So I just saw this study and it looks pretty convincing. How do keto, carnivore etc. bros cope? I don't try to bait, I personally feel better on meat and diary too than on bread, fish, and veggies. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-025-03570-5
>>76729299
>>76729448>science is le joowishSir?
It says that the full vegan diet is worse than omnivorous diet and that fat in general is actually good btw, even though red meat and saturated fat are still bad.
>>76729505>It says that the full vegan diet is worse than omnivorous dietit didn't directly compare them dumbass so your claim that they made suck a claim is bullshit. fuck off bot
>>76729299this is an article on the colon cancer meat association but it applies to this whole article>Nevertheless, the IARC working group concluded that for every 50 grams of processed meat eaten, the relative risk of colon cancer was increased by 18% compared with those who ate the least processed meat. How does this compare with known carcinogens? The increased relative risk of lung cancer from smoking cigarettes is 1000–3000%. The increased relative risk of liver cancer from eating moldy grains contaminated with aflatoxin is about 600%. In fields outside nutrition, the usual threshold for confidence about relative risk is in the range of 200–400%. At the higher end of that range, one can be guardedly confident but “we can hardly ever be confident about estimates of less than 2.0, and when estimates are much below 2.0, we are simply out of business” (Shapiro, 2004); relative risk of 2.0 translates to an increase of 100%. So, an 18% increase equals a relative risk of 1.18, and this score falls substantially below the threshold that epidemiologists in other fields generally accept as worthy of further investigation.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7015455/
>>76729299what the fuck do we it, every day, more lies, every day a food that's not ok to eat even though yesterday it was the best food to eatWHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?
>>76729526So there are habits that reduce your lifespan for more than 70%? >>76729522hPDI is the vegan diet.and it consistently performs the worst, retard.
>>76729654>So there are habits that reduce your lifespan for more than 70%?no theyre all weak confounded associations not worth paying attention to
>>76729638ignore all the headlines and bs. even most of the "science" in nutrition isnt really that its just people publishing to advance their career like the OPs article
>>76729299These diets have skill issues with excess cholesterol and oxidate stress in addition to some minerals. But vegans also end up underweight and grey haired, so omnivore wins, kek.>>76729526If you're eating BromAC, berberine, sulphoraphane and turmeric for example, your ass cancer risk will plummet more than simply omitting meat. Just don't fall for the raw meme, processed, or overcooking skill issues; they all give you ass cancer eventually through different mechanisms.
>>76729638Lean ground beef is a superfood. Even fatty ground beef is fine if you burn a lot of calories.
>>76729691Why ground beef and not like normal steak meat?
>>76729665The article says the difference is up to 2.5 even when controlled for all other factors. Could you elaborate how this particular study is wrong? I'm really confused.
still eating red meat every day and I won't get in the pod or eat the bugs
>>76729720then its maybe a real association assuming they report raw outcome statistics (usually not the case). knowing some of the authors past work i can say its not worth anyones time
>>76729737So carnivore is healthy?
>>76729522It did. Stop coping. Veganism os rotting your ability to read.
Oh shit. A graph with red and green bars. Don't care. Still eating a ton of meat and crushing whole milk OP.
>>76729654>>76729759>hPDI is the vegan diet.and it consistently performs the worst, retard.hPDI isn't a vegan diet, it just a measure of adherence to a particular subset of foods, meaning that meat is still eaten, just less frequently. Look at picrel, you see THE FUCKING PINK NEXT TO SEAFOOD RETARDagain, fuck off
>>76729718Ground beef generally has a mixture of round, chuck, and sirloin, which are all more nutrient dense cuts of beef, especially the round. Steaks are usually just from one specific location. It really doesn't matter that much unless you are highly autistic about macros.
>>76729869Cope. It's vegan.
>>76729914>looks at OP's picrel, sees that pPDI eats>meat>eggs>seafood>miscellaneous animal-based foods>animal fats>dairy>"cope bro, it's vegan"you retarded, you need to go back to preschool and learn your colors too bro
>>76729950*hPDI
>>76729299You eat meat to get thick and tight. Not to stay around sucking up resources as an old bag.
>>76729950Red means you don't eat all those things on this diet.
>>76730010no it fucking doesn't retard, do you see pink next to poultry or organ meats? eh? did you even click the link? stop lying and fuck off
>>76730058Vegan is unhealthy anyway. Stay mad.
