Was he wrong?
Is this ai? Why is his collar jumping all over the place?
>>76588410Yeah cos he was talking about his fag machines He wasn't wrong necessarily if talking about Olympic lifts because I think those gooks at the actual Olympics can probably out run anyone In the running general
source:http://arthurjonesexercise.com/Athletic/Total.PDF
>>76588410Weights don't build any kind of aerobic baseThink about how long (or short rather) of a time your heartrate is elevated when you're lifting weightsIt's essentially while you're lifting, so anywhere from thirty seconds to a minute, and then descends as you restIt's a bit better if it's a circuit like how arthur jones had set up his machines to do twenty sets in a row but it's still not as good as running for an hour if you're trying to improve your endurance>>76588417probably but I bet actual weightlifters do some kind of conditioning
>>76588410>>76588474Arthur Jones was the guy who invented the 100 rep barbell squat set, who Tom Platz learned from. That kind of weight lifting is what builds cardio
>>76588410Thought that was red foreman from far away.
>>76588416No. Arthur Jones is just training his MMC in the neck and his eyebrows.
>>76588410lifting weights never allowed me to run long distances or fuck unperturbed for long sequences. running did. basically the guy in the OP can't fuck and he knows it.
>>76588410He's making a disingenuous comparison and is wrong about the speed and effectiveness.You can modify almost any activity even walking to use anaerobic pathways if you make the conditions hard enough. Which has more profound vascular and metabolic benefits than steady state cardio. But like lifting to failure with compounds there's only so much of it you can realistically do in week before you have incorporate a base of less intense stuff to prevent regression.
