If I get my 315 squat to 20 reps, would that mean I could do 365 for 1?
>>76635308Depends if youre counting the bar
>>76635506>Depends if youre counting the barroid whore physique awaits u whether u count the bar or don't :D
>>76635308No, I don't think sothat is too big of a difference- eventhough there is some merit in being able to do more reps is being able to exert a higher force (after all doing more reps means doing them dynamically because the strength component is already there (starting from 1-3 reps) and you start to work on you endurance (motorunit strength too)) but the returns are diminishing rapidly from 5 to 10, from 10 to 15, from 15 to 20 - I would guess that from 7-8 reps the strength component does not really advance anymore- the difference between 1-3 and 7-8 reps in terms of dynamic force exertion won't be that much (16%), I think only the usual increments (5%) will work (in lieu doing ballistic movements that will result in a whole different force-time curve)
>>76635308No, it means you could taper and squat 365 for 1 IN A FEW MONTHS.
>>76635308I got my squat to 315x5 and could do 365x1
>>76635308I got up to 315lb for 20 and I think my 1rm was 400lb, I did quickly push my 1rm to 425lb after that, but maybe I could do it all along. Always felt 20 rep squats was more being decent strong + cardio rather than just being strong.
>>76635308Doing 365 for 1 would definitely count.
>>76635308I have no idea i do all my squats past 300 in 1rm
>>76635651I'm trans btw bot :D
>>76635308stop sexualizing market forces
>>76635824Stop giving advice on this board. I can tell it's you in every thread with your fucking reddit spacing retard. All of your advice is completely wrong. If you can do 20 reps of 315 you can probably do 3 or 4 reps of 365. Have you ever even touched a weight before
>>76638064>Have you ever even touched a weight beforeThe only weight a woman needs to lift is her bf's dick.
>>76635308According to this calculator it would be 525 lbs. Though you never know until you test it. Doing heavy singles is a skill that has to be practiced which would result in you getting a higher 1RM.
>>76635651
>>76638189>>76637756and u leave it without comment as if it were good legs bot lol - they are equally disastrous and squat is to blame :D squat and roids of course but roids serve as magnification tool for natty, yes your vastus lateralis will get blown out of proportion and give your leg appearance of roid chicken with bulbous idiotic whamanly seeminly fat thighs and that is just the aesthetics of it, there is function that's crippled and health that gets demolished also, there's also atrophy as the squat produced muscles take over function of other muscles, u can 100% expect glute max to atrophy in relation to glute medius for example, calves will shrink cause your walking pattern will change i could go on and on about it - u know that bot :Dmine: >>76635651>>76627650the ONLY squat u should do is unilaterally in full internal hip rotation (keep rotating in entire time) quartersquat isometric hold >whuwhy? i made it>that's not a good reason it grows quad regionally - closer to knee - and blows up the only part of quad u really want and will never get with squats: Vastus Medialis Oblique >but platz has VMO it's not real muscle - it's roidous watery bloat and it's the proportion that matters - he's got small vmo compared to rest of quad :D and remember he wasn't REALLY squatting like u for weight, he was keeping knees close together - don't do it it will fuck u up do my quartersquat if ya rly want that close to knee part of quad folding over joint gently when relaxed with straight leg (by the way - i don't think i have ever seen this phenomenon in roiders)
>>76639563post physique
>>76639665>i give up so u give up bot - cool :D
>>76635308Don't listen to these two retards:>>76635824>>76635866You two definitely don't even fucking lift.>>76635947This guy has it right. I did exactly the same thing. Your results might vary a little but you should be pretty fucking close if you can do a clean 315x5.
>>76638173That calc is pretty shit for any rep range past like 8 or so. The 1RM conversion probably shouldn't even change for conversions past 15.
>>76639677i'm a different personpost physique
>>76638064>>76639679>what is even science The PostTM
If you can do 315 for 20 you should be squatting over 405.