>>76729299This study has precisely jackshit to do with keto or carnivore. The average retarded obese drug addict sedentary moron this data is pulled from would do well to change just about anything they do on a day to day basis.
>>76730385>obese drug addict sedentaryThey controlled for non-dietary factors.
>>76729505>fat in general is actually goodBut not trans fat or saturated fat. So animal fats are out.
>>76730420They didn't control anything. That's a misuse of the term. If you want to control for other factors you would randomize
>>76730580There's no good evidence saturated fats are unhealthy. Clinical trials show no effect on all cause or cvd mortality. Associations are weak and inconsistent
>>76730584>>76730587So the study is bad and carnivore is healthy?
>>76730580There's negligible trans fat in unprocessed meat. Trans fat is a byproduct of food processing.
>>76730592Not bad per se but overstated. These types of studies should usually only be used to generate hypotheses which could then be tested in experiment. Carnivore has a lack of evidence one way or the other in controlled human trials
>>76730600What about keto or high-protein low-carb?
>>76730587>>76730592Youtubers and social media grifters say saturated fat is ok, all health institutions in all developed countries say to limit saturated fat intake. Make of that what you will.
>>76730618There are papers like >>76729526 and some health institutions (there's a clinic in Europe where they use low-carb diets) say it's ok too.
>>76729505Omnivorous is bad. Vegetarian is healthier and more ethical.>>76729680> But vegans also end up underweight and grey haired, so omnivore wins, kek.Omnivore doesn't wins, vegetarian does.And vegan diet was not designed for health but for ethics.
>>76730632Mentally ill.
>>76730618>all health institutions in all developed countries say to limit saturated fat intake.The jewish institutions recommend avoiding saturated fat because it is necessary for testosterone production. They want you to be deficient in saturated fat and testosterone, they want you weak, fat, obedient. Don't listen to the jews, they aren't your friend.
>>76730618Judging by how quickly you shift to ad hominem and appeal to authority your argument must be piss poor
>>76730629It's pointless to look into individual studies, because you will always have industry funded research that is designed to deliver certain results. That's why you look at the consensus in the field. Low carb diets are used for some health conditions because the benefits for these specific patients outweighs the health risks of the diet.
>>76729299I've seen so much shitty "science" being promoted in regards to nutrition like this that I genuinelly have to wonder if there is some financial incentive behind itEvery single time there is like "research" among the lines of "this study suggests that if you shove a stake in your throat you will suffocate" which is taken as "proof" by "experts" that diet including animal protein is unhealthy. They constsntly try to weasel in "processed meat" in there as if it's not already well known that eating processed food in general is insanely unhealthy. And they always compare "carnivore" diet of eating goyslop like fried chicken nuggets from KFC to "vegan" diet of boiled broccoli as if that's what vegans are eating instead of highly processed and chemically infused goyslop of "meat alternatives"
>>76730645They also tell me to avoid smoking, trans fats and lead exposure. Are those things also making me stronger?>>76730655>ad hominem and appeal to authorityThose are fallacies in a strict logical sense, but in the real world I will listen to an expert in his field over a grifting chiropractor on social media
>>76730661So generally you better not risk with extreme diets and just eat bread if you aren't obese?
>>76730683>extreme diets They're usually not a good idea, jnless you have food allergies or other medical issues. Just eat real food (not processed), and lots of fruits and veggies.>eat bread if you aren't obese?Bread is fine but it should be whole grain (like all of your carbs) and without sugar or corn syrup.
>>76730670>financial incentiveYou know that countries invest money in public health, right? That also goes into researching nutrition and coming up with guidelines.>animal protein is unhealthyLiterally no country tells their people to avoid all animal products and to eat vegan. It's not black and white, they tell you fish it good, chicken ok, red meat bad and processed meat the worst.>"vegan" diet of boiled broccoli Well yeah, they don't tell you to eat "vegan", they tell you to eat your veggies. And if you're going to eat vegan you should not eat tprocessed slop either.
>>76729299>So I just saw this study and it looks pretty convincingAn American's famous last words.
>>76730618>all health institutions in all developed countries say to limit saturated fat intakeThey say a lot of things, always the ones politicians approve of and it's allways the same. So, not very trutworthy.
