese factory? It can look 99% the same, have 80% the same specs, but it's not the same at all. >I know you're talking about the sense of self-satisfaction that you're a highfalutin Rolex ownerYeah, it's the whole point, ngl. I would have no feeling wearing a copy.
>>18683477I can get laid with real women. You don't own any fucking Picasso. The insecurity of Rolex owners is hilarious. You're so secure that you're on 4chan lording your false superiority over people. >you'll simply never know the feeling I do with your cheap imitations. If you say so. I'm not impressed though. I said everyone should just be happy with what they have and you continue to be kind of a snobby dick. No one in the real world I've ever met with a Rolex acted like a dick about it or looked down on what I was wearing. But hey, I'm on 4chan. Anyone here with a Rolex is some sort of social deviant or trustfund weirdo or nazi or is just making it up.
>>18683479going online to be a asshole and say shit you never would irl? welcome to the internet sonu know u want a poolex
>>18683479>I said everyone should just be happy with what they haveThen why did you tie your uterus into a knot when someone else said they’d be happier with the real thing? Aren’t people allowed to be happy? Those people aren’t flexing on you. They can’t, in fact, because you said you’re happy with the Chinese equivalent. Make up your mind, sister.
>>18683479>You're so secure that you're on 4chan lording your false superiority over people.I don't think i'm doing that.I'm just calling out your fucking COPE right here >>18683458If a Pagani design is good enough for you, GOOD FOR YOUUUUUU, kek.(it's not the same thing than having a Rolex tho)
Might get a tank solo, retarded or based?
>>18683526Getting a Tank is good, but if you’re getting a steel Tank, try to get a current generation Must. The Solo’s brancards have flattened tops that don’t look as good. The Must follows the case shape of the classic Tank Louis Cartier.
anyone else find it fascinating how people are obsessed with strapping insanely expensive time keepers to their body? seems like some sort of spell
>>18683538poor, poor, poor!look at this poorfag and laugh!what you can't afford a proper watch???! lmfaooo kek
>>18683540the fuck? I didn't say it's a bad thing, I was just wondering sheesh, calm down
>>18683542>I didn't say it's a bad thing>OMG PEOPLE BUY EXPENSIVE THINGS I CAN'T AFFORDpoorfag seethe paycheck to paycheck buy now pay later retard.
>>18683543what in the pajeet
>>18683534Thanks for advice. I can't justify cost of a gold tank to myself as I'll only wear it like 4 times a year. I know it's what I should get.
>>18683548>I can't justify cost of a gold tank to myselfpoorfag.
>>18683538Not really fascinating no.What i find fascinating is people who understand neither beauty nor crafstmanship. It's like people who don't like music (they do exist) or people who don't understand humor. I stay the fuck away from these people, they are beneath me and beneath anyone with a human soul.
>>18683548You can also try and get the solar-powered Tank. Those are pretty cool.
>>18683464>multiple reports>>18683469youtube videos>reviewswould it kill you guys to have an opinion of your own? you know you're allowed to go outside and have your own experiences, right? walking into an AD is free
>>18683559A Rolex AD wouldn't let them in.
>>18683559>>18683565>average 4channer
Rolex don't use recycled plastic rings as movement holders. - Tudor Owner
>>18683550How many piss bottles do you have next to your desk in your studio apartment right now?
>>18683466Come to london.
>>18683665I don't go to this shit city, i don't go to this shit country. So no problem here.What's the appeal of the UK even?
>>18683543>>18683540>>18683550posts like these are retarded. only someone truly poor thinks about money like this.
>>18683551>those who don't want ten-thousand dollar watches don't understand beauty, craftsmanship. And therefore are beneath me.I think more than the price it's the pomposity of Rolex owners that's the turn off. Imagine what they were like before they got the watch.
Kofé time.
>>18683730Marrying your cousin is legal.
