These were considered peak female form 2 and 1 millennium ago
>>76653785Still are.
>>76653790/thread
those bellies really activate my neurons
Would
>>76653785When will you learn that these were exaggerated for the wow factor. No one looks like that naturally.
>>7665378511/10 in (currentyear-1)+1
this was peak female 30k years ago
>>76653804I doubt it was even possible to get that fat 30k years ago
>>76653785belly
>the slight overhang on the leftsexomade by a true artists
>>76653804Naah Grug just couldn't figure out how to chisel that fat rock flat
>>76653804This wouldn't be out of place in a high school with some dorky kids making it in some art class to make fun of some fat teacher.
>>76653804>oldest your mom joke
Goethe's Faust says at the start of his adventure: "In the beginning was not the Word, but the Deed". The warlike heroic acts of the Indo-Europeans came before the Logos of the ancient Greeks. This should make sense to Christians too. For why should God be identified with a transcendental Logos from the beginning, a self-sufficient, absolutely perfect being, ab initio ------- only to create an imperfect world of lower unconscious beings, the imperfect flowing out of the perfect? In the beginning God was not yet realized, but came to be through his creation of nature, for God is a life subject to becoming. God was pure nothingness in the beginning, an undifferentiated dark ground. Logos existed only potentially, not actually. God became Logos through the self-consciousness of man, and man became self-conscious gradually, starting with the heroic contests of men against other men, to overcome their dependency on the Great Mother, the inertia of the unconscious. Women are, but men can only become men by proving their masculine self in risky contests. This struggle to become a man in the eyes of other men initiates the conscious differentiation of the male ego from the enveloping world of unconscious longing for motherly safety. Indo-Europeans, more so than any other people, freed themselves from the cult of fertility goddesses, due to their aristocratic individualism and obsession with achieving recognition of their selves as men through heroic acts. They invented sky gods and the Sky Father. Only Indo-Europeans witnessed a complete differentiation and crystallization of masculine ego consciousness. This was the primordial basis for the eventual discovery of Logos. Therefore, the great deeds of Indo-European men came before the Word.
>>76653785this the exact type shit id be making if i where around back then. just this dishevelled goblin living in squalor pumping out these sculptures at alarming rates.
>>76653785Do you think people hot glued these things back in the day?
>>76653853Absolutely. They also posted videos of them doing it on their version of 4chan
>>76653848
>>76653785What was going on in Ancient India!
>>76653785Wow, back in the day huge tits, wide hips, and a small waist were considered attractive? I wonder what happened.
>>76653834>anthropomorphizing GodAlso your picture is mostly swastikas but there are also some swavstikas2/10 do more homework
>>76653785I had a curry girl like this in uni once, before she got fat three months laterStill use those memories as wank inspo
>>76653804it's incredibly funny that we found figures of landwhales and feminists immediately claimed they were sex symbols like how do you know this was their "venus"? Where is the actual evidence of tribal people liking this body shape? Or even that they were carved by horny men instead of women?Kinda hillarious that the same people whining about sexualization and male-centered approach to history immediately sexualized a figurine and attributed it to men the moment it provided an excuse for being fat
>>76653856theres a jeetchan??
>>76653800Like, where are their organs?!
>>76653785big stone milkers :)
>>76653804Plapgrug approves
>>76654057>that picfucking kek
>>76654103>>that pic>fucking kekYou may like this one too https://youtube.com/shorts/jtKNznIAaIc?feature=shared
>>76653804>niggers... niggers never change
>>76653804how do you know this wasnt a shitpost 30k years ago?
>>76653785And this?
>>76653804>30KYe old Horus's cum rag
Do you guys even wheel?
>>76654306they're found en masse across many regions
>>76654518They're meant to be exaggerated, not ideal formLike a guy having a 15 inch dick to represent being masculine. These figurines were likely involved in worshipping gods of fertility. Of course you make them the most overrepresented form of fertility. What do you think they'd do? Make a stick thin figure and wave them around in the air praying to the god of fertility? Hell no!If you believed in a, say, god of big penis, would you worship with a 12 foot long log from the forest of a 3 inch stick off the floor. I dont need to give you the answer for you to know
>>76654531I think it was mean t as evil goddess of the land.Like in MENA region, there is a myth femoid demon that share the same features, fat body and large breasts old woman.That would drown men while they slept in the desert.
