>>76727544>he watches pseudoscience roidtrannies to this daynot gonna make it familia
>>76727544>he still watches this midget
>>76727562It's not pseudo, he tracked his lean mass and he also increased the load on several exercises while cutting the sets in half
>>76727544based>>76727566just because you are taller than him doesn't mean you're smarter or know more about making gains. by your logic people shouldn't have learned from Einstein because he was 5'7.
Made massive gains when i got rid of ppl and moved 4 times a weekthere's a lesson in there
>>76727625But did you just cram your sets in less days or you reduced sets too?
>>76727575he's on steroids dude
>>76727575and how many sets was he doing in the first place?
>>76727613people shouldn't have learned from Einstein because he was jewish. Being 5'7 is just the cherry on top
>>76727632Depends on the muscle group, he was doing 10 to 15 sets per week before, now 6-8 per week, roughly half
>>76727627NTA but I assume he means less sets. Happens to a lot of people
>>76727544I don't know what his argument is because you rudely did not post a link to the video you wanted to discuss
>>76727627reduced sets.
>>76727629No balding, clear skin, very good physique but nothing crazy for someone who's been training 10+ years as a job
>>76727671I apologize to you broski, however you can easily find it since it's the very last one published on his channel.
>would I lose muscle of course not maintaining muscle is way easierYou could do like 2 sets a week and not lose muscle
His science is flawed when you realize that his 1 to 2 hard sets is spanned across multiple exercises that hit the same muscle group. If I do 8 exercises for legs and 4 to 5 of them have serious overlap or synergistic activation and only do 2 sets for them, that's still a god amount of volume for legs or shoulders or back. Of course he would feel tired from doing 6 sets of 5 exercises for legs, he's probably sandbagging everything after the second or third lift. He cut down the fluff across the exercises but still has that heavy overlap of exercises. I want to see this faggot do something like 1 to 2 sets of squat to failure and see if the minimalist training methodology still works to BUILD more muscle and not just maintain.
>>76727999I suggest you watch the video or shut the fuck up, you pulled those numbers out of your ass
>>76728011I watched the whole thing, Jeff. Next time when you're on a cut and need something to film, keep it to yourself because nobody cares.
>>76728011> you pulled those numbers out of your assSource?
>>76728011Oh and here you go, Nipples.>10 sets on legs>5 sets for quadshttps://youtu.be/DzjWEn2BS_k?si=XKqliUoVD1Y5IrqG&t=614
>>76728028>If I do 8 exercise for legs>only 2 sets for them>Here you go, 10 sets on legsAre you actually retarded?
>>76727544Cucky! Dinner is served (BBC Creampie)Also BUY AN AD
>>76727544That guy doesnt look healthy
>>76727544he looks severly deranged and mentally ill, the only reason he doesn't trigger a reaction in people is his height
>>76728048Ok retard, if I do 2 sets of 5 exercises for legs, how many sets did I do in total for legs? Also,. thanks for exaggerating my point in saying that he did 16 sets for legs (even though he didn't)
>>76728141You wrote that dumbfuck, you wrote 8 exercises for 2 sets each, and then said it was 10 DUMBFUCK stop pulling numbers out of your ass i repeat
>>76727627>But did you just cram your sets in less days or you reduced sets too?Was doing too much volume, blames split.
>>76728144It was hyperbole, Jeff.
>>76728063twitched
>>76727650so he went from high volume to still high volume, because he's a roid tranny.
all his experiments are like >"I gained a net of 1.5 pounds of muscle in a whole year bro"ok? is that supposed to be good?
we know it's you jeff, stop also, brosplit remains king to this day, everything else is for autistic gymcels
>>76728151Literally yes, what? Your split determines your volume.
>>76729670the truth is that once you hit a certain point natty, you aren't making any more meaningful progress. you can do autistic shit for a year to eke out a tiny amount of gains, or you can accept that you're pretty jacked, cut to a maintenance program, and get a lifejeff can't get any useful information by experimenting on himself because he can't go up much (or down, really)
>>76729745i laughed out loud at this picture.Thanks friend, haven't laughed in a while
I sat behind Jeff Nippard on a plane once. Not only did he order a Diet Pepsi and then explain in his nasally, annoying nerd voice to the flight attendant why Diet Coke isn’t a suitable replacement, but he is like 5’ 1” at most. I mean seriously, he looks like munchkin in person. That said, I’ve done this exact experiment on myself and got same result so I actually agree that this is the best way to retain muscle on a cut.
>>76727544If youre only doing 10 sets a week of bench thats not even trying thats more of a squat optizarion program as it keeps your weekly workload in the sweet spot since theyre the largest muscles.
>>76727625Try frontloading with say bench 10 sets monday 8 sets wednesday, then focusing delts more until chest is recovered and if not strength peaking ill burn out chest again before the weekend. Of course add other work but i mean whatever needs work. Im on delts right now so im still brmching first but the wednesday is incline maybe some reverse flat and nailing delts every other day or so for the week and just doing chest first. The same obviously works for lats/rear delts(mid delts usually any overhead and front delts is adding delt bench + cables) as rows/pulldowns/pullups as bench and top rom rows as my favorite lately for rear delts and the tbar seal row thing. I have it lately to where i dont need more than a day or 2 rest and it be beneficial as i like 2x/day to split volume, way sicker than going nuts in the gym to condense the session.