>>18683559I said I tried on a Datejust in the very fucking post you're responding to. Can you not read? I don't need to try on EVERY Rolex to know that it's not going to be heavier or lighter or tighter or anything else than the watch it's being compared to. Are you telling me you can't learn from watch review videos? I'm not going to buy such a spendy watch anyway, so why would I bother an "AD" and waste their time. None of that appeals to me. You snobs just refuse to accept this. You can't let us enjoy what we want. You have to try and make a case for why we're stupid or poor or must have terrible taste. You posted a watch you don't even own. I see my jeweler at least twice a month. I have plenty of outside experiences. I've traveled extensively. How much of the world have you seen? You don't comport yourself like much of an adult. You have nothing better to do than argue with and insult people you believe you're so superior to? I just buy every watch I want. That's the part you resent. For every one new luxury watch a member of this community actually buys, I have shown probably 40. You wish and yearn and post your ad photos. You declare your superiority as you fail to purchase and post new watches. I'm actually a doer. Regardless of whether you respect the level on which I'm doing it.Quit trying to disparage me and invalidate my joy. You're nobody. It's never anyone with an impressive watch collection posting that shit. Just poser losers. Chug my nuts.:)
>>18683526Large I hope
Reminder we won
Vanilla Latte time
>>18683773>weSo you work for Credor? What did you win? I must say I don't understand what you've been doing these past few weeks. Obviously you're some autistic incel OCD guy. But what do YOU think it means?
>>18683551>Look at sophisticated and classy I am. Won’t someone compliment me on how mature I look? Swag is for boys. Class is for men. Fucking normies.
Unironically the only good G-shock in years. Who knew blob watches actually look good when you don't make the faces ultra minimalist
>>18683771lol ok
>>18683786nice date window placement
>>18683773>that would be $200K
>>18683794Japanese watches make jewish "people" seethe because the jews have burrowed themselves in the swiss watchmaking distribution networks and can extract value from the goyim by being "authorized dealers." They have no problem degrading the quality of the watches made by their swiss hosts by encouraging and justifying the use of Chinese components. The retail price of the watch to stays the same or goes up, and their margins get fatter. Japanese watch manufacturers, on the other hand, have a much stricter MSRP control and heavily penalize "AD games". Furthermore, timekeeping innovations from companies like Citizen Watch Co. and Seiko Epson Corp. further shift the value proposition away from what jews like (((Ben Clymer))) have established as kosher, triggering immense backlash from jews ITT when anons post a Japanese watch.
>>18683773>no micro-artist flower markit's OVER
>>18683867looks like a bionicle mask.but speaking of g shocks, wearing a g shock has ruined all my other watches. i dont want to wear them. i just want to wear my g shock
>>18683930No one is thinking about Jews but you. I own Japanese watches too. Seikos just don't give you much watch for the money. I own several and they're just not worth what I paid for them while Chinese watches are almost too inexpensive for what you get. They're making everyone else look greedy. You'd think the snobs in these threads personally have a stake in any of this, like they lose money if these overpriced brands don't sell as well. The Chinese watch revolution is here and I'm going to keep spreading the word on how much better they are for the money IF that's the price range someone's interested in. Someone did that for me when I was new here and I really took to it and now I'm showing everyone how great they are. The jew stuff is just crazy. I'm sure you can't prove anything you believe. And now you will call ME jewish. LOL, so predictable, these crazy virgin losers.
>>18683773I like the way they decorated the movement, the classic design was getting a bit boring desu
I'm at W&W and I've seen a few cool things.>Bulgari Octo Finissimo in a smaller size>new JLC Master Control Calendar (I think in 36mm)>new JLC integrated sports watch (at least 4 of them)>new Vacheron Mercator>some Nomos triple calendar (not exactly sure but it looked like it) >the one that everybody will talk about : Tudor dress watch with a tonneau case and a small seconds
>>18683963Anything anyone here can actually afford or will ever purchase?
Casio time
>>18683965Well, seeing as at least one person here actually owns an Octo Finissimo, yeah, probably.
Picked up this the weekend, I like it not as chunky as the usual g-shocks.
>>18684050It's a gay male thing.
sushi time
>sports watch (also travel watch)>dress watchDo you really need more?
>>18684106>dress watchCan you even fit that thing under a cuff?
>>18684110Sure. It’s a little snug but it’ll get there.
>>18684079SUSH TIME!!Do you like to gobble your sush, or do you like to bite the tip of the sush and eat it little by little?
>>18684106How many times a year do you wear a tuxedo or a three pieces suit?
Universal Geneve is coming after the Cartier tank
>>18684125Tuxedo? Maybe once per year, but a suit at least twice per week. It used to be daily, but standards of dress have relaxed dramatically in the last few years. Like, no one ever wears a tie anymore unless they specifically want to, but it’s no longer required.
>>18684126>the laughing girls meme with one girl labeled Tank and the other labeled Reverso.
>>18683769is that watch kofe proof?
>>18684106Based, what is the reference number for the Radiomir?
>>18684215Pam 992.