>>76730723Not an American.
>>76730673>They also tell me to avoid smoking, trans fats and lead exposure. Are those things also making me stronger?No, they only lie about saturated fat.But the anti smoking policy might be also because smoking increases testosterone - I do not recommend smoking though.>>76730730They are jewish frauds.
>>76730739>blind belief in basedence>muh veggies>muh meat>muh fear of death and aging>can only post in meme speak>"I don't feel good eating bread and veggies">not AmericanCome on, everyone can tell.
>>76730895How anything of this is American lol. Americans don't even have bread in their country.
>>76730912>How anything of this is American lol. Americans don't even have bread in their country.Can't speak English either, you're digigng your hole even deeper, bro.
>>76730915Exactly you imbecile faggot, we don't speak English IN EUROPE. Are you a vegan by chance?
>>76730730>always the ones politicians approve ofThe nutritional guidelines are pretty consistent across 100+ countries and multiple decades, schizo
>>76730885Nah, they're right about saturated fat and smoking, but they're wrong about everything else. THEY don't want you to inhale asbestos and eat paint chips because they fear you'll become too based.
>>76730618>Youtubers and social media griftersFaggots selling a product but at least they lift. >all health institutions in all developed countriesPencil necked dweebs with near zero fitness experience who think squatting 2pl8 is "highly dangerous". Last seen unsuccessfully trying to replicate a kinesiology study where they managed to distinguish their ass from their elbow.
>>76731198Actually, this. Why would da jooz advice against consuming actual goyslop?
>>76731198The jews have no evidence on saturated fat evil, they just post "recommendations".Whereas there is evidence that too little saturated fat = testosterone deficiency.
>>76731318If your end goal is just a lot of testosterone, why won't you just take the shots?
>>76730719You're definitely winning the whatever separate argument you're having man hope it goes well
>>76729299OP. Look down from the screen, and at your wrist. Move it backwards and forwards vertically - see the range of motion there? No other primate species has an unlocked wrist like we do. Do you know why this is? Its so you can swing a club or rock with enough force to smash open the skulls of game animals and crack bones for extracting bone marrow. Your body has evolved over the past 7 million years to be the best in the world at running down and killing animals >3 times your bodyweight with a fucking rock so you can devour their meat and grow even larger. Anyone telling you otherwise is lying to you, or fundamentally anti-human in temperament.
>>76730632Vegetarianism is evil and unethical human abuse.
>>76731399The difference is wild animals are lean while pork/beef are, most of the time, fatty.
An honest post about the whole diet war and it will blow your minds.............. everything within moderation. I was doing more of a ancestral diet than a carnivore diet for lack of better terms (meat, kefir, eggs, rice, honey, berries, sourdough) I was eating a boat load of meat and eggs, with a good amount of kefir everyday and my body couldn't process my free test, turning it into DHT. It made my scalp not oily, but it had this gunk on it and caused pre-mature balding. The proper term is I had overactive sebum production because the amount of free test being converted into DHT. I then used AI to give me a diet plan that reduced my sebum production by processing my free-test more than I was. I found my zinc copper ratio was bad, my phosphorus to calcium ratio was bad, and had too many androgenic foods (yes you can overdo a good thing, shocker) and recommended to cut down on my meat, dairy and egg intake, increase vegetables, including cruciferous ones, add more carbs, eat more nuts. For those who were carnivore pilled like myself "but vegetables are anti-nutrients and your body can't digest them". Correct, their role is to process hormones (fiber and some other micronutrient things do this), not necessarily provide calories or nutrients. Now my diet is way more well rounded (I was eating 1lb of 80/20 beef a day prior) and the gunk went away, and my body's natural hairloss came back to its normal rate. My previous diet was:1lb 80/20 beef2 cups kefir12 eggs2 cups rice cooked2 cups frozen berrierhoney with my sleepy time teaSo yea, do everything in moderation.
>>76731326My goal is health, strong, fit.Taking steroids does not fulfill that.But everybody should avoid testosterone deficiency caused by jewish diet. Eat saturated fat - eat coconut oil.>>76731473How does it abuse humans?
Vegetarianism is peak health, but veganism is peak ethics.
>>76729299I'm supposed to learn 12 new acronyms just to debunk your gay study? No thanks. I'll just keep eating meat because it makes me feel strong and energized.
