Is 6-7 reps in a set a good target?
unironically yes
>>767408506-7 reps = no gains
You should do all the rep ranges.You need PRs in one range to get a PR in another and vice versa.
>>76740850holy shit all those black kids in the crowd lol, white america is doomedif youre white send your kids to white schools
>>767408506-8 is a hair more realistic. Not that reps are going to come out thin air in that range because you slept a little better or had an extra cup of coffee like they do in higher ranges. But sometimes when you add 5 lbs to a 8rep lift it sinks to 6 instead of the expected 7. Loads heavier than that you usually have to warm up more for or rest longer between sets both of which are mostly preference.
>>76740850>Is 6-7 reps in a set a good target?i go 2 or 3 sets of no reps >>76740936
>>76740907to be fair they’re at a basketball game, the natural habitat of the black man
>>76740850keyed but fr timmy type shit no cap
>>76741034football games are the natural habitat of the black man too
>>76740853This. Either go for 5 or 8. 6, 7 do nothing.
>>76740850>6-7 reps
>>76740850>>76742615New meets old
>>767408503-6 for big movements 6-8 for everything else7 reps might be negative gains tho, science is still out about it
>>76742615The study overlay of the old meme is pretty hilarious Sad the newfags don't know tho
>>76742810>New
>>76743386If you do negative reps only for 7 reps it flips the no gainz zone to infinite gainz
compound 6 repsisolation 8 repsonce they get easy up the weight
