[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/fit/ - Fitness


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_3850.jpg (431 KB, 1170x822)
431 KB
431 KB JPG
Is 2 rashers of grilled bacon everyday bad for you?
>>
>>76713915
enjoy your bowel cancer
>>
>>76713915
physically, yes.
spiritually, no.
>>
>>76713915
Enjoy your bacon sandwich
>>
File: ty.jpg (158 KB, 1172x1043)
158 KB
158 KB JPG
>>76713915
i do a 1lb of ground turkey with onions and six eggs instead. it's about 76 grams of protein.
>>
>>76713915
Enjoy your 200k units of AGE
>>
>>76713915
ChatGPT says “Not ideal — it’s better to alternate with other protein options like beans or tofu”
>>
>>76713915
>known carcinogen
Idk
>>
>>76713952
That's more like 130 grams of protein
>>
>>76713915
>rashers
Uwotm8
>>
>>76713919
Pussy
>>
>>76714048
I lost one friend to it already and about to lose a 2nd. It's no joke.
>>
>>76714058
So you really think I’m gonna get because I eat 2 bits of bacon GRILLED in the morning
>>
>>76714071
idk. it depends on a lot of different factors but it isn't helping you at all.
>>
>>76714077
Ok then I’ll stop
>>
goatse
>>
>>76714071
Can you explain why you capitalized the word grilled?
>>
File: asscancer.jpg (188 KB, 1349x683)
188 KB
188 KB JPG
>>76714058
people are eating ridiculous food everyday now. we need to calm down and have more raw and boiled whole foods.
>>
>>76713915
2 rashers? Just fine. Have lower sodium rest of the day.
BTW Rashers O'Bacon is my Irish pornstar name.
>>
>>76714114
Because grilled is supposed to be healthier than fried
>>
>>76714003
You don't know shit pussy i cant even finish it I get distracted and masturbate 7 times a day
>>
>>76714290
And? How is that relevant to the conversation topic which is bowel cancer?
>>
>>76714406
I don’t know how the fucking bacon causes bowel cancer do I? Why you giving me a hard time over nothing
>>
>>76714425
OK sorry
>>
>>76713915
as long as youre not grossly exceeding your daily caloric requirement its fine
>>76713919
no evidence for this. the best evidence (multiple RCTs) is against it
>>76714000
its not. there is no evidence for that
>>
>>76713919
Oh no, my lifelong probability of dying from bowel cancer is going to go from 3% to 4%! Better switch to vegetarianism so that I can live a subpar life and die from a stroke instead!

>>76713915
The current meta for me is buying thick cut bacon, which comes in packs of seven rashers for some reason, and 15 packs of eggs. While the bacon is air frying I fry five eggs in a pan, and make two bacon and egg wraps. It works out to about 100 grams of protein, plus the ten grams from the "high protein tortilla". Good breakfast!
>>
>>76715314
>bowel cancer is going to go from 3% to 4%
no reason to think that's the case. a WHO committee of vegetarian ideologues declared processed meat a carcinogen with no good evidence while ignoring the best evidence. The one sane dissenter on the committee wrote a scathing critique of their conclusions here
>Most importantly for the IARC report, two major dietary intervention studies that should have contributed to the assessment of the claimed relationship of red meat and cancer were not considered. The first was a study of colon polyps, the precancerous growths that greatly increase the likelihood of developing colon cancer. Almost 1,900 subjects with a recent history of having a polyp removed were divided into a control group that ate their usual diet and a group following a diet characterized by significant decreases in total fat, red, and processed meat along with increases in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and legumes (Schatzkin et al., 2000). Participants were followed for 3 years and at the end of that time, the recurrence of colon polyps was identical in both diet groups. It is possible that the precancerous stage may not have been the proper time for dietary intervention. The Women’s Health Initiative, therefore, studied a low-fat diet, achieved in large part by reducing red- and processed-meat consumption, among almost 49,000 women (Beresford et al., 2006); about 30,000 followed their normal diets and almost 20,000 were assigned to low-fat diets. After 9 years, the rate of colon cancer was almost identical in the low-fat and control-diet groups. These studies strongly suggest that the observational studies are not supported by dietary intervention studies at either the precancerous or malignant tumor stages of colon cancer.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7015455/
>>
>>76714115
I got a colonoscopy not to long ago. It was worth it.
>>
>>76713915
No
>>
>>76714115
My grandpa died from it. Was absolutely brutal.
>>
Probably not best practice but this fag >>76713919 is off his rocker and there’s a million different things/variables going on that are all just as likely to give you cancer including just shitty luck and genes.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.