>>76654531It's not like I don't already agree with you. But keep in mind women used to be a lot shorter. A modern shortstack pawgs would be considered a tall woman. Their bodies would be a little more compressed, and all in all the exaggeration wouldn't be quite to the extent I think you're implying.And if you think about it, even using the word "ideal" is loaded, and potentially a mischaracterization of ancient thought. We have no real idea of how they understood ideality, or what kind of consensuses, if any, existed thereabout.
>>76653804Yeah maybe to niggers
>>76653800I'm pulling out my redditor goomer card and state that I've masturbated to women who look exactly like that, on top of that I'll call you a jealous roastie who can never mimic that level of "perfection" because much like most body builders who wish to mimic Arnold physique, you simply do not possess the genetics. Now go apply your daily dose of cosmetics to cope with your poor natural looks.
>>76654518>Africa
>>76653800>these were exaggerated for the wow factorsource?
>>76653834Greeks are Indo-Europeans too you dummy.
>>76654662Do you even read nigga?
>>76653804This is modern day.Notice how having a belly bigger than breasts masculines her compared to her other fatty friend?This is what they used to scare naughty children with.
>>76654804holy fuck i need herhnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnffff
>>76654804mirin girth
>>76654639largely european
>>76653785Damn near perfection
>>76653785Challenge: Find one Indian woman on the Internet, from any time period, who has a body like thatHard mode: Not Peggy Sue/Para SilosYou can't do it. They are malformed.
>>76655297That's because these Indian women were reserved for aryans only.
>>76653804
>>76653785seems like even back then i would never got laid, fucking hell literally no woman in whole history of universe would ever like me
>>76654183>>76654578Those were found in europe lol
>>76654804We either need a famine or we need to start selling Ozempic by the gallon at walmart.
>>76655392
>>76655430Nevermind, just bring back whaling.
>>76655376Doesnt matter, niggers still worship fat slobs like that
>>76654566Not 30k years ago they weren't. Preagricultural Europeans were as tall as they are now. It was only after agriculture became a thing that there wasn't enough meat to go around for full potential growth. Average height of a population has more to do with nutrition, barring some plague or something, than just older = shorter.
>>76655776>Preagricultural Europeans were as tall as they are now.hm you're right. Well then nevermind.
>>76654092I remember the turboautist girl on twitter that posted herself next to the "WHERE ARE HER ORGANS" puritans, she had an amazing body but never cashed in on it
>>76654057Bharatchan. You may be shocked to learn it's basically identical to this site since 2020 because it's all the same posters
>>76656106Lotard or Fatlover69, she was perfect.
>>76653856i remember reading roman writings on stone walls that were like modern shitposts. we really have not evolved.
>>76653804>>76654482Could it be possible that they avoided depicting their goddesses as sexually appealing to avoid offending them?
>>76654609
>>76655376the first europeans were black, whites stole their land
>>7665537630000 years ago european homo sapiens had dark skin. White skin appeared in europe 25000 ago
>>76656287>roman writings on stone walls that were like modern shitpostshttps://web.archive.org/web/20171109084104/http://www.pompeiana.org/Resources/Ancient/Graffiti%20from%20Pompeii.htm
This is a representation of AMAMANA, the round world, the enemy of mankind, the fat mother, who both feeds and kills and keeps her children fat and useless and stupid.It's a "name the enemy" situation, men everywhere were expected to know, name pinpoint and hate the enemy, thus keep themselves from falling for the enemy: becoming fat, sexually depleted, happy, lazy, sleeping, cozy, soft and plump, but also enchained, enslaved, Noble strength turned into Vulgar strength, etc.Eve was a fat combative constantly shaming woman who pulled Adam by the dick everywhere she wanted.This is a "before the fall of Adam" warning sign, a long lost vestige of the Golden Age.Source: it was revealed to me in a vision
>>76657180Sorry i'm talking about>>76653804
>>76654609>I've masturbated to women who look exactly like thatUnless you were in front of them irl it's most likely post edition/anglefraud/surgery.