>>76729638Globalists unironically want you to eat bugs. Or grass. They don't care as long as you're weak and stupid.
>>76730618I literally trust a random Youtuber more than I trust the "experts"
>>76732038The study shows eating meat, excluding red, is healthier than vegetarianism.
>>76732127Of course you do. You get your information from youtube and memes and fall for fad diets.
I dont listnen to dyel eggheads for eating advice or lifting advice.If the guy doing that study isnt huge and has freak apnea I dont give a shit
>>76732401No, I get my information from my own intuition. You just don't understand comparative statements.
>>76729299>whole grains all green>onions all green>nuts all green>red meat combined with processed meats>red meat also separate>all red meat is all red>organ meats all red>pizza all green>sodium all redyeah, this chart is absolute dog shit and obviously propaganda
>>76732122>things that give you cancer, heart disease, and diabetes like beef are worse than le honey nut cheeriosyes, seethe
>>76730523>healthy eating>multivitamin requiredLMFAO
>>76730587>Associations are weak and inconsistentBullshit. Explain which variable isn't being controlled for. You're just regurgitating what YouTubers tell you. Dismissing decades of epidemiology spanning millions of people all showing similar repeatable results is beyond retarded. Especially when the "clinical trials" are severely flawed and from the 70's. They also often don't show what you think they showed. 99% of studies show that replacing saturated fat with ANY other fat source greatly reduces cardiovascular incidents, so again please explain which variable all of these studies aren't controlling for. >https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2556125>https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/41/24/2313/5735221>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16904539/>Consumption of a saturated fat reduces the anti-inflammatory potential of HDL and impairs arterial endothelial function> https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.ATV.0000163185.28245.a1> High SFA caused deterioration in FMD compared with high PUFA, MUFA, or CARB diets> https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00394-021-02507-1>replacement of saturated fats with other macronutrients, such as polyunsaturated fats, was associated with reduced cardiovascular disease occurrence.> https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010236> These data provide support for current recommendations to replace saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat for primary prevention of CHD.https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2831265> In this cohort study, higher intake of butter was associated with increased mortality, while higher plant-based oils intake was associated with lower mortality. Substituting butter with plant-based oils may confer substantial benefits for preventing premature deaths.
>>76732127>I admit I'm a fucking tool and proud of itKill yourself
>>76732543>again please explain which variable all of these studies aren't controlling for.post body. this is both a request and the variable.
>>76732437Eat your grainslop, then. I'll keep eating beef.
>>76732549Stay mad
>>76732125The jews want you to eat meat so you get ass cancer and they will sell you "treatment", treatment that will kill you.>>76732383Does not.
I just eat what my mom cooks :)
>>76732543>ANY other fat sourceWhat is healthier btw, monounsaturated or polyunsaturated fat? >>76732601It controls for the amount of exercise. Read the paper retard.
>>76732650>Our findings suggest that dietary patterns rich in plant-based foods, with moderate inclusion of healthy animal-based foods, may enhance overall healthy aging, guiding future dietary guidelines.>>>with moderate inclusion of healthy animal-based foodsThe diets with more animal foods perform better than the diet with little animal food.
>>76732650>eat meat so you get ass cancerthe best evidence that we have has exonerated meat red processed or otherwise of anything to do with colorectal cancer
>>76732543>Bullshitevery word in my post was objectively correct which is why you dont address it and instead post papers unrelated
>>76732543i can post just as many if not more papers showing no or the opposite correlation. still doesnt matter much one way or the other>We found no indication that saturated or polyunsaturated fats increase CVD or T2DM risk, and both were linked with lower all-cause mortality. In general, all types of dietary fat were associated with less body fat and a more favorable lipoprotein profile. This study found no evidence that saturated fat has an adverse impact on cardiometabolic health.https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4198093> lower intake of SFA, specifically lower intake from cheese, were associated with higher CHD risk.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32907659/look at all this "science">There was no statistically significant association between Na density or energy from saturated fat and all-cause mortality or CVD events for all models investigated. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35392993/>Increasing saturated fat intake was not associated with CVD or mortality and instead correlated with lower rates of diabetes, hypertension and obesity. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34509998/
>>76732543>In this study, no significant associations were found between dietary fats and CVD risk. Considering the emerging body of literature that suggests no association between fats and CVD risk, reconsideration of dietary recommendations regarding low fat diets to prevent CVD, seems to be essential. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34717669/according to you the authors of this paper must be youtubers or "grifters" of some sort. that or youre delusional and obsessed
>>76732855>>76732858God why is it so confusing. What the fuck should I eat?