>>18684126You'd have to be braindead to buy this instead of a Tank or a Reverso.I'm sure /wt/ will defend it though. You faggots would buy a GS over a Rolex lmao
>>18683730>What's the appeal of the UK even?the social benefits
>>18684106Nice
>>18684126I actually quite like classic universal watches, hope they succeed in relaunching the brand.
>>18684261it's owned by Brietling, so the quality will be there, but they will be overpriced.
>>18684079why did you buy a watch thats too big for your wrist? Tudors arent two dollars, seems like a waste of money to spend it on something that doesnt fit.
>>18684106I mean you could have bought watches that werent ugly?
>>18684264prices are already out and they are indeed overpriced
>>18684074>>18684050>>18683559>>18683426nice watch
>>18684283>seething
NEW GRAND SEIKO UFA DIVERS SLGB023 and SLGB025Grand Seiko looking like a new Omega seamaster trying to look like a Seiko. Kind of hot tho. GS needed a diver.
>>18684388
>>18684363Why would I be angry you bought ugly watches? It doesn't even make sense.
>>18684389
>>18684388why?
Other Grand Seiko new releases"Ice Forest at Dawn" gold UFA
>>18684393Iwao Blue (named after the meth mines of Iwao mountain or whatever)
>>18684395“Mystic Waterfall” Platinum Spring Drive
>>18684396“Red Lion” Spring Drive Jewellery Watch Limited Edition (44.5mm!!)
>>18684388>>18684389>>18684391https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQDLzYQtbkI
New Rolexesfuck, they post everything at 1am, i have to go to sleep
new OP 36, keep it or need it?
The new jlc integrated bracelet models look nice
New IWC Venturer, space watch
IWC pilot 36 (anniversary edition, golden hands), they killed the date window on this pilot but not on the bigger sizes.
>>18684410all things considered, i prefer with the date window on these mondelspicrel, full gold Mark XX anniversary edition
>>18684388Now put a 9s in it don't care about a sprigdrive that costs the same as a submariner
>>18684414The 9S is too big to fit inside a 40mm and 12mm thickness case
>>18684416They put it in 37mm case...
>>18684406>Ceramic >Diameter 44.3 mm >120h power reserve
>>18684406story for this watch is such a nonsense. who needs a mechanical watch in space? and even if, then what's wrong with crown? pathetic imitation of moonwatch that actually served some purpose and was appropriate tool for the time. now there's no need for anything more than gshock. this hobby is fucking useless. it's all just money grab. let me out. pic rel would actually better fit space mission
>>18684410This is cool
>>18684421Off course you only need a quartz to go to space, but what you gonna do? Omega has been ridding the space dick for 50 years, IWC wants some.
NEW GRAND SEIKO UFA 40mm DIVERSspring drive, +/-20 seconds/year
>>18684423gaaaaaay
>>18684424>IWC wants somehow about making something actually fucking useful then? God I'm glad this industry is dying. there's not even "craftsmanship" left it's just syphoning money out of richfags via more and more creative marketing.
>>18684433Based tag
>>18684432>God I'm glad this industry is dying. there's not even "craftsmanship" left it's just syphoning money out of richfags via more and more creative marketing.wait for Tudor, sister.Let's see Tudor's card.
New Panerai 47 mm (kek)These fuckers don't get it, at all. A big 'fuck you' to all the wristlets.
relaunch of the Cartier Roadster, hot as fuck
>>18684441I think the "tit" crown is smaller than on the og model.I could totally wear that, 10/10
>>18684437Sounds like they get it perfectly.They don’t have to specifically exclude females and low-testosterone “males”. Just make 47mm watches and they’ll self-deport.
How are these Chinese Oakley Blade bootlegs? Willing to buy a real one, just curious how far off they are.
>>18684423based
>>18684437ugly watch for ugly people, i dont understand the appeal >>18684445branding your company to retarded oafs is a bold strategy
>>18684480>fat watch for fat people, i dont understand the appealftfyI only see them on the wrists of fat men nowadays. I'm talking american-tier fat, not just mildly overweight.
Zenith have released a micro adjust for the Chronomaster bracelet.
>>18684388>>18684389>>18684425Bezel looks so bland and doesn't suit the dial at all. >GS finally make a 40mm-ish diver>it's this shitlmao
>>18684395nice king seik-damn...
>>18684425they actually look perfect ngl. Good job. Simple yet distinctively GS.
Latest acquisition. Very much enjoying it.
>>18684502love the thin bezel. Nice one
>>18684495so that will be their excuse to bring it to 10K msrp?
