>doing more than 4-6 reps (science says gains max out at 5 effective reps)>not exercising at least every 48 hours (muscle atrophy begins at 48 hours and you lose 3 months worth of gains after not training for ten days)>not doing both a sagittal and frontal exercise for each muscle group as hypertrophy is fiber specific>continuing to do lat pulldowns and rows rather than isolating the lats specifically>doing more than one set (holy fatigue)>not hitting each muscle group 2-3x a weak (holy atrophy batman)>not tying your limbs down as you do extension in order to isolate the muscle as much as possible>weighing more than 200 pounds (chopped)are you even trying to make gains, fit? or is this all a big joke to you?
>>76679285>Take two week break from lifting, come back and hit 20lb bench pr (scientifically measured by weight )>Body composition improved (scientifically measured by mating success)I love doing science
>not hopping on sarms and peptides
>>76679285Yeah if you rest less than 5-15min youre basically on rep 2-4 amd if you arent strength peaked. Like i had cery good suceess with arms just doing a set every 20min then burning out for effectively 3-4 sets getting different roms. High vol through sets with high intensity rep ranges is definitely preferable and why its harder to get a bigger chest/delts for me at least.
>>76679285It looks like entirely accessory work i wanna be strong not big i look like im twice my actual strength and it pisses me off.
>>76679285That boy has no muscle mass, I will stick with what works
>>76679868>low muscle mass insanity veinsHes roided if he ate and forgot the nipple shit hed easily be twice as big by now.
>>76679285>science Fuck off manlet lover
>>76679285>5rmsEven 5 seems high i find failing in the <3rm range is good every/every other session for a given muscle if you want to balance size/density/cns.>atrophy at 48hrsThats roiders, working yourself into the ground is maybe good for half a week hypertrophy wise to be able to still be bulking and be resting and not have much room to even benefit from more work ime. Youll find by the 2nd day if you trained right you might be growing without a pump before.>latino slurs for exercisesIdk mane i just touch my body to feel the fibers.I kinda might have to use a cloth to do this for a chest fly machine and repurpose my home gym butt machine.
>not doing isometrics to train full motor unit recruitmentare you guys even really doing anything in the gym?
>>76680030Lil gup fr out there doing the bad girl machine ain't no way
>>76679285did science tell you to reduce your ROM and isolate your shoulder blades you faggot? lol, 99% of the gym goers whether online or offline are piece of shits who refuse to learn, who refuse to think, but loves taking what someone has said lololol no wonder exogenic testo is almost essential for these fgts.
>>76680135it's a lat isolation exercise, you remove the elbow joint from the equation
>>76679285Effective reps isn't science yet it's cutting edge broscience that will eventually become science. Also the recommended amount is usually 12-25 ER per group per session with weekly goals of about 30-60
>>76680182>Also the recommended amount is usually 12-25 ER per group per session with weekly goals of about 30-60Thats about what I get doing DC training but where do you get those figures from
>>76679285>science says gains max out at 5 effective repsdeboonked by the first google resulthttps://www.strongerbyscience.com/effective-reps/
>>76679285finally a demo on some psoas bot bot :D exercises
You are a joke to me, OP.
>>76679285Yup, that's what the average science based lifting denier sounds like.Literally just mocking strawmen and starting failed arguments on false premises.
>>76679285>not exercising at least every 48 hours (muscle atrophy begins at 48 hours and you lose 3 months worth of gains after not training for ten days)>muscles require 48-72 hours to fully regenerate>you lose gains after 48 hoursit's over, isn't it?
>>76680211Probably Lyle I don't even know what video or article but he goes on a lot about training stimulus and why dissimilar volume and methods tend to have similar results and how to use that to appraise a routines effectiveness and fatigue.I belive he's talking about explicitly growth in that context tough not maintence which would be significantly lower.