>>76729299>Imagine not eating meat because someone told you to>Imagine resigning yourself to being a subhuman second-class citizen on purpose>Imagine thinking animals have rights>Like (You)As usual, OP is a faggot. I'll eat twice as many burgers for you, Anon.
>>76732764so you're too pussy to post body lmao. anything you say regarding health is moot.
>>76732928This *unzips*
>>76733024What do you unzip
>>76729482Modern science isn't science.
>>76730632>EthicalEat shit and die.
>>76730723>>76730895>>76730912Keep seething and coping, you pathetic insignificunt turdies.
>>76733103>*sips corn syrup*
I started to buy bread guys.
>>76732651Holy based
>>76732812Processed red meat is literally classified as a Group 1 carcinogen ("carcinogenic to humans") by the WHO because it causes colorectal cancer
>>76732928See>>76730618
>>76730922>we don't speak English IN EUROPELmao, the American gets angrier.Hint: Everyone can speak English in Europe. Stuff like>How anything of this is American lol.Is ironically only posted by Americans. They suck at their own language.>>76731530fat
>>76732768>animal-based foodsAnimal-based foods = cheese and dairy = vegetarianismIt doesn't say meat.>>76732812Which is exactly the meat that Americans consume.>>76732928Plants.
>>76733991>>76734018So I eat bread and fruits and some poultry, diary, and fish? I don't like vegetables and legumes.
>>76733985the best evidence says it doesn't cause anything of the sort. The WHO report you refer to was a sham. Don't take it from me. One of the authors on that WHO IARC committee says so himself>Despite claims by the World Health Organization (WHO) that eating processed meat causes colon cancer and red meat probably causes cancer, the observational data used to support the claims are weak, confounded by multiple unmeasured factors, and not supported by other types of research needed for such a conclusion. Although intervention studies are designed to test the validity of associations found in observational studies, two interventions of low-fat, low-meat diets in volunteers that failed to find a benefit on cancer were not considered in the WHO decision.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7015455/
>>76734163What the cardiovascular health?
>>76734163>noooo don't listen to the scientific consensus, listen to this one dissenting voice rattlting off all the usual beef industry talking points
>>76734208He was PART of the consensus you drooling retard. He has insider knowledge.
What should I eat.
>>76732650>The jews want you to eat meatTotally. That's why they rank meat as less healthy than sugary cereal on their nutrition lists, why they constantly decry saturated fat and cholesterol, why they are actively shutting down farms in Europe, why they went out of their way to ban raw milk, and why their WEF 2030 climate-saving diet only allows like 2 servings of beef per year.
>>76732928It's confusing because the powers that be flood you with a bunch of meaningless and dishonest noise. Just listen to your body. What whole foods do you feel good when eating? I feel good when I eat beef, so I keep eating it. Same with honey, fruit, oysters, eggs, and raw milk. I don't feel good when I eat seed oils or grains, so I don't eat them. I don't care what any gay studies say and neither should you. Studies can be designed to "prove" literally any hypothesis. I could design a study showing that if you eat chocolate cake, you grandmother will get pancreas cancer. All I have to do is manipulate the data, have a small sample size, and ignore data points that don't fit my desired result. And that's exactly what these paid studies do.
>>76729299>I don't try to baitYour English indicates that this is a crypto-indian vegetarian propoganda thread. I see Indians do it on other boards too. Seems to be their most common form of evangelism
>>76734726I'm from Eastern Europe sir. Also I literally wrote I'm kinda better off on carnivore.
>>76734695>That's why they rank meat as less healthy than sugary cereal on their nutrition listsThe jews want you to live long because then they will profit more from medical treatments when you are old, nursing homes, etc.They want you to be sick and fat, but live long to profit from you.
>>76734767>The jews want you to live long
>>76734767So you admit that eating meat makes you live longer. Thanks for playing.
>>76734842>eating meat makes you live longerSource?