>>18684404Africa-coded
>>18684403>>18684404a-are we winning?
>>18684388>>18684389Looks nice and chunky, but not fat. I like the design, it looks solid and tight.
>>18684403>>18684404I like that dial, would wear.
>>18684282lol, I think this every single time he posts. I'm guessing no one makes fun of that where he lives. Everyone has tiny wrists with tastes that don't conform to them. I bet he bought it before he knew any better and since it was expensive and he's probably stubborn he just kept it anyway.
>>18684106You need variety. That's the same damn watch with a couple of slight variations. People are strange. That's the weirdest collection I've ever seen. I think you are really a one watch guy and you have two of the same one.
>>18684390Not just angry. *Seething* with rage. Frothing about the lips and shaking in fury.You'd have to be wildly, violently irate to suggest those ugly watches are ugly.
>>18684413You won't buy any of those watches.
Jlc won
>>18684530If it's over 40mm it's cringe. If it's under 39mm it's based.
>>18684425Glad these don't have polished center links. GS is obsessed with that shit.
any news from the big boys?
>>18684530~50k for SS, lmao
Once you've seen, worn, felt and owned a Credor, there's simply no going back.
>>18684533It’s 39mm>>18684537The bad part
>>18684538So you do own a Credor? Looks like you're trying one on. Let's see the one that you paid for and wear. Because there's no going back, right?
What in the Cosby sweater is this shit?
anything announced by TUDOR yet?
>>18684538hard agree
>>18684557There’s a rumor they’ll be releasing something resembling a rolex
>>18684562Wow, you think so? It's about time.
>>18684562Hope not, I don't want my watches to look like this >>18684556
>>18684530Why are you posting watches you will never own? You're cheerleading for the 1%.
>>18684571it's good to have a goal or just aim high in general.Why do people post supercars? Why do they post women that they will never have? Placea they will never visit? I think it's cool that maybe some of that will trickle down to affordable models. Something that GS and Credor do btw.
>>18684572But you will not approve of it trickling into China for actually affordable watches under say $250. My apologies if you will be, but usually you guys aren't. And that makes you hypocrites. Again, if this is not you, sorry. But I don't consider Grand Seiko to be "affordable".
>>18684574I appreciate you for saying thag preemptively because I actually do support chinese watches and I like how they're exposing the watch world-scam. Not only talking about San Martin but higher end watches like the handmade guilloche on the atelier wen etc. my problem with the Chinese is that they are not trying to innovate at anything right now because their relatively fairly new to the game. Which means they are doomed to copy designs and trends, exceptions do exist. A slightly used 9F GS is affordable. Compared to an eichi II, a Kuon is affordable. They go for 6K new.There are porcelain seiko watches for like 1K And about san martin, I think it's very funny how people compare their case, marker and hand finishing to Rolex (under macro) and discover that San Martin surpasses rolex in most aspects.And then it's even funnier to see the fanboys seethe. So I'm with you on this one.
>>18684441Looks great. Cartier knows how to make a good looking watch
>Documents unsealed in 2026 by the Auschwitz Memorial Foundation (AMF) shed light on previously undisclosed forms of gruesome torture perpetrated by German guards at the Auschwitz-Birkenau Concentration Camp during the Second World War. "Austernhandentferner" or "oyster-hand-remover" was an anti-Semitic torture technique used to violently harm and humiliate Jewish prisoners. First, prisoners would be presented with a brand new model-year Rolex Datejust. Then, a single link would be removed from the high-quality steel bracelet before they were forced at gunpoint to try it on again. Guards continued to remove links until blood-flow was restricted, and in most cases tissue and even bone was permanently damaged. A majority of victims had their wrists completely crushed from the process. Rabbi Chaim Goldstein of the AMF commented: "This form of torture was especially cruel because culturally we can't turn down a datejust." Requests for a statement from the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation, the parent company of Rolex and Tudor, have been declined.
>>18684582You already posted this. It's not funny.
>>18684388>>18684389>>18684425I like it, but I don't $12,000 like it.
>>18684425Also, in the diver style, the GS Evo cut-off hour hand looks weirder to me. Reminds me of an aqua terra. Why is everyone so afraid to put an arrow on the hour hand? The planet ocean has one.
>>18684556That's the new rollie? I thought it was a swatch.
GS won.Cartier continues to devolve into into a despicable fashion brand that discontinues watches just to re-release a few years later.New funko-pops (lolex) are ok.
Kofe time.