>>76654564No it was meant to reperesent what would make them go ooga booga
>>76653800>im upset because i cant look like thatFix'd
>>76654531I mean, we have goddess statues like those of Ishtar or Isis, and neither of them looked even remotely close to that. On the other hand, they did come way later
>>76654531I've seen woman IRL close to those proportions, or with one of the elements missing (crazy hip-to-waist ratio but way smaller boobs). I know that depending on where you are from it's hard to believe but there are indeed hot women out there.
>>76653834>>76657180I guess it depends on perspective, but I disagree with the notion that moving away from the fertility cults was done by men trying to conquer and prove themselves to other men.I think it is the exact opposite, it is when men banded together and saw women for what they were, that they started to build civilization. When men respected and built each other up, either through mentors or through a warrior-based education system that implemented the basics of training both the soul and body. It is that exact competition amongst men that is actually driving us closer to the fertility cults that we so despise, where a couple men survive because they are chad, not because they have any civilization-building skills, and the rest of men suffer and are blamed for their suffering in a system that was designed to keep them weak. Like imagine the school system you spend 8 hours a day in as a kid, then having to do homework, and still being expected to develop well, do sports, and get enough sunlight and development of the soul and body.And then strenght is redefined to what appeals to women, not to how you can have the strongest group cohesion in a big group. Where even in the face of fear people stick together and carry the same high-trust principles.It is these qualities that make a formidable army, not a womanizer that couldn't work a day in construction despite his muscles and has no wisdom to speak of except how to make money in a crooked system.It's pride in the self vs pride of belonging to a group.
>>76657541>when men banded together and saw women for what they were, that they started to build civilization.except civilization is done for the benefit of women. See Enkidu' seduction by Shamhat
>>76656296>portraying someone as fugly is actually respectful to that person, actuallydo you realize just how retarded and modern this concept is?
>>76657757It depends on how you look at it, civilization, higher order, is definitely not in line with cooming and submitting to women.The idea that wild man is some higher being totally in control of his lust, and yet when a woman seduces him he loses his vril... seems absurd to me. Almost no beast in nature can control his lust as well as man can. So I would say it is different, where civilized man, learnt to harness his true power by keeping himself from being lustful, would definitely not be beastly and "wild". Of course, the idea of "wild" and "in touch with nature" are two different concepts.African tribes are matriarchal and beastly people, by becoming lustful we imitate them. We want to imitate the early Greeks and Romans, where vril is used to advance philosophical ideas to become good people. Women always select for people that will destroy civilization, civilization is inherently masculine as it conveys order, where femininity conveys chaos and emotions.
>>76653800Get some sunlight and maybe your tits and hips will grow.
>>76653807>I doubt it was even possible to get that fat 30k years agoAmericans...
>>76657757Women can hijack and parasitize off of a civilization, but that always leads to the watering down of civilization until there is no civilization left and we're in the stone age again. The civilization in the story of Enkidu probably collapsed later because it didn't let men control their balls. Civilization is when men can control their own balls. Religion is just someone telling you what to do with your dick and balls. If your religion is telling you to do the right thing with your balls (control your balls and use your Vril for yourself), your religion is right. If your religion is telling you to use your balls to further someone else's agenda, your religion is either wrong or has gone corrupt.
>>76657913Why are Americans like this? You don't even have a foreskin.
>>76657842>So I would say it is different, where civilized man, learnt to harness his true power by keeping himself from being lustful, would definitely not be beastly and "wild".In this case, "wild" just means not domesticated by the kikes and assimilated into their eternally-suffering goy herd.
>>76657915not him but your wrong
>>76657915I will grow my foreskin back and I will jizz on your house and then formally inform your female relatives that they are ugly and I would sooner rape a house than fuck them. I will be wearing a tuxedo and yes I will tie the bowtie myself.
>>76657541What I'm saying, in a plainer way:You won't go back in the womb, no matter how hard you try. Might as well get over it, and differentiate for good, once and for all.Who is wiser?He who falls a thousand times but gets up again and again, or he who falls but once and in his fall splits heaven and earth?
