[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/fa/ - Fashion

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: s.mp4 (2.69 MB, 720x1280)
2.69 MB MP4
Why would you ever need to shop anywhere else?
>>
>>18689619
What's hilarious is the "people" that shop at Zara actually believe this
>>
>>18689619
Womens clothing is a mess. I've worked in clothes retail before, literally everything, from $5 blouses to $1000 "leather" coats is just the thinnest, shittiest crap ever
There is no quality clothing in womens fashion at all. It is all rockbottom quality, no matter the price tag.
>>
>>18689658
I have been a selvedge denim/japanese clothing "heritage" bro for years, and almost all of my wardrobe is very nice stuff I've had for years. I never throw anything out because it never wears out
My wife still buys stuff from the mall and likes her Uniqlo and Zara stuff. Sometimes you just can't help them and they simply get what they like. 99% of women do not give a single fuck about clothing quality, country of origin or material. Only thing that matters is the style
>>
>>18689658
I'm glad I'm not the only one who notices this. The same brand and same overall style piece is going to be twice as thin for women for no reason that I can think of. And women seem to be perfectly okay with that.
>>
>>18689658
>>18689675
>>18689715
This
>>
>>18689675
yeah I was surprised at how many women wear blazers and whatnot and even have several of them until I realised that they just buy these plastic jackets for 30 euros
>>
>>18689619
I buy 90% of my clothing from zara, next, and h&m and everyone thinks I dress great. Normies absolutely do not care about quality and buy most of their stuff from primark, matalan or supermarkets.
>>
File: 054644654.png (213 KB, 317x485)
213 KB PNG
>theeehee hahawhahawaaah.

Mind you, that mongrel face is after 2 hours of hair work and 1 hour of makeup.
>>
File: manifest-meditate.gif (10 KB, 190x200)
10 KB GIF
>>18689619
I am into clothing not fashion so zara is not for me
>>
>>18689658
I have noticed the same thing. You can really only find identical quality and materials from workwear and outdoor brands and even there be careful. With fast fashion it's actually insane. At gap for example the mens denim jacket is thick, probably around 14oz while the womens feels like 6oz. Every item is like this. But if you buy something like a duck vest from carhartt it's pretty much exactly the same as the mens duck vest. Same at rei, the hiking pants are the same things. Shoes are complete insanity. Where men will only spend a lot of money (outside of the negro) on shoes that are resolable and will last 20 years with care, women spend insane money on these shitty disposable heels with tiny thin straps. I was looking for a wool sweater for my mother for christmas and at ll bean as another example the womens section has exactly 0 wool sweaters, they're all elastalane and cotton synthetic or alpaca blends. The mens section has like 10 100% wool sweaters. There is no point to trying to buy your wife or mother nice things outside of workwear because they really don't exist.
>>
>>18690122
>>18689658
You can blame women for that.
If they were not such gullible consoomers with a heard mentality, they would care for what matters (materials, quality of the stitching).
>>
>>18689992
It depends on the company you keep. Other low-wage earners won't notice but if you associate with moneyed people, they will know you clothes are Zara and H&M trash and look down on you for it.
>>
>>18690122
>blends
adding like 5% alpaca wool to synthetics is really disgusting
>>
>>18690168
I'm from a very wealthy rural family that wear brands like Buffalo and Craghoppers, and 30 year old jumpers. The people I associate with are mostly average income though.
>>
>>18690168
for things people wear everyday (jeans, tshirts, casual jackets) nobody can tell the difference between a zara pair of jeans and a pair of jeans from loro piana or zegna or whatever you retards associate with le old money these days
it's only worth it if a) those are logo heavy clothes b) those are suits/formalwear c) it's techwear and you're using it for its purpose
>>
>>18689658
Which is why I am wary of buying anything. A pair of Dior boots, at $2500, is going to last the same amount of time as Amazon chinesesium, since they're being manufactured by the same people. Fashion, at one point, implied quality. Now it implies nothing. You are paying for the label, not the finery. That's why it makes more sense as a lady to go for a fit rather than a brand.
>>
File: 1772822459942832.jpg (320 KB, 1280x1600)
320 KB JPG
>>18689715
You can't think of a single reason why women might prefer thinner, more flowy fabric that contours to the body, rather than stiff, boxy workwear men prefer that is so thick they're moving around like robots?

You should also consider the vast number of dyes, stiches, patterns, and variations that women get in exchange. Men have more durable clothes with less variety while women have less durable clothes with more variety.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.