how true is this for lean bulking?
>>76673924Why dont you spin your wheels for 6 months or a few years and let us know.
>>76673967What does spin your wheels mean
>>76673999how brown are you?
>>76673924It's true in theory but unless you're wearing the worlds most accurate fitness tracker and measuring every gram of food and oil you eat you're probably never going to nail down your tdee to a +/- 100 kcal window. Covering that with 300 kcal over is just safer. Also while we're at it you don't have bulk for 6+ months to have the gains "stick" like retards used to say. You just ease up a bit a week or two before going into a cut and consolidate to a lower volume higher intensity routine .
>>76673924niggers will do everything but go run for an hour i swear
>>76673924If you trust le science, then studies show that bulking works really well, as long as the surplus is not too big. A surplus as little as 200kcal can already be enough for optimal muscle growth with minimal fat gain, but the rule of thumb of up to 500kcal surplus still holds true. Excessive surplus way beyond 500kcal typically leads to not much more muscle growth but considerably more fat gain.
>>76674006How brown are you. You do realize not all whites speak english?