>>76657924True, but everyone is domesticated to an extent, by design.The school example is just the easiest one, where kids spend majority of their time at school, then doing homework, then preparing exams, then sleeping 10 hours... or doing their own activities and fucking up their development. At the end of the day, they have no time to think about life or their future except: I'm gonna be a doctor, or I'm gonna be a streamer or w/e.Later it is just the debt-based system and the grinding in universities to get a degree and have connections. The degrees that are worth it like Engineering are hard af, require you to study a LOT, all by design, and you need to build up FAKE friends so you can have "connections" and be a good goy that gets enslaved by the financial system because you are BY DESIGN underpaid and/or expected to intern for free.So let's say a bachelor is 3 years but high stress, why not make it 5 years and low stress? And why not guarantee kids that they will not have to compute with thirld-worlders for jobs, so they don't grind away their time to be qualified for an entry-level job through a humiliation ritual?And then everyone complains why nobody marries or gets kids. Women live a masculine lifestyle and get fucked up, and men never get to develop their spiritual side that allows them to overcome their lust not through sheer willpower (which is useless btw) but through transmutation into an energy source for the brain. Otherwise your just gonna blueball yourself and be lustful 24/7. >>76657939The wiser one is the one that can end the cycle. This requires a combination of both qualities, one to stay in the system minimally to do what is expected and sustain himself and stay connected to people. One to differentiate in your free time and understand both yourself and other people better by developing your soul.>You won't go back in the womb, no matter how hard you try. In a just society you realize this by the age of 5, from your dad.
>>76657757This. Civilization is a chain around a man's neck, but women need civilization to function. Men innately know this and it's why in the past, men were always striving to be on the outskirts and fringes of the civilized world. Deep down they wanted to escape the chain around their neck.
>>76657842>civilization is not in line with submitting to womenNo it absolutely is. Civilization demonises strength and violence, which forces men into an equal playing field with women. That's without going into all the institutions like marriage which are inherently designed to favor women. There is no cope you can try to apply to say that monogamy somehow benefits men more than it does women over polygyny.Of course men want to cum in women, that's the biological imperative and only by accepting the primal can a man reach his full potential. Women can only control a man if there are limits placed on his sexuality. In a natural setting, when a man wants to fuck, he just fucks and the women has no say. >where civilized man, learnt to harness his true power by keeping himself from being lustfulThe fundamental mistake you have made is that you think civilization was built by civilized man. Civilized man is the product of civilization not its progenitor. Civilization was built by untamed strong men who conquered the natural world with sheer force of will. The civilized man is nothing but his domesticated descendant who has grown weak from living drenched in poisonous comfort. A wolf is far greater than a dog.>beastlyMan is a beast. You truly believe you aren't a slave to your most base and animalistic instincts? Do you sleep? Do you eat? If so then how exactly are you above being an animal? It's just a larp. It's time to grow up and stop playing pretend. Man will never be more than an animal, just like how a tranny will never be a woman. It is sheer delusion. Don't get me wrong, man has the greatest soul out of all animals, but a smartphone is still just a phone. Being a hedonist and pure materialist is detrimental, but to deny the material weakens you just as much.
>>76658963Man is a beast is a feminine concept. I don't agree with that at all, and find women more beastly.Also, civilization is built by men, it's just that the end-stage of civilization becomes gynocentric before it falls. Greece and Rome and even Europe had constant wars that I would definitely not call in favour of women, where they are nothing but property. During these times the empires were flourishing and not in a decline like we are now, where the middle class is absolutely shrinking.But like I said it is a matter of perspective. I believe character to be the most important thing one can have, as that determines how creative and how good of a warrior you can be. If people had better character women wouldn't rule over us. Basically, I see character, virtue, intellect, spirituality and higher-order ideals as something that comes in a package. It's hard to only a part of it. I guess it boils down to the philosophies of Aristotle, where happiness is achieved through goodness and balance.>There is no cope you can try to apply to say that monogamy somehow benefits men more than it does women over polygyny.How come, when the whole concept affects 90% of men negatively, for whom civilization is built. Without civilization chad vanishes, so chad relies just as much on civilization as mr beta does, and seeing beta as an insult is a bad thing Imo.An army of moral and well-developed betas will beat any muh bbc african tribe no matter their "beastliness".I'd say you have a prideful perspective based on "winning", and that this social status perspective you take is animalistic, tainting how you see the world. I won't say it's a lie, but I won't say it is good either. I would choose a high-trust society where people trust and like each other over a competitive, individualistic society any day of the week.
