Can anyone pull off the high rise look? Is it about height or proportions? I genuinely cannot tell if this person is pulling it off or not.
He looks like a little boy trying to play dress-up.
>>18701835What makes you say that?
>>18701839Looks like he’s about to sign the peace agreement with General MacArthur.
>>18701840What the fuck does that even mean?
>>18701843Holy ravioli. You must be Gen Z to be that historically illiterate
Evidently everyone can
>>18701847This guy has to lose some weight first.
>>18701840TOP KEK
>>18701845Well, to be fair, Hirohito was wearing morning dress, and this kid wasn't.
>>18701835His head is too big and his shoulders aren't broad enough. He needs to put on some weight at the top to pull off that look.
>>18701829BECAUSE HE’S SHORTThe legend that high rise helps short people is the most retarded fashion take ever. High rise is for tall people.>b-but it elongates dem legz!Look at that fucking head as big as his torso.
>>18701849He looks like he knows what he's doing
>>18701829He looks like he should be in an 80s movie as a stereotypical Japanese nerd.
>>18701839His neck looks the same length as the legs below the knee.
The 1940's style high waist is ugly.The t-shirt looks bad.He needs to go with a proper collared long sleeve shirt.He also needs to go with 19th century style high waisted pants that look a million times better.
>>18702252He looks like he’s gonna tie little bell to a train track.
>>18702052it's about body proportions not height.
>>18702447No, it’s not.
>>18701847>side adjusters>single pleat Menswear^TM fashion victim, he knows too much so he gets quirky with it, I'd bet he wears goofy socks with his workwear fits for a "modern twist"
>>18701839I thought his frock was cut a but short bit apparently that was the style for a time
>>18701843Those are some child bearing hips on that nip.
It is about proportions, but you also need to modernize it and have muscular arms.Do NOT make it look vintage and do NOT be fat, bear-like, or skinny fat. That will make you look like an old man from the 40s or a dweeb.
>>18702878Nobody was skinny fat or fat in the 40s, sweatie. Most men back then looked good in suits precisely because they were thin AND socially competent with the body language of men. Unlike all these low-T effeminate soiboys who look like little boys playing dress up.https://youtu.be/ePH--widhXk?t=11
>>18702881There were fat people back then. Hollywood used to cast fat men with hairy forearms and then call them “strong” when they were just sucking in their gut and walking like a gorilla.
>>18702884Hollywood used to show fat people as pathetic freaks to laugh at, even until the 2000s. They weren't meant to be taken seriously. 99.9% of people in the 40s weren't fat, because they weren't gluttonous pigs living in a degenerate consumerist culture. They ate less and better, and also walked a hell of a lot more than modern Americans, because most of them lived in the cities and not suburbs that you drove to and from each time.
