Would a full year of blasting a shit ton of roids get me to Brock Lesnar's physique or even close? We're the same height (6'3)
>>76638871No. You would need the same frame (genetic), same muscle shape and growth potential (genetic), and same training history (environmental). You can't recreate another physique. Build your own.
>>76638871Do you have any idea how pointless this question is without a body pic you doobly fuck? How do I know you're not a stick bug from east africa
>>76638871In this context your sensitivity to steroids would be what makes this yes or no. Assuming everything else is comparable. Weird fact: men with baseline lower t levels tends to have higher androgen sensitivity and are better responders to roids.
>>76638871Hes probably more like 6ft1 irl, i mean youd need to be insane skill to beat a brute force elite wrestler like that idk if youre 4pl8+ bench anderson silva+karelin but thats what itd probably take to beat brock blasting super hw.
>>76638881I have a pp pic but nothing else, the rest will have to be up to your imagination and its a lot to think of.
>>76638871Op get back down there you little bitch, you could never dream of beating this hulkin man. If he wanted to he could fuck you right up your ass and tgeres nothing you would or could do. Hows it feel beta bitch butt boy? Whos your daddy now?
Maybe, it depends where you're starting from. Also, going off rip "blasting a shitton" is not gonna go well. Ultimately at the end of the day there's a pretty hard cap on how much muscle you can gain in a given time period where more gear is only gonna give you marginally better gains if not regress you due to side effects interfering with sleep/recovery. Ultimately that line depends on where you're starting from. A natty limit guy is gonna need more gear to hit that "weekly cap" than someone just starting out in the gym. Imo, since you're probably low to moderate intermediate level you could start off with 300mg test for a couple months and titrate up by 100mg every 2-3 months. I'm normally against pussy low dose cycles but circumstances where you're going for a long ass time I feel they're appropriate. And honestly running between 300 and 700 test over the course of a year is relatively pretty innocuous assuming you control e2.
Oh, it’s another “steroids are magic” thread. How original.
>>76638934>300 and 700That has to be practically worse than just being natty for a few years and eating enough. Brocks physique isnt unachievable natty, only bodybuilders have whats basically unachievable in size because they CAN have their test be consisently over 2000. But i could definitely see someone actually elite at lifting and doesnt get bored of it get to brocks level in this pic.
>>76638949Like roiding for sports is the dumbest shit ever, you arent allowed to look like mr olympia or else thered be a large scale fbi raid on the nfl which id find hilarious, same with if people took hs roiders there parents probably knew well about it. That would be one of the funniest things ever. I just dont know if its a good idea to tell them that though unless it can be televised and whatnot. A football coach village where they escape to israel or something.
>>76638892Dont you genetically build androgen receptors by working out over years just like type 1/2 fibers?
>>76638871Yeah bro, 2 months of roids s
>>76638871Yeah bro, 2 months of roids and do SS + GOMAD while on them
>>76639108He was a candidate for nfl and pro wrestling he gets the good juice not some cheap shit. Well maybe thats an exaggeration since even arnie had like 5 open heart surgeries.
>>76638904Post PP or gtfo
>>76638871No. He has absolutely freakish genetics.
>>76638949>Brocks physique isnt unachievable nattyHe was blasting for years on end. That doesn't just go away
>>76638955Lol what? There are tons of roidmaxxxed athletes in the NFL.
>>76638961To some degree but you'd probably be bottlenecked by your t levels way before then.
>>76638880This. Steroids are not the answer to "looking good" >>76638892This. If you look like shit now, its because you have garbage genetics for responding to androgens - your naturally present androgens. Adding in more androgens (i.e blasting steroids) cannot tranform you from garbage to great. The roids have nothing to work on. The best responders to steroids are those who ALREADY look really damn good. it can bump them to great.If you presently look like shit, or skinny fat or DYEL you absolutely MUST get to "okay" through superior traing and dietary practices. Once you get to "okay" you can then add steroids to the mix and hope to get to Good Minus. Thats the best you can ever be.Unfortunately, your Good Minus physique still has the health risks. So it really may not be worth the squeeze
No. Brock Lesnar has the genes of a Nazi experiment.
>>76638880I think I'm pretty built. Maybe not exactly like Brock but my frame is pretty good
>>76638871Dimes
>>76638871It doesnt matter because you'll never put in the work. If you really wanted it, you'd already be lifting and not worried about some arbitrary timeline.If someone does tell you a timeframe you find acceptable, you'll go the gym then quit in a few months when you see no progress and then go back to making "how to achieve" threads with a pic of Gooky the anime character waiting for someone to "redpill" you on how to get jacked without doing anything. loser
1mg of testosterone would get you there halfway through the injection so becareful as you might end up even bigger
>>76640804>has polish ancestrey>Nazi experimentheh
>>76641513Post your body, winner.
>>76638949>That has to be practically worse than just being natty for a few years and eating enough.Technically even natural levels of androgens are bad for you. Eunuchs lived well over a decade longer than men in their own social class and even the royal families they served. It's all a matter of relativity. 300-700mg of test a week really isn't that much gear. Most trt protocols fall between 100-150mg. Test is also obviously extremely well tolerated. At these dosages on test only your lipids will be worse and blood pressure may be a concern especially if you aren't controlling e2... That's pretty much it and both are easily mitigated. Hematocrit shouldn't be a concern, little to no nephrotoxicity again assuming bp is kept in check, you're not taking enough to enter "obese with muscle" territory.That's definitely not to say it's safe. Obviously not, but it's a matter of relativity. The damage from baby doses of test is more comparable to a couple nights a month out drinking with friends. The damage from ifbb pro cycles of 3-4+ grams with outright toxic androgens like tren and dhb is more like daily alcoholism.