>>76728011>you pulled those numbers out of your assWhat's the problem with that? I'm Science-based™ lifter.
>>76729670After he's been training for 10+ years? Yes.
People make out like they have chosen between two paths of “volume” and “intensity” and they rarely do the former properly and never do the latter, then blame it on something other than themselves when it inevitably doesn’t work
>>76730296What makes a workout intense or not?
>>76730327something like reps close to failure
>>76727544nice star trek outfit. fucking fag
>>76730190"nasally" is an adverb; you mean "nasal".
>>76729745>Your split determines your volume.It doesn't mine. I've done three working sets some days.
>>76729745Lol, no it doesn't...a split is just a way to distribute volume in a week, but first you decide how much volume
>>76730410But i mean if you do enough volume you should get a lot of reps close to failure, right?
>>76730447Not necessarily, if you leave enough reps in the tank and rest enough you can go on for a lot of sets before reaching RPE 9+ and that would be highly inefficient
>>76730455I dont really believe in resting more than 30 secs to maybe a minute between sets, personally.
>>76730431i really like it.Then again, i also like star trek.
>>76730465post body
>>76727636Based
>>76727999>I want to see this faggot do something like 1 to 2 sets of squat to failure and see if the minimalist training methodology still works to BUILD more muscle and not just maintain.This is what I do and I have strength and mass gains. But I am beginner, might not work anymore after I build muscles. If so, I will increase to 2 or 3 sets.
>>76730465If you rest so little you are basically training for endurance. You will also do much less reps on every next set.
>>76727636> Based and physics-pilled
>>76727544Ultra High Volume is king tho.Low Volume and Medium Volume are copes.Haney and Cutler mogged the HIT Cope Scam
what about ramping sets with one top set?
>>76727676idiot
>>76727544flip flopping in real time. if you still listen to this faggot you deserve no gains
>>76730465>I dont really believe in resting more than 30 secs to maybe a minute between sets, personally.just go to a crosshitter gym at that point all you're doing is cardio with weights
>>76730888Aaaughhh
>>76727544Real question: why is this guy so popular?
>>76727999I still don't know how to count total sets per week when compounds are involved. Let's say I do 4 sets of bench press. Do those count as four sets for chest, front delts and triceps?
>>76731115youtube gerrymandering>>76731158there is no hard rule but for bench i'd count them all because they all get work, for me.
>>76730540Your turn
>>76731165Oopa.Been eating whatever i want for 4 months so im a bit flabbier than this now but i just started a new cut a few days ago
>>76731163>youtube gerrymanderingI love this phrase. Thanks for it.
>>76727629I dont know of he still is but he definitely was
>>76731163OK, so let's say I do 4 sets of bench press on monday, 4 sets of OHP on wednesday and 4 sets of dips on friday. Does that count as 12 sets for triceps? And if so, considering that 12 weekly sets is the optimal volume for muscle growth, would there be a reason to do more triceps isolations on top of that?
This is some 2010 common knowledge,you cut down the volume but keep intensity the same when cutting because you MAINTAIN,saved you 20 minutes
>>76727544why does he have to go off cycle for 100 days? (and cover it up with this bs experiment?)
>>76730465for strength you can rest 4-5 minutes
>>76731535>OK, so let's say I do 4 sets of bench press on monday, 4 sets of OHP on wednesday and 4 sets of dips on friday. Does that count as 12 sets for triceps?Yes.>And if so, considering that 12 weekly sets is the optimal volume for muscle growth, would there be a reason to do more triceps isolations on top of that?Yes, but for different reason. I have read that bench press does not train all tricep heads. So if you want full growth you should do tricep extension.
>>76732620>if you want full growth you should do tricep extension.Rows do long head.
>>767285716-8 sets is not high volume lmao2 sets each on squats, leg press, and extensions spread out over a whole week is simply not a lot for the quads.
>>76732627Rows do not train tricep.
>>76732620So bench, OHP and dips already take care of the long head, right? Some pushdowns for the short head and that's it, then.
Volume matters a lot in the long term, not in a session to session basis.The main thing is to increase and keep your testosterone levels high while giving a signal to your muscles to grow by training them. The working out is just the signal and your body and diet does 90% of the work.You just need to hit a muscle close to failure or to failure.In the longer term volume matters because the same amount of volume is going to be way easier for you. I think the general perception people have is upside down. They think the way to grow is to force an increase in volume when the increase in volume is an indication of growth. You don't increase volume to get stronger, you increase volume because you got stronger.
>>76727613>Comparing this retard to einstein
>>76730749You don’t know what the word cope means
>>76727629So are 99% of fitness influcencers
>>76732589It's the opposite, he makes these stupid videos whenever he's blasting >look i discovered this magic trick that makes me able to gain muscle after reaching my "natural" limit but i wont stick to it anymore because...? anyways buy my course goyim here's my paid programs and app tooIt's not that dumb actually and waves off any suspicions
>>76730888crossfags btfo
>>76734033the volume papers are short term to my knowledge so you have no basis for what you're claiming
>jeff nipples in 2019>science says volume is king, trust the science>jeff nipples in 2025>science says low volume is king, trust the science>jeff nipples in 2031>science says volume is king, trust the science>...isn't science supposed to be objective?
>>76735440Science isnt supposed to stagnate so he's correct in that regard and only that regard, nothing else about his methodology is scientifical
>>76735452seems like basedence is useless for gym then
>>76735500basedence*
>>76735516s o yence
