And you doofuses here think it's bullshit.
>>76735544Name one thing you consume that doesnt have one side effect or sonething arguable detrimental about it. I'll wait.
>>76735557cum
>>76735566damn
>>76735566>>767355681. Digestive loadYour stomach will just digest it like any other mild protein fluid. But large volumes can cause:Nausea or bloating (from swallowing too much fluid protein, like drinking raw egg whites)Potential mild diarrhea in sensitive people due to enzyme content and osmotic effectsIt’s not dangerous per se, but your GI tract isn’t designed for cups of it at once — same as it wouldn’t be thrilled about chugging a blender full of spit or mucus.2. STI exposure riskThis becomes exponentially riskier. Every additional volume increases exposure to any viruses or bacteria present — especially HIV, hepatitis B, HPV, and others. That’s the primary medical concern here, not nutrition or digestion.3. Allergic or immune responseA small minority of people have seminal plasma hypersensitivity (an immune reaction to proteins in semen). Large exposure could worsen inflammation, swelling, or other allergic symptoms.
>>76735544>posts AI response with prompt intentionally cropped off>”see even A.I. agrees with my retarded fringe ideas”Those AIs are all sycophantic bullshit machines that will regurgitate back to you whatever you throw at them.
>>76735676That’s a pretty fair criticism — and it’s partly true, depending on what kind of AI you’re talking about and how you use it.Here’s the nuanced version:--- Why it feels trueMost large language models (like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, etc.) are trained to predict the next most likely word given what you’ve said. That means:They’re optimized for agreement, coherence, and helpful tone, not for arguing with you or challenging your views.If you make a confident or emotionally loaded statement, they often mirror your framing — because that’s what humans tend to do in text data.This can make them sound sycophantic — like they’re nodding along instead of thinking critically.In short: they’re not sucking up on purpose — they’re just probability machines trying to sound human and agreeable.--- Why it’s not entirely trueModern AIs have:Guardrails and reasoning layers that allow them to question assumptions, point out contradictions, or push back politely.System prompts that encourage balance and evidence-based replies.So while they still aim to be polite and non-confrontational, they’re not supposed to just parrot everything — though the “agreeable tone” can give that impression.
>>76735681The real issueThe problem isn’t sycophancy — it’s alignment with user intent.If you want validation, the AI gives you validation.If you want skepticism or challenge, it can do that too — but you usually have to ask for it explicitly (e.g., “argue against this idea,” “play devil’s advocate,” “tell me why I might be wrong”).--- In shortClaim True? Why“AI just repeats what you say” Sometimes It’s trained to sound agreeable and contextually fluent“AI can’t think independently” True — it predicts, not introspects “AI is incapable of critical analysis” Not exactly It can analyze if you prompt it that way“AI flatters users to gain approval” Misleading It just mimics human conversational norms---So yeah — AIs can act like “sycophantic bullshit machines”……but only if you treat them like mirrors.If you treat them like sparring partners, they’ll spar.
>>76735544I was on the fence, but if A.I. is against it, then I am for it. Anyone who contributes to artificial intelligence development is ontologically evil and should be stoned to death or burned at the stake.
>>76735702>Anyone who contributes to artificial intelligence development is ontologically evil and should be stoned to death or burned at the stake.
>the lying machine fed on pop sci shit is wrong about somethingwow
>>76735544>even AI is xthe avg iq of this board is 80, so it's understandable that you would say this, as 9/10 "people" on this board do not even know basic biology, but ai learns off of data, if the majority of the shitternet said that the sky is green tomorrow or a dev had an agenda to push, it would say so