>>76734904what that anon means is meat intake is associated with longevity>Worldwide, bivariate correlation analyses revealed that meat intake is positively correlated with life expectancies. This relationship remained significant when influences of caloric intake, urbanization, obesity, education and carbohydrate crops were statistically controlled. Stepwise linear regression selected meat intake, not carbohydrate crops, as one of the significant predictors of life expectancy. In contrast, carbohydrate crops showed weak and negative correlation with life expectancy.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35228814/
>>76734946So generally there's no cons in doing carnivore or something close? Idk today I ate fruits and bread again and I feel bad, though it might be because I added some fatty milk. Either way I haven't ever felt like that on meat.
>>76734605Nothing in the article you posted is insider knowledge
Go VEGAN today
>>76734842>>76734946Every time I see this posted, somebody points out meat consumption is also directly correlated with socioeconomic status. Yet still it gets posted. The more money someone has, the more meat they buy and the better healthcare they have. Notice how all of the low meat countries are third world. But I'm sure you don't care and will continue to post it.
>>76734605>trust me bro, I was there. They are actually all satanic child eaters. I was there bro. I saw it with my own eyes. No nobody else can verify this, they are all in on it. Trust me bro.
>>76736227Why would rich people eat meat then if it's bad?
>>76729482yes, the "studies" telling you to be weak and servile are jewish
It's over
>>76729299The fact that alcohol is not a deep dark red across the board should tell you everything you need to know about the quality of this study.You'll notice that anyone with an advanced degree in anything that involves cell metabolism studies will never touch the stuff, because they know how toxic it is to the human body as a whole. Especially the nervous system.
>>76737346https://nutritionsource.hsph.harvard.edu/healthy-drinks/drinks-to-consume-in-moderation/alcohol-full-story/
Meat bad
>>76736227>Rich people eat healthier foodYeah, we know. Caviar is incredibly nutrient-dense.
>>76738021I mean like literally. Why would richer people eat worse food? Does any vegan have an explanation?
>>76738113>why would anyone buy a bag of Doritos instead of a bag of beans>why would anyone order uber eats slop instead of buying salmon >why would anyone go to McDonalds instead of buying a pound of beef
>>76738132It's poor people who prefer processed food. You literally confirm my point.
>>76738193My point is that people usually eat food they like, even if they could afford healthier options. Gout was literally known as the disease of kings, because mostly rich people who could afford lots of rich foods and alcohol would get it.
>>76738208Your point is nonsensical. Fast food is for poor people. Meat is not.
>>76729299Ah yes. An unsound statistical methodology evaluating papers with unsound statistical methodologies that are purposely designed by their authors to "prove" their claim. The fact of the matter is that you cannot trust statistical studies. And of course, surveys are unreliable. >meat-based dietsThe people in those studies are eating plant-based diets (70% or more plants). In fact, the vast majority of people who are eating the standard diet are eating plant-based diets. Even if they're not vegans or vegetarians. >>76729638Your pic is just the logistic inefficiency of globalism because it's monetarily cheaper to buy produce from argentina ship it to thailand then ship it to the US to be sold. All for some CEO to avoid paying their countrymen a living wage so that their jewish stockholders are happy that they have a 4.2% profit margin instead of a 3.3% profit margin.>WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?Nutrition is even more of a joke of a field than exercise "science." You have to take it with a grain of salt or even doubt it's validity. Most guys outside of statistics don't actually know statistics anyways. Their results are pretty much just a result of the standard settings of R or whatever other statistics program they're using and usually questionable sampling and shitty methodology.
>>76729299I eat what I want and I'll never change no matter what any nerd study says. Every cunt knows what's generally healthy and not. Eat mostly healthy, junk in moderation. simple as that.
>>76729677and for every study there's another one contradicting it. junk science.
>>76738386Is meat healthy?
>>76734842explain the balkans>>76736227explain uk, france, spain and luxemburg
>>76738113>>76738021>>76736350Rich COUNTRIES you fucking idiots. Yes I'm sure Americans don't eat burgers. Even the poorest Americans are going to have much better healthcare than a shithole in Nigeria. Zero critical thinking on this board.
>>76738742Also>"why rich people do bad thing for health?"Yeah the rich are well known for not being massive alcoholic drug addict.
>>76738750Some rich people do street drugs, others pharmacy drugs, but it's the ones on dozens of supplement store drugs who actually know what they are doing, kek.>t. rich guy on dozens of supplements